Read Erased: Missing Women, Murdered Wives Online
Authors: Marilee Strong
Tags: #Violence in Society, #General, #Murderers, #Case studies, #United States, #Psychology, #Women's Studies, #Murder, #Uxoricide, #Pregnancy & Childbirth, #True Crime, #Social Science, #Crimes against, #Pregnant Women, #Health & Fitness
E R A S E D
Just five days had passed since Liana disappeared. Yet left in that
ditch, exposed to the elements, her corpse had been so scavenged by
animals and maggots that it took months to complete an autopsy.
She had been stabbed twice in the back and also had cut marks on
several fingers, indicating that she fought for her life and may have
been trying to run away from her attacker when she died.
The medical examiner could not determine the exact cause of
death because so much of her body tissue was missing. He believed
that she most likely died from an injury to the neck, either from
stabbing or strangulation—in part because he was able to rule out
other causes. The degree of insect infestation in the neck area led him
to believe that there had been an open wound. Strangulation was also
a possibility because Liana’s hyoid bone, a small bone in base of the
throat that is often broken during manual strangulation, was missing.
He believed that abrasions on her backside occurred post-mortem,
probably as a result of the corpse’s having been dragged.
There was no evidence of sexual assault.
A few hours before finding his wife’s body, White complained
to the local newspaper, the
Edmonton Sun
, about being compared
to Scott Peterson. In fact, he was very much like Peterson. In that
interview, he was already speaking of his wife as dead, and described
plans for her funeral. He seemed eager to move on, saying he had to
‘‘get back to normalcy’’ for their daughter’s sake.
‘‘Liana would want me to,’’ he said.
He made another gratuitous remark about how clean detectives
found his house on the day his wife disappeared, saying that his wife
‘‘hated mess.’’ That was the same explanation Scott Peterson gave
for why he claimed that his wife mopped the kitchen the day she
disappeared— strange considering that their maid had cleaned the
whole house just the day before.
White told the paper where he planned to search that evening—the
very place he would find his wife—saying that was where he believed
a body would most likely be abandoned. It was another eraser-killer
prophecy that would come true.
Q
White was the son and grandson of farmers. His life took a major
turn at age ten, when his parents split and his mother married the
farmer next door. On the surface, he was a polite and obedient child;
Pregnant and Vulnerable
1 6 3
underneath, some darker traits were evident at an early age. As a
teenager, he stole from relatives and friends. When caught, he would
deny the allegations as convincingly as he would years later when
charged with murder, with tears in his eyes and feigned sincerity.
He was prosecuted twice in the military for stealing equipment.
One item, a computer, he gave to his wife as a Christmas present.
When military police confiscated it, he told her they needed it back
because it contained classified information. He only came clean with
his wife on the eve of his court martial. He was fined and demoted but
not discharged. According to her mother, Kelly, Liana told Michael
that if he ever stole anything again, their marriage was over.
With the demotion they struggled financially. White left the
military and found work as a mechanic. The couple managed to buy
a small bungalow, but he still wasn’t earning enough to satisfy himself
or, he said, his wife. He began stealing again, this time tools from the
trucking company.
Revealing perhaps more about his own mind-set than Liana’s at the
time of the crime, he claimed that his wife was tired of living paycheck
to paycheck and that she wanted to ‘‘buy things, have things.’’ Yet he
said his wife didn’t like him working so much overtime and asked
him to cut back after she became pregnant with their second child,
wanting him around to help her with their three-year-old, as she was
still working full-time and was tired and ill from the pregnancy. He
agreed, but he didn’t seem that happy about it. The night before she
disappeared, he stayed out late—not working, but drinking with a
coworker.
Despite their financial troubles, Liana was clearly happy about
having another child. She repeatedly checked a Web site on her
computer that tracked the developmental stages of her pregnancy,
and excitedly reported her findings to her friends. White claimed
that he also very much wanted the baby his wife was carrying, but
that seems less certain. He had long harbored the fantasy of one day
buying the family farm and running his own machine shop. Another
mouth to feed must have made those dreams seem remote.
And there was an even more serious obstacle to that goal. Liana’s
mother says her daughter had no intention of ever moving to the farm,
where Liana felt that both she and her daughter were unwelcome
among Michael’s family.
