Read Allies and Enemies: How the World Depends on Bacteria Online
Authors: Anne Maczulak
Tags: #Science, #Reference, #Non-Fiction
Samples containing several thousand to millions of cells would
create an almost contiguous sheet of colonies unless the microbiologist serially dilutes the sample before inoculating the plates. Serial dilution produces plates containing between 30 and 300 CFUs, most of which are spatially separated from each other and easy to count. Microbiologists prefer plates with this many colonies because CFU numbers of less than 30 do not give consistently accurate results, and plates with 300 or more colonies are too dense to count. On densely populated
168
allies and enemies
plates, bacteria begin inhibiting the growth of nearby colonies by using up nutrients and excreting antimicrobial substances.
To determine the number of bacteria in a liquid culture, the
microbiologist selects duplicate plates containing 30 to 300 colonies
each. In this example, the plates that had been inoculated with 0.1 milliliter of the 1:10,000 dilution look like they have between 30 and 300 colonies. After counting the number of CFUs on each duplicate plate, the microbiologist discovers one plate has 98 colonies and the second has 138 colonies. The average of the two plate counts equals 118. Now the microbiologist must account for the dilutions to
calculate the number of bacteria that were in the original sample.
In the first step, the microbiologist multiplies 118 by the dilution,
in this case, 1:10,000:
118 × 10,000 = 1,180,000 or 1.18 × 106
The aliquot volume was only 0.1 milliliter, which is equivalent to
diluting a milliliter by 1:10. To correct for this dilution, the microbiologist multiplies the above result by 10:
10 × 1,180,000 = 11,800,000 or 1.18 × 107
The original culture therefore held almost 12 billion bacteria. In
microbiology, such large microbial numbers occur often. Soil, marine
water, surface freshwaters, and the animal digestive tract all contain
similar high bacterial concentrations.
Logarithms
Numbers of several million or billion can be unwieldy for calculations. Furthermore, when a number as large as 1.18 × 106 is doubled to 2.36 × 106 or even tripled, the differences between these numbers are not meaningful in microbiology. Variability in nature can cause replicate cultures prepared exactly the same way to produce different concentrations of bacteria. Microbiologists therefore use logarithms
to make very large numbers easier to use in calculations and to help
discern significant differences between large numbers.
Understanding the definition of a logarithm (abbreviated to log)
can be difficult, but an example helps. For the number 1.0 × 105, the log is 5.00. The log for 1.0 × 106 equals 6.00. Numbers that fall
epilogue · how microbiologists grow bacteria
169
in between whole numbers also can be converted to a log value. For
example, the log of 5.0 × 105 equals 5.699. All of these logs are called logarithms to base 10 because they are multiples of 10.
Expressed as log , whole numbers and fractions can be looked up
10
in tables, determined by a slide rule, or produced by a calculator.
Use a calculator!
Converting large numbers to their log value illustrates that for
10
huge numbers of microbes, doubling, tripling, and even quadrupling
does not mean much in microbiology. The log of 1.18 × 107 equals 7.07. Doubling 1.18 × 107 to 2.36 × 107 results in a log of 7.37, not 10
14.14 (2 times 7.07). The triple of 1.18 × 107 is 3.54 × 107 or log10
equal to 7.55; quadrupling the number gives a log of 7.67. This illus—
10
trates that bacterial numbers differing by a few multiples can be viewed as being of the same general magnitude. Only when bacterial numbers change by at least 100 times do microbiologists view this as
a real change beyond the normal variability of nature.
Anaerobic microbiology
Diluting and counting anaerobic bacteria resembles the steps used for aerobic bacteria except that anaerobes require sealed containers that exclude all air. Anaerobic microbiology calls for diligence that aerobic methods ignore, that is, the microbiologist follow aseptic techniques and keep air away from the bacteria.
Anaerobic bacteria grow only on agar plates placed inside a sealed
jar containing a chemical to remove all the oxygen from the jar once it has been sealed. As a second option, microbiologists can use an anaerobic chamber, which is a large plastic bubble filled with an inert gas lacking oxygen. One side of the chamber has arm holes built directly
into the plastic so that a microbiologist can sit outside the chamber,
put her arms into the arm holes, and dilute and perform other activities with the anaerobes inside the chamber. Some anaerobic chambers include a small incubator so that plates need never exit the anaerobic environment during an experiment.
I learned anaerobic microbiology by using a third method named
for Robert Hungate who advanced the techniques for growing strict
anaerobes in the 1950s and 1960s. The Hungate method developed
170
allies and enemies
almost exclusively by studying the anaerobes from the digestive tracts
of cattle, sheep, and goats. These bacteria have more stringent requirements for oxygen-free environments—they are often referred
to as fastidious anaerobes. The Hungate method thus grows the bacteria in test tubes instead of plates, which are impractical for airtight conditions.
