Suppressed Inventions and Other Discoveries (29 page)

According to Gerson, the way to prevent cancer was by ". . . preventing damage to the liver. The basic measure of prevention is not to eat the damaged, dead, poisoned food which we bring into our bodies. Every day, day by day, we poison our bodies." Gerson's nutritional therapy worked on the principle that in order to cure a serious disorder such as cancer, treatment of the symptoms of the disease was not sufficient to restore the patient to health. He wrote in his book A Cancer Therapy: Results of Fifty Cases in 1958 that the "whole body" or "whole metabolism" had to be treated to "correct all the vital processes" in order to effect a cure.

The basis of Dr. Gerson's nutritional programme to strengthen the body to allow healing to take place is a diet comprised mostly of raw foods, especially freshly-made fruit and vegetable juices, green salad, and a soup cooked at a very low heat. Some cooked fruit and vegetables are also permitted in the first six weeks of his dietary plan. However, no canned, salted, pickled, bleached, sulphured, frozen or smoked foods in short no denatured foods of any kind—are permitted at any time during the Gerson regime.
The therapy Dr. Gerson devised was also designed to be high in potassium and low in sodium. The soup mentioned above is especially high in potassium, which helped to correct a too-high ratio of sodium to potassium suffered by many people with cancer, especially those with moderate or advanced cancer. Dr. Gerson discovered that restoring a favourable potassium/sodium balance could reverse some of the cell damage caused by an excess of sodium.

The function of the freshly-made fruit and vegetable juices in the programme is to detoxify the body and provide oxidising enzymes to assist in the rehabilitation of the liver. Other techniques to support the liver and detoxify the body are also used in the programme, including coffee enemas to stimulate the flow of bile and safely dispose of toxins, the juice of raw calves' liver, and injections of crude liver extract. (Liver juices and extracts are no longer used by people following a Gerson programme in the 1990s, due to the contamination of the liver with pesticides and bacteria. Spirulina and carrot juice may be taken instead to provide nutritional iron and pro-vitamin A. Desiccated liver tablets may be used instead, since these are thought to contain fewer toxins.)

Gerson also supplemented the diet of people in his care with additional potassium salts, as well as organic and inorganic iodine. Fluoride-contaminated water or other products are forbidden because of fluoride's toxicity to valuable enzymes. Animal fats are excluded. Dr. Gerson's programme was originally completely free of fats and oils (excluding the small amount of fat present in the calves' liver), but after experimentation, Gerson modified his programme to include a small amount of flax seed oil to supply essential fatty acids.

After six weeks of detoxification using the diet and supplements outlined above, patients in Gerson's care graduated to a diet which included small amounts of the protein foods such as yogurt, cottage cheese, and natural buttermilk. (Foods containing protein had been previously restricted to allow the body adequate time to detoxify and begin to break down tumour tissue.)

These, then, were the basic theories and therapy which Dr. Gerson had developed by the time that he came to the United States in 1936. In January 1948—almost twenty years after he had first successfully treated cancer in Germany in 1928—he went to work at New York's Gotham Hospital. However, Gerson's efforts to publish his discoveries consistently met with a negative response from the publishers of medical journals.

His article "Cancer, A Deficiency Disease" was rejected by the New York State Journal of Medicine in 1943. The next year another paper, "Dietic Treatment of Malignant Tumours," was also rejected by every medical journal to which it had been sent. In 1945, he finally succeeded in publishing "Dietary Considerations in Malignant Neoplastic Disease," which appeared in the November-December edition of Review of Gastroenterology. His work might have been destined to obscurity forever, but for an investigative reporter who discovered the good doctor working quietly to cure cancer with his most unorthodox therapies, and determined to bring Dr. Gerson's life-saving discoveries to public attention.