The day Liana went missing, Kelly rushed over to talk with her
son-in-law, but he wouldn’t answer her questions. While she stayed
1 6 4
E R A S E D
up all night in the couple’s bedroom, pacing anxiously, keeping vigil
for her missing daughter, she could hear Michael snoring away in
front of the television, sleeping like a baby. The next morning, she
was shocked to overhear Michael say he had been unable to sleep a
wink.
Q
Ultimately, the Edmonton authorities amassed a wealth of evi-dence against Michael White, one of the strongest circumstantial
cases ever presented in an eraser killing. They managed to do so,
however, only because they acted quickly and astutely. If they hadn’t
moved rapidly, the security tape that refuted White’s time line of
the morning’s events and served as a virtual eyewitness account of
his dumping his wife’s car and setting up the abduction scenario
might have been taped over. If they hadn’t set up surveillance on
Michael when they did, the evidence in the trash bags, unimpeachable
proof of his guilt, would have been lost forever, buried in the city
dump.
They picked up on clues that didn’t fit the supposed crime scene.
They expertly worked their relationship with their suspect, ratcheting
up the pressure as needed but also holding back on their suspicions
enough to fool him into making mistakes and revealing his hand.
They intuitively grasped something about his psychology and played
into his ego, giving him enough rope to hang himself.
According to the theory presented by Crown prosecutors, some-time in the early morning hours of July 12, 2005, White killed Liana
in the couple’s bedroom, knocking over the bedside lamp during the
attack. Criminalists detected traces of blood in the bedroom, hall,
front doorway, garage, and the back of Liana’s SUV— revealing the
trail her killer took as he dragged her lifeless body through the house
and drove her out to the ditch where he left her. The murder weapon,
which has never been found, was ditched someplace else.
There was evidence that White did not randomly select the area
where he dumped his wife’s body. His next-door neighbor testified
that he and White had once dumped a load of dirt in that same
area while constructing a shared driveway. Many residents illegally
dumped trash there. Liana’s body lay near someone’s discarded toilet.
It was an ugly insight into his psychology. She meant so little to him
that he would leave her body next to a broken-down toilet.
Pregnant and Vulnerable
1 6 5
White then returned home to clean up the mess and went on
another dumping run, stashing the blood-soaked items and shattered
lamp in the grassy field. White apparently marked this site, preparing
all along to return at some point and more carefully dispose of
the evidence. Detectives later found the shade to the broken lamp
propped up on a fence post like a beacon guiding his way to the exact
spot where White had pulled over to retrieve the bags.
DNA tests matched the items in the trash bags to both Michael and
Liana White. The clothing, which bore Michael’s DNA, was stained
with Liana’s blood. Liana’s blood was on the outside of the rubber
gloves; his DNA was found inside the fingertips. The same brand of
sponges and towels as those in the trash bags were found in the White
home. Clothing identical in size and brand to the articles in the bag
was also found among Michael’s possessions.
A DNA expert testified that the odds that the blood on the gloves
was from anyone other than Liana were 1 in 5.1 trillion. The odds that
the DNA extracted from skin cells inside the gloves did not belong to
Michael were even more astronomical: 1 in 8.7 trillion.
At five on the morning she vanished, White made his third
foray, abandoning Liana’s car in the parking lot and setting up the
kidnapping ruse. In addition to the security tape, a neighbor testified
that as he arrived home at five that morning from working a graveyard
shift, he saw White heading out in his wife’s car, speeding away as if
in a big hurry.
White raised the usual defenses employed in eraser killings. The
prosecution did not prove when, where, or how Liana died, White’s
attorneys contended, nor did it establish motive for why her husband
would have killed her.
‘‘He gained nothing from this crime,’’ defense counsel Laura
Stevens contended. ‘‘He lost everything.’’ However, that argument
fails to grasp (or purposely attempts to obscure) the peculiarly
insidious nature of motive in eraser killings. The gain the killer is
seeking is inextricably tied to the loss of his victim. Eraser killers
think they will be better off without a particular woman or child in
their life, without having to support them or share their estate or give
up their home. They simply cannot abide for their victim to go on
living.
