| | House staff time to the selection process; and reserving for the White House all final decisions even on subcabinet selections. Also, the Reagan personnel selection process subjected candidates to an unprecedented effort to "align presidential appointment decisions with presidential policy objectives." Appointees were carefully screened for policy and political background, legislative ties, ethics, and general compatibility with the core team-with sign-offs required from key people in each area. (Salamon and Abramson 1984, 46)
|
Central clearance as a philosophy of management in the Reagan White House meant that control and ideological purity were the dominant themes, particularly for appointments to subcabinet positions. While earlier administrations had reviewed approximately 10 percent of the appointments, Reagan's team oversaw the entire slate of some three thousand positions (Smith 1988, 302). They focused heavily on the second- and third-tier positions, "insist[ing] on the litmus of Reaganite conservative ideology, [and] push[ing] names from Reagan's conservative movement onto cabinet secretaries" for these positions. The resulting long delay in filling positions "left agencies decapitated and thus even more susceptible to White House control" (ibid., 302-03). According to political theorist Paul Light, the White House appointed lower-level appointees who
|
| | would cut their [political] boss's throat to please the president, . . . They are an entirely different breed of appointee than in the Carter, Nixon, and Ford administrations. They are ideologically committed. There is no allegiance to the department, but to the Oval Office or the conservative cause. No administration has penetrated so deeply [into the bureaucracy]. (Ibid., 302-03)
|
Reagan's people were remarkably successful in "purging the federal government of moderate appointees" (Aberbach 1991, 230), recruiting more Republicans and more conservatives to his administration. Some 93 percent of his appointees and 40 percent of his senior careerists were Republicans, in contrast to Nixon's 66 percent and 17 percent, respectively. While 19 percent of Nixon's partisans and 13 percent of his careerists opposed an active role of government in the economy, 72 percent and 47 percent, respectively, of Reagan's harbored the same beliefs. And, building further on Nixon's teachings to strengthen political leverage, Reagan repoliticized the deputy assistant secretary (DAS) layer by converting them back into political appointments (Light 1995, 56-57).
|
|