ministrative strategy in the second and third years of his first term. Those years also saw an increase in use of the judicial strategy as the administration assumed a more aggressive stance in court cases (Nathan 1986, 128-35). The Reagan (and later Bush) Justice Department became a frequent complainant against the extension of civil rights and regulatory control of industry, particularly in regard to the banking and airline industries and in health, safety, and environmental issues. Also, by the end of his two terms Reagan had appointed four Supreme Court justices and over half of the federal judiciary, filling those positions with predominantly young judges who passed his political litmus test.
|
Nixon's "executive privilege" was perfected to a fine art by Reagan, who made joint appointments of individuals to both PAS and PA (appointments in the Executive Office of the President [EOP] that do not require Senate confirmation) positions. When called upon to testify before Congress, these PAS/PA appointees would simply don their PA hat and refuse to testify, citing this executive privilege. As had Nixon before him, Reagan set the White House over and against not only the Congress, but also against his own bureaucracy, appointing chiefs of domestic civilian bureaus who were hostile to the basic mission and goal of their agency (Rourke 1991a, 114-15). One commentator, Harold Raines, described the "Reagan appointments strategy in the New York Times in 1981 as 'a revolution of attitudes involving the appointment of officials who in previous administrations might have been ruled out by a concern over possible lack of qualifications or conflict of interest or open hostility to the mission of the agencies they now lead"' (Aberbach 1991, 227).
|
The breadth and depth of Reagan's approach made Nixon's administrative strategy look amateurish by comparison, as Reagan made use of all the strategic tools of the administrative presidency-appointment, removal, budget, reorganization, delegation to the states, central clearance, and cost-benefit analysis.
|
Facing a Democratic House and, after 1986, a Democratic Senate as well, the Reagan administration increasingly looked to the PASs and their powers to advance its policy objectives. According to Salamon and Abramson,
|
| | The predominant characteristic of the Reagan approach to personnel selection was its emphasis on centralized, unrelenting White House control of the appointment process. The control was achieved through a variety of means: starting the personnel search early; giving the personnel chief access to the president; discouraging independent "head hunting" on the part of cabinet secretaries; making a heavy commitment of senior White
|
|