Supernatural (59 page)

There is an equally striking correspondence between the ‘higher order’ described by mental patients and the entities Swedenborg calls ‘angels’.
The angels are kind, helpful and wise.
The reason that they are so sparing of words is that man’s ‘interior mind’ does not think in words, but in ‘universals which comprise many particulars’—that is to say, in intuitive insights.
They are, in short, a right-brain function.
Or, to put it another way, ‘angels’ communicate through the right cerebral hemisphere, and prefer symbols—we may recollect Van Dusen’s gaspipe fitter who was shown hundreds of universal symbols in an hour by his ‘higher order’ mentor.
Swedenborg also notes that ‘higher order’ spirits can see the lower ones, but not vice versa—which again corresponded to Van Dusen’s own experience.

Van Dusen was inclined to wonder why ‘higher-order’ hallucinations are so much rarer than those of the ‘lower order’ (approximately one fifth as many).
Swedenborg suggests an answer.
Angels, he says, possess the very interior of man, and their ‘influx is tacit’.
So they are simply less apparent than the hostile spirits, who make sure their presence is recognised.
What are we to make of all this?
Both Crabtree and Van Dusen insist that they try to function solely as observers, implying that the reader can choose which explanation he prefers—spirits or the unconscious mind.
But we have seen that Van Dusen is inclined to wonder why, if the ‘lower order’ is merely the patient’s unconscious, they should show such consistent hostility to religion.
And how can we explain the following story from Crabtree’s book?
An acquaintance of Crabtree’s called Pat was invited by a girlfriend to spend a weekend at her grandparents’ farm.
The grandparents turned out to be dabblers in the occult, and parts of the house, such as the attic, gave Pat peculiar feelings of uneasiness.
Later, the grandparents suggested that Pat should try automatic writing, which she did with some misgivings.
The moment she took the pen in her hand and relaxed, she slipped into a drugged, trance-like state, and experienced a numbness in her hand and arm.
She seemed to see a woman who appeared behind her; the woman had a doll-like face, and wore a long mauve gown.
Pat felt as though her energies were being usurped by this woman, and suddenly her hand wrote: ‘Elizabeth Barrett Browning here.’
(Her hosts had earlier mentioned Elizabeth Barrett Browning.) There followed a long message which included the information that Mrs Browning and Robert were having difficulty getting used to their ‘new surroundings’.
Slowly, the energy seemed to diminish until the writing stopped.
But Pat felt oddly dissociated for the rest of the day.

Later that evening a second session was held.
This time several different ‘entities’ used Pat’s hand to write, and the messages were of a ‘coarse nature’.
At a third session, ‘Mrs Browning’ answered the question ‘Where do you live now?’
‘Everywhere .
.
.
nowhere.
We are you and you are us.’
After that she seemed to become very cagey.

Then the handwriting changed to that of Pat’s deceased brother Tom, and there was a message of love and comfort.
But when Pat said how moved she felt, her girlfriend snapped: ‘That wasn’t Tom.
They’ll pretend to be anyone.’
Evidently she knew a great deal about ‘lower-order’ entities.

Later, one of the grandparents remarked that some entity no longer seemed to be in the house; it had left because it was attracted to Pat’s aura.
Pat was disturbed at the thought that she had been used as a kind of sponge to soak up some dubious force.

Back home again, Pat began to hear ‘Elizabeth’ ’s voice inside
her head, and she felt oddly detached from reality.
‘Elizabeth’ tried to persuade her to do more automatic writing, but she felt that if she did this, she would only be consolidating the ‘spirit’s’ hold.
‘We need you’, said ‘Elizabeth’.
‘If you refuse to speak to us we shall live in your room, in your walls.’

Pat’s girlfriend had told her that if she ignored the entity, it would soon go away.
She found that it was not as easy as that.
She tried reading a trashy novel and ignoring the voice, but a sensation that someone was pressing her face against her own made it hard to concentrate.
In bed she tossed and turned so violently that she had to remake the bed several times.
But she felt that her ‘starvation’ technique was the right one.
After a few days, her ability to concentrate began to return; slowly, little by little, the influence of the entities (for she felt there was more than one) began to diminish.
Finally, she had the impression that she could actually see the woman in the mauve dress receding, turning first into a mauve mass, then into a ‘low grade vibration’.

