The Witches: Salem, 1692 (61 page)

“could after tedious”: Usher to the Earl of Nottingham, October 20, 1692, John Usher Papers.

“It is taken”: Roland L. Warren,
Loyal Dissenter: The Life and Times of Robert Pike
(Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1992), 167. As London heard it, Thomas Danforth informed the poor Maine settlers that if the Lord Jesus could not help them, he could not; Bullivant letter, April 11, 1690, CO 5/855, no. 103, PRO.

They were well armed: Josselyn, in Baker and Reid,
New England Knight,
8.

“pillars of smoke” to “pluck you up”: Burroughs letter of January 27, 1692, Massachusetts Archives Collection, vol. 37, 259, Massachusetts State Archives. See also Kences, “Some Unexplored Relationships,” 190.

“barbarously murdered”: Captain Lloyd letter of January 27, 1692, Massachusetts Archives Collection, vol. 38, 257, Massachusetts State Archives.

encouraged the enemy:
Andros Tracts,
1: 176–78.

“no peace, order or safety”: Bullivant letter, July 1690, CO 5/855, no. 103, PRO.

careful case against Burroughs: R, 241. The documentation for the preliminary examination is scant. Some of the charges against Burroughs may have surfaced only at the August trial, though the hearing notes indicate that all the themes were touched upon in May. Trask points out that some testimony was rewritten; R, 47. On the back of his account, SP scrawled a series of scriptural passages about purification.

“he was a very sharp”: R, 246–47.

“My God makes known”: R, 532. The Sarah Burroughs divorce,
Records of the Court of Assistants of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay
(Boston, 1901), 3: 146.

“an amazing” to “cannot name it”: R, 241.

“a very puny”: CM in Burr, 219.

“None of us could do”: R, 249.

George Jacobs hobbled: R, 251–52. The location of the hearing is not clear. See Matti Rissanen, “Power and Changing Roles in Salem Witch Trials,”
Studia Neophilologica
84 (2012): 119–29; Rissanen, “‘Candy No Witch, Barbados’”; Rissanen, “Salem Witchcraft Papers as Evidence of Early American English,”
English Linguistics
(2003): 84–114. On the trespassing animals: RFQC, 5: 428.

another wizard nervously quipped: R, 288. It was John Willard.

“Hollowed be thy name”: Calef in Burr, 347.

“I verily believe”: R, 254 or 256 or 257; David L. Greene, “Salem Witches II: George Jacobs,”
American Genealogist
58 (April 1982): 65–76.

Mary Warren, the Procter maid, waffled: R, 356–57. Her tongue protruded from her mouth: R, 268–69.

“altogether false” to “believe her”: R, 355.

Salem farmer Bray Wilkins: R, 527–28. Wilkins would live another decade, dying at ninety-two. The villagers complained that SP had recruited Mary Walcott and Abigail as visionaries; SP swore to an account Mercy Lewis had provided at a bedside as well, however. The idea that Willard balked at arrests originates with Upham.

“if he could”: R, 281–82, 295, 296, 297.

“What do you say” to “really believe it”: R, 286–88. On the proliferation of family in the Willard case, Rosenthal,
Salem Story,
118–19.

“suburb of hell”: Dunton,
Dunton’s Letters
, 119. CM wrote down the impious household as the very suburb of hell in his
Batteries upon the Kingdom of the Devil
(1695), 62. A man had “better live in a prison, in a dungeon, than in such a family!”

On the politics, Richard A. Johnson’s very fine
Adjustment to Empire
(New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1981); Owen Stanwood,
The Empire Reformed: English America in the Age of the Glorious Revolution
(Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011); William Pencak,
War, Politics, and Revolution in Provincial Massachusetts
(Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1981); Viola Florence Barnes,
The Dominion of New England
(New York: Ungar, 1960); Edward Randolph,
Documents and Letters.
For excellent portraits of colonial administration, Gertrude Ann Jacobsen,
William Blathwayt: A Late Seventeenth-Century English Administrator
(New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1932), and Michael Hall,
Edward Randolph and the American Colonies.
Especially astute on the intercharter period—and the new, destabilizing role of the people in civic affairs—is Breen,
Puritans and Adventurers,
81–105. The coup served the Puritan orthodoxy well. It also introduced them to an empowered populace, many of whom expected to make their voices heard
.

