The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (45 page)

Also, from the same source; “These newly discovered natural molecules had only one disadvantage: they were non-patentable.
 
Thus, already in its first decades of existence, the pharmaceutical investment business faced a mortal threat.
 
Vitamins and other micro-nutrients promoted as public health programmes would have prohibited the development of any sizable investment business based on patented synthetic drugs.
 
The elimination of this unwanted competition from micronutrients and other natural therapies became a question of survival for the young pharmaceutical investment business.

To promote public acceptance of his ‘new medicine’ as the philanthropic umbrella of the newly created pharmaceutical investment industry with patented drugs, the Rockefeller-controlled media used the Spanish flu epidemic of 1918, to start a campaign against all forms of non-patented medicine and discredit them as ‘unscientific’.
 
Within the next 15 years, essentially all medical schools in the US, all influential hospitals and, most significantly, the ‘American Medical Association’ became part of this strategy to align the entire health care sector under the control of the pharmaceutical investment business.”

This witch-hunt, with Bayer in a leading role, has a long and violent history and continues today whereby Big Pharma is now resorting to draconian measures, with the banning of all herbal remedies across the EU, commencing April 2011, with the attempt to criminalise homeopaths and all natural practitioners including midwives, with the banning of IV vitamin C because it is a powerfully effective yet gentle treatment for cancer, in December 2010 and a plan in Australia to ban nature itself.

Given Big Pharma's epic battle against nature, suppressing the truth of what happened during 1918 and the pharmaceutical industry deliberately killing millions in the name of obscene profits, natural healing becomes even more important for them.

The Centers for Disease Control claims it has reconstructed the ‘virulent’ 1918 ‘flu’ virus.
 
“CDC researchers and their colleagues have successfully reconstructed the influenza virus that caused the 1918-19 flu pandemic, which killed as many as 50 million people worldwide.”

Whatever the CDC ‘reconstructed’, it was certainly not what killed millions of people in 1918-19.
 
The CDC appears unaware or more likely is totally ignoring the fact that the NIAID has proven beyond reasonable doubt that it was not a virus or flu but common upper respiratory bacteria and massive infection combined with an insidious and incorrectly-used drug that killed millions.
 
Bayer was also, possibly unsurprisingly, responsible through its vaccine division, Baxter, for sending out to 18 countries, a seasonal flu vaccine in 2009 that contained live avian virus, a bioweapon, which could have killed millions itself.
 
Had it not been for a single laboratory technician discovering that the vaccines were lethal through injecting ferrets which all died, Bayer's vaccines could have potentially initiated a pandemic such as nature has never seen.
 
In 1918, the convergence of a toxic drug, massive corporate advertising and government, military and medical pressure to use the drug, led to millions of deaths.
 
That combination of groups has joined forces again, this time behind vaccines.

Despite Bayer's 2009 seasonal vaccines containing a bio-weapon and there being no reasonable explanation, Bayer was never charged, not even with negligence, but instead was immediately selected by the WHO to produce the H1N1 vaccines. Those vaccines were promoted strongly by the government and the CDC, even as the CDC itself acknowledged that the H1N1 vaccines could be predicted to maim or kill 30,000 people in the USA alone.

So, why does the CDC persist in this myth, despite abundant evidence to the contrary?
 
Disregarding motives, one might only suggest some effects of projecting the terrifying myth that millions of people could die from virus:

Distraction from the hard reality that natural treatments were the only effective treatments during 1918.

The hiding of Bayer, aspirin and the industry's role in the deaths.

The sales of billions in anti-viral drugs and vaccine development.

Increased financial power to the pharmaceutical industry to control media and influence governments.

Increased illnesses and deaths from chemical, pharmaceutical agents, one of the highest risk factors.

Fearful dependence on ‘expert medical authority’ and complex, expensive solutions to save people.

Surrender of unlimited authority to government regulatory agencies to ‘protect’ the public from natural products.

Use of the spectre of millions of deaths as the justification for the removal of human rights to ‘protect’ the public.

Enhancement of the pharmaceutical industry moves toward an uncontested global monopoly over health

The industrialisation, commercialisation and militarisation of disease.

An open door to the use of ‘pandemic emergency’ to justify martial law.

The truth, that medical authorities using Bayer aspirin (and generic aspirin) killed so many millions of people that those deaths became one the most terrifying events in human history, fundamentally threatens a global multi-trillion dollar industry built around unassailable ‘medical expertise’ and their use of synthetic drugs.
  
But the fuller truth contains something even more dangerous to the pharmaceutical industry than simply the millions of deaths they caused, because something else of great significance occurred at that time too.
 
Non-industrial medicine ie. those using organic substances, actually saved further millions of people from death.
 
The events of 1918 unknowingly instigated a world-wide trial, comparing millions of people who were treated by pharmaceutical medicine and those treated by organic medicine.
 
The first group died in unimaginable numbers whilst of the second group, almost all of them survived.

More than anything else, this is the real, important lesson to be gleaned from this dark period in medical history.
 
What stands-out is the spectacular failure and toxicity of one of the industry's oldest and purportedly most trusted products, aspirin.
 