Pat may have been very suggestible, and her unconscious mind may have created the woman in mauve, but it must be admitted that this explanation seems less convincing than the alternative—that Pat had willingly opened herself to one of the ‘lower order’, and had to extricate herself as best she could.
Descriptions of this type of possession are familiar in ‘occult’ literature.
The American researcher Alan Vaughan describes how he himself became ‘possessed’ for a time.
He had bought himself a ouija board, to amuse a friend who was convalescing.
Soon he was receiving all kinds of messages, some of which seemed to convey information that was not available to Vaughan’s own unconscious mind—for example, when the radio announced the death of the newspaper columnist Dorothy Kilgallen, from a heart attack, they asked the board if this was true; it replied that she had actually died of poison.
Ten days later, this proved to be true.
(It was suspected—and still is—that she died because she knew too much about the John F.
Kennedy assassination.) Then, to his alarm, Vaughan found that a spirit who called itself ‘Nada’ (‘nothing’—recalling ‘Elizabeth’ ‘s answer to the question about where she lived) had ‘got inside his head’.
‘I could hear her voice repeating the same phrases over and over again’—in the typical manner of the ‘lower order’.
When asked about this, the board replied: ‘Awful consequences—possession.’

A friend who understood such matters undertook to help Vaughan, and another ‘spirit’ took possession of his hand and made him write a message: ‘Each of us has a spirit while living.
Do not meddle with the spirits of the dead.’
Then the spirit seemed to cause an uprising of energy in Vaughan’s body which pushed both ‘Nada’ and the helpful entity out of the top of Vaughan’s head:

‘I felt a tremendous sense of elation and physical wellbeing .
.
.
My mind began to race in some extended dimension that knew no confines of time or space.
For the first time, I began to sense what was going on in other people’s minds, and, to my astonishment, I began to sense the future through some kind of extended awareness .
.
.’
¹

Here again, we can see that Vaughan’s account seems to tally closely with what Swedenborg had to say about angels and spirits.
‘Nada’ repeated the same phrases over and over again, as the ‘lower order’ always do.
She identified herself as the wife of a Nantucket sea captain, and Vaughan remarks that she seemed to resent the fact that he was alive and she was dead.
The entity that helped to push ‘Nada’ out of Vaughan’s head sounds very much like one of Swedenborg’s angels.

But could not both entities have been a product of Vaughan’s ‘right brain’, as Julian Jaynes suggests?
This is conceivable; yet again, there
does
seem to be a distinction between the manifestations of the right brain, and ‘lower order’ entities.
The right brain is the intuitive self—the aspect of us that provides insight and ‘inspiration’—such as the tunes that ‘walked into’ Mozart’s head.
It has better things to do than repeat the same stupid phrase over and over again.

The distinction can be seen clearly in a case I have described elsewhere,
²
that of Brad Absetz, an American teacher living in Finland, who accidentally stumbled upon the trick of establishing contact with his ‘other self.
After the death of their child from cancer, Brad Absetz’s wife retreated into a state of schizophrenia.
For hours at a time, she would lie on the bed, her eyes closed, struggling with guilt and depression.
Brad would lie there beside her, waiting for her to emerge from these sessions of gloomy introspection so he could comfort and encourage her.
He lay totally alert, waiting for the slightest movement that would indicate that she was returning to normal awareness.
Yet clearly, a man who lies on a bed for hours at a time will drift into a state of relaxation.
One day, as he lay there in this combined state of relaxation and alertness, he experienced a curious sense of inner freedom, of release from the body, almost as if floating clear of the bed.
Then he noticed an impulse in the muscles of his arm, as if it wanted to move.
Brad mentally gave his arm ‘permission to move’, and it floated up into the air.
Soon both arms were making spontaneous movements, while he looked on as a bystander.

In the dining hall, where buffet meals were served, his hands showed a disposition to select food for themselves; for several weeks, he allowed them to select the food they preferred—it was seldom what he would have chosen himself—and noticed that he began to lose weight, and to feel fitter than ever before.
His ‘hand’ later used crayons and paints to create an extraordinary series of paintings, and to make metal sculptures.
It also began to write poems in free-verse form, and these poems were remarkable for a certain clarity and purity of language.

