Flight of the Eagle: The Grand Strategies That Brought America From Colonial Dependence to World Leadership (37 page)

Read Flight of the Eagle: The Grand Strategies That Brought America From Colonial Dependence to World Leadership Online

Authors: Conrad Black

BOOK: Flight of the Eagle: The Grand Strategies That Brought America From Colonial Dependence to World Leadership
8.79Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
Polk had sent the senior clerk of the State Department, Nicholas Trist, to negotiate peace terms, and squabbling immediately erupted between him and Scott. Trist was eventually recalled in November, but ignored the fact and negotiated and signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on February 2, 1848. The United States paid a total of about $18,250,000 to Mexico, and Mexico renounced everything north of the Rio Grande, Gila, and Colorado Rivers. It was a gigantic acquest for the United States, 1,193,000 square miles, almost 150 percent of the size of the Louisiana Purchase. The United States had suffered 1,721 dead in action or of wounds, 11,155 who died of disease, 4,102 wounded. The cost to the Treasury was $97.5 million; it was a good deal more onerous proportionately than the War of 1812, but the United States bagged another great chunk of a continent at a knockdown economic cost and with a bearable loss of life.
Polk presented Trist’s treaty to the Senate with an ambiguous endorsement, given that it was unauthorized. The Senate ratified, 38–14, on March 10, 1848, and the opposition was from doughface Democrats led by Buchanan (despite his presence as secretary of state in Polk’s administration), who now wanted to annex the whole of Mexico. It had worked as a splendid, cheap patriotic war after all, though there were absurd aspects to it (Santa Anna’s presence virtually assured that), and much of it, including the peace negotiations, was conducted contrary to orders. The Wilmot Proviso was again defeated, and the Gadsden Purchase of 1853 picked up another 45,000 square miles, for $10 million. It was brilliant strategy by Polk. The growth of slavery was concealed in the glorious martial growth of the nation, and, as a bonus, gold was fortuitously discovered on January 24, 1848, in large quantities at Sutter’s Mill, California, and over 100,000 adventurers and fortune-seekers flooded into the state (as it soon became) from all over the world by the end of 1849. If Polk had bungled the war effort as badly as Madison had, it would have been a disaster (though there was no chance that the Mexicans would prove as militarily proficient as the British and the Canadians). By settling Oregon first and devising a realistic war plan, Polk had gambled successfully, made an immense accretion of territory, and punted the slavery issue forward again for a few years, though the atmosphere in which it was endlessly discussed was becoming steadily more ominous. The awful reckoning slavery always portended could not now be long postponed.
6. THE 1848 ELECTION
 
