What constitutes its classic religious and social agenda? How does it compare and contrast with Protestant fundamentalism? How important is it to understand contemporary Catholicism?
|
Classic Catholic Integralism
|
In the last decades of the nineteenth century Catholicism, like Protestantism, had to come to grips with modernity in the forms of: higher-biblical criticism; the scientific, especially Darwinian, revolution; and the new forces of liberal, bourgeois democracy in Europe with its decided anticlerical stamp and its program of separation of church and state and social progress. Especially after the loss of the Papal States in 1870, European Catholicism felt under siege. Long allied in France with an antirevolutionary monarchist party, the church remained rooted in traditionalist politics. At Vatican I, in defiance of its loss of temporal power, the church escalated its spiritual claims by proclaiming, the doctrine of papal infallibility.
|
Around the turn of the century, a number of Catholic scholars, notably Alfred Loisy in France and George Tyrell and Baron Friedrich von Hügel in England, sought a new Catholic rapprochement with modernity. They combined doctrinal with social modernism, much as liberal Protestantism, at the time, conjoined the social gospel with a project of dialoguein Schliermacher's classic terms, "with the cultural despisers of religion."
|
The modernist movement in Catholicism was a loose, spontaneous movement of scholars in a number of countries, including the United States. None saw themselves as heretics. A very loose connection also existed between the modernist scholars and socially progressive movements open to the ideas of the French Republic (e.g., Marc Sangnier and the Le Sillon movement in France, Romolu Murri's movement for a Catholic socialism in Italy). Generally, the modernists saw their task as, in Loisy's terms, building a "true Catholicism of the future" and constructing a new Catholic apologetic based on the role of religion rather than by appealing to scholastic theology. They distanced themselves from many elements of Protestant higher criticism. Thus, in treating of Adolph von Harnack's discussion of the essence of Christianity, Loisy insisted that: (1) it
|
|