Read The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown Online
Authors: Andreas J. Köstenberger,Charles L Quarles
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
The convictions that there is one God, that Jesus is the Messiah and the exalted Lord, and that the Christian community has been entrusted with the proclamation of the gospel of salvation in Jesus Christ, can be found in the following partial listing of NT writings, which is provided in Table 21.1 in the general chronological order of composition.
Perhaps the best summary of the gospel is found in Acts 10:36: “He sent the message to the sons of Israel, proclaiming the good news of peace through Jesus Christ—He is Lord of all.” Jesus is Christ and Lord, and his followers proclaim the gospel: “They continued teaching and proclaiming the good news that the Messiah is Jesus” (Acts 5:42). This gospel was also proclaimed by Paul (Acts 17:2—3). The expression “the Lord Jesus Christ” likewise sums up the unified Christian conviction of faith.
83
The joint foundation of faith of the first Christians comprised several further convictions—not just belief in the one God, in Jesus as Messiah and Lord, and in the gospel of forgiveness of sins in Christ. As examples, we may cite the expectation of Jesus' return
84
and the love commandment, especially in Paul and John, but it also occurs in Peter. The first Christians were also united in the understanding that the NT church was the new messianic community, in continuity with OT Israel.
85
Paul's statement that speaks of a sevenfold unity should also be cited: “One body and one Spirit,…one hope…; one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all” (Eph
4:4—6).
Table 21.1: Major Unifying Themes in NT Theology
The One God | Jesus as Messiah & Lord | Gospel, Message, the Faith |
1. James: | ||
Jas 1:1, 5,13 ,20 ;2:5, 19 | Jas 2:1 | Jas 1:27 |
2. Paul: | ||
Gal 1:1, 10,13 , 20,24; etc. | Gal 1:3; 3:26; 6:14 | Gal 1:7–9, 23; 2:1, 5, 7, etc. |
1 Thess 2:2,8–9;2 Thess 1:5 | 1 Thess 1:1, 3; 5:9, 23, 28 | 1 Thess 1:5; 2:2,4 ,8 ,9 ; 3:2; 2 Thess 1:8;2: 14; 3:1 |
1 Cor 4:20;6:9–10; 8:6;15:50; 2 Cor 5:21; 11:7 | 1 Cor 2:2; 8:6 | 1 Cor 1:17–18; 2:4; 4:15; 9:12, 14, 16,23; 15:1–4; 2 Cor 2:12; 4:3,4 ; 5:19; 8:18; 9:13; 10 :14; 11:4, 7 |
Rom 1:1, 18, 23;3:5, 7, 21–23;5 2; 10:3;14:17; 15:7, 16 | Rom 1:1–4; 5:1, 11; 6:23 | Rom 1:1,2 ,9 ,16–17; 2:16; 10:15–17;15:16, 19, 20; 16:25 |
Eph 1:3–6; Phil1:2, 3; 3:9; Col1:1, 3, 6, 9,10 ;4:11 | Eph 1:10; 2:20; 4:15; 5:23; Col 2:6; Phlm 1 | Eph 1:13; 3:6; 4:5; 6:15,19 ; Phil 1:5, 7,12, 16, 18, 25,27 ; 2:22; 4:3, 15; Col 1:5, 23; 2:5, 7; Phlm 6, 13 |
1 Tim 1:1, 4, 11,17; 2:3, 5; 3: 5,15 ; 4:3–5; etc, | 1 Tim 1:12, 15; 2 Tim 1:10 | 1 Tim 1:2, 11; 2:7; 4:1,6 ; 6:10, 12, 21;2 Tim 1:8,10 ,13–14; 2:8 ; 3:8; 4:7;Titus 1:9 |
3. Synoptics and Acts: | ||
Mark 1:14–15;12:26, 29, 32 | Mark 1:1; 8:29; 12:35–37 | Mark 1:1,14–15; 8:35; 10:29; 13:10;14:9 |
Matt 15:31;22:32, 37 | Matt 1:1; 16:16; 22:41–46 | Matt 4:23; 9:35; 24:14; 26:13; 28:20 |
Luke 1:68; 20:37 Acts 1:3; 3:13; 7:32, 55; 8:12; 14:22; 19:8; 20:24; 28:23, 31 | Luke 2:11; 9:20; 20:41–44 Acts 2:36; 5:42; 9:22; 17: 2–3; 18:28 | Luke 4:18, 43; 7:22; 8:1; 9:6; 16:16; 20:1; Acts 2:41; 5:20, 42; 8:4,12 , 25, 35, 40; 10:36; 11:20; 15:7, 35; 17:11, 18; 20:24 |
4. Hebrews: | ||
Heb 1:1–3, 5–6, 13; etc. | Heb 3:6; 13:8 | Heb 2:3; 4:2,6, 14; 12:2 |
5. Peter: | ||
1 Pet 4:14, 17 | 1 Pet 1:1–3, 11; 3:15 | 1 Pet 1:12, 25; 2:8; 4:17; 5:9; 2 Pet 1:1 |
2 Pet 1:1 | 2 Pet 1:1, 16 | 2 Pet 1:1 |
6. Jude: | ||
Jude 1,4 , 21, 25 | Jude 1,4 | Jude 3, 20 |
7. John: | ||
John 1:1–2,6 , 12, 18, 36, 51; etc. | John 1:17, 41, 45; 11:27; 20:31; 1 John 2:22; 5:1 | John 12:38; 17:20; 1 John 5:4 |