The United States did not much notice it, but 1848 was a year of revolution and tumult overseas, as the French and German and Italian worlds seethed. In what was called “the Springtime of Europe,” Clemens von Metternich, the Austrian chancellor and foreign minister for 39 years, was sent packing by the mobs in Vienna; Pope Pius IX, just launched into a pontificate of 32 years, was temporarily chased out of Rome by Italian reunificationists; the Orleans monarchy in Paris was driven out and replaced by the Second Republic, led by Napoleon’s nephew; and there were uprisings across Germany and in Poland, Hungary, Denmark, Switzerland, Belgium, and even Brazil. The departure of Metternich, “the Coachman of Europe” and convening genius of the Congress of Vienna, was particularly striking and presaged the rise of a united Germany as Austria’s replacement as the leading German-speaking power, while the upheavals in Italy foretold the unification of that country as well as of Germany.
In America, the slavery issue flared again when Polk, in August 1848, sent the Congress a bill for the organization in Oregon of a territorial government free of slavery. The rising star of the congressional Democrats as the great triumvirs of Clay, Webster, and Calhoun moved through the autumn of their days, Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, responded to southern complaints that the Congress had no power to restrict slavery in the states with a measure keeping Oregon laws in place unless and until its own legislature changed them. This led to a bill extending the Missouri Compromise line, 36°30, all the way to the Pacific, which would reestablish slavery in New Mexico and southern California, where Mexican law had abolished it. Inevitably, Calhoun was soon on his feet making his usual arguments with an acidulous tone made more mordant by the unimaginable idea that Mexican laws would govern in the United States. After seven months of debate, Oregon was set up as a non-slave territory, but all attempts to deal with other areas failed of adoption by one house or other of the Congress. In the last months of his term, Polk would be unable to secure the admission of California or New Mexico as slave-free territories.
By the time this controversy subsided, the presidential campaign was well along. Polk, on his record, could easily have been reelected, but he was not well and declined renomination. (He died three months after the inauguration of his successor.) At the Democratic convention in (inevitably) Baltimore, the New York delegation split between the Van Buren “Barnburners,” who opposed the extension of slavery, and the “Hunkers” led by Marcy, who were doughface appeasers of the “slave power.” The Hunkers pledged their support to the nominees, but Van Buren’s Barnburners did not. Polk declined to exercise any influence, and Jackson was dead (in June 1845, aged 78). The Andrew Jackson of the North (to scale), General Lewis Cass, an expansionist and Anglophobe, was nominated on a platform that replicated that of 1844, denied the right of Congress to consider the status of slavery in the states, and criticized any attempt to bring the status of slavery before the Congress. General William O. Butler of Kentucky was chosen for vice president.
The Whigs met at Philadelphia in June and Clay, Taylor, and Scott were the contenders. The generals had the advantage of lack of any political policy track record, and Taylor was nominated. He shared in the glory of victory in the Mexican War, but was an enemy of Polk, and thus enjoyed the best of both worlds for a Whig. And Senator Millard Fillmore of New York was nominated for vice president, the only one of the four main-party candidates for national office who was not a general, in the aftermath of this fine little war. (The nomination of high-ranking military officers for national office, as has been mentioned, was commonplace, but with two generals from the same party the Democrats were unique overachievers.) There was fear that Clay was too controversial—that though he was the father of the party and the greatest figure in the public life of the country, he was in the overwrought atmosphere not electable, as he had tried three times before unsuccessfully. Anti-slavery motions were voted down and Taylor ran on a thoroughly ambiguous platform. It was well-known that the Whigs were anti-slavery, but they dissembled altogether at this convention. The platform ignored the issues and praised Taylor for his martial and patriotic virtues.
The Barnburners (named after a legendary Dutch New York farmer so stubborn he burned his own barn down to get rid of the rats in it) met at Utica and nominated Van Buren for president and Henry Dodge of Wisconsin for vice president. Anti-slavery militants from other states, especially New Englanders, held a convention at Buffalo later in June, of what was called the Free Soil Party, which effectively adopted the Wilmot Proviso of no extension of slavery. Charles Francis Adams, son of John Quincy Adams, was nominated for vice president. The new party attracted the support of anti-slavery lawyers Charles Sumner of Massachusetts and Salmon P. Chase of Ohio. The Barnburners of Van Buren united with Free Soil, and the combined nominees were Van Buren and Adams (a memorial to the fluidity of political attachments, given Van Buren’s role in assisting Jackson against his running mate’s father). The party demanded full liberty to attack slavery, supported the Wilmot Proviso, favored federal internal improvements and free homesteads for settlers (to expand the country with free states and people), and took the slogan “Free soil, free speech, free labor and free men.” It was a complete affront to the Jackson settlement with the South, and was headed by Jackson’s then chief disciple, who had replaced Calhoun after he was purged as vice president. Van Buren had not taken his disembarkation at the hands of Polk and Jackson like a good sport.
Taylor won the election with the tired Whig version of the Jackson formula, trying, within what were now very narrow parameters, to express some reservations about the expansion of slavery. Taylor received 1.36 million votes to 1.22 million for Cass to 291,000 for Van Buren; he won the popular vote by 47 percent to 43 percent, to 10 percent, with 163 electoral votes to 127 for Cass. Van Buren, whose motives were an indiscernible amalgam of sour grapes and, in the one seriously principled moment of his career, real reservations about slavery and the aggressivity of its advocates, flipped the election to Taylor by taking most of the Democratic vote in New York. He ran 121,000 to 114,000 ahead of Cass in that state and delivered it to Taylor. New York determined the election, as it had in 1844.
As if slavery had not strained the comity of the nation enough, on January 22, 1849, 69 southern members of Congress, with Calhoun as their spokesman, presented an “Address” enumerating the “acts of aggression” of the North—principally exclusion of slavery from territories and making the return of fugitive slaves more difficult.
Polk went into his brief retirement and came to his early death on June 15, 1849, aged only 53. He was far from charismatic and was never a great public figure. He was plucked almost from obscurity as a dark horse in a deadlocked convention, but was an extremely capable and successful president, an able leader of congressional opinion, and a fine war leader. He moved through difficult times and among looming shoals with great skill and agility. He was devious and duplicitous, was indistinct to the country, and was pushing the Jackson formula, the best solution but an inglorious one, so he was not a great president. But he was one of the country’s 10 or 12 ablest and most accomplished presidents. As a political, diplomatic, and war strategist, settling with Britain before dealing with Mexico, obscuring the expansion of slavery in patriotic jingo, conducting one of the most efficiently executed wars in American history, and extending the rather tawdry Jackson settlement (the only method to hand to preserve the Union) into the vast new territory he acquired, and into another decade, he earned more, and more grateful, recognition than he has received from posterity. In straight strategic terms, James K. Polk was as capable as any of the presidents who preceded him except Washington. But this was the last of the brilliant series of American strategic triumphs from the Seven Years’ War on, before the ghastly specter of slavery was finally confronted. There would now be a demeaning decade of mealy mouthed dissembling, shabby compromise, and gamecock provocation before the awful reckoning so long delayed and feared. America and the world that was watching it held their breath.
7. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850
 