“Hell seems a great deal”: Flannery O’Connor,
A Prayer Journal
(New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013), 6.

What could not yet happen: While there is general agreement that Governor Dudley Bradstreet held off, there is no hard evidence that he did so. The delay certainly allowed allegations to accumulate. See Benjamin C. Ray, “The Salem Witch Mania,”
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
(2010): 5.

“between government and no government”: Calef in Burr, 349.

“Salem is one of the few”: Arthur Miller, introduction,
The Crucible
(New York: Penguin, 1995), ix.

Boston’s majestic harbor: For Boston, see Samuel Maverick, “Account of New England,”
Proceedings of the MHS,
vol. 1 (1884), 231–51; Josselyn,
New-England’s Rarities,
32; Fisher,
Report of a French Protestant Refugee
. For the lost cow: SS
Diary,
1: 63; for hogs in the street: Bridenbaugh,
Cities in the Wilderness,
56.

“shaken and shattered”:
Magnalia,
1: 183.

“thousand perplexities”: CM,
The Present State,
35.

The rugged forty-one-year-old: On the militiamen, Richard Trask interview, April 1, 2013. The best source on Phips is Baker and Reid’s meticulously researched volume
New England Knight
. See also Viola F. Barnes, “The Rise of William Phips,”
New England Quarterly
(July 1928): 271–94, and Barnes, “Phippius Maximus,”
New England Quarterly
(October 1928): 532–53, from which come the Indian divers, and T. H. Breen,
The Character of a Good Ruler
(New York: W. W. Norton, 1974). For Keynes, see
A Treatise on Money
(London: Macmillan, 1930), vol. 2, 151. Philip F. Gura is excellent on CM’s mythologizing of the governor; “Cotton Mather’s Life of Phips,”
New England Quarterly
50 (September 1977): 440–57. For the Golden Fleece comparison: SS
Diary,
1: 172. The arrival: Jacob Melyen letter book, May 25, 1692, AAS.

“did not care a turd”: John Knepp journal, Egerton Ms. 2526, 5r, 9r, British Library.

“dropped from the machine”:
Magnalia,
1: 184.

“distressed, enfeebled”: Cited in Silverman,
Life and Times of Cotton Mather,
78. The charter was vacated on October 23, 1684; news that the colony no longer had one reached its governor on April 17, 1685. See Jacobsen,
William Blathwayt,
128.

the delayed rite:
Magnalia,
1: 165.

a clerk’s art: Tamara Plakins Thornton,
Handwriting in America: A Cultural History
(New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996), 39.

“a shameful and cowardly”: Cited in Baker and Reid,
New England Knight,
113.

“poor people”: Benjamin Bullivant letter, May 19, 1690, CO 5/855, no. 94, PRO.

“a knot of people”:
MP,
appendix 8.

“alien incubus”: Cited in Johnson,
Adjustment to Empire,
93.

“an unthankful murmuring”: IM,
The Great Blessing of Primitive Counsellors
(Boston, 1693), 19–21.

“a people fit only”: CM,
Midnight Cry,
63.

“vultures and harpies” to “breaches in God’s hedge”: CM,
Optanda,
70–87. He recycled the “spit of reproach” from
The Present State,
12.

One prominent New Englander: It was Elisha Cooke, far from alone in repudiating a document that reimposed royal authority.

“that the people”: Nottingham to Blathwayt, Add. Ms. 37991, fol. 138r, British Library; IM to Nottingham, June 23, 1692, CO/5/571, no. 7, PRO.

“I found this province”: Phips to William Blathwayt, October 12, 1692, R, 686.

Sweden’s earlier scourge: That account, which reached NE via Glanvill, featured a more classically configured Miltonian devil who played harp for the children and arranged for dancing, feasting, and sex. See the English summary of Birgitta Lagerlöf-Génetay,
De Svenska Haxprocessernas Utbrottsskede 1668–1671
(Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell, 1990); Thomas Wright,
Narratives of Sorcery and Magic
(London: Bentley, 1851), 2: 244–60. Wright notes that those elements derive from earlier French and German cases. Most of the visionaries were boys.

“with a remarkable smile”: CM to Richards, May 31, 1692, Cotton Mather Letters, John J. Burns Library, Boston College.

