Authors: Damon Root
17.
Pilon, email to author.
18.
United States v. Lopez,
514 U.S. 549 (1995). Audio of the November 8, 1994 oral argument is available at
http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1260
.
19.
United States v. Lopez,
514 U.S. 549, 567-568 (1995).
20.
Interview with Randy Barnett, March 2012.
21.
Randy E. Barnett,
Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), x-xi.
22.
Barnett interview.
23.
United States v. Morrison,
529 U.S. 598, 613 (2000).
24.
Randy Barnett, Nathaniel Stewart, and Todd Gaziano, “Why the Personal Mandate to Buy Health Insurance Is Unprecedented and Unconstitutional,” Heritage Foundation Legal Memorandum, no. 49, December 9, 2009. See also Josh Blackman,
Unprecedented: The Constitutional Challenge to Obamacare
(New York: Public Affairs, 2013).
25.
Barnett interview.
26.
Complaint at 4,
Florida v. Department of Health and Human Services,
no. 3:10-cv-91, N.D. Fla., March 23, 2010.
27.
Florida v. Department of Health and Human Services,
780 F. Supp. 2d 1256 (N.D. Fla. 2011).
28.
Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida,
648 F.3d 1235 (11th Cir. 2011).
29.
Thomas More Law Center v. Obama,
651 F.3d 529, 566 (6th Cir. 2011).
30.
The Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a) (1867).
31.
David Weigel, “Into the Void: How the Democrats Gave a Conservative Judge an Opening to Invalidate the Health Care Law,”
Slate,
January 31, 2011. Available at
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2011/01/into_the_void.html
.
32.
Time,
June 18, 2012.
33.
Confirmation Hearings on the Nomination of John G. Roberts, Jr. to be Chief Justice of the United States, Hearing Before the Senate Judiciary Committee,
109th Cong., 1st Sess. (2005), 145 [hereinafter
Roberts Hearings
].
34.
Roberts Hearings,
284-285.
35.
Roberts Hearings,
285-286.
36.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,
130 S. Ct. 876, 917 (2010).
37.
Citizens United,
130 S. Ct. at 919.
38.
Citizens United,
130 S. Ct. at 921.
39.
Damon Root, “Strict Scrutiny,” Reason.com, August 18, 2011. Available at
http://www.reason.com/archives/2011/08/18/strict-scrutiny
.
40.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida,
transcript, no. 11-398, transcript of oral argument, March 26, 2012, 3.
41.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 26, 2012, 31-32.
42.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 26, 2012, 44-45.
43.
Jason DeParle, “In Battle to Pick Next Justice, Right Says, Avoid a Kennedy,”
New York Times,
June 27, 2005.
44.
Raich,
545 U.S. at 1. That same year, Justice Kennedy also voted against the libertarian Institute for Justice in
Kelo v. City of New London,
545 U.S. 469 (2005). For the argument that Kennedy practices a “modestly libertarian jurisprudence,” see Helen J. Knowles,
The Tie Goes to Freedom: Justice Anthony Kennedy on Liberty
(Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefied, 2009), 3.
45.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 31.
46.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 104.
47.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 39-40.
48.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 12-13.
49.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
648 F.3d at 1235.
50.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 15-16.
51.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 30.
52.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 39.
53.
Roberts Hearings,
162.
54.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 46.
55.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 47-48.
56.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 50.
57.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 52-53.
58.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 54.
59.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 81.
60.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 108-109.
61.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 110-11.
62.
Dept. of HHS v. Florida
transcript, March 27, 2012, 111.
63.
Florida v. Department of Health and Human Services,
no. 11-400, transcript of oral argument, March 28, 2012, 81.
64.
Florida v. Dept. of HHS
transcript, March 28, 2012, 82.
65.
Florida v. Dept. of HHS
transcript, March 28, 2012, 83.
66.
Franklin D. Roosevelt, “Press Conference,” May 31, 1935. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley,
The American Presidency Project,
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=15065
.
67.
Jake Tapper and Mary Bruce, “President Obama Seems to Prepare Arguments for a Supreme Court Defeat,” ABC News, April 2, 2012. Available at
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/president-obama-seems-to-prepare-arguments-for-a-supreme-court-defeat/
.
68.
Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, On the Supreme Court's Review of the Affordable Care Act, May 14, 2012. Available at
http://www.leahy.senate.gov/press/on-senate-floor-leahy-shares-observations-about-scotus-arguments-on-affordable-care-act
.
69.
Jeffrey Rosen, “Second Opinions,”
The New Republic,
May 4, 2012. Available at
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/politics/103090/magazine/conservative-judges-justices-supreme-court-obama
.
70.
George Will, “Liberals Put the Squeeze to Justice Roberts,”
Washington Post,
May 25, 2012.
71.
