What Would Lynne Tillman Do? (33 page)

Twee Kamers

It’s very difficult to find apartments in Amsterdam, an old and small city. Sidonie and her friend were trying to find a place to live and they placed an ad in the newspaper, giving my place of work to call. They asked if I would mind taking calls for them. I said I wouldn’t.

My Dutch was hardly adequate; it enabled me to buy food and panic when times called for it. They had advertised for two rooms. I knew two rooms to be
twee kamers
.

I was alone in the office when the telephone rang. A Dutch male voice asked, “
Advertitie voor twee kamers?” Ya
, I replied, not me (or
may
, as it would be pronounced in Dutch), my friends,
twee persons voor twee kamers
. I felt quite proud of myself, two people for two rooms.
Aah
, he said,
twee persons. Ya
, I said, do you have them?
Twee kamers
, he said.
Ya, ya
, I said. Slowly, and partially in English, he said, “I am holding my
pemel
.” Oh,
ya
, I said, thinking he might mean he was holding a pencil, not knowing the world for pencil in Dutch, though curious as to why he would tell me that at all. “
Momentje
,” he called out. I imagined he was writing something down and waited. “
Ik kom
,” he cried. I hung up.

Y is for Yearning

For Sensitive People

It’s Independence Day, the Fourth of July, and America is 236 years old. I’ve been pondering the tortuous coupling, “art and politics.” Each partner resists easy definition, especially “art” (“Is it art?” and “What is art?” are jokes); I can’t imagine Ludwig Wittgenstein countenancing their murky conjunction. It’s hard to avoid the couple’s traps.

Art is not usually measured by its utility (the school of “relational aesthetics” attempts to call that hand), while politics is. What usefulness is believed to be is also a matter of contestation. In 1972, in Amsterdam, with artist Jos Schoffelen, I ran a cinema with an eclectic program, the first in the Netherlands to feature double-headers and to screen an Andy Warhol movie,
Bike Boy
(1967). A rogue film collector approached us with a 16mm print of
Tarzan Escapes
(1936). He screened it for us: Its white supremacy and brutal racism were shockingly casual. Black African men fell off steep cliffs, while their white British masters exclaimed about the loss of precious equipment.

Jos and I wanted to pair it with a documentary about the Black Panthers. Amsterdam’s Communist Film Club distributed it, but wouldn’t rent it unless we organized a protest march. “Why do we have to organize a march?” “Because it’s a political film,” they said. I said, “If people want to march afterward, they can.”
Juxtaposing the two was art and politics; “Art could be a dialogue,” we said, “which is political activity.” “No way,” they said.

The cinema wasn’t considered “serious” because of its emphasis on art; soon their club vetoed the cinema getting funding from Amsterdam City Council. Maybe this is too strident or absurd an example of conflict between, and in, art and politics. Generally, I proffer the idea that all art is political, though I’m not satisfied by it. It seems subtle, yet too broad, and because of this not convincing. But I may be trapped in it, not having a better argument.

Writing novels and stories, I’ve become convinced that narratives concern themselves with justice or adjudication. Writing fiction, I might be able to avoid mental traps, habits of mind. I try to be vigilant about how I write—style, form—to trample complacency of all types; in concert with a writer’s lacks, it generates truisms and stereotypical characters.

I often recall other artists’ choices. Ad Reinhardt drew political cartoons and made non-referential paintings. The American poet George Oppen stopped writing poetry for 30 years, after he became a member of the Communist Party in the 1930s, because he wouldn’t write Party poems. When he started again, he produced an exceptional poetics.

In a performance I once saw, the artist Bob Flanagan hammered a nail into his penis. I put my head in my hands, covering my eyes (one man fainted); but I wouldn’t think of stopping him. It was his penis. Was this a political act? Flanagan was born with cystic fibrosis and was told he’d die at 20. He’d been a cystic fibrosis poster boy at 13. His art fought his genetic identity, and what the disease didn’t cruelly claim, he tormented. For his exhibition
“Visiting Hours” at the New Museum, New York, in 1994, Flanagan built a hospital room and lay on a hospital bed, attached to an oxygen tank.

Viewing Flanagan installed as a piece in a museum, knowing him since the 1980s, I felt disorientated—installed momentarily in his hell. “Voyeuristic” pales as a description of my looking. Was his métier disorientation? Flanagan’s conflation of art, body and disease bewildered me, rebelling against any modifier, such as progressive or regressive, which might characterize the politics of an art practice.

