Read The Professor and Other Writings Online
Authors: Terry Castle,Terry Castle
Elsewhere, in a fatally perky folk-song medley of “Handsome Molly,” “Sweet Betsy from Pike,” “Goodnight, Irene,” and “Darling Clementine,” the singer offered a down-home dollop of Sapphic Americana. Such songsâshe explained in her chatty liner notes (
so glad I kept that LP
)âwere part of “Lavender Jane's great Dyke HERitage”: lesbian love songs that needed reclaiming as such. And sure enough, as Alix jogged brightly from one tune to the next, the kinky world of one's pioneer foremothersâof galâgal bundling, quilting bees, and little women-only houses on the prairieâcame vividly to mind.
All easy enough to lampoon, of course, and I hadn't even gotten yet to the album's blockbuster final numberâone that I fully expected, based on what I could remember of it, to reveal itself definitively, now and for the ages, as The Worst Song Ever Written. To borrow a canny phrase from a hipster colleague: seemed like Alix was about to rip Nana Mouskouri a new one. Indeed, when the ditty in question, the unfortunately named “View from Gay Head,” started coming in over the 'phones, I was already tittering quietly in cynical forepleasure.
As the first couple of verses unfurled I felt a malicious urge to share the merriment. Blakey, it's true, was about ten or twelve paces ahead of me, but I'd been managing quite nicely (I thought) cardio-wise, and had even surmounted my bête noire, the infarction-inducing Sanchez Hill, in fairly good time. Surely Blakey wouldn't object to stopping the onerous Power Walk for just a sec to exchange headphones and exult in the ludicrousness of it all? Nor did she. After I had explained who Alix Dobkin wasâB. having been maybe six or seven, I guess, when the original
Lavender Jane Loves Women
album came outâshe listened in wide-eyed horror and disbelief, then began emitting great girlish war-whoops of laughter. These eructations became so insistent that she was soon quite breathless with guffawing and had to bend over at the waist, hands on hips, gasping all
the while, like someone who had just finished running the 400-meter high hurdles at the Olympics.
Reasons for mirthâas I well knew myselfâwere not hard to find. According to Dobkin's liner notes, the song had apparently had a kind of mystical, magical, jubilant birthing, its chorus having come to its creator, “Ode to Joy”âlike, while she was driving with her girlfriend to Gay Head on Martha's Vineyard in the summer of 1973. (
Wow, 1973! They could have seen Lillian Hellman! Maybe even've run her over!
) Pretty great, too, some of the other compositional details. “After we arrived,” Dobkin explained, “I wrote the verses and very carefully lifted the tune from the Balkan song, âSavo Vodo,' which I had recently learned at my Balkan singing class.” Ah, yes: how well we remember rocking out to “Savo Vodo”ânot to mention those air-guitar favorites “Pobjednicki Cocek” and “Vai, Ce Rau Ma Simi Acuma.”
And from one angle, the lyrics of “View from Gay Head” no doubt offered glorious satiric fodder. Each verse was a potted parable of sorts, designed to expose the vileness with which the greedy patriarchal brutes who ruled the world (men) drove women, shrieking and tremulous, into the arms of their own sex. Luckily for the poor battered gals, though, this abrupt exit from the not-so Edenic Garden of Heterosexuality was really a Fortunate Fall: once one lady-refugee met up with another, awesome dyke-dacious ecstasy ensued, accompanied by huge bursts of shared cleansing revolutionary anger. Thus in the song's opening versesâoddly ornamented with wobbly little eighteenth-century trills by the flute-cello backup teamâAlix sang of one “Cheryl” and new squeeze “Molly,” the blissful beneficiaries of just such an eroto-political awakening. “There are two kinds of people in the world today,” the pair had realized:
One or the other, a Person must be;
The Men are Them and the Women are WEEEâEEEE!
This key insight, laid bare with the analytic clarity of Marx and Engels, led ineluctably to boogie-oogie-oogie Woman-Love. Now “both agree-ee-ee-ee-ee-ee,” crowed Alix, “It's a pleasure to
bee-ee
a
LES-BEE-ENNE
!”
Cue loud and lusty chorus, sung by Dobkin and ragtag but euphoric female choir, several of whose members sounded as if they might be age six or under:
LES-BEE-ENNE! LES-BEE-ENNE!
LES-BEE-ENNE in No Man's Land!