Hungate tubes are prepared by pouring sterile molten agar into
each tube and then inoculating the agar while it is still a liquid. Microbiologists exclude air from the open tube during this step by directing a gentle stream of inert gas into the tube. The microbiologist must inoculate the agar quickly and then withdraw the gassing hose an instant before sealing the tube with a rubber stopper. Fastidious anaerobes require stoppers made of special rubber that prevents any molecule of air from seeping into the tube during incubation. A good practitioner of anaerobic microbiology can perform the one-two step of withdrawing the hose and stoppering the tube quicker than the eye can follow. The
microbiologist then rolls the inoculated tubes on a horizontal surface
until the agar has solidified into a uniform layer coating the inside of
the tube. After incubation, the microbiologist counts CFUs in the agar.
Aseptic technique
All microbiological procedures require aseptic technique, which
refers to all the activities microbiologists perform to keep unwanted
microbes out of pure cultures or sterile items. Aseptic means free from germs, and sepsis is a medical term for the presence of germs.
Media, glassware, and anything else that comes in contact with live
cultures must be sterilized in an autoclave. This piece of equipment
treats liquids and solids with pressurized steam to kill all microbes.
Items that have been sterilized and covered can be stored indefinitely.
In addition to sterilized laboratory supplies, microbiologists also
“flame” items over a Bunsen burner before handling bacterial cultures. Flaming works well for metal or glass items such as inoculating loops, forceps, and open test tubes.
All these activities require that the microbiologist imagine where
bacteria exist and predict the places most likely to suffer contamination. To reduce the chances of contamination by unseen and
epilogue · how microbiologists grow bacteria
171
unwanted microbes, aseptic technique includes disinfection of laboratory surfaces before and after using them. Microbiologists also avoid coughing, sneezing, and breathing into open culture containers.
Surgery rooms exemplify aseptic technique because every action
performed there is done in a manner to prevent contamination of the
patient. Aseptic technique does not require sophisticated technology,
but neither does it tolerate shortcuts. Whatever scientific advances microbiology absorbs in the future, aseptic techniques will endure in much the same way they are practiced today.
This page intentionally left blank
Resources for learning
more about bacteria
Internet resources on bacteria
Bacteria World: http://www.bacteria-world.com/.
Cells Alive: http://www.cellsalive.com/.
Dennis Kunkel Microscopy: http://www.denniskunkel.com/.
Infectious Diseases in History: http://urbanrim.org.uk/diseases.htm.
Microbe World: http://www.microbeworld.org/.
Todar’s Online Textbook of Bacteriology: http://www.
textbookofbacteriology.net/.
The Microbial World: http://www.microbiologytext.com/index.php?
module=Book&func=toc&book_id=4.
University of California Museum of Paleontology: http://www.ucmp.
berkeley.edu/bacteria/bacteria.html.
The Virtual Museum of Bacteria: http://www.bacteriamuseum.
org/cms/.
Book resources on bacteria
Biddle, Wayne. A Field Guide to Germs, 2002, Anchor Books,
New York.
Dyer, Betsey Dexter. A Field Guide to the Bacteria, 2003, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
173
174
allies and enemies
Lax, Alistair. Toxin: The Cunning of Bacterial Poisons, 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Maczulak, Anne E. The Five-Second Rule and Other Myths about
Germs, 2007, Thunder’s Mouth Press/Perseus Books, Philadelphia.
Meinesz, Alexandre. How Life Began, Evolution’s Three Geneses,
2008, University of Chicago Press.
Sachs, Jessica Snyder. Good Germs, Bad Germs: Health and Survival
in a Bacterial World, 2007, Hill and Wang, New York.
Schaechter, Moselio, John L. Ingraham, and Frederick C.
Neidhardt. Microbe, 2006, American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington, DC.
Spellberg, Brad. Rising Plague: The Global Threat from Deadly
Bacteria and Our Dwindling Arsenal to Fight Them, 2009,
Prometheus Books, New York.
Zimmer, Carl. Microcosm: E. coli and the New Science of Life, 2008, Vintage Books, New York.
Classic reading on bacteria
De Kruif, Paul. Microbe Hunters, 1926, Harcourt, Orlando, Fla.
History of bacteriology through biographies of the greatest
microbiologists.
Garrett, Laurie. The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a
World Out of Balance, 1994, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
Mainly about viruses but with eternal lessons on all germs.