Some say artists should make work for an audience, that anything else is indulgent; art should be “accessible.” To whom is never clear. Recently, in various newspapers and literary magazines, a debate about so-called “difficult books” has been unfolding. Writers should remember their readers, one side insisted, by making books enjoyable. For one thing, “difficulty” and “pleasure” are relative terms; without foundation, the argument lacked cogency and drifted into nowheresville.

Filmmaker Trinh T. Minh-ha reckoned with the concept of audience differently. Minh-ha was present at the New York premiere of
Naked Spaces
—
Living is Round
(1985), at the Museum of Modern Art. The film pictured women working, walking, socializing. No narrator explained the women or the spaces they inhabited. Instead, words shaped and suggested more impressions, ways of seeing.

The first question to Minh-ha came from a man, who asked, vehemently: “Who is this film for? Who’s the audience for this film?” Minh-ha took a moment, then said: “I make films for sensitive
people.” Her audience fell silent, maybe stunned by her brilliant tactic, which leaped over patterned responses. Minh-ha allowed for the contemplation of positions, by escaping the usual discursive traps. It’s the hardest thing to do, and in art and politics the most imaginative and stimulating.

Z is for Jonze

Stars In Their Eyes: Fame is a Frame

Life’s tough as a street-art puppeteer, but when Craig Schwartz (cunning John Cusack) starts a deadbeat day job in an office where the ceiling’s so low everyone has to bend over, he discovers a way out—a secret tunnel into the mind and body of John Malkovich (playing himself, sort of). Spike Jonze’s first feature
Being John Malkovich
renders identity as the playground and prison it is. When everyone wants to be known, rather than to try to know, celebrity is the pinnacle of success. To the star-obsessed, being known might mean not having to know yourself, and if you don’t like yourself, this must be freedom. Dropped into the body of someone else, though, might allow for the ironic discovery that others are just as limited as you are. I laugh every time I think of Cameron Diaz—so thoroughly unglamorous she’s a sight gag—in a cage with a monkey; and Malkovich at home halfnaked, his paunch smiling at the fantasy of celebrity perfection.

Acknowledgments

The publisher and author would like to acknowledge and thank Stephen Frailey, artist/photographer and chair of Undergraduate Photography Department (The School of Visual Arts), for providing the title for this collection. Frailey edits a photography magazine,
Dear Dave
, and for its advertising campaign, several years ago, chose to run, in every issue, a powder-blue page, with white letters: “WHAT WOULD LYNNE TILLMAN DO?” (This was a great surprise to LT.) On the side of the page, it says: Subscribe to Dear Dave,
WWW.DEARDAVEMAGAZINE.COM
. We heartily recommend you do.

Credits

“The Last Words are Andy Warhol,” in
Grey Room
21, Grey Room Inc. and M.I.T., Fall 2005, pp. 38-44.

“Blame it on Andy: The Problems of Acting Natural,” In these Intemperate Times,
Frieze Magazine
, Issue 141, Sept. 2011, London.

“Nothing is Lost or Found: Desperately Seeking Paul and Jane Bowles,”
Tin House
, Vol. 1, number 3, New York: Winter 2000, pp. 122-29.

“Adieu, American Abroad,”
Tin House
, Vol. 12, number 2. Ed: Rob Spillman, pp. 70-79.

“Cut Up Life,” Introductory essay in
Water from a Bucket: Diary
1948-57, by Charles Henri Ford, Turtle Point Press, 2001, pp. vii-xiii.

“Object Lesson” (on Fred Hughes’s house and art collection),
Nest
, New York: Summer 2000, pp. 54-61.

“White Cool,”
Elle
4:86, New York: May 1989, p. 86.

It’s About Time: Definitions, in The Future Dictionary of America
, McSweeney’s Books, 2004.

“There, Not There: How our attitudes betray us,” In these Intemperate Times,
Frieze Magazine
, Issue 147, May 2012, London.

This interview, Paula Fox by Lynne Tillman, was commissioned by and first published in
BOMB Magazine
, from
BOMB
95/Spring 2006. ©
Bomb Magazine
, New Art Publications, and its Contributors. All rights reserved.
BOMB
can be read at
www.bombmagazine.org
.

“
Borrowed Finery
,” (memoir by Paula Fox),
Bookforum
, Winter 2001, p. 27.