LES-BEE-ENNE! LES-BEE-ENNE!
ANY WOMAN CAN BE A LES-BEE-ENNE!
[dainty flourish by flute player]
And so it went: the incendiary Cheryl and Molly succeeded by literary-lez “Liza,” who “wishes the librar-eee/Had men and women placed separate-leee”
Â
âall the way to “Louise” (grousing at “a million second places in the Master's Games”) and right-on Alix herself, who in the course of decrying the sexual warfare waged on women by men, absolutely
nails
my favorite internal rhyme in all of English poetry:
I'll return to the bosom,
Where my journey ends
â
Where there's no penis
Between us friends!
I feel faint just typing it.
But faintâwhether with joy, pleasure, or involuntary glandular stimulationâwas hardly the state in which I found myself as I continued to observe the rippling laugh-bomb “View from Gay Head” had set off in Blakey. Quite the opposite: I suddenly felt uneasy, a
little spooked, as if I'd had a scary dream the night beforeâsome grisly vision crowded with frightsâbut now couldn't remember anything about it. A chill passed over me and I smiled wanly even as B. launched into some of her cherished satiric themes: the idiocies of the old hard-line feminism, the embarrassing travesty that Women's Studies had become in American universities, the aggravating failure of our lesbian friends to acknowledge the sheer hottitude of Daniel Craig, Cristiano Ronaldo, or various other brawny baby-daddies now gracing the covers of
People
magazine and the
National Enquirer.
Ordinarily I would have been seconding these delightful sentiments, even suggesting other neglected hotties from history. (
I
know
Rupert Brooke is dead, butâo-h-h, what a studmuffinâ¦Did you know that he and Virginia Woolf went nude swimming in a Sussex duck pond in 1913
?) But today something was different. Suddenly consciousâsomewhat painfullyâof the age difference between myself and my boisterous bride-to-be, I felt a stab of pure seventies-nostalgia, at once perverse, plaintive, and self-righteous.
You have no idea what it was like to be gay then. Nobody ever talked about it. There weren't any other lesbians. At least where I was. It wasn't like being at Yale with Maia and Sylvia and Jodie Foster in 1987.
Did I actually say such dreary things? Something along these lines, I confess, even as B. pulled a droopy-sad Pagliaccio-faceâher usual gambit during my more pathetic sermonsâand pretended to play an invisible two-inch violin, holding it delicately between thumb and forefinger and mooning tragically as she did so.
But I was increasingly piqued, too, by less comfortable feelings: a certain shamefacedness, above all. Who was I to make fun of Alix Dobkin? I worried I had been unjust, even disloyalânot only to the spunky songsmith, who by now is probably an entirely inoffensive lesbian grandmother and fully paid-up member of the AARP, but
also to my confused, somewhat impressionable twenty-year-old self. Yes, granted: even thirty years ago, I found some of the numbers on
Lavender Jane Loves Women
wanting. (Warning from the U.S. Surgeon General: Do Not Play “Hug-Ee-Boo Song” While Operating Heavy Machinery.) But on the whole, hadn't I been right in there with Alix from the start? An admirer? An acolyte? Maybe even the Biggest Fan She Ever Had?
With the rap of a gavel, the Judge Judy tribunal in my brain, permanently empowered, was at once in session and I found myself under harsh DIY cross-examination. The first time I heard “The Woman in Your Life,” three decades ago, the court wished to know, had I not become desperately eager to find a recording of it? (
Yes, your Honor
.
It was the theme song on a feminist talk show on the Seattle public-access radio station to which I had become fanatically devoted
.) Had I not also
adored
Alix's superb cover version of Dusty Springfield's “I Only Want to Be with You”âso far unmentioned in this all-too-strategic and shifty prologue? (
Umâ¦erâ¦yes
,
your Honor
.) Was it not a million billion tons better than the one Annie Lennox did when she was in The Tourists? (
Uhâ¦yesâ¦
) And indeed all the more poignant, given Springfield's own long-unacknowledged lesbianism? (Slight catch in voice:
Um, well, umâ¦yes, your Honor
.
I guessâ¦.