Jan Crawford, “Roberts Switched Views to Uphold Health Care Law,” CBS News, July 2, 2012. Available at
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/roberts-switched-views-to-uphold-health-care-law/
.
72.
Jeffrey Rosen, “Are Liberals Trying to Intimidate John Roberts?”
The New Republic,
May 28, 2012. Available at
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/politics/103656/obamacare-affordable-care-act-critics-response
.
73.
Audio of the June 28, 2012 opinion announcement in
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012) is available at
http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_11_400
. All quotes from the opinion announcement are taken from my transcription.
74.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius,
132 S. Ct. 2566, 2593 (2012).
75.
Blodgett v. Holden,
275 U.S. 142, 148 (1927).
76.
NFIB v. Sebelius,
132 S. Ct. at 2594.
77.
NFIB v. Sebelius,
132 S. Ct. at 2579.
78.
Oliver Wendell Holmes to Harold Laski, March 4, 1920, in
Holmes-Laski Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Harold J. Laski, 1916-1935,
vol. 1, ed. Mark De Wolfe Howe (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953), 249.
Epilogue
1.
Video of the Yale conference is available at
http://www.law.yale.edu/intellectuallife/constinterp12.htm
.
2.
Clint Bolick,
Changing Course: Civil Rights at the Crossroads
(New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1988), 122.
3.
St. Joseph Abbey v. Castille,
712 F.3 215, 226 (5th Cir. 2013).
Index
The index that appeared in the print version of this title does not match the pages in your e-book. Please use the search function on your e-reading device to search for terms of interest. For your reference, the terms that appear in the print index are listed below.
abolitionism and abolitionists,
11
â13,
17
â20,
25
â6,
58
,
60
,
202
abortion.
See
reproductive rights cases
activism.
See
judicial activism
Adamson v. California,
95
Adkins v. Children's Hospital,
62
â3,
73
â4,
93
Affordable Care Act.
See
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)
Agricultural Adjustment Act (1933),
71
,
73
Agricultural Adjustment Act (1938),
211
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act (1937),
133
Ah Kow v. Nunan,
37
Alito, Samuel,
3
,
202
,
224
â5,
239
Allen v. Tooley,
15
American Civil Liberties Union,
116
American Civil Rights Union,
197
â8
American Home Missionary Society, 22
Anthony, Susan B.,
63
Anti-Federalists,
187
Anti-Imperialist League,
58
Anti-Injunction Act (1867),
220
â1,
224
â5
Articles of Confederation,
210
Auld, Thomas,
11
â12
Baker v. Carr,
88
â9
Bakeshop Act (1895),
45
â8
Barnett, Randy,
130
â1,
205
â8,
214
â19,
225
,
235
,
237
,
239
Restoring the Lost Constitution,
215
Barron v. Baltimore,
25
Bartels v. Iowa,
57
Benedict, Jeff,
168
Berman v. Parker,
150
â1,
156
â7,
160
â1,
163
,
166
Bernstein, David,
46
Bickel, Alexander,
96
â7
Least Dangerous Branch, The,
97
Fourteenth Amendment and,
28
,
30
proposal and original application of,
25
,
187
,
189
â90
substantive due process and,
189
â90,
193
See also individual amendments
birth control.
See
reproductive rights cases
Black Codes,
20
â3,
25
â7,
31
,
202
â3
“Black Monday” (May 27, 1935),
67
,
72
Blackmun, Harry,
99
â100
Blackstone, William:
Commentaries on the Laws of England,
28
Blackwell, Ken,
198
Blakely, Clayton B.,
59
â60
Blodgett v. Holden,
4
Boggs, Danny,
147
Changing Course: Civil Rights at the Crossroads,
144
,
195
Unfinished Business,
141
,
144
,
149
,
195
,
204
education and early career,
96
â7
and Federalist Society,
106
,
108
â9
on
Griswold
v. Connecticut,
96
â9,
111
â13
and judicial restraint/activism,
5
,
77
â9,
96
â7,
112
â13
and majoritarianism,
5
,
109
â10,
112
,
118
â19,
121
â2,
131
on
Slaughter-House Cases,
195
â6
Supreme Court nomination and hearings,
77
â9,
109
Tempting of America, The,
5
,
109
,
195
Bowers v. Hardwick,
114
â17,
128
Bradwell, Myra,
35
