The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (119 page)

Whilst social-engineering may be, and often is, carried out by any organisation whatsoever, whether large or small, public or private, the most comprehensive (and therefore the most effective) campaigns of social-engineering are those initiated by powerful central governments controlled by our Elite masters.

Extremely intensive social-engineering campaigns have always occurred in countries with authoritarian governments.
 
In the 1920s for example, the revolutionary government of the Soviet Union embarked on a campaign to fundamentally modify the behaviour and ideals of Soviet citizens, to replace the old social mores of the Czarist government with a new ‘Soviet’ culture, to create the modern Russian citizen.
 
They used newspapers, books, film, mass relocations and even architectural design tactics to serve as social modification techniques in order to change personal values and private relationships into those which benefitted the state.

Similar examples would be the Chinese ‘Great Leap Forward’ under Chairman Mao Tse Tung and the ‘Cultural Revolution’ programme and also the Khmer Rouge’s plan of de-urbanisation of Cambodia under Pol Pot in the 1970s.

More recently, sustained social-engineering campaigns that create more gradual, but ultimately far-reaching, changes would include initiatives such as the ‘war on drugs’ and the ‘war on terror’, both fake constructs which have seriously changed the hearts and minds of western populations towards a multitude of issues, such as Islam itself and primarily the attitudes to the ongoing foreign wars being fought in the name of British, US and Israeli hegemony and empire-building.
 

Other examples would include such as the ever-increasing encroachment of intellectual property rights on behalf of the Elite-run corporations and the copyrighting of anything remotely profitable including the human genome, which in my view is an absolutely scandalous act that should never have been allowed in a fair and equitable society.
 
We may also include here, the promotion of faux elections as a political tool, a tactic that has now been in place for over two centuries.

Social theorists of the Frankfurt School (see relevant section) such as Theodor Adorno also commentated upon the new phenomenon in the 1920s and 30s of mass culture and remarked on its manipulative power.
 
When the rise of the Nazis in Germany drove him out of the country around 1930, he and many others of his ilk became involved with the ‘Institute for Social Research’ in the United States.
 
The Nazis themselves of course, were no strangers to the idea of influencing political attitudes and re-defining personal and social relationships.
 
The Nazi propaganda machine under Josef Goebbels was a sophisticated and effective tool for creating and manipulating public opinion to the benefit of the regime.

Social-engineering can and is being used constantly by the Elite, as a means to achieve a wide variety of different results, as illustrated by the many different governments and other organisations that have employed it as an effective tool to retain the balance of power in their favour.
 
The possibilities for large-scale manipulation became more realistic immediately following WWII, with the widespread, exponential growth of television and ongoing social-engineering, particularly with regard to advertising techniques is still pertinent in the abhorrent western model of consumer capitalism that enslaves us all.

In his classic political science work, ‘The Open Society and Its Enemies, The Spell of Plato’, Karl Popper examined the application of the critical and rational methods of science to the problems of the open society.
 
In this respect, he made an important distinction between the principles of what he referred to as 'piecemeal social-engineering' and 'Utopian social-engineering'.

“The piecemeal [social] engineer will adopt the method of searching for and fighting against, the greatest and most urgent evil of society, rather than searching for, and fighting for, its greatest ultimate good.”
 
For him, the difference between 'piecemeal social-engineering' and 'Utopian social-engineering' is "…the difference between a reasonable method of improving the lot of man, and a method which, if really tried, may easily lead to an intolerable increase in human suffering.
 
It is the difference between a method which can be applied at any moment, and a method whose advocacy may easily become a means of continually postponing action until a later date, when conditions are more favourable.
 
And it is also the difference between the only method of improving matters which has so far been really successful, at any time, and in any place, and a method which, wherever it has been tried, has led only to the use of violence in place of reason, and if not to its own abandonment, at any rate to that of its original blueprint.”
 
Karl Popper, Austrian philosopher, 1902-1994

We are all subjected to and affected by social-engineering whether we like it or not but as Popper rightly points-out, there is a world of difference between benign social-engineering and its hugely more malignant cousin.
 
Unfortunately the insidious, covert use of social-engineering techniques upon the whole of mankind is a valuable tool in the armoury of those who seek to deceive us and thus enslave us.
 
Social-engineering could also be said to be a less-intrusive version of that other popular Elite tool, mind-control techniques.

MK Ultra (short for the Germanic form, Mind Kontrolle) was introduced shortly after WWII using Nazi scientists and hypnotists procured via Project Paperclip (see section on WWII).
 
Its aim was to research into hypnotic techniques for interrogation, secure courier duties and reducing fatigue for the armed forces and also to research the effects of primitive drugs like barbiturates and cannabis for drug-assisted interrogation.

A man by the name of George Estabrooks was the leading proponent of hypnosis as the ultimate method of manipulation of the human mind.
 
His book, Hypnotism, published in the early 1940s, has been decried as too fantastic and improbable in terms of describing the capabilities of hypnosis with certain very suggestible subjects, but his arguments and examples remain valid to this day.
 
Estabrooks admitted in 1971 to creating hypnotic couriers and programmed multiple personalities for Military Intelligence purposes.