The defense ridiculed the evidence against White, casting the mis-takes he made in staging, his inconsistent statements, his inexplicable
behavior, and even the hard physical evidence as proof not of guilt but
1 6 6
E R A S E D
of innocence. It was another argument invariably made by defense
attorneys in eraser homicides, but a logically specious one: that a
cunning killer would not make mistakes that would give him away. As
eraser killers go, Michael White was not a particularly sophisticated
or adept one. But even the best are often tripped up by their own
hubris, by their abiding belief that they are above scrutiny, and by
the sometimes warring aspects of their psychology.
If White were lying, Stevens argued, he should have been able to
come up with a better explanation for the blood in his home and on
the items in the trash bags than the far-fetched tale he told in court.
If he were guilty, he wouldn’t have left incriminating evidence lying
around just waiting to be discovered.
‘‘There have to be a thousand better places to get rid of evidence
than an open field,’’ she said. ‘‘It doesn’t make any sense.’’
And if Michael had stabbed his wife to death in their home as the
state contended, ‘‘that place should have lit up like a Christmas tree,’’
said Stevens—referring to forensic tests with the chemical luminol,
which causes blood to glow when viewed under a blue light. However,
the articles in the trash bags proved that a major cleanup job had
taken place. They also found traces of blood on a bottle of bleach in
the house.
When police confronted White with the contents of the bags, he
initially claimed not to recognize anything. He later came up with an
explanation that attempted to cover all the evidence. He blamed it
on his three-year-old.
While playing horsey in their bedroom with a coat rack as her
steed, White said, Ashley accidentally hit her mother in the face and
broke the lamp. Liana suffered a bloody nose, and White put on the
rubber gloves to attend to her because his hands were dirty from his
mechanic’s work.
Liana wanted to go to the hospital, but Michael didn’t want to
take her. Like a ‘‘cold-hearted idiot,’’ as he described himself at trial,
he didn’t want to spend the day in the ER because her nose wasn’t
broken. They fought about it as they walked through the house,
leaving the blood trail. Liana gave in and later cleaned up the mess.
She must have dumped the bags in the field herself, which they had
used before to dump car parts, yard clippings, and other debris.
He said the nosebleed incident occurred three weeks before his
wife disappeared—a time frame that defies credulity, considering
that the towels in the trash bags were still wet with blood when
Pregnant and Vulnerable
1 6 7
police discovered them. What also defies credulity is the astounding
number of missing women who are alleged to have had innocent yet
blood-provoking accidents in their homes right around the time they
disappeared.
The blood pattern on the recovered clothing contradicted White’s
account. A pair of men’s pants found in the bag were soaked in blood
all the way up to the waist. A nosebleed that copious would have
been fatal. Blood on a sock (as well as the bedroom wall) revealed a
high-velocity spatter pattern, consistent with someone’s being struck,
not a dripping nose.
When lab technicians checked the pants pockets, they discovered
something even more eerie and highly significant. Stuffed inside was
a piece of cardboard emblazoned with the brand name Extreme
Edge—which appeared to be packaging for a knife. White was
charged only with second-degree murder because police said they
did not have evidence that the crime was planned. But the fact that
White was apparently carrying a newly purchased knife in his pocket
at the time of the killing certainly makes it appear that the murder
was premeditated.
White’s explanation for his bizarre retrieval of the garbage bags
was as implausible as his nosebleed story. Because he had allegedly
used the field before to dump trash, he assumed without ever opening
the bags that they must belong to him, and brought them home to
dispose of them properly— what his attorneys characterized as a
‘‘Good Samaritan’’ act.
He also backed off from the time line he had given for when Liana
left home that morning. He told police the day she disappeared that
he had spoken to Liana as she left for work at 6:15 A.M. He described
what she was wearing, her mood, and plans they talked about for
later in the day.
Now he said he was asleep when she left and just assumed that
she departed at the time she normally did. However, that revision
did nothing to explain his appearance on the security video an hour
earlier.
‘‘That’s not me,’’ he simply stated when a detective showed him
the security footage after his arrest. When the videotape of that
interrogation was played at trial, it was as if he were daring the jury
with the old adage, ‘‘Who are you going to believe, me or your own
lying eyes?’’ He grew out his hair for the trial, perhaps hoping that
jurors would not recognize him as the man on the tape.
1 6 8