Bradwell v. Illinois,
35
“Brain Trust” (of FDR),
69
Brandeis, Louis,
53
,
63
â4,
67
â70,
72
,
74
Curse of Bigness, The,
69
Breyer, Stephen,
127
,
159
â60,
164
â5,
185
,
187
,
227
Brooks, Preston,
58
Brown, Janice Rogers,
133
â5
Brown, John,
19
Brown v. Board of Education,
8
,
83
â6,
142
Brownback, Sam,
222
Buchanan, Charles H.,
59
Buck, Carrie,
44
Bullock, Scott,
154
â66
Bush, George H. W.,
104
Bush, George W.,
4
,
103
â4,
169
,
183
â4,
206
,
208
,
220
Butchers Benevolent Association,
13
Butler, Pierce,
73
Calhoun, John C.,
17
Carolene Products Company,
80
â1,
83
,
92
â3,
111
,
130
,
135
,
150
,
166
Carr, Joseph Cardell,
88
â9
Carvin, Michael,
230
Case of the Tailors of Ipswich,
15
Casino Reinvestment Development Authority v. Coking,
151
â2,
154
Cato Institute,
119
,
121
,
158
,
170
,
175
â6,
189
,
196
Center for Constitutional Studies,
116
,
123
â4,
154
,
174
,
209
,
212
founding of,
116
and
Lawrence v. Texas,
124
â5,
128
New Right v. The Constitution, The
(Macedo),
121
and
United States v. Lopez,
213
Center for Applied Jurisprudence (Pacific Research Institute),
139
â41
Center for Civil Rights (Landmark Legal Foundation),
154
Center for Constitutional Studies (Cato Institute),
116
,
123
â4,
154
,
174
,
209
,
212
Chase, Salmon P.,
31
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,
223
,
235
Civil Rights Act of 1866,
24
â6,
29
,
31
,
143
civil rights cases
Brown v. Board of Education,
8
,
83
â6,
142
Dred Scott v. Sandford,
19
â20,
24
,
60
,
70
Plessy v. Ferguson,
142
See also
sexual orientation cases
civil rights movement,
83
â6,
141
â4
Civil War, American,
20
,
27
,
38
â9,
41
â4
Clement, Paul,
183
â4,
199
,
206
â8,
230
Cleveland, Grover,
58
Coburn, Tom,
1
Coke, Sir Edward,
15
â16
Coking, Vera,
151
â2
Colfax massacre,
191
â2
Commerce Clause,
67
â8,
70
,
75
â6,
205
â18,
224
â39
Compassionate Use Act (California, 1996),
205
,
216
.
See also Gonzales v. Raich
Concerned Women for America,
116
conservative legal movement
and
D.C. v. Heller,
169
and Federalist Society,
103
â9,
114
,
122
and judicial activism,
106
â8,
117
,
121
and judicial restraint,
8
,
52
,
108
,
112
,
119
â20
and libertarianism,
110
â25,
168
,
195
â9
and Mountain States Legal Foundation,
137
â42
Constitution.
See individual amendments;
Bill of Rights;
U.S. Constitution
contraception.
See
reproductive rights cases
Controlled Substances Act,
205
â6.
See also Gonzales v. Raich
Coolidge, Calvin,
73
Cooper, Charles,
176
Coors, Joseph,
138
â9
Corcoran, Thomas,
69
Corfield v. Coryell,
28
â9,
31
,
57
Coyle, Marcia,
193
Craigmiles, Nathaniel,
147
Craigmiles v. Giles,
147
Crane, Ed,
119
Crawford, Jan,
233
â4
Progressive Democracy,
52
Curtis, Michael Kent:
No State Shall Abridge,
27
â8
Darrow, Clarence,
137
Davis, Jefferson,
41
Day, William,
60
Days, Drew,
214
Declaration of Independence,
17
,
27
deference.
See
judicial deference
DeLay, Tom,
166
Dellinger, Walter,
181
â3
Democratic Party,
78
â9.
See also
National Democratic Party (Gold Democrats)
Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida,
223
.
See also National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
and related cases
Department of Justice (DOJ),
178
â9,
184
Dery, Wilhelmina,
157
Dewey, John,
61
District of Columbia v. Heller,
169
â70,
173
â4,
181
â93,
196
â7,
199
â202,
234
Dole, Bob,
78
â9
Dorn, James,
119
Douglas, William O.,
80
,
82
,
91
,
93
â5,
113
,
151
,
161
,
163
Douglass, Frederick,
11
â13,
18
â20, 202
My Bondage and My Freedom,
12
Dred Scott v. Sandford,
19
â20,
24
,
60
,
70
Du Bois, W. E. B.,
60
Due Process Clause
Fifth Amendment,
62
â3
Fourteenth Amendment,
7
,
12
,
26
â7,
33
,
36
,
52
â3,
56
,
59
,
62
â3,
85
â6,
90
â5,
98
â100
See also
substantive due process
Dunlap, Alexander,
23
economic rights cases
Adkins v. Children's Hospital,
62
â3,
73
â4,
93
Kelo v. City of New London,
152
â68,
222
Lochner v. New York,
45
,
47
â51,
57
,
59
,
62
,
71
,
79
,
84
â5,
93
â5,
98
â100,
112
,
119
,
129
,
227