It was obvious that the issue of the organization of territorial governments and the admission of new states would be a battleground between the abolitionists, the less fervent dissenters from slavery, the accomplices of the slaveholders, and the defenders of slavery. Each time the issue arose, which was now over a wide range of questions involving the extent of federal authority and the nature of the Constitution, including, ominously, the indissolubility or otherwise of the Union, there was a rending debate, always resolved by an extension of the Jackson formula of the security of slavery in the South and Southwest, and the unacceptability of nullification or any secessionist movement. But the process was one of attrition of nerves, patience, and goodwill. The North tired of the South’s effort, usually through the recondite but lugubrious spokesmanship of Calhoun, to impose equality of influence between the regions despite the steadily swifter demographic and economic advance of the free states, and of the misplaced righteousness with which a clearly despicable and fallacious system was defended. The South was endlessly embarrassed and provoked by northern condescension toward a southern society that the southerners loved, was legitimized by the Constitution, and worked much better and more fairly, they believed, than the northerners, in their smug hypocrisy, acknowledged. And the large group that wasn’t overly excited about the issue, but endorsed the Jackson formula, wearied of the endless and increasingly vituperative circumlocution as the same points were bellowed back and forth ad nauseam.
It would be a mistake to imagine that the majority of northerners were especially disconcerted by the moral implications of slavery. There were many abolitionists who found slavery repugnant, but the great majority of northern Americans had no notions of racial equality and did not consider it the business of the North to dictate to the South how their society was organized, as there were then very few African Americans in free states. Most northerners would have found slavery conceptually distasteful, but there is no evidence that a significant percentage of them wished to force the issue or risk the Union to be rid of slavery. A great mythos developed that the Union armies more than a decade later were trampling through the South prepared, as Julia Ward Howe wrote in the
Battle Hymn of the Republic,
“to die to make men free.” This was just another creation of the mighty American public relations system. But the frustration of the North, that slavery existed in the South but was not offensive enough to do anything about it, aggravated the ambiance of moral back-biting at every opportunity to rail ineffectually about slavery, until the South routinely threatened to secede.
Henry Clay returned to the Senate in 1849 after an absence of seven years, and on January 29, 1850, he presented a series of resolutions designed to resolve the problem durably and replace the constant friction with a clean-cut and practical regime that would give all factions except the abolitionists and secessionists most of what they sought. His resolutions would admit California as a free state; organize the rest of the territory taken from Mexico without restriction on slavery; change the boundary between Texas and New Mexico; assume federally the debt accumulated by Texas, which would renounce any territorial claims on Mexico; abolish the slave trade in the District of Columbia while confirming the legitimacy of slavery itself there; tighten the pursuit and return of fugitive slaves; and proclaim the lack of congressional authority to intervene in the interstate slave trade. The ensuing debate continued for eight months and was the longest, most intense, and at times the most intellectually and oratorically distinguished in the history of the United States Congress, before or since. It marked the summit and the end of the reign of the Clay-Webster-Calhoun Triumvirate. Other great figures made their last great interventions, such as Thomas Hart Benton, and still others who would lead the nation into and through the coming turbulence, such as Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, Salmon P. Chase of Ohio, William H. Seward of New York, and Jefferson Davis of Mississippi (named after a man all three triumvirs had known), shone brightly.

Other books

Low Road by Eddie B. Allen, Jr.
Dark Seduction by Jeffrey, Shaun
A Wanton Tale by Paula Marie Kenny
In My Wildest Fantasies by Julianne Maclean
Experiencing God Day By Day by Richard Blackaby
The Bohemian Murders by Dianne Day