) And what
about
that “View from Gay Head”? Hadn't every line of the lyrics come rushing back as soon as I heard it again? Hadn't I found myself humming along, even mouthing the words of the chorus with a certain bemused if not rakish enjoyment? (Head bent in mortification, quiet sniffling sounds:
yeah, umâ¦your Honorâ¦Iâ¦uhhhâ¦snuffle snuffleâ¦
)
Finally, and most damningly, was it not the caseâor perhaps one should say
is
it not the caseâthat I have been playing Dobkin's songs nonstop since I retrieved them online? That they make me feel strangely happy-go-lucky, as ifâdespite much evidence to
the contraryâall were right with the world? That sometimes, amid the inanity, Alix hits the thirty-year-old emotional love-spot with such warmth and precision, reaches back so deeply and surely to the lonely, naïve, damaged-yet-hopeful young listener I once was, she makes me want to cry? That her singing is beautiful? That she makes me reflect, with gratitude, on the great kindness and understanding that I have received from people, gay and straight, over the course of my life? That when you get right down to it, a certain Terry Castle
loves
Alix Dobkin?
Guilty as charged, your Honor.
And thus my donnée, the question that now haunts me: What happened to that other T-Ball? The kinder, gentler T-Ball? The acoustic T-Ball, so to speak? Where did she go? She who was once,
in illo tempore
, as soft and pattable as a much-loved old flannel shirt or the consoling suede puppy-skin on the tummy of Wally? Putting it more bluntly: How had I become the japing, nay-saying, emotionally stunted creature I now felt myself to be? A veritable devil when it came to making fun of people but, oh, so much harder on myself?
The Dobkin rencontre suggested, obviously, that I had not, in fact, always been “that way”âthat there had been a time of illusions and (relative) simplicity, a Bambi-time. How then had I morphed from doe-eyed little forest creature into the Thersites of Noe Valley? That my long-ago relationship with the Professor might be involved seemed most likelyâa personally tailored Intro to Savage Irony 101âbut beyond that, mental confusion reigned. How, precisely, had the rot set in? What did it have to do with my sexual orientation? And perhaps most important, what attitude to adopt toward it now? For even as I wallowed in wistful compassion for my younger self, I could also see in retrospect that some temperingâa certain steelingâhad been necessary. Little T-Ball, poor shatter-brained mite,
had
had it coming, after all. The Bambi lifestyle is a dangerous
one: one moment of baby-deer myopia, one dainty-hoofed gambol into freeway traffic, and you're road kill. What I saw now as the ineluctable corrosion of my character, in other words, might have been adaptive: a way of surviving.
But was that the good news or the bad news? Or was it just what it was? Did the concepts of good and bad even apply? Here indeed was a mystery worth plumbing: I was fat; I was mean; but I was alive.
The Gods Tried to Warn Me
SO WHO EXACTLY WAS
Terry Castleânow Spoiled Avocado Professor of English at Silicon Valley Universityâway back in 1975? An embarrassing incident in the spring of my senior year in college will demonstrate just how deep the baby-fawn syndrome went, and how troublesome it would turn out to be, even as I was about to launch myself, purblind and gullible, into graduate school, a new life, and the cold Professorial embrace. Precocious one was, but also foolishly unguarded.
The kindest way of explaining it? Put it this way: I was so avid a Student in those daysâso ardently devoted to the intellectualization of my world, so confident about my fledgling powers of analysis, so scholastic in my aspirations, so serious and chaste and idealisticâ
such a twatty little Simone Weil wannabe in fact
âthat I had somehow managed mostly to avoid acknowledging the real world and its inhabitants. Emotionally speaking, I was dim and unschooled, a sort of very low-grade idiot savant. (Asâat a far more exalted level, I now realizeâwas Simone herself.) My undergraduate years, spent at a tiny then-barely accredited private school in the Pacific Northwest, had been a somewhat soggy, inconclusive affair, but apart from having to endure a plethora of fir trees, dark precipitation-filled days, and the sulfurous smells that wafted up from the lumber mills
down by the Sound, I had not found my sojourn there particularly challenging. In some of my literature classes I was better informed than my professors. It was easy to be snobbish about the place, to feel superior. Compared with the apocalyptic urgency and difficulty of my high school yearsâduring which I had been compelled by such frenzied longing to get away from San Diego and the worsening emotional chaos associated with the Mavis-Turk ménage (not to mention the crew of new and piratical stepsiblings) that I frequently ended up weeping at the dinner table over my chemistry homework, fearful I wouldn't win a scholarshipâ¦
ack ack ack
â¦âwell, after all
that
, college was a pretty much bound to be a cinch. It was easy to do well and I nailed it.