Karlen, Arlo. Biography of a Germ, 2000, Pantheon Books, New
York. A unique introduction to bacteria by following the activities of
the lyme disease pathogen, Borrelia burgdorferi.
MacFarlane, Gwyn. Alexander Fleming: The Man and the Myth,
1985, Oxford University Press, Oxford. The story and intrigue
behind a historic scientific discovery.
Thomas, Lewis. The Lives of a Cell: Notes of a Biology Watcher, 1974, Viking Press, New York. Appreciation of biology for nonbiologists.
Bacteria rule references
Print
Brothwell, D. R., and P. Brothwell. Food in Antiquity. Johns
Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Luckey, Thomas D. “Effects of Microbes on Germfree Animals.”
In Advances in Applied Microbiology, Volume 7. Edited by Wayne
W. Umbreit. Academic Press, 1965.
Munn, Colin B. Marine Microbiology— Ecology and Applications.
New York: Garland Science, 2004.
Rainey, Fred A., and Aheron Oren, eds. Extremophiles. London:
Elsevier, 2006.
Internet
Astrobiology Web. “Life in Extreme Environments.” http://www.
astrobiology.com/extreme.html#archaea.
Baron, Samuel, ed. “Normal Flora of Skin. Chap. 6 in Medical
Microbiology, 4th ed. Galveston: University of Texas Medical
Branch, 1996. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=
mmed&part=A512.
BBC News. “A Whale of a Bug.” News release, April 15, 1999.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/320117.stm.
Central Vermont Public Service. http://www.cvps.com.
175
176
allies and enemies
Chung, King-Thom, and Christine L. Case. “Sergei Winogradsky:
Founder of Soil Microbiology.” Society for Industrial Microbiology
News 51 (2001): 133-35. http://www.smccd.edu/accounts/case/
envmic/winogradsky.pdf.
CNN.com. “Star Survey Reaches 70 Sextillion.” News release, July
23, 2003. http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/22/stars.survey.
DeLong, Edward F. “Archaeal Mysteries of the Deep Revealed.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (2006):
6417-18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1458900.
DuBois, Andre. “Spiral Bacteria in the Human Stomach: The
Gastric Helicobacters.” Emerging Infectious Diseases 1 (1995): 79-88. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol1no3/dubois.htm.
Eder, Waltraud, and Erika von Mutius. “Hygiene Hypothesis and
Endotoxin: What is the Evidence?” Current Opinions in Clinical
Immunology 4 (2004): 113-17. http://www.forallvent.info/uploads/
media/von_Mutius_Hygiene_hypothesis_and_endotoxin_2004.pdf.
Egland, Paul G., Robert J. Palmer, and Paul E. Kolenbrander.
“Interspecies Communication in Streptococcus gordonii—Veillonella
atypica Biofilms: Signaling in Flow Conditions Requires Juxta—
position.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101
(2004): 16917-22. http://www.pnas.org/content/101/48/16917.full.
Eureka Science News. “A Woman’s Nose Knows Body Odor.” April
6, 2009. http://esciencenews.com/articles/2009/04/07/a.womans.nose.
knows.body.odor.
Favier, Christine F., Willem M. de Vos, Antoon D. L. Akkermans.
“Development of Bacterial and Bifidobacterial Communities in
Feces of Newborn Babies.” Anaerobe 9 (2003): 219-29. http://www.
sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W9T—
49J8TBH-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_
sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1024766517&_rerun
Origin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_
userid=10&md5=c3bab74e038cbd08afbd0e897c31ee96.
bacteria rule references
177
Featherstone, J. D. B. “The Continuum of Dental Caries—
Evidence for a Dynamic Disease Process.” Journal of Dental
Research 83 (2004): C39-C42. http://jdr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/
83/suppl_1/C39.pdf.
Folk, Robert L. “Nanobacteria: Surely Not Figments, but under
What Heaven Are They?” Natural Science, February 11, 1997. http:/
naturalscience.comns/articles/01-03/ns_folk.html.
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. “Hydrogen Production.” Chap. 5 in Renewable Biological Systems for
Alternative Sustainable Energy Production. Edited by Kasuhisha
Miyamoto. FOA, 1997. http://www.fao.org/docrep/w7241e/
w7241e0g.htm#5.2%20biophotolysis%20of%20water%20by%20
microalgae%20and%20cyanobacteria.
Fulhage, Charles D., Dennis Sievers, and James R. Fischer.
“Generating Methane Gas from Manure.” University of Missouri
Extension, October 1993. http://extension.missouri.edu/
publications/DisplayPub.aspx?P=G1881.