The commencement of the Cold War and the Korean War in particular saw an upsurge in mind control research and also the emergence of the term 'brain-washing'.
 
Supposedly a development of the Chinese communists, the term was actually coined by a magazine writer later found to be on the CIA payroll as an agent of influence.
 
In postulating a 'brainwashing gap', the CIA were given permission to undertake research into countering communist mind-control efforts and developing their own as an aid in the espionage wars that were a prominent feature of the second half of the twentieth century.

Hypnosis and drugs were the primary tools of this search for the ultimate truth-serum and also regarded as an extremely desirable goal was the capability to create an agent who would never reveal his mission even under extreme torture, or even be aware that they were carrying secret information given to them in an altered state of consciousness.
 
Sophisticated ‘designer’ drugs were also developed and tested, such as LSD, Ketamine, and Psilocybin whilst partial lobotomy and the implantation of electrodes were considered as methods for creating a fully-compliant, ‘non-tamperable’, secure field agent.
 
Electro-convulsive shock treatment, combined with LSD, semi-permanent sedation and constantly replaying the subject’s own voice through headphones were also experimental techniques in this field.

One of the most notable cases of mind control at this time involved a famous model of the late 1940s and 50s named Candy Jones.
 
In the book, ‘The Control of Candy Jones’ the author reviewed hours of tapes made by Candy Jones and her husband which revealed a systematic programme to create and manipulate alternate personalities (known as ‘alters’) as the basis of programmed couriers resistant to torture, where the primary personality would not even be aware of the secret information being carried by the alter.
 
In this state, the information carried could be extracted via either a post-hypnotic command or response to a pre-programmed cue.

Research continued into early 1970s by the CIA's own admission and John Marks, author of the best study of CIA mind control experiments, makes the subtle differentiation that the CIA congressional witnesses might truthfully say that all research done by the TSS Directorate had ended, since the programmes were moved into other areas once operational techniques had been developed.
 
Many of the names mentioned in reference to mind-control research occur in the references to supposed dead-end research in extra-sensory perception (ESP).

As the years and decades wore on, these techniques began to be used more and more for clandestine civilian purposes as opposed to the initial, almost exclusively military use.

In the 1980s and early 1990s more than 30 scientists working on top secret British projects, mostly computer technicians, died in very strange and unexplained circumstances.
 
Several defence contractor companies such as Marconi, Plessey and British Aerospace, among others were involved in what can only be described as a bizarre series of events.
 

In 1986, Vimal Dajibhai, who was working for Marconi Underwater Systems, drove from London to Bristol, a city with which he had no connection and threw himself off the famous Clifton Suspension Bridge located there.
 
A few months previously, Arshad Sharif, a computer programmer with Marconi Defence Systems, also drove from London to Bristol and hanged himself.
 
Why Bristol of all places?
 
Bristol is a former Knights Templar port and before that a Phoenician port.
 
Its name has evolved from Barati, the Phoenician goddess.
 
It just so happens that an elite unit of British intelligence called the Committee of 26 is based there and they use the runway of the British Aerospace complex to clandestinely fly British and foreign agents in and out of the country.
 
In that period of the 1980s there was a multiplicity of strange deaths of people at the cutting edge of development in the defence industries.

 
What possesses a man to get into his car, drive more than two hours to the Clifton Suspension Bridge and jump off?

A CIA scientist once told a researcher he was put through forms of mind control to prevent him from recalling his knowledge once a project was completed.
 
By way of another example; David Sands was a highly skilled scientist working on a very sensitive area of defence, but at 37 he was talking about leaving the industry and changing his lifestyle.
 
(Moral of the story: never tell anyone what you propose to do, just do it).
 
He was happily married with two small children, a son aged six and a three year old daughter.
 
Sands and his wife had just returned from an enjoyable holiday in Venice when he died in mysterious circumstances, although they are not so mysterious once mind-control is understood to be the cause.
 
He worked for Easams who were fulfilling contracts for the Ministry of Defence and it appears that whilst Sands and his wife were in Venice, the company was visited by members of the elite British police unit, the Special Branch.

 
Then, on Saturday 28th March 1987, David Sands told his wife he was going out to refuel the car, but he didn’t return for six hours.
 
No one, least of all himself had any idea where he was.
 
His wife Anna called the police and Constable John Hiscock was at the house when Sands returned at 10.20pm.
 
When questioned about his whereabouts he said he had been ‘driving and thinking’.
 
His wife said it was out of character for him to be away for so long and she did not think he realised how long he had been out.
 
He seemed confused, but happy, she said.
 
Two days later, on Monday, 30th March, he climbed into his excellently maintained Austin Maestro car and began his regular journey from his home in Itchen Abbas, near Winchester, Hampshire to Easams at Camberley in Surrey.
 
His wife said there was nothing unusual about his demeanour or behaviour and driving conditions were good but about 30 minutes into his journey when he was driving along the A33 at Popham, near Basingstoke, he suddenly did a U-turn across the dual carriageway and headed at high speed in the opposite direction to his destination.
 
Turning onto a slip road at about 80 miles an hour, Sands then drove his car straight into a disused café building, killing himself in an explosion of flame.
 
There were no skid marks and he had not even tried to brake.