“by reason of witchcrafts”: IM, “The Autobiography of Increase Mather,” May 14 entry, 344. The word “possession” does not turn up in the testimony until seventeen-year-old Margaret Jacobs used it in January 1693.

Carrier jostled a twelve-year-old: R, 510–11. The disembodied voice: CM in Burr, 243.

round up the extended family of George Jacobs: Calef in Burr, 371. On Jacobs, Greene, “Salem Witches II.”

nineteen different afflictions: The tally is Norton’s,
In the Devil’s Snare,
174.

Mercy Lewis hovered near death: R, 311–12, 624.

“enemy he had”: R, 309.

“to sink that happy”:
WOW,
21.

Nathaniel Cary: R, 309–311. Bernard Rosenthal suspects that Elizabeth Cary may actually have been Hannah, as Upham suggested in “Salem Witchcraft and Cotton Mather,”
The Historical Magazine,
September 1869. That would make sense of several dating discrepancies—as would Rosenthal’s theory that two Cary women, Elizabeth and Hannah, were accused; Rosenthal e-mail, May 21, 2015. For an earlier Cary suit, see
Records of the Court of Assistants,
1: 106. For the generous liquor allowances, Gildrie, “Taverns and Popular Culture,” 178. For Tituba and John’s presumed marriage, Rosenthal, “Tituba,” 48.

the touch test: Brattle in Burr, 171; R, 34; Lawson, appendix to
Christ’s Fidelity,
102.

“to sit in the stocks”: Cited in Adam Jay Hirsch,
The Rise of the Penitentiary: Prisons and Punishments in Early America
(New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992), 34. See also Alice Morse Earle,
Curious Punishments of Bygone Days
(New York: Book League of America, 1929), 30.

facility announced itself: Randolph to Robert Chaplin, October 28, 1689, CO 5/855, no. 46, PRO; Beattie,
Crime and the Courts,
299; R, 311; RFQC, 8: 335–57; Perley,
History of Salem,
vol. 3, 241. For the prison visit, Calef in Burr, 259–60. The released prisoners: RFQC, 7: 243.

“the fierceness”: Dunton,
Dunton’s Letters,
120. The rain in the cell: Randolph to Robert Chaplin, October 28, 1689, CO 5/855, no. 103, PRO.

“a noisome place”: RFQC, 2: 227; “almost poisoned”: RFQC 8, 335. The ship captain who had jailed the sailor came regularly to rail at him at the top of his lungs. Fourteen weeks in a freezing, fetid prison was bad enough, the youngster complained. Did he really have to hear his father denounced in the street outside as “an Anabaptistical quaking rogue” in league with the devil?

William Dounton: Esther I. Wik, “The Jailkeeper at Salem in 1692,”
EIHC
111 (1975): 221–27; RFQC, 8: 31. Many suspects made the tour of prisons. Sarah Wilds, the constable’s mother, spent April in Salem, to be removed for two months to Boston and afterward confined at Ipswich, before being moved again to Salem. The family was responsible for the costs of those guarded trips. Dounton was the official who met with a warming pan when collecting the minister’s salary. He himself had attacked a fellow Salemite who resented his many appointments and opposed his nomination to yet another. It was probably no coincidence that he was relieved of the post shortly after the trials.

Phips established a special court: R, 322. A quorum of five would suffice, stipulated the order, so long as Stoughton, Richards, or Gedney was present.

One Scotswoman preferred to burn: MacKay,
The Witch Mania,
505. See Thompson,
Cambridge Cameos,
96, for the puddle-drinking.

Civic leaders produced civic leaders: Kenneth A. Lockridge and Alan Kreider, “The Evolution of Massachusetts Town Government,”
William and Mary Quarterly
23 (October 1966): 566; Gildrie, “Salem Society,” 199. Samuel Sewall would be elected to the Massachusetts council thirty-three times.

“people of the best”: Phips to the privy council, October 12, 1692, R, 686. On the Salem justices, Benjamin C. Ray, “Satan’s War Against the Covenant in Salem Village, 1692,”
New England Quarterly
80 (March 2007): 72. As Baker points out in
A Storm of Witchcraft,
180, Sergeant alone was not a substantial landowner. At least several of the same men presided over the Goodwin case; Norton,
In the Devil’s Snare,
382n; e-mail with Elizabeth Bouvier, May 5, 2015.

