Censored 2014 (28 page)

The corporate press focused on the subsequent political firestorm surrounding Petraeus's resignation, and thereby created a media environment that failed to cover the real story of the Benghazi attacks. Barry Grey of the World Socialist Web Site explained: “The attack on the US consulate and the CIA annex exposed the fact that Washington had financed and helped arm al-Qaeda–linked Islamist and jihadist forces in its bloody 2011 war to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi and install a more pliant regime.”
⁵⁵
The government and media cover-up of the CIA's role in the Benghazi attacks has screened the agency's
actions from the eyes of US citizens and the aided overthrow of sovereign leaders. This no doubt diminishes the standing of the Unites States in the global community and erodes fundamental American ideals. This is also further evidence of the scandal of manufacturing a scandal in order to distract from another scandal at work in Washington DC. One might also say this is obfuscation writ large.

While the “mainstream” corporate media inflated the Petraeus affair beyond all comprehension, avoiding more crucial issues at hand in Libya, it also ultimately obscured the ongoing and deplorable treatment of women in the military (see
Censored
story #16 in this volume), which has eventually found some coverage due to a congressional inquiry into allegations of sexual assault at Joint Base San AntonioߝLackland. The scandal has been labeled “the largest sex scandal in military history” and drew comparisons to the “Tail-hook Scandal.” As a result of an Air Force inquiry into the allegations, six instructors have been court martialed for adultery, rape, and conducting unprofessional relationships and nine others and are awaiting court martial. Moreover, the Air Force found thirty-two military training instructors allegedly engaged in inappropriate or coercive sexual relationships with fifty-nine recruits and airmen at Lackland. The Pentagon estimates that 19,000 cases of sexual assault occur each year with only a few thousand actually reported. Out of the incidents reported, only 200 resulted in court martial.
⁵⁶

A recent article by the Associated Press reported that 30 percent of military commanders who have lost their jobs in the last eight years have been due to various charges of sexual misconduct that range from harassment to adultery to improper relationships.
⁵⁷
News Abuse stories don't only function as obfuscators regarding their own subject matter, they also can function as broader distractions from breaking news developments and revelations about other very important issues.

Corporate Media Ignore Worker Rights . . . Claim Twinkie Defense

Some notable celebrity deaths of the last year included Michael Clarke Duncan, Neil Armstrong, Phyllis Diller, Gore Vidal, Sherman Helmsley, Ernest Borgnine, and Andy Griffith. However, the corporate media demonstrated considerably more
grief
reporting
regarding the bankruptcy of Hostess and the subsequent loss of a beloved snack icon—the Twinkie. Television pundits on
Good Morning America
anticipated the “Chocodile” tears of millions of school children, and mourned while they stuffed their faces with their last memorial Twinkies. Jesse Thomas, a contributor to
Forbes Magazine
online, echoed similar sentiments, lamenting: “This announcement is a travesty for pre-packaged desserts and kindergarten lunch-boxes across America.”
⁵⁸

Yet, not all media outlets grieve in the same fashion. Those with a pro-corporate bias such as Fox News (News Corp.) and ABC News (Disney) vented their rage at labor, suggesting that disputes between management and labor ultimately contributed to the company's bankruptcy. Fox's
America's Newsroom,
and ABC News repeated statements issued by Hostess that placed “[blame upon] a worker's strike for crippling their ability to make and deliver their products.”
⁵⁹
Some in the corporate media noted Hostess's inability to adapt to a changing marketplace, yet did so with a hint of derision; though acknowledging that Americans have been attempting to be more conscious of the nutritional content of foods they eat,
Forbes Magazine
labeled the trend a “health food craze.”
⁶⁰
And the
Huffington Post
speculated that “even a repackaged Twinkie would be hard to sell to the current generation of health-obsessed parents.”
⁶ⁱ

Preposterously, some angry bloggers bitterly remarked, “The Twinkie was Michelle Obama's Osama bin laden,” in a thinly veiled jab at the first lady's unveiling of the new United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) nutritional guide titled “My Plate.”
⁶²
Few in the corporate media reported that Hostess initially filed for bankruptcy in 2004. At that time, the company had cited “declining sales, high food costs, excess capacity and worker benefit expenses,” as contributing factors to its difficulties. In response, the company closed some bakeries and restructured union contracts; however, this did not mitigate the problem of its debt, which totaled nearly $800 million. Members of the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers, and Grain Millers International Union, expressed little surprise (unlike those in the press) by the company's second bankruptcy filing and even “accused the company of having ‘frittered away' union concessions, wasting money on a corporate headquarters move, according to court papers.”
⁶³

The Huffington Post
reported that panic-stricken Hostess-philes desperately bought up remaining supplies of various Hostess products on eBay, while other more enterprising individuals sold cartons of unopened Twinkies as a vanishing piece of Americana for as much as five hundred dollars.
⁶⁴
As it turned out, the panic surrounding the Hostess bankruptcy and the beloved filling-stuffed polystyrene snack was premature. The judge hearing the bankruptcy proceeding urged both the union and Hostess into mediation, a measure that may yet lengthen the companies' shelf life. Moreover, Hostess has claimed that several other companies have expressed interest in the brand.
⁶⁵

While the corporate media offered coverage of overpaid television pundits stuffing their faces with Twinkies, poorly paid and mistreated Walmart employees attempted a strike against the world's largest retailer. Employees at several locations including: Chicago, Milwaukee, Washington DC, Dallas, Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Francisco, and Seattle walked off the job for the first time in Walmart's fiftyyear history.
⁶⁶
While the strike
has
received coverage in the corporate press, there has been a noticeable bias toward covering the management's perspective along with profits—all while the retailer logged record Black Friday sales.