Rev 12:10; 15:8; 19:1; 21:11, 23 | Rev 1:1–2, 5 | Rev 10:7; 14:6 |
The diversity and unity of the NT coexist as joint characteristics of the NT and do not constitute a problem—in the sense of unsolvable tensions or contradictions—but present the reader with the rich legacy of the faith of the first Christians, in which various perspectives of the same Jesus Christ and of the same gospel mutually complemented one another. Paul's reference to the “whole plan of God” (Acts 20:27) seems to presuppose a unified perspective.
86
Wenham talked about a “concern for the working out of an orthodoxy (and orthopraxis) defined by the person and teaching of Jesus” and an organic development that can be likened to a tree whose branches have a common origin and are part of a common entity.
87
Betz noted that the successful mission of the first Christians would not have been possible without the fundamental unity of the Christian faith.
88
One also thinks of the readiness to martyrdom, in which regard Pliny, for example, never portrayed the Christians he interrogated as a divided or diversified group.
The first Christians, and here especially Paul and John, concurred that Jesus is the Godsent Christ and the exalted Lord. On the basis of this conviction and the resulting gospel message, Paul, John, and other NT authors developed their own theologies depending on a variety of circumstances: the respective requirements of ministry, their own faith experience, and numerous other cultural, historical, missionary factors. Thus the NT shows that the first Christians were from the start united in their belief that Jesus was and is the Messiah. This is indicated already in the earliest apostolic tradition.
89
Only gradually were these fundamental convictions applied to various situations and further relevant theological conclusions drawn. W. Bauer believed there was a movement from diversity to unity, but the first Christians actually developed from unity to diversity.
90
G. B. Caird puts it well:
The question we must ask is not whether these books all say the same thing, but whether they all bear witness to the same Jesus and through him to the many splendoured wisdom of the one God. If we are persuaded that the second Moses, the son of Man, the friend of sinners, the incarnate
logos
, the firstborn of all creation, the Apostle and High Priest of our calling, the Chief Shepherd, and the Lamb opening the scroll are the same person in whom the one God has achieved and is achieving his mighty work, we shall neither attempt to press all our witnesses into a single mould nor captiously complain that one seems at some points deficient in comparison with another. What we shall do is rejoice that God has seen fit to establish His gospel at the mouth of so many independent witnesses. The music of the New Testament choir is not written to be sung in unison.
91
The one God, Jesus Christ, and the gospel—these are the major pillars of NT theology.
92
It remains the task of the interpreter to exegete individual passages in the respective NT writings and to relate diverse motifs in different NT documents to one another.
93
Yet this may take place in the confidence that the NT is not a disparate collection of ill-fitting parts, which together result in nothing more than a cacophony of voices but a well-composed symphony in which different elements combine to a harmonious work that echoes into all the world to the glory of God and the edification of those individuals who respond to the divine revelation, not with skepticism, but in faith.
STUDY QUESTIONS
FOR FURTHER STUDY
Balla, P.
Challenges to New Testament Theology: An Attempt to Justify the Enterprise.
