Authors: Bernard Minier
He had delivered this long tirade in a bitter tone, the smile gone from his face. Now he stood up and pushed back his chair.
âHave a good look round and make up your own mind,' he advised.
âMy own mind about what?'
âAbout what's going on here.'
âBecause there's something going on?'
âWhat does it matter? You're the one who wanted to learn more about the place.'
She watched him return his tray and leave the room.
*Â Â Â *Â Â Â *
The first thing Servaz did was to lower the blinds and turn on the lights. He wanted to make sure no journalists could be stalking them with a telephoto lens. The young author of graphic novels had gone home. In the incident room, Espérandieu and Ziegler had taken out their laptops and were typing away. Cathy d'Humières was standing in the corner talking on the telephone. She snapped her phone shut and came to sit down. Servaz observed them for a moment, then turned round.
There was a whiteboard in a corner by the window. He pulled it out into the light, picked up a marker and drew two columns:
HORSE | Â Â Â Â Â Â | GRIMM |
dismembered | Â Â Â Â Â Â | naked |
decapitated | Â Â Â Â Â Â | strangled, finger cut off, boots, cape |
killed at night? | Â Â Â Â Â Â | killed at night? |
Hirtmann's DNA | Â Â Â Â Â Â | Hirtmann's DNA? |
âDo we have enough to go on to assume that the same people are responsible for both crimes?' he asked.
âThere are similarities, and there are differences,' answered Ziegler.
âStill, two crimes committed four days apart in the same town,' said Espérandieu.
âExactly. The hypothesis of a second criminal is highly unlikely. It's bound to be the same person.'
âOr persons,' specified Servaz. âDon't forget what we talked about in the helicopter.'
âI haven't forgotten. In any case, there is one thing that would establish a definite connection between the two crimesâ'
âHirtmann's DNA.'
âHirtmann's DNA,' she confirmed.
Servaz lifted the slats of the blinds. He peered outside, then let go with an abrupt snap.
âDo you really think he could have got out of the Institute and given your men the slip?' he asked, turning back to them.
âNo, that's impossible. I checked our set-up myself. There's no way he could have slipped through the net.'
âIn that case, it's not Hirtmann.'
âOr at least, not this time.'
âIf it's not Hirtmann this time, conceivably, it might not have been him the previous time either,' suggested Espérandieu.
Everyone turned to look at him.
âHirtmann never went up to the top of the cable car. Someone else did. Someone who is in contact with him at the Institute and who, voluntarily or not, had a hair belonging to Hirtmann on him.'
Ziegler turned to Servaz with a questioning look. She understood that he hadn't told his assistant everything.
âExcept that it wasn't a hair they found in the cable-car cabin,' she said, âit was saliva.'
Espérandieu looked at her. Then he trained his gaze in turn at Servaz, who nodded his head apologetically.
âI don't see the logic in any of this,' said Servaz. âWhy would they kill the horse first and then the man? Why hang the animal up at the top of the cable car? And the man below a bridge? What is the point?'
âBoth of them were hanged, after a fashion,' said Ziegler.
Servaz looked at her.
âThat's true.'
He went over to the whiteboard, wiped out some of his notes and wrote:
HORSE | Â Â Â Â Â Â | GRIMM |
hanging from cable car | Â Â Â Â Â Â | hanging from metal bridge |
isolated place | Â Â Â Â Â Â | isolated place |
cut up | Â Â Â Â Â Â | naked |
decapitated | Â Â Â Â Â Â | strangled, finger cut off, boots, cape |
killed at night? | Â Â Â Â Â Â | killed at night? |
Hirtmann's DNA | Â Â Â Â Â Â | Hirtmann's DNA? |
âFair enough. Why take it out on an animal?'
âTo get at Ãric Lombard,' said Ziegler once again. âThe power plant and the horse lead to him.'
âOK. Let's suppose Lombard was the target. What does the chemist have to do with anything? Moreover, the horse was decapitated and half flayed, whereas the chemist was naked except for a cape. What's the connection between the two?'
âPartly skinning an animal is a way of making it naked,' ventured Espérandieu.
âAnd the horse had two large pieces of skin hanging on either side,' said Ziegler. âWe thought they were meant to represent wings â but maybe they were the imitation of a capeâ¦'
âIt's possible,' said Servaz, not fully convinced. âBut why chop off its head? And why the cape and the boots: what do they stand for?'
No one had an answer.
He went on: âAnd we always come up against the same puzzle: what could Hirtmann have to do with all this?'
âHe's setting you a challenge!' called a voice from the doorway.
They turned round. A man was standing at the entrance to the room.
Servaz's first thought was that he must be a journalist, and was about to throw him out. The man was in his forties, with long light brown hair, a curly beard and little round glasses, which he removed in order to wipe off the mist that had formed when he came into the warmth from the cold, then put back on to gaze at everyone with his pale eyes. He was wearing a heavy jumper and thick corduroy trousers. He looked like a teacher of social sciences, or a union activist, or someone who was nostalgic for the 1960s.
âWho are you?' asked Servaz curtly.
âAre you the person in charge of the investigation?'
The visitor came closer.
âSimon Propp. I'm the psychologist. I was supposed to come tomorrow, but the gendarmerie called me and told me what happened. So here I am.'
He went round the table and shook everyone's hand. Then he stopped to look at the empty chairs. He chose one on Servaz's left. Servaz was sure he chose it for a particular reason and felt vaguely irritated, as if he were trying to manipulate him.
Simon Propp looked at the whiteboard.
âInteresting,' he said.
âReally?' Servaz's tone was involuntarily sarcastic. âWhat sort of thoughts does it inspire in you?'