According to their website, Walmart employs over two million employees in twenty-seven countries. Walmart has supported the unionization of its employees in foreign countries such as China, yet has fought unionization within the United States. In the past, Walmart's relationships with its labor force have been strained, to say the least. Former abuses against employees have included violation of child labor laws, failure to pay back wages and overtime, and the employment of undocumented workers. Walmart has been the focus of many studies, books, and documentaries that have all attempted to expose the unethical business practices of the company as well as its negative impacts on communities. Walmart has attempted to silence the most recent push to hold the company accountable for its treatment of its employees. And, as outlined by Paddy Ryan on
Daily Kos,

Possibly further driving the ire of workers is the fact that Walmart's CEO makes $16,826 an hour, while the typical Walmart worker makes $13,650 a year. But at least that's not quite a full-blown two-to-one/year-to-hour wage ratio like in the late nineteenth century under the Rockefeller monopoly, so, it's an obvious improvement for workers, right?
⁶⁸

The fight for unionization at Walmart is long-standing and complex. Lawyers for Walmart filed an injunction against the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) in response to the striking workers. UFCW aided the creation of the 2010 Organization United for Respect at Walmart, or OUR Walmart. The fledgling organization has called for protests at one thousand Walmart stores during the Black Friday shopping weekend.
⁶⁹
Striking employees charge that the company not only manipulates hours and benefits, leading to low wages and part-time status, but they allege that it also discriminates against women and minorities. OUR Walmart filed a claim with the National Labor Relations Board “that Walmart's human resources department violated the National Labor Relations Act by instructing store managers to threaten workers with termination and disciplinary actions if they participate in the strikes.”
⁷⁰
Nonetheless, in spite of the controversy it has generated, Walmart has been ranked by
Forbes Magazine
as the twenty-fourth most powerful brand. Its annual sales exceed over $450 billion.
⁷ⁱ

Corporate media has demonstrated a noticeable bias toward management in their coverage; Fox News questioned Walmart's ability to control its striking workers. Moreover, Fox News expressed worry that this latest labor dispute (notice it isn't referred to as a management dispute) would interrupt sales in what has become a traditional post-Thanksgiving rush for unnecessary consumer goods. Nonetheless, Fox praised Walmart for “taking on” unions and even ran a segment
sponsored by Walmart that defended the company against striking workers.
⁷²
Regardless of the publicity surrounding the desperate situation of Walmart employees, fewer than i percent of the company's workforce participated in the strike. Unfortunately, very few shoppers were informed enough, or cared enough, to be able to stand up for impoverished workers and resist the lure of cheap consumer goods.
⁷³
Meanwhile, in the US, CEO pay and compensation packages can go as high as 1,795 to i compared to average workers at companies like J. C. Penney. Abercrombie and Fitch's CEO made 1,640 to i compared to the average retail worker in the company. All of this indicates that there is some money to go around that could pay more wages and benefits, and could lead to more full-time employment, but the corporate media often fail to come to that conclusion.
⁷⁴

With All Eyes on Marriage Equality, Monsanto Slips Under the Radar

Two same-sex marriage Supreme Court cases began on March 26, 2013. The first case was
Hollingsworth v. Perry,
which challenges the constitutionality of California's 2008 ballot initiative Proposition 8. Proposition 8 defines marriage to be between a man and a woman and does not allow same-sex couples to legally marry. Opponents of Proposition 8 argue it to be unconstitutional on the basis that it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The next day, the Supreme Court heard arguments for
United States v. Windsor,
disputing the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). This case claims DOMA to be unconstitutional because it allows legally married same-sex couples to be treated differently under federal law than opposite-sex couples, such as denying them federal benefits.
⁷⁵
Both cases are very significant, have been a long time coming, and have the potential to be a big step towards equal rights for same-sex couples.

Coverage of these cases is key, and there has certainly been media coverage from most major news outlets. Many devoted extensive amounts of time to the court proceedings, including live coverage, numerous reports, and transcripts after the fact. However, with the time given to this issue, some reports deteriorated to News Abuse, including the usual partisan battles and “who just came out supporting/opposing gay marriage” focus. The
Los Angeles Times
kept the
public up to date on the latest celebrity “tweeting” about the Supreme Court cases,
⁷⁶
while CNN chronicled the most interesting signs and costumes seen outside the courtroom.
⁷⁷

With so much focus on the Proposition 8 and DOMA Supreme Court cases, little attention was given to President Obama signing spending bill HR 933, which included the “Monsanto Protection Act.” Hidden in the Agricultural Appropriations bill under the modest title of “Farmer Assurance Provision,” the Monsanto Protection Act “strips federal courts of the authority to immediately halt the planting and sale of genetically modified seed crops regardless of any consumer health concerns.”
⁷⁸
With neither certainty over the safety of genetically modified crops nor a labeling system in place, it is one more step backward for food safety and justice. And with the public's eyes on the Supreme Court, directed by the corporate media's infatuation with culture war issues, the act was hardly even noticed. While the public should be informed about marriage equality, they should be just as concerned about the quality and safety of the food they are eating, and about which big corporations are literally writing themselves into the law so they can be shielded from any future liability.

As
Censored 2014
went to press, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on DOMA, setting the stage for marital equality. While this is a major step forward for civil rights, people should also pay very close attention to the independent press to see what else may be missed, from the court's rulings on voting rights and the US prosecution resting their case against Bradley Manning to the protests going on in Turkey and the military coup overthrowing the Morsi government in Egypt. Bait and switch is an old game, and the major news media should be able to cover more than just a few stories at a time in detail, with context and clarity, and for the betterment of the public.