Raymond Swing, an ABC radio journalist, proposed that Dr. Gerson be called to testify before the Senate which was debating a bill to allocate funds for cancer research. Raymond Swing's efforts on Dr. Gerson's behalf were successful and the doctor, together with five of his patients, went before a sub-committee of the Senate in 1946 and told their stories. All of the five patients had had a positive response to Dr. Gerson's therapy, and had been told by their former doctors that there was no longer any hope for them. They included: a woman with breast cancer who had undergone mastectomy and radiation treatments to no avail. Her cancer had disappeared after nine months of the Gerson therapy; a fifteen year old girl had been paralysed by a tumour in her spinal cord. Her tumour had vanished after 8 months of Gerson therapy; a soldier with an inoperable tumour which had grown from his neck into his skull, making radiation treatment impossible because of the risk of brain damage—a year after commencing the Gerson therapy he was completely free of cancer; and a woman who had suffered from a malignant sarcoma. Prior to beginning the Gerson therapy, she had large tumours in her groin, neck and abdomen. After a year on the Gerson therapy she was completely free of cancer.

Unfortunately, Dr. Gerson's successful treatment of these and other patients who otherwise had been doomed to die did not earn him the respect and recognition from the medical community that he deserved. Quite to the contrary. The public display of Dr. Gerson's successful but unorthodox treatment of cancer victims further alienated him from mainstream medicine. An abusive editorial in the Journal of the American Medical Association in November 1946 followed Dr. Gerson's appearance in front of the Senate sub-committee. The editorial celebrated the unfortunate fact that, despite the amazing and incredibly newsworthy results of Dr. Gerson's therapy, his presentation before the Senate subcommittee had received "little, if any newspaper publicity"—as if the lack of mainstream publicity itself was an indictment of the treatment! The editor further denigrated his work by splitting hairs as to what precisely constituted a "cure." Dr. Gerson, he wrote, "admits lack of any actual cure, claiming only that patients seemed improved in health and that some tumours were delayed in growth or became smaller." In one final coup against Dr. Gerson, who for years had been submitting work to the journal for publication without success, he wrote that "the journal has on several occasions requested Dr. Gerson supply details of the method of treatment but has thus far received no satisfactory reply."

This editorial was just the beginning of a concentrated campaign of harassment against Dr. Gerson and the people who were working with him in his Research Foundation. Between 1946 and 1954, Dr. Gerson was investigated five times by the Medical Society of the County of New York. After each investigation, the Research Foundation requested that the investigators give a statement, and in each case the request was denied.

However, in 1948, Dr. Gerson and his Research Foundation were left in no doubt as to what the medical establishment thought of them when a review of their work was published in the Journal of the AMA. The review was entitled "Frauds and Fables," in which the journal suggested that Gerson was a fraud. The Research Foundation threatened to sue the AMA and were able to stop reprints of the damaging article. However, as a consequence of the damaging publicity, Gotham Hospital refused to allow Dr. Gerson to work on its premises after 1950.

Moreover, Dr. Gerson was not able to restore his good name within the medical profession in America. It became impossible for him to publish a single piece of research in any medical journal from the end of 1949 until the end of his life, despite (or perhaps because of) his thousands of success stories. In addition, Gerson was prevented from presenting patients at a hearing of the House of Commerce Committee in 1953, which was investigating therapies for cancer and other diseases. Despite requests from his patients that he be allowed to present his findings, as well as a letter from Dr. Gerson himself, the chairman of the committee failed to offer Dr. Gerson the chance to demonstrate his findings.

With his work increasingly under fire in the United States, Dr. Gerson went to Europe in order to publish his discoveries. A German journal, Medizinische Klinik, published two of the reports which U.S. journals had refused to print: "Cancer: A Problem of Metabolism" and "No Cancer in Normal Metabolism." He was also invited to the University of Zurich in 1952, after attending the International Cancer Congress in Berchtesgaden.

When Dr. Gerson returned to the United States from Europe, however, he faced still more hurdles. In 1957, he was investigated by the Licensing Board of New York State. Even more damaging to his work, his malpractice insurance was terminated. In 1958 Gerson was suspended from the Medical Society of the State of New York, and the laboratories which Dr. Gerson's Research Foundation used for X-rays, blood, and urine analyses were warned that should they continue to do work for Dr. Gerson and his patients, they would be put out of business. Dr. Gerson died in 1959.

