The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (28 page)

The speed at which the world has become ‘industrialised’ is absolutely staggering.
 
Only just over one hundred years ago, we were still largely dependent on horse-power for transport and steam engines powered by coal and water were the only machines in existence capable of challenging the horse’s superiority in this regard.
 
Indeed, as a species we progressed from steam-power and horses to jet engines and space-travel in around 60 years.
 
A monumental technological feat that had it been used for the benefit of humanity as a whole instead of a tiny minority, would have led to a world of peace and plenty for all instead of the truly appalling state of affairs we see today.

The last two hundred years have seen us shift from being the servants of Mother Nature to being its masters.
 
We have behaved in the past, and are still today behaving in ways that seriously threaten the very existence of the Earth upon which we depend, whilst over 100,000 people die of starvation each day.
 
Starvation caused directly by Elite profiteering.

Our so-called economic system depends wholly on the fact that we need to consume the Earth’s resources at an ever-increasing rate simply to maintain and increase the profits and margins of the corporations.
 
Economic growth, we are constantly told by the Elite-controlled economists, media pundits and financial analysts, is the only meaningful measure of a strong economy and as such is portrayed forcibly to be inherently desirable despite the fact that it is this very ‘economic growth’ that results in the wholesale destruction of the planet we see today and the constant widening of the gap between those who ‘have’ and those who do not.

"Somehow, we have come to think the whole purpose of the economy is to grow, yet growth is not a goal or purpose.
 
The pursuit of endless growth is suicidal."
 
David Suzuki

If a country has to produce and consume more and more to effect this growth, then a point is soon reached whereby that cannot be sustained within that country’s own borders.
 
It becomes necessary to sell abroad and export goods and technology and in order to do this effectively, often means converting other cultures and societies to the ethics (and I use the term loosely) of extremist capitalist consumerism.
 
This can only be achieved by making them dependent upon the consumer goods and designer, junk foodstuffs of the originating country, through the use of thoroughly misleading, manipulative and often subliminal advertising.
 
This then in turn has the long-term effect of destroying that country’s self-sufficiency in food and further increasing its dependency upon the imports of the goods and food-types now newly in demand.
 
The need to expand and increase production year on year means that everyone has to compete or die – literally in the case of many third world nations.
 
The obvious exception to this rule being the banking cartels which never lose, whichever way the dice may fall.

We hear much idle talk and empty rhetoric about ‘economic co-operation’ and ‘pulling in the same direction’ in order to cure the ills of the world but the very basis of our corrupt economic system is to turn people against people and country against country as they fight among themselves for the metaphorical crumbs from the banksters’ tables.
 
‘Every man for himself’, ‘greed is good’ and ‘survival of the fittest’ are the watchwords by which we are all really forced to live in order to survive in this artificially engineered world of utterly brutal, dog-eat-dog competitiveness.

“In order to give the Goyim* no time to think and take note, their minds must be diverted towards industry and trade.
 
Thus, all the nations will be swallowed-up in the pursuit of gain and in the race for it will not take note of their common foe.
 
But, again, in order that freedom may once and for all disintegrate and ruin the communities of the Goyim, we must put industry on a speculative basis; the result of this will be that what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands and pass into speculation, that is, to our classes.”
 
Protocol 4.
 
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

*Hebrew word for ‘cattle’ and a derogatory term for a non-Jew, ie. ‘the masses’.

The impetus for expansion is then promulgated by scientific research into new inventions and improvements of existing technology.
 
Little by little we have been propagandised into the belief that we simply must have the latest technologies, gizmos and gadgets and that it is desirable to be seen as one who wears the most expensive clothing, jewellery and shoes or the person who buys the most expensive cars, watches, perfumes, colognes and visits the world’s most desirable locations – all in the name of expanding the bank accounts and boosting the ‘bottom lines’ of the Elite corporations in catastrophic expense to the quality of our environment.
 
But still, who cares eh?
 
As long as the already filthy-rich continue to get richer and richer by enticing us to give them all our money plus some that we do not even have, to buy things that we do not even want or need and as a result remain in an almost permanent state of poverty and therefore slavery, as a result, that’s OK.

Indeed, shopping and buying things – anything – seems to be a modern-day ‘hobby’.
 
Visit a shopping mall in any town anywhere in the Western world and people-watch for a while to see what I mean.
 
These places are usually thronged with people at all hours of the day and night – buying consumer goods they do not need with money they do not even possess (credit granted by the banksters) and this, more often than not is stuff that we would not miss if we were not ‘sold’ it at every given opportunity by subtly persuasive and invasive marketing and advertising.
 
Most of it anyway is used for a short time only and then when the updated version is released three months hence; it will be thrown away, even though it still more than adequately fulfils the function for which it was originally intended.
 
We are made to feel worthless or like pariahs by both our masters and peers if we do not own the latest and ‘best’ versions of any given technology or possession.

It is exactly the same with clothes.
 
How many suits, dresses, shirts, sweaters and t-shirts does one really need?
 
How many pairs of shoes can one reasonably wear in a week or a month?
 
I would even admit that I have myself on occasions, bought an item of clothing that I never got around to wearing even once, before deciding to dispose of it.
 
Our forebears would probably have had one suit of clothes, perhaps two shirts, two pairs of underwear and socks and one pair of shoes (more likely, boots) to their name, two if they were very lucky and whilst I am not advocating that we return to this opposite extreme, surely there is a happy medium?
 