“all the councilors”:
CM Diary,
1: 148.

John Alden: Kences, “Some Unexplored Relationships,” 191; Hull,
Diaries,
159. Interview with Richard Johnson, August 20, 2014; Louise Breen,
Transgressing the Bounds,
197–208.

“honest and lawful”: R, 332. For their experience, Langbein, “The Criminal Trial,” 276–77.

the Alden interrogation: R, 334. Norton,
In the Devil’s Snare,
provides the estimate of the frontier trips, 186. For Alden and the munitions, Baker,
A Storm of Witchcraft,
144–45. Alden in 1690 requisitioned Marblehead’s cannon, leaving the town vulnerable. For the instructions with the “bears and wolves,” Robinson,
The Devil Discovered,
38. On Alden see also Louise Breen,
Transgressing the Bounds,
199–206.

“They will dissemble” to “you will not believe”: R, 335–36.

“she should be Queen”: CM in Burr, 244.

“Staring in people’s faces”: R, 334.

“had always looked” to “these say of me”: R, 334; similarly, Brattle in Burr, 170. For Alden and the Indian captives,
Magnalia,
2: 360.

“I have beheld”: R, 348.

It was not unusual: Oberholzer,
Delinquent Saints,
215–16; Haskins,
Law and Authority,
61. Nor was it surprising that Richards should do so. Along with Gedney and Stoughton, he had served on the court that presided over the Elizabeth Morse witchcraft case eleven years earlier. She was found guilty; reprieved; retried; reprieved a second time. There was cause for confusion.

Willard affirmed: Samuel Sewall, notes on sermons, May 29 entry, Ms. N-905, MHS; Mark Peterson, “‘Ordinary Preaching,’”
EIHC
129 (1992): 95–98.

“murmuring frenzies” to “lisping witches”: CM to Richards, May 31, 1692, Cotton Mather Letters, John J. Burns Library, Boston College. Already the colonists marked the date of the November 5, 1605, Gunpowder Plot. It would give way in the eighteenth century to effigies of the pope and the devil being paraded around Boston
and torched. Richards was not the first to confer with CM about Salem; there is evidence that Lawson already had and unmistakable hints that SP had, too.

Henry IV: Fox,
Science and Justice,
80.

consulted precedent in witchcraft cases: Hale in Burr, 415–16.

“If there were a witch”: Calef in Burr, 383.

A school occupied: For courtroom geography and process, see Trask on legal procedures, R, 44–63; Martha J. McNamara, “In the Face of the Court”
Winterthur Portfolio
36 (Summer 2001): 125–39; William D. Northend, “Address Before the Essex Bar Association,”
EIHC
22 (1885): 276; interview with Richard Trask, January 21, 2015; interview with J. M. Beattie, September 9, 2014. Generally on the courtroom attitudes and procedures: Langbein,
Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial;
Langbein, “The Criminal Trial”; Beattie,
Crime and the Courts;
Edgar J. McManus,
Law and Liberty in Early New England: Criminal Justice and Due Process
(Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1993); Murrin, “Magistrates, Sinners, and a Precarious Liberty: Trial by Jury in Seventeenth-Century New England,” in Hall,
Saints and Revolutionaries,
152–206. Interviews with John Murrin, December 11, 2014, and Richard Trask, November 29, 2012.

“that according to your best”: R, 356.

“hurt, tortured, afflicted”: R, 334.

witch’s teats: Louis J. Kern, “Eros, the Devil, and the Cunning Woman,”
EIHC
129 (1993): 20, 31. Koehler,
Search for Power,
84–85, notes that the language of female genitalia is altogether missing from Puritan literature. A panel of Connecticut women: Godbeer,
Escaping Salem,
95. The woman at the gallows: Hall,
Witch-Hunting,
79.

The heart that passes for a stomach: Watson,
Angelical Conjunction,
141. On the literature of witch’s marks, see Pavlac,
Witch Hunts.
Rosenthal,
Salem Story,
77, thinks at least some of the women who examined the six suspects refused to sign anything, knowing what was at stake.

A Quaker woman: Thomas Maule,
Truth Held Forth and Maintained
(Boston, 1695), 214.