political commissars, were to be kil ed on the spot.46 Unlike in the case of
Western Europe, Himmler would now be ‘granted special responsibilities
on behalf of the Führer’ in the rear area of the army where the SS would act
‘independently’ and on its ‘own responsibility’. In this way, the Wehrmacht
leadership believed it could keep its distance from the mass murders that
were expected to occur on an even larger scale than had been the case in
Poland.47
Negotiations between Heydrich and the General Quartermaster of the
army, Eduard Wagner, about the exact nature of SS and Wehrmacht
collaboration in the forthcoming campaign against the Soviet Union
began in February 1941 and intensified in mid-March when Heydrich
returned from a brief holiday on the Baltic coast. The atmosphere was far
more cordial than during their previous discussions in the lead-up to the
Polish campaign of 1939. The draft agreement of late March 1941 speci-
fied that the ‘implementation of certain security policy tasks’ required the
‘deployment of special commandos of the Security Police’ in the opera-
tional area.48
The exact task of these special units was only vaguely described: in the
rear operational areas near the front, the task forces would be in charge of
the ‘identification and combating of subversive activities against the
Reich’. The
Einsatzkommandos
were to fulfil their tasks ‘on their own
responsibility’, receiving their orders for ‘executive measures against the
civilian population’ directly from Heydrich. At the same time, they were
subject to the army’s authority in all matters of ‘transport, supply and
lodging’. Phrased differently, Heydrich and Wagner had agreed that the
intended mass liquidations of Communist functionaries in the army’s rear
would be the sole responsibility of the
Einsatzgruppen
, which, in turn,
could rely on the Wehrmacht’s logistical support. Close co-operation with
the army was to be ensured through an SS task-force liaison officer on the
staff of each army. The military would be kept informed of all of Heydrich’s
orders and instructions to the
Einsatzgruppen
.49
186
HITLER’S HANGMAN
On the same day, 26 March, Göring asked Heydrich to produce a
brief memorandum for the army, informing them of the ‘dangerous
nature’ of the Soviet Union’s political commissars, secret police and
Jews, so that they would ‘understand who they will be putting up against
the wall’.50
The negotiations between the SS and the army were still under way
when unexpected events occurred in South-eastern Europe. On 27 March
the pro-German Yugoslav government under Dragiša Cvetković was
toppled by a military coup, giving rise to fears in Berlin that the new rulers
in Belgrade would join the Allied war effort against Nazi Germany. Both
the army and the SS leadership hurriedly made preparations for an impro-
vised attack on Yugoslavia. Simultaneously, Hitler decided to invade
Greece, which was already at war with Germany’s ally, Italy, and had
successfully resisted the Italian advance with the aid of its British ally. On
6 April the Wehrmacht marched into Yugoslavia, which capitulated less
than two weeks later. Greece was occupied by German troops by the end
of April. Heydrich hastily requested Himmler’s permission to join the
advancing armed forces and briefly participated in the attack as a fighter
pilot, but the swiftness of the German victory prevented him from having
any major involvement in combat.51
Two
Einsatzgruppen
of the Security Police and the SD followed the
advancing German troops into the Balkans – one in Yugoslavia, the other
in Greece. The question of what role Heydrich’s Security Police and SD
should play in this improvised war was handled pragmatically on the basis
of the draft agreement that Heydrich and Wagner had worked out in late
March, although with one small but highly significant modification: the
list of persons whom Heydrich’s men were to arrest included not only
‘emigrés, saboteurs and terrorists’, but also the far less delimited group of
‘Communists and Jews’. From Heydrich’s point of view, the deployment
of SS
Einsatzgruppen
in the Balkan campaign was a major improvement
when compared to the setbacks experienced the previous year during the
occupation of Denmark, France, Belgium and the Netherlands.52
On 16 April, one day before the surrender of Yugoslavia, Heydrich and
Himmler met with Wagner in a hotel room in the Austrian city of Graz.