âI'd rather you went on as if I wasn't here, if you don't mind,' answered the shrink. âI'm sorry I interrupted. I'm not here to judge your work methods.' Servaz watched him flap his hand. âAnd besides, it's not something I could do. I'm only here to assist you when the time comes to discuss Julian Hirtmann's personality, or when you need to draw up a clinical profile on the basis of the clues found at the crime scene.'
âYou said when you came in that he's setting us a challenge?' said Servaz.
He saw the shrink narrow his little yellow eyes behind his glasses. Beneath his shining beard, which made him look like a clever leprechaun, he had round cheeks, ruddy with the cold. Servaz got the unpleasant sensation he was being mentally dissected. He nevertheless held the newcomer's gaze.
âRight,' said Propp. âI did my homework yesterday. I studied Hirtmann's file when I heard his DNA had been found in the cable car cabin. It's obvious he's a manipulator, a sociopath and a very smart man. But it goes further than that: Hirtmann is a special case even as far as organised killers go. Sooner or later the personality disorders they suffer from are bound to affect their intellectual faculties and their social life, one way or the other. And sooner or later the people around them will become aware of their monstrous nature. That is why they often need an accomplice, generally a wife who is as much of a monster as they are, to help them maintain their façade. But Hirtmann, when he was at liberty, managed perfectly to disconnect the part of himself that was prey to rage and madness from his social life. He was an expert at putting others off the scent. Other sociopaths have managed to do something similar before him, but none of them were in a profession as prominent as his.'
Propp stood up and slowly began to circle the table. With increasing irritation, Servaz surmised that this must be one of the shrink's conjuring tricks.
âHe is suspected of the murder of over forty young women in twenty-five years. Forty murders and not the slightest clue, not a single lead to connect them with the perpetrator! If it weren't for the newspaper cuttings and files that were found at his home and in his safe deposit box, the crimes would never have been traced to him.'
He stopped behind Servaz, who refused to turn his head, and merely looked at Irène Ziegler on the other side of the table.
âAnd suddenly, he leaves a trace â an obvious, vulgar, ordinary trace.'
âYou're forgetting one detail,' said Ziegler.
Propp sat back down.
âAt the time he committed most of his crimes, DNA analysis either did not yet exist or was far less conclusive than it is today.'
âThat's true, butâ'
âSo you're thinking that what we have today doesn't look anything like the Hirtmann we know, is that it?' said Ziegler, staring right into the shrink's eyes.
Propp blinked and nodded his head.
âSo, in your opinion, despite his DNA, he did not kill the horse?'
âI didn't say that.'
âI don't understand.'
âDon't forget he's been locked up for several years. His circumstances have changed. Hirtmann has been in prison for a long time and he's dying of boredom. He's slowly wasting away â and this is a man who used to be incredibly active. He wants to play. Think about it: until he got caught for that stupid crime of passion, he had an intense, stimulating, demanding social life. He was held in high professional regard. He had a beautiful wife, and the orgies he hosted were attended by the cream of Geneva high society. At the same time he was kidnapping, torturing, raping and killing young women in the utmost secrecy. In other words, for a monster like him, a dream life. He certainly did not want it to end. Which is why he was so careful to ensure his victims disappeared.'
Propp joined his fingers beneath his chin.
âNowadays he has no reason to hide. On the contrary: he wants people to know it's him; he wants to be talked about, attract attention.'
âBut he could have escaped outright and started up again in complete liberty,' objected Servaz. âWhy would he go back to his cell? It doesn't make sense.'
Propp scratched his beard.
âI confess that is the question that has been nagging me, too, since yesterday. Why would he go back to the Institute? With the obvious chance that he couldn't get out again if security was tightened. Why run such a risk? What would be the point? You're right: it doesn't make sense.'
âUnless we suppose that to him the game is more exciting than his freedom,' said Ziegler. â
Or that he is certain of being able to get out again.
'
âHow could that be?' said Espérandieu, astonished.
âI thought it was impossible for Hirtmann to have committed the second murder,' insisted Servaz. âGiven the extent of the police security. That's what we just agreed, isn't it?'
The shrink looked at them one after the other, still thoughtfully stroking his beard. Behind his glasses his yellow eyes looked like two overripe grapes.
âI think you are grossly underestimating this man,' he said. âI think you absolutely do not realise what you are dealing with.'
âThe watchmen,' said Cathy d'Humières suddenly. âWhat's the latest on them?'
âNothing,' said Servaz. âI don't think they're guilty. In spite of the fact they ran away. It's too subtle for them. Up to now they've never shown themselves to be capable of anything but the kind of violence that's too ordinary for words. A painter and decorator doesn't turn into Michelangelo overnight. The swabs we took will tell us whether they were present at the crime scene or not, but I don't think so. But they are hiding something, that's obvious.'
âI agree,' said Propp. âI had a look at the interview transcripts. They just don't have the profile. But I'll check all the same to see whether they have any psychiatric history. Petty delinquents have been known to turn overnight into monsters of unbelievable cruelty. The human spirit can conceal a great many mysteries. Let's not rule anything out.'
Servaz shook his head with a frown.
âThen there's the poker game last night. Let's try and determine whether there was a quarrel. Maybe Grimm had debtsâ¦'
âThere is another issue we have to settle quickly,' said the prosecutor. âBefore, all we had was a dead horse, which meant we could take our time. Now we've got a human victim. And it won't take long for the media to make the connection with the Institute. If, perish the thought, the news gets out about finding Hirtmann's DNA, they'll be all over us. Have you seen the number of journalists outside? The two essential questions are these: were the security measures at the Wargnier Institute at fault in any way? Are our roadblocks and cordons enough? The sooner we have answers, the better. I suggest we go and visit the Institute right now.'
âBut if we do that,' objected Ziegler, âthose journalists camped outside could easily tail us. There's surely no point in luring them over there.'