We do not realise it, but we are being constantly enticed though subtle and subliminal advertising techniques to part with most of the money we earn as soon as it hits our bank accounts and the ongoing damage that this philosophy is wreaking, not only upon the environment, but to our own psychological well-being, beggars belief.
 
The prevailing system ensures that we are given money with one hand, in exchange for our hard labours month on month and then have it taken from us with the other, whilst the Elites take ownership of and control the entire process and reap the vast profits to be had from this circular-process methodology.
 
This is the ‘religion’ of extreme consumerism – criticise it only at your peril – you will very quickly be put in your place by your masters and peers, should you do so!

“An enormous, dictatorial corporate cartel is ruling the world through its proxies in government, banking, academia and media. Our entire Western culture has become an insidious farce with the sole purpose of maintaining the enslaved masses in their conjured up democracies, religions and histories”.
 
Robert Bonomo, activistpost.com 13th October 2011

The car licence/registration system in Britain is one good example of how consumers are subtly enticed to spend money unnecessarily by being peer-pressured into replacing their cars more often than they would under normal circumstances.
 
Within the licence plate number is a code which tells everyone exactly the age of any car, to within 6 months.
 
For example, a car may have a registration mark of RK05ZDP.
 
‘RK’ is the area code for the town of Reading, so that is the place of registration of the vehicle, ‘ZDP’ is the 3 digit unique identifier consisting of any combination of three letters from AAA to ZZZ and finally, the ‘05’ is the giveaway.
 
This denotes to everyone that the car was first registered between the 1st March 2005 and 31st August 2005, which has given rise to a ‘keeping-up with the Joneses’ mentality amongst British car buyers.
 
When the neighbours suddenly appear with a brand new ‘11’ (the code for March to August 2011) registered car, to many people an ‘05’ car will begin to look a little dated and mark them down as inferior, such is the power of ostentation and peer pressure.
 
Of course this system was lobbyed for and ‘paid’ for by the car manufacturers’ lobbyists, probably in the form of party donations, making a mockery of so-called democracy in the process.
 
What other possible reason could there be for devising such a system in the first place?
 

According to government it is in order that people cannot easily fake the age of their cars when selling them, but that is abject nonsense.
 
To get around this problem is simple – buy a cheap private, dateless plate from pre-1963 or even a dated plate from say the 1980s that is obviously not the year of manufacture of the car and yet in any case, the vehicle’s registration document will tell a potential buyer the age of the car in an instant.
 
One more example of how governments are dictated to by the mega-corporations at the expense of the people and in this case, the environment.

We are also bombarded with propaganda in the form of advertising, trying to convince us at every opportunity that banks and other large corporations are really quite benevolent entities who are here to serve you, care about the welfare of you and your family and cater for your every need – all at a price, of course.
 
How often do we see TV and billboard ads proclaiming such things as ‘… the bank that cares’ or ‘…let us look after you and your family’, ‘…you deserve only the best...’ or ‘…we are here to help’?
 
All absolute lies and extremely subtle psycho-babble of course, designed to lull you into a false sense of security, convince you of the benevolence of Elite corporations and generally make you believe that the world is a completely different place to the one you know is real, deep-down.

“The more money most people earn, the more they want and expect. In fact, for some it becomes a pathetic, obsessive way of life. Their version of God becomes the accumulation of worthless Federal Reserve notes stuffed in their pocket.
 
Or running up insane balances for credit card junk purchases, for which greedy banks freely extend more and more credit until the person is buried too deep to get out.
 
It proves the old expression – ‘give someone enough rope and they will hang themselves’.”
  
Ted Twietmeyer, ‘Are People Really Stupid or is it Something Else?’
 
2007

But, we always hear the cry… ‘What is the alternative?’
 
A ridiculous question if ever I heard one, because there are so many alternatives.
 
The reason that this question never gets a sensible, coherent answer, in my opinion is three-fold.
 
This is firstly, because any alternative would probably destroy the current status-quo to the detriment of the Elite powers-that-be and their fat bank accounts.
 
Secondly we are falsely encouraged to believe that no alternative is feasible because of the inherent human traits of greed and selfishness.
 
However, anthropological science has long suggested that unbridled greed is not in fact a universal attribute of humanity, merely a personality blemish – usually applicable only to the psychopaths who freely walk among us and dictate our every movement and thought.
 
And the third reason is, simply because it is the kind of question that is not possible to answer in an instant, succinct sound-bite.
 
It is almost akin to abruptly asking someone in the street ‘what is the meaning of life?’ and expecting a precise, scientific and concise assessment of the issue.

The neatest answer to this largely rhetorical question I ever heard was this;

“What's the alternative to a world in which the few control the many for the benefit of the few?
 
Where billions get up every day to go to some joyless, soulless job that they hate - just to survive?
 
Where every month is a daily challenge to pay the bills and there is no time for living, just survival?
 
Where millions die of hunger in a world of plenty and millions more die in manufactured wars?
 
Where billionaires run a system that makes them ever-richer while staggering numbers of people live on less than a dollar a day?
 
Where people suffer and die from illnesses that could be cured if the means were not suppressed?
 
Where children are conditioned from birth to serve the system that controls them their entire lives?
  
What's the alternative to that?
 
I don't know - you got me.”
 
David Icke, political researcher