Peabody: Hendrickson,1998.
Bauer, W.
Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity.
Edited by R. A. Kraft and G. Krodel. Philadelphia:Fortress, 1979 (German original, 1934).
Blomberg, C. L. “The Legitimacy and Limits of Harmonization.” Pages 139—74 in
Hermeneutics, Authority,and Canon.
Edited by D. A. Carson and J. D. Woodbridge. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1986.
Bockmuehl, M. N. A.
Seeing the Word: Refocusing New Testament Study.
Studies in Theological Interpretation.Grand Rapids: Baker, 2006.
Bruce, F. F. “‘All Things to All Men’: Diversity in Unity and Other Pauline Tensions.” Pages 82-99 in
Unity and Diversity in New Testament Theology.
Edited by R. Guelich. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978.
____________. “Is the Paul of Acts the Real Paul?”
Bulletin of the John Rylands Library
58 (1976): 282-305.
Caird, G. B.
New Testament Theology.
Edited by L. D. Hurst. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.
Carson, D. A. “Unity and Diversity in the New Testament: The Possibility of Systematic Theology.” Pages 65-95, 368-75 in
Scripture and Truth.
Edited by D. A. Carson and J. D. Woodbrige. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1983.
____________. “New Testament Theology.” Pages 796—814 in
Dictionary of the Later New Testament and Its Developments.
Edited by R. P. Martin and P. H. Davids. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 1998.
Dunn, J. D. G.
Unity and Diversity in the New Testament: An Inquiry into the Character of Earliest Christianity.
London: SCM, 1990.
Fuller, D. P.
The Unity of the Bible.
Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1992.
Furnish, V. P. “Development in Paul's Thought.”
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
38 (1970): 289-303.
Goldsworthy, G.
According to Plan: The Unfolding Revelation of God in the Bible.
Leicester, UK: InterVarsity,1991.
Guthrie, D.
New Testament Theology.
Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 1981.
Hengel, M.
The Four Gospels and the One Gospel of Jesus.
Valley Forge: Trinity Press International, 2000.
Köstenberger, A. J. “Diversity and Unity in the New Testament.” Pages 144—58 in
Biblical Theology: Retrospect and Prospect.
Edited by S. J. Hafemann. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2002.
___________. “The Gospel for All Nations.” Pages 201—19 in
Faith Comes by Hearing: A Response to Inclusivism.
Edited by R. A. Peterson and C. W. Morgan. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2008.
Ladd, G. E.
A Theology of the New Testament.
Rev. ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993.
Lohse, E. “Changes of Thought in Pauline Theology? Some Reflections on Paul's Ethical Teaching in the Context of His Theology.” Pages 146—60 in
Theology and Ethics in Paul and His Interpreters: Essays in Honor of Victor Paul Furnish.
Edited by E. H. Lovering Jr. and J. L. Sumney. Nashville: Abingdon, 1996.
Longenecker, R. N. “On the Concept of Development in Pauline Thought.” Pages 195—207 in
Perspectives on Evangelical Theology.
Edited by K. S. Kantzer and S. N. Gundry. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979.
Marshall, I. H. “Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earlier Christianity.”
Themelios
2/1 (1976): 5-14.
___________.
New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel.
Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2004.
Matera, F. J.
New Testament Theology: Exploring Diversity and Unity.
Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2007.
Morgan, R. “The Historical Jesus and the Theology of the New Testament.” Pages 187—206 in
The Glory of Christ in the New Testament: Studies in Christology in Memory of George Bradford Caird.
Edited by L. D. Hurst and N. T. Wright. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.
Porter, S. E.
The Paul of Acts.
Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 115. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 1999.
Reumann, J.
Variety and Unity in New Testament Thought.
Oxford: University Press, 1991.
Schlatter, A.
New Testament Theology.
Vol. 1:
The History of the Christ.
Vol. 2:
The Theology of the Apostles.
Translated by A. J. Köstenberger. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1997, 1999.
Schreiner, T. R.
New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ.
Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008.
Scobie, C. H. H.
The Ways of Our God: An Approach to Biblical Theology.
Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003.
Stuhlmacher, P.
Biblische Theologie des New Testament. 2
vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1992, 1999.
Thielman, F.
Theology of the New Testament: A Canonical and Synthetic Approach.
Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2005.