Handwerk, Brian. “Armpits Are ‘Rain Forests’ for Bacteria, Skin
Map Shows.” National Geographic News, May 28, 2009. http://news.
nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090528-armpits-bacteria—
rainforests.html.
Helicobacter Foundation. 2006. http://www.helico.com/h_general.
html.
Higaki, Shuichi, Taro Kitagawa, Masaaki Morohashi, and Takayoshi
Tamagishi. “Anerobes Isolated From Infectious Skin Diseases.”
Anaerobe 5 (1999): 583-87. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_
ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W9T-45HR7PX-C&_user=10&_rdoc=
1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_search
StrId=1021747765&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_
version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=ee63538d7839935b73
ce52130111d3ae.
Keith, William A., Roko J. Smiljanec, William A. Akers, ad Lonnie
W. Keith. “Uneven Distribution of Aerobic Mesophilic Bacteria on
Human Skin.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 37 (1979): 345-47. http://aem.asm.org/cgi/reprint/37/2/345.pdf.
178
allies and enemies
Krulwich, Robert. “Bacteria Outnumber Cells in Human Body.”
National Public Radio. All Things Considered, July 1, 2006.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5527426.
Lubick, Naomi. “Where Biosphere Meets Geosphere.” Scientific
American, January 28, 2002. http://www.scientificamerican.com/
article.cfm?id=where-biosphere-meets-geo.
Martinez, Chelsea. “Baby’s First Bacteria.” Los Angeles Times, June 26, 2007. http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-hew—
booster26jun26,1,3571421.story.
Montville, Thomas J. “Dependence of Clostridium botulinum Gas
and Protease Production on Culture Conditions.” Applied and
Environmental Microbiology 45 (1983): 571-75. http://www.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC242325/pdf/aem00171-0229.pdf.
National Human Genome Research Institute. http://www.genome.
gov/10000354#top.
National Science Foundation. “Bacteria May Thrive in Antarctic
Lake.” News release, December 9, 1999. http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/
news/press/99/pr9972.htm.
Nobel Foundation. “Marshall, Barry J., and J. Robin Warren.” Nobel
Prize Press release, October 3, 2005. http://nobelprize.org/
nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2005/press.html.
Pasteur, Louis. Oeuvres de Pasteur. Liebraires de l’Académie de Médicine, Paris, 1922.
Peterson, W. H., and Mary S. Peterson. “Relation of Bacteria to
Vitamins and Other Growth Factors.” Bacteriological Reviews 9
(1946): 49-109. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/
PMC440891.
Porter, Alan M. W. “Why Do we Have Apocrine and Sebaceous
Glands.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 94 (2001): 236-37.
http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/full/94/5/236.
Sapp, Jan. “The Prokaryote-Eukaryote Dichotomy: Meanings and
Mythology.” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 69 (2005): 292-305. http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/full/69/2/292.
bacteria rule references
179
ScienceDaily. “Human Skin Harbors Completely Unknown
Bacteria.” February 6, 2007. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/
2007/02/070206095816.htm.
—————. “The Hygiene Hypothesis: Are Cleanlier Lifestyles
Causing More Allergies for Kids?” September 9, 2007. http://www.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/09/070905174501.htm.
—————. “A Survivor in Greenland: A Novel Bacterial Species Is
Found Trapped in 120,000-Year-old Ice.” June 3, 2008. http://www.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080603104418.htm.
Stark, P. L., and A. Lee. “The Bacterial Colonization of the Large
Bowel of Pre-term Low Birth Weight Neonates.” Journal of Hygiene
89 (1982): 59-67. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7097003.
University of Georgia. “First-ever Estimate of Total Bacteria on
Earth.” San Diego Earth Times, September 1988. http://www.
sdearthtimes.com/et0998/et0998s8.html.
University of Iowa. “Turning on Cell-Cell Communication Wipes
Out Staph Biofilms.” News release, April 30, 2008. http://www.
news-releases.uiowa.edu/2008/april/043008biofilms.html.
Vaglio, Stefano. “Chemical Communication and Mother-Infant
Recognition.” Communicative and Integrative Biology 2 (2009):
279-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2717541.
Von Mutius, Erika. “A Conundrum of Modern Times That’s Still
Unresolved.” European Respiratory Journal 22 (2003): 719-720.
http://www.erj.ersjournals.com/cgi/reprint/22/5/719.
Wassenaar, T. M. “Extremophiles.” Virtual Museum of Bacteria.
January 6, 2009. http://www.bacteriamuseum.org/cms/Evolution/
extremophiles.html.