We can also add to that, Bayer's global advertising of its toxic product, government and media influence and the fact that it increased deaths to a level never seen before. Bayer’s product, political and financial power and media influence, combined to produce so many millions of deaths that it actually merits comparison with the Black Death.
 
20 to 50 million deaths during 1918 and 1919 versus 25 to 75 million during the course of many years of the bubonic plague.

But that single, synthetic pharmaceutical product has by now far outstripped the number of deaths of the most infamous disease in history since the deaths have not ceased yet and are continuing to be of epidemic proportions.
 
The numbers of those who have died from aspirin poisoning alone over the 90+ years since this huge tragedy are absolutely incalculable.

It was natural health practitioners who saved lives during 1918, while aspirin killed in vast numbers, but today the government is actively and vigorously suppressing access to natural health products which are perfectly safe and saved lives during 1918, in favour of predictably lethal vaccines and pharmaceutical products, the need for which is based on an immensely misdirecting myth.
 
What does this tell us about the insidious methods of the Big Pharma companies, who operate with impunity, hand in glove with corrupt politicians of all affiliations, whilst carrying out their genocidal policies?

In light of the 1918 deaths from Bayer's pushing of aspirin onto an unsuspecting population and Bayer's and other manufacturers' vaccines (synthetic, even genetically engineered), an automatic reassessment of natural versus synthetic treatments is triggered.

 
“A confluence of events created a ‘perfect storm’ for widespread salicylate toxicity. The loss of Bayer's patent on aspirin in February 1917 allowed many manufacturers into the lucrative aspirin market. Official recommendations for aspirin therapy at toxic doses were preceded by ignorance of the unusual nonlinear kinetics of salicylate (unknown until the 1960s), which predispose to accumulation and toxicity; tins and bottles that contained no warnings and few instructions; and fear of ‘Spanish’ influenza, an illness that had been spreading like wildfire.”
 
Dr. Karen Starko

Given the role that it played in the millions of 1918 deaths, a further more in-depth assessment of aspirin is probably expedient.
 
Bayer aspirin was one of the earliest of drugs from the pharmaceutical industry, dependent on the oil industry and has become the most commonly used and a staple, trusted drug.
 
As such, it represents a good example of the displacement of natural treatments by synthetic drugs.
  
But is it actually safe?

During 1918 repeatedly, first hand medical accounts point to aspirin as the source of pneumonias.
 
“I had a package handed to me containing 1,000 aspirin tablets, which was 994 too many.
 
I think I gave about a half dozen.
 
I could find no place for it.
 
My remedies were few.
 
I almost invariably gave Gelsemium and Bryonia.
 
I hardly ever lost a case if I got there first, unless the patient had been sent to a drug store and bought aspirin, in which event I was likely to have a case of pneumonia on my hands.”
 
Dr.
 
J.P. Huff, Olive Branch, Kentucky

Upon reading the accounts of the epidemic it seems that most of the deaths were caused by a virulent pneumonia that was especially devastating to those who depressed their system with analgesics, the most common being aspirin.
 

Aspirin was the first of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, others not becoming available until 1955 when Tylenol was first marketed.
 
They are the most commonly used drugs on the market, sold both with and without prescriptions.
 
For Bayer and the entire pharmaceutical industry, they are the absolute foundation stones of their industry and yet they all routinely kill.

“Over 100,000 people are hospitalized for internal bleeding and of those, 16,500 die every year.
 
And these values are considered ‘conservative’.
 
Also the figures only include prescription NSAIDs used to treat only arthritis and only in the United States.
 
If prescription and over the counter NSAID-related hospitalizations and death rates were counted for not only arthritis, but for all conditions and throughout the world, the figures would no doubt be enormous.
 
Taking those figures and applying them over the many years that this class of drug that has been available since the early 1970s and the numbers would be horrific.
 
And yet, no study to date has attempted to quantify these figures.”
  
‘Toxic and Deadly NSAIDs’, an investigative report by Roman Bystrianyk.

Another important observation is that most people receive no warning signs that these drugs are causing them internal damage before they end-up in hospital with a serious medical condition and approximately 10% of these hospitalisations end in death.
 
Considering that aspirin is still being highly recommended by the vast majority of medical practitioners to reduce the incidence of heart disease we must also consider the catastrophic levels of gastro-intestinal damage being caused, as in the recent case of my own mother.

It has been discovered that that no particular dose of aspirin between 75 mg and 300 mg daily currently used in the treatment of heart ailments, is completely free of risk of causing intestinal bleeding.
 
Even very low doses of aspirin reportedly caused gastric bleeding in volunteers.
 
Some 10,000 episodes of bleeding occur in people aged 60 and over each year in England and Wales alone and it is estimated that around 90% of the 10,000 episodes could be associated with and directly ascribed to aspirin usage.

Unfortunately the risk of hospitalisation and death is not the only problem caused by taking these types of drugs.
 
Other studies have also indicated that the risk of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) while using NSAIDs is also quite substantial.
 
One author suggested that the number of deaths could be similar to those that are evident with gastro-intestinal bleeding.
 
If so, the numbers of deaths attributed to NSAIDs would increase dramatically from the already large figure of 16,500.