The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (94 page)

I believe that the most likely scenario for the four hapless young men being embroiled in this situation in the first place was that they had naively (as it turned out) agreed to take part in what they thought was going to be an anti-terrorism exercise.
 
The plan was that they would pose as terrorists and to make the scenario absolutely realistic and plausible it would have to be planned exactly like a precision military operation.
 
Of course there were no live bombs in the rucksacks, just dummies, but the four did not realise of course that the real bombs were planted under the exact seats in the exact carriages in which they had no doubt been instructed to sit and in the case of Hussain, the bus.
 
The best laid plans of mice and men…
 
All was probably going exactly to plan until the 6th July…

The most likely explanation for Khan’s sudden disappearance on the 6th was that he informed his handler for the 7/7 exercise that he was not going to be able to meet his obligations due to his wife’s extreme ill health.
 
He may then have been told to ensure that the others could make it without him because it was certain that the bombings were not going to be called-off but unfortunately he had now presented his handlers with a problem that had only one possible outcome and I do not believe that I actually need to spell this out.

Could this possibly also neatly explain why the attendant at the filling station where Tanweer filled his car and argued about the change he was given, stated categorically that he only saw one other person in Tanweer’s car, Hasib Hussain.
 
Khan was almost certainly not there and probably unknown to Tanweer and Hussain, was already dead.
 
This would also provide a reason that the now-suppressed BBC Radio 5 news reports from the morning of 7/7 reported that only two and not three ‘suspected terrorists’ had been shot at Canary Wharf and as seen by dozens of witnesses in the surrounding office buildings.
 

Anyway, on the morning of 7/7, Germaine Lindsay drove the relatively short distance from Aylesbury in nearby Buckinghamshire to meet the other so-called bombers at Luton railway station.
 
He arrived too early and decided to take a short nap in his car before the others were due to rendezvous with him.
 
Interestingly, he paid for a car park ticket for the full day but surely, had he been a real suicide bomber and not a patsy he would have known that he had only a few short hours left to live and this would then have rendered the purchase of a ticket totally unnecessary.

At the inquest, one of the station attendants, a Mr Patel, gave testimony to the Inquest to the effect that a man whom he identified from photographs as Germaine Lindsay, arrived on the concourse of King’s Cross station and immediately asked to speak urgently with ‘the Duty Manager’ and stated that it was ‘very important’.
 
Mr Patel remembered Lindsay simply for the reason that it was extremely unusual for any member of the public to know the exact job title of the person in overall charge of the station.
 
Usually people would ask for the ‘supervisor’ or simply the ‘manager’.
 
By this time there was utter chaos on the station concourse.
 
The metal grilles on the outer doors to the station had been lowered and locked shut and passengers were not being allowed through the barriers.
 
A sizeable crowd had gathered and were starting to abuse staff in their frustration at being unable to enter the station concourse and several police community support personnel were trying to keep order.
 
However when Patel managed to finally locate the Duty Manager, Germaine Lindsay had disappeared, as it turned out – forever.
 

The primary cause of Lindsay’s confusion was the fact that he was late for his date with destiny and events had already spiralled out of control for both the patsies and the real perpetrators, by this time.
 
The train upon which the ‘bombers’ had been scheduled to travel from Luton to London King’s Cross station, the 7.40am, had been cancelled.
 
The train that they eventually caught was also delayed by 23 minutes and so by the time the hapless foursome arrived in London using their ‘return’ tickets, yes return tickets note, the master-plan was already underway without them as they had all already missed their respective trains.

According to many people who visited the Leeds area they had spoken with several local residents and all were adamant that all three of Khan, Hussain and Tanweer had shown no inclination whatsoever in their communities towards political or religious radicalism.

In much the same vein as other inside-jobs or false flag events, there are so few videos or even still photographs of the quartet together.
 
Even those that do exist could easily have been ‘photo-shopped’ with only a basic knowledge of this technique.
 
In reality there should be dozens if not hundreds of pictures of these men at various stages of the plot.
 
London is the most CCTV-intensive environment on the planet and so the pertinent question must be, why are there only two extremely poor, grainy, still pictures of the four, one at Luton station and one at Kings Cross, Thameslink station, the date and time stamps on which could have easily been faked.
 
In fact I could probably have done it myself!
 
Is it possible perchance that the photos of Khan have been dubbed-in from the ‘dummy run’ that the foursome carried out on the 29th June 2005, a mere eight days earlier?

The mobile phone evidence places them all on the correct train at the correct time, the Luton to Kings Cross train that is.
 
However, there are three issues here worthy of note.
 
Firstly, this is relatively new evidence that was not released in the previous, 2006 hearing. Why should this be?
 
Is it an invented afterthought maybe, to lend greater credence to the official conspiracy theory?
 