The harassment of Dr. Gerson by the medical establishment, while both unethical and immoral, is understandable within a commercial context. If Gerson's methods of curing cancer had replaced the "conventional" cancer treatments, the profession's investment in expensive equipment such as surgical facilities and radiation treatment apparatus would have been lost, to say nothing of prestige.

However, it was not just Dr. Gerson and his colleagues who had to endure harassment. Patients who sought out the Gerson treatment in preference to orthodox medicine were also harassed by members of the orthodox medical community. In many cases, doctors harangued patients so persistently that they abandoned Gerson's therapy—even when it appeared to be helping them—and accepted conventional medical treatment for their cancer. These tactics compelled Gerson to write to a close friend in 1957 that:

The most difficult and inhuman part of the measures taken against me is that the physicians approach the best and almost completely cured patients and try to have them returned to their hospitals. Here they manage with orthodox treatments to kill them. I lose in this manner somewhere between 25 and 30 percent of my best cases.

This sort of harassment of people using the Gerson therapy occurred even after Dr. Gerson's death, with doctors going as far as phoning patients in residence at the La Gloria Hospital in Mexico, which was set up in 1977 to provide Dr. Gerson's therapy on an in-patient basis.

In 1998, the climate of mainstream medical hostility towards Dr. Gerson's unorthodox therapy programme has not changed. "Anti-quackery" laws forbid the practise of the Gerson therapy in California and other states of the U.S. by medical doctors. People with cancer who reject the options of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy offered to them by the major cancer hospitals must either struggle to pursue a Gerson-type programme in their own homes without adequate medical support, or find the money necessary to travel to Mexico and pay for treatment at La Gloria Hospital, near Tijuana.

The parents of a growing number of children with cancer are even less able to choose what they believe is the most suitable treatment option for their son and daughter, since by law all children in the United States who have cancer must be given chemotherapy, or their parents may be imprisoned. Even a demonstrable improvement in the child's condition using non-toxic methods of cancer treatment will not forestall the application of this barbarous law.

Gerson's therapy remains on the "Unproven Methods List" of the American Cancer Society, despite ample evidence in Dr. Gerson's book A Cancer Therapy: The Results of Fifty Cases, as well as testimony from former cancer patients whose cancerous conditions have been healed by Gerson's techniques. Dr. Gerson's therapy has now been practised for over 60 years, and patients of La Gloria Hospital experience an average improvement rate of 80 percent in early to moderate cancer and even more amazingly a 40-50 percent rate of improvement in people with so-called "terminal" cancer. Other benefits of the Gerson therapy for cancer sufferers included a marked reduction in pain, and also control of the acute infections which often led to the death of cancer patients. (The clinic does however, have a general rule of not accepting people who have previously undergone chemotherapy, since due to the damage that chemotherapeutic drugs inflict upon the liver and other organs of the body, sustained improvement in the condition of these cancer patients is much less likely. The medical director has also stated that people with tumours which have spread into the brain and begun to damage the delicate regulatory mechanisms within it are also less likely than most patients to respond to the Gerson treatment.)

In 1995, the Gerson Research Association and the Cancer Prevention and Control Program of the University of California published the results of a fifteen-year retrospective study which evaluated the success of Gerson therapy in treating malignant melanoma.

The results of this study showed that people with melanoma who used Gerson therapy survived longer than people using conventional therapy.
One most encouraging finding was that 100 percent of 14 people with stage I and II (localized melanoma) survived for five years, compared to 79 percent of 15,798 people who did not follow the Gerson program.
For people with melanoma classified as IIIA and IIIB (regionally metastasized), 70 percent of 33 Gerson patients lived for five years, compared to 41 percent of 134 melanoma patients under the care of the Fachklinik Hornheide.
Of those patients with melanoma which had metastasized to distant lymph nodes, skin areas or subcutaneous tissue—39 percent of 18 Gerson patients were alive after five years. By comparison, just 6 percent of 194 patients under the care of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group survived five years.
Despite these impressive results of Dr. Gerson's therapies, mainstream medicine is even less receptive to his ideas and treatment plans now than when he began publishing the results of his work in the United States in the 1940s.
In January 1945, the then manager-director of the American Cancer Society Mr. C. C. Little wrote (to a doctor):