What had happened is that the right-brain self had begun to express itself; we might say that in the parliament of his mind, the member for the unconscious had worked up the courage to start making speeches.
Psychologists refer to the right brain as the ‘non-dominant hemisphere’; in most of us, it behaves like a suppressed housewife who never dares to utter her own opinion.
Brad’s hours of quiescence had taught her to overcome her shyness.

One day when he took up a pencil to allow his hand to write, the handwriting was quite different from his own.
A woman named herself and briefly introduced herself.
Brad’s immediate reaction was a powerful sense of rejection.
He pushed the paper away, and said forcefully: ‘I will not be a mouthpiece for anyone but myself.’
The ‘communicator’ went away and did not return.
Here we seem to have a clear distinction between the ‘voice’ of the right brain and some external communicator or spirit.

In short, whether we accept it or not, it seems there is a
prima facie
case for the existence of disembodied entities that can, under certain circumstances, ‘get inside the heads’ of human beings.
When this happens ‘by invitation’—that is, when the human being goes into a trance and allows himself—or herself—to be used by the entity, it is known as mediumship.
When it happens involuntarily, as in the case of Alan Vaughan, it is known as possession.

The case that first drew Adam Crabtree’s attention to the phenomenon dated from the last decade of the 19th century, and had been described in a pamphlet called
Begone Satan,
by the Rev.
Carl Vogel.
In 1896, a 14-year-old Wisconsin girl named Anna Ecklund began to be troubled by a desire to commit what she considered ‘unspeakable sexual acts’, and by an inability to enter Catholic churches, complicated by a desire to attack holy objects.
Her problems were ignored for sixteen years, then Reisinger, a Capuchin monk from the nearby community of St Anthony at Marathon, performed an exorcism which brought relief.
But it was only temporary.
In 1928—when Anna was 46—he decided to try again, this time at the convent of Earling, Iowa.
The results of the 23-day exorcism were spectacular, and many of the nuns were so exhausted by the appalling goings-on that they had to be transferred to another convent.

Before the exorcism began, a number of the strongest nuns held Anna down on the bed.
But as soon as Reisinger began to speak, Anna’s body shot up into the air and landed high up on the wall, apparently holding on ‘with catlike grip’.
She was dragged down to the bed again, and as soon as Reisinger began again, began to howl and screech so loudly that people in the street ran to the convent to find out what was happening.
Then various ‘demons’ spoke through the girl in different voices, although her mouth did not move.
Her face became twisted, and her whole body contorted into extraordinary positions.
Her head swelled and became bright red.
She also vomited large quantities of ‘foul matter’.

She also displayed another common phenomenon of possession: speaking in languages of which she had no conscious knowledge; when the exorcist spoke in German or Latin, she would reply in the same language.
When food was sprinkled surreptitiously with holy water, she knew it instantly.

A ‘demon’ who identified himself as Beelzebub told the exorcist that he and his cohorts had been invited to enter the girl by her father, who had been infuriated by her rejection of his attempts at incest.
The exorcist succeeded in ‘summoning’ the father, who confirmed this story.
His common-law wife also spoke through Anna’s mouth, and admitted to killing four of her babies (she was probably referring to abortions).
During all this time, Anna herself was ‘unconscious’, so in fact the spirits were speaking through her as through a medium.

During the course of the exorcism, the pastor was involved in a strange car accident.
And on the twenty-third day, Anna’s body shot erect off the bed so that only her heels remained in contact.
Then she collapsed on her knees, and a terrible voice repeated the names of the departing spirits, until it seemed to die away in the distance.
As a kind of parting shot, the room filled with an appalling stench.
At this point, Anna opened her eyes and smiled.

Crabtree interviewed the monk who had translated Vogel’s pamphlet into English, and who was able to confirm the details.
So when he encountered the case of Sarah Worthington, he found it easier to accept that he was dealing with a case of ‘possession’.

In fact, Crabtree insists that he merely accepts possession as a working hypothesis—a hypothesis that happens, in fact, to work.
He is saying, in effect, that his cases might really involve some strange, complex activity of the unconscious—like ‘multiple personality’—but that by treating it as possession, he can cure his patients.