Secondly, is it really likely that the four men would have been texting each other on a train upon which they were all travelling together?
 
And thirdly and perhaps most significant, this type of evidence is ridiculously easy to fake.
 
It is after all simply a series of printed characters on an official-looking piece of paper.

It is worth at this juncture mentioning the famous ‘terror-warning’ videos made by Khan and Tanweer and which have been submitted as ‘proof’ of their radical or terrorist tendencies.
 
Khan and Tanweer could easily have been coerced into making the Jihad-inciting videos that have played such a large part in convincing the public to accept their guilt.
 
They were employees of the government for at least two days (possibly more) after all and probably very well-paid employees for the dry-run on the 29th June and the day of 7/7 itself.
 
They would no doubt have been told that the exercise had to be completely realistic and were probably told that the film would be used by the station staff and other authorities to aid them in intercepting the four suspected ‘terrorists’.
 
The ‘threats’ from Khan and Tanweer on the videos are totally vague and unspecific and unconvincing in the extreme.
 
When Khan’s wife first saw the video it was reported that she said, “That’s not my husband.” Her brother however, said he believed it was Khan.
 
I would surmise that it is most likely that her words were taken completely out of context and that she actually meant ‘that is not the husband I know as he would never say those things’.

Daniel Obachike is the most famous of the survivors of the bus blast in Tavistock Square, the ‘4th bomb’ as it has come to be known.
 
Daniel’s experiences, terrible as they were on the day were also matched subsequently by the sheer terror he experienced by being subjected to several years of overt threats and surveillance by MI5.
 
All he is guilty of is telling the truth as he saw it that day.
 

"I'm just a regular guy, I was born and bred and work in London and that day I was on my way to work in Old Street and there was some kind of disruption going on.
 
We were told that it was a power surge on the underground and that's how I came to be on the bus."
 
Daniel Obachike

He described in detail how he boarded the bus at Euston along with several dozen others who had all been denied access to the tube station as he thought that the bus was going in the direction he required.
 
Shortly after the bus had started its journey, Daniel looked out of the window and saw two cars, a black Mercedes and a blue BMW blocking the road and their drivers directing the bus away from its normal route, towards Tavistock Square.
 
It was in Tavistock Square where the bus exploded and this is where events took a distinctly sinister turn.

After the explosion, instinct took over and he just ran as fast as possible off the bus and away down the street in the direction the bus had just travelled in order to escape the scene.
 
A few yards down the street, Daniel noticed that a man was actually filming him running away at which point he became confused and stopped.
 
He looked around him and back in the direction of the bus which he could now see had the entire top-deck blown away by the blast

The 7/7 bus explosion

At this point his demeanour abruptly changed from fear to curiosity as he became aware that something strange was going on.

“I was looking at the people moving into the actual space on the square.
 
There were guys who were hanging around.
 
There was a row of policemen who were just standing there in yellow fluorescent jackets, they weren't doing anything, they were just watching.
 
There was this guy filming and I'm saying 'what is going on here'.
 
It didn't feel right."

Contrary to other witness’ statements, Daniel says he did not see any Asian-looking man on the lower deck of the bus, nor did he see an Asian man get on the bus at any time.
 
The Metropolitan Police later changed their initial reports that the bomber was on the lower deck and instead placed him on the upper deck of the bus.

Daniel then described a man who he noticed after the blast, as he appeared to be injured but was acting very strangely.
 
He (Daniel) went to help an injured woman and was assisting her down the street ahead of the bus towards a hotel where she could at least sit whilst waiting for medical attention and in doing so he passed a man who seemed to be injured himself as he was swathed in bandages.
 
However, he was extremely confused by this because the man was forty or fifty metres ahead of the bus and the bomb blast had actually travelled backwards and had even killed a passer-by behind the bus.
 
This person was making a lot of noise and generally creating a fuss by rolling around in the road which Daniel thought at the time was extremely strange behaviour, not to mention poor acting.

Do not forget that all this took place within perhaps a minute of the explosion and so how on earth had this man managed to gain medical assistance let alone be already sporting bandages?

In addition to this strange scenario, Daniel noticed that…

“Some people were running forward, the medical staff and the medical professionals, you could tell who they were because they were seeing what they could try and do for people.
 
But then there were these other people who were just watching, taking notes, organising people, moving things around.”

Daniel then went on to say that he believed that this person whoever he was, had prior knowledge and prior intelligence and was placed at the scene for some ulterior purpose.
 
He actually conducted his own search on the Internet after the event, because a few days after the event, his picture ‘was everywhere’ and yet has now been removed from Internet.
 
The face of this man complete with bandaged head was all over the BBC and British news websites as well as most of the international ones too.