“
The Coldest Winter
,” (novel by Paula Fox),
Bookforum, WORD: The Literary Magazine
, ed. M Mark, June 1995, New York.

“The Regulation of Pleasure,”
Voice Literary Supplement
, 1989.

“A New Chapter of Nan Goldin’s Diary,” in the Sunday
New York Times
, Arts and Leisure, Nov. 16, 2003, p. 36.

Interview with Harry Mathews, commissioned by and first published in
BOMB Magazine
, from
BOMB
26/Winter 1989. ©
Bomb Magazine
, New Art Publications, and its Contributors. All rights reserved.
BOMB
can be read at
www.bombmagazine.org

“SLANT,”
Artforum
, April 1990.

“Try Again,” In these Intemperate Times,”
Frieze
Magazine, Issue 145, March 2012, London.

“Of Its time,” In these Intemperate Times,
Frieze Magazine
, Issue 151, November-December 2012, London.

“The Final Plot,”
The Inevitable: Contemporary Writers Confront Death
, pp 275-280. Ed: David Shields, Bradford Morrow. W.W. Norton & Company inc, New York 2011.

“Downtown’s Room in Hotel History” in
Downtown Film, TV and Video Culture
1975-2001. Ed. Joan Hawkins. Intellect Press: London, 2014

“Boss of Bosses—The Fall of the Godfather: The FBI and Paul Castellano,” by Joseph F. O’Brien and Andris Kurins (review),
Voice Literary Supplement
36:28, New York: July 9, 1991, pp. 6-7.

“The Real McCoy: I Should Have Stayed Home” (Horace McCoy),
Voice Literary Supplement
35:17, New York: September 11, 1990, pp. 15-16.

“Guide for the Misbegotten:” Lynne Tillman on John Waters’s Role Models,
Art Forum International
, 2010.

“Point of View,” In these Intemperate Times,
Frieze Magazine
, Issue 143, Nov. 2011, London.

“The Rolling Stones, The Academy of Music,” in
The Show I’ll Never Forget
, ed. Sean Manning, Da Capo Press, Cambridge, MA., 2007, pp. 22-25.

“Great Expectations:
Underworld
by Don DeLillo,”
Bookforum
, New York: Winter 1997, p. 17.

“Future Shock” (review of George Saunders’s
Pastoralia
)
, New York Times Book Review
, May 28, 2000, p. 8.

“Reconsidering the Genius of Gertrude Stein,”
New York Times Book Review
, January 27, 2012, p. 13.

“First Novel,” in
Bookforum
, July/August/September 2006, New York, p. 37.

“Doing Laps Without A Pool,” Chapbook, New Herring Press, Brooklyn, 2011. Reprinted: Best Offense 2009.

interview with Peter Dreher, commissioned by and first published in
BOMB Magazine
, from
BOMB
57/Winter 1996. ©
Bomb Magazine
, New Art Publications, and its Contributors. All rights reserved.
BOMB
can be read at
www.bombmagazine.org

“The Virtual President,”
Art Forum
, January 2009.

“A Mole in the House of the Modern,” in
The American Novel: The House of Mirth
, ed. Deborah Esch, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Winter 2001, pp. 133-58.

“
History of Shit
,” (review of Dominique LaPorte’s
History of Shit), Bookforum
, New York: Summer 2000, p. 9.

“The Hardest Thing,” In these Intemperate Times,
Frieze Magazine
, Issue 149, September 2012, London

“Stars in their Eyes: Fame is a Frame” (on Spike Jonze’s Being John Malkovich), Frieze, #49, London: Fall 1999, p. 58.

About the Author

Lynne Tillman is the author of five novels, four collections of short stories, one collection of essays and two other nonfiction books. She has collaborated often with artists and writes regularly on culture. Her novels include
American Genius, A Comedy
(2006),
No Lease on Life
(1997), a New York Times Notable Book of 1998 and a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award;
Cast in Doubt
(1992);
Motion Sickness
(1991); and
Haunted Houses
(1987).
Someday This Will Be Funny
(2012) is her most recent short story collection. Her nonfiction books include
The Velvet Years: Warhol’s Factory 1965-1967
, with photographs by Stephen Shore (1995);
Bookstore: The Life and Times of Jeannette Watson and Books & Co
. (1999), a cultural history of a literary landmark, and
The Broad Picture
, an essay collection.