Read Exodus From the Alamo: The Anatomy of the Last Stand Myth Online
Authors: Phillip Thomas Tucker
Tags: #State & Local, #Texas - History - to 1846, #Mexico, #Modern, #General, #United States, #Other, #19th Century, #Alamo (San Antonio; Tex.) - Siege; 1836, #Alamo (San Antonio; Tex.), #Military, #Latin America, #Southwest (AZ; NM; OK; TX), #History
Perhaps an indicator of what was really most relevant for the contemporary U.S. public was expressed in an emotional letter to Mrs. David Crockett not long after the Alamo’s fall. In his letter, Isaac N. Jones, who had met Crockett on the Tennessean’s way to meet his cruel fate at the Alamo, paid a final tribute to the former Congressman, who hated slavery and how it had corrupted the American republic’s most idealistic values: “His military career was short. But though I deeply lament his death, I cannot restrain my American smile at the recollection of the fact that he died as a United States soldier should die, covered with his slain enemy.”
38
Clearly, and like so many others, both then and today, Jones had allowed his imagination to take flight, because he believed that a popular personality of Crockett’s stature should have easily killed a horde of allegedly inferior opponents. Indeed, in the analysis of historian Mark Derr, who explained in part how the last stand myth—by way of a national obsession with Crockett’s demise—became so firmly entrenched in the national consciousness: “By the 1950s, American filmmakers and writers were fixated on the notion that Crockett had died while killing Mexicans, in no small measure because, fresh from the Second World War and the conflict in Korea, they were obsessed with the hero’s death in battle. The growing myth of the Alamo demanded too that all the brave defenders died fighting.”
39
Ironically, the story of the Alamo last stand began to grow to mythological proportions only in the later years of the 19th century. Even a principal leader of the Texas Revolution, realistic-thinking Colonel Francis White Johnson, was bemused by the power of the growing myth: “The old popular tale of Texas that the Alamo was stormed by ten thousand men, of whom a thousand or more were killed, shows how rapidly legend may grow up even in their age.”
40
And though without directly challenging the last stand mythology, respected historian David J. Weber concluded how: “A number of the cherished stories about the Alamo have no basis in historical fact, but have moved out of the earthly realm of reality into the stratosphere of myth.”
41
And in his recent book,
Sleuthing the Alamo
, James E. Crisp emphasized how in regard to the battle, “Myths offer the false comfort of simplicity, and this simplicity is accomplished by the selective silencing of the past.”
42
This is precisely why the truth of the mass exodus of defenders from the Alamo has been silenced for so long: because it runs so directly contrary to the iconic and romantic version of events.
This work about what really happened at the Alamo was written in the hope of presenting a more honest and realistic version of the events of March 6, 1836 than has ever been presented before. Based upon fact rather than fiction, truth rather than mythology, and an unbiased, openminded approach rather than embracing prejudicial stereotypes and an out-dated legend, this new perspective of the Alamo has also been presented in the hope of uniting many Americans who yet have radically opposing views of the Alamo’s meaning today. Perhaps the old, timehonored perceptions of the mythical Alamo, rooted in the complex dynamics of politics, economics, and race, should be erased from the national memory, especially given the new realities of American society and culture. Hopefully, a new and more honest understanding of what really happened at the Alamo will make it a story—of heroics on both sides—not from the biased perspective of a single group but of lasting importance for all Americans today. Horace Greeley’s famous words, “When the legend is better than the fact, print the legend,” should no longer apply to the Alamo.
In this sense, therefore, the Alamo should be a monument not to a mythical last stand, but as an enduring monument to folly and the inevitable high price paid by common soldiers for leadership mistakes. Ironically, the area around the Alamo church and in the compound itself very likely saw less fighting and killing than outside the fort’s walls, because of mass exodus from the Alamo. Today, now covered by parking lots, office buildings, and traffic moving along the busy, downtown streets of San Antonio, the area where most Alamo garrison members were killed has no marker or monument to memorialize the forgotten fights and last stands in and around a long-forgotten irrigation ditch outside the walls.
43
Instead of the mythical “line in the sand” story in which every defender crossed Travis’ line, in reality the majority of Alamo garrison members unhesitatingly chose life when they attempted to save themselves by escaping a certain deathtrap in the cold, late winter darkness. It had been a bloody early Sunday morning that would live on as both history and legend. Even though most garrison members died outside the Alamo’s walls, romantic myth not only had these young men and boys of the Alamo garrison dying in the wrong location, but also under the wrong circumstances: the mythical last stand.