On the basis of the draft of 26 March, they reached final agreement on a
‘regulation of the deployment of the Security Police and the SD within
the framework of the army’ for the impending war against the Soviet
Union. Although ‘Communists and Jews’ were not expressly mentioned in
the final document, all of the participants in the meeting were fully aware
would be the main target of the conflict ahead.53
Heydrich had not waited for the conclusion of this agreement to start
his own preparations for the war against the Soviet Union. Throughout
AT W A R W I T H T H E W O R L D
187
March, he and his chief of personnel, Bruno Streckenbach, selected
leading officers for the originally envisaged three
Einsatzgruppen
, each of
which was to follow one army group into the Soviet Union. Eventually, a
fourth task force was added for the Romanian front. Task Force A, led by
Dr Franz Walter Stahlecker, was to follow Army Group North through
the Baltic States. Task Force B, under the command of Arthur Nebe, was
instructed to advance with Army Group Centre through Belorussia and
central Russia all the way to Moscow. Task Forces C and D, under the
command of Dr Dr Otto Rasch and Dr Otto Ohlendorf, were to operate
in the Ukraine, Romania and the Crimea. Each of the task forces was, in
turn, subdivided into two special commandos operating directly behind
the front and two task force commandos operating in their rear. Compared
with the 3 million Wehrmacht soldiers that were about to plunge into
Soviet territory, Heydrich’s
Einsatzgruppen
were almost insignificant in
size: in total, the four task forces numbered only 3,000 to 3,200 men,
composed of members of the SD and the Security Police, and also of
ordinary policemen and members of the Waffen-SS.54
As in previous campaigns, the leadership of the
Einsatzgruppen
was
dominated by highly educated Nazis from Heydrich’s RSHA empire,
most of them under the age of forty. Of the seventeen leading officers of
Einsatzgruppe A, for example, eleven were lawyers, nine of them with
doctoral degrees. Thirteen of the men had been members of the Nazi
Party or one of its affiliated organizations before 1933 and all of them had
been long-standing members of the SS and police apparatus prior to
the outbreak of war in 1939. Whatever their previous postings, many of
the leading officers of the
Einsatzgruppen
had risen through Heydrich’s
SD and presumably impressed him not just because of their widely shared
ideological views on Jews, Bolsheviks and Slavs, but because they exempli-
fied the RSHA’s dominant ethos of energetic ruthlessness, initiative and
activism. Throughout May and early June, those assigned to the task forces
assembled in the border police training schools in Pretzsch and the neigh-
bouring towns of Düben and Bad Schmiedeberg in Saxony where
Heydrich repeatedly visited them before the invasion.55
Himmler and Heydrich met several times in late May and early June to
finalize their preparations for Operation Barbarossa.56 No detailed records
of these meetings have survived, but it is likely that they discussed the
overall SS strategy for the war against the Soviet Union, which was
revealed two days later. On 11 June, Himmler gathered the entire SS
leadership – including Heydrich, Daluege, Wolff and the three designated
higher SS and police leaders for the occupied Soviet territories, Hans-
Adolf Prützmann, Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski and Friedrich Jeckeln –
for a four-day conference at the Wewelsburg, a medieval castle near
188
HITLER’S HANGMAN
Paderborn in Westphalia that Himmler wished to develop into the cultural
and spiritual centre of the SS.57
During this meeting, the SS leadership revelled in the forthcoming
possibilities for demographic engineering that would dwarf the experi-
ments of the previous eighteen months. Himmler referred to an estimated
death toll of 30 million people among the populations of Eastern Europe.
His speech reflected the murderous mood that prevailed within the
highest SS leadership in the days and weeks preceding the attack on the
Soviet Union. They were entirely aware that they were about to embark on
a campaign of historically unprecedented and racially motivated extermi-
nation.58
These murderous plans of truly genocidal proportions were by no means
confined to the top echelons of the SS leadership. Five weeks earlier, on 2
May 1941, the state secretaries of various ministries had met with General
Georg Thomas, head of the War Economy and Armaments Office, in
order to discuss the economic preparations for the war against the Soviet
Union. They agreed that the invading Wehrmacht would have to be
supplied with food from within Russia if Germany was to win the war.
Furthermore, agricultural products essential for the provision of the home
front such as oil and grain would have to be shipped back to Germany. ‘In
so doing’, the meeting’s protocol laconically stated, ‘x million people’ in the
conquered Soviet Union ‘will doubtless starve to death’. Three weeks later
the target group of potential victims of the so-called hunger plan was
further specified to include ‘many tens of millions’ of Soviet citizens.59
It is likely, though impossible to prove, that the abstract figure of ‘tens of
mil ions’ of people who would have to die to secure Germany’s victory
entered Himmler’s and Heydrich’s mindset through one of the key figures
present at the May conference: Herbert Backe. Born in 1896 to German
parents in Georgia, then part of the Russian Empire, Backe was interned
as an enemy alien in 1914 before moving to Germany at the end of the
Great War. In the 1920s, Backe studied for a diploma (and later a doctorate)
in agriculture, first at the University of Göttingen, then in Hanover. In
his doctoral thesis Backe explained the inevitable decline of Soviet Russia
as a result of racial inferiority and argued that Germany had a natural right
to occupy the uncultivated Slavic lands in the East. Some of Backe’s
published articles caught the attention of Walther Darré, the future
Nazi Minister for Food and Agriculture. He invited Backe to join the
Nazi Party, which he did in 1931. Three years after the Nazis’ seizure
of power, Backe was recommended to Göring, who was looking for an
agriculture expert for his office of the Four-Year Plan, a position
that put Backe in direct competition with his former mentor. Darré. It was
at that time that Heydrich and Backe met. The former was particularly
AT W A R W I T H T H E W O R L D
189
impressed with and inspired by Backe’s unreserved radicalism. Heydrich
and Backe became close friends and they frequently met for dinner at
their houses in Berlin.60 Backe had been working on the hunger plan in
his capacity as state secretary in the Reich Food Ministry since the
beginning of 1941 and was also responsible for drafting the so-cal ed
Twelve Commandments for future administrators in the occupied East.
Backe emphasized that ‘we wish not to convert the Russians to National
Socialism but to make them our tools . . . The Russian has stood poverty,
hunger and austerity for centuries. His stomach is flexible; hence no
false pity!’61
Two days after the meeting of the SS leadership at Wewelsburg Castle,
Heydrich briefed the commanding officers of his SS task forces, first at a
conference in Berlin on 17 June and then again at the closing ceremony at
the border police training school in Pretzsch shortly before the German
attack on the Soviet Union. According to the post-war testimonies of several
Einsatzgruppen
members present at these gatherings, Heydrich spoke of a
mission that demanded ‘unprecedented severity’.62 As the commander of
Task Force D, Otto Ohlendorf, recal ed after the war, Heydrich explicitly
ordered that Communist functionaries and Jews, who in Heydrich’s mind
had amalgamated into a single enemy, were to be executed.63
After the meeting in Berlin on 17 June, one of the designated