Authors: David E. Murphy
This account differs substantially from that of Simonov in his report-
ing of the interviews in which Zhukov spoke of meeting Stalin in January
1941. Simonov also does not say that Stalin actually showed Zhukov both
his letter to Hitler and Hitler’s reply. Bezymensky claims that there are
no archival records of the Stalin-Hitler correspondence but notes that
they may have been destroyed. He quotes German archives to show that
at the end Hitler ordered his private correspondence with heads of state
destroyed.4
A 1997 novel on the immediate prewar period entitled
Groza
refers to
this correspondence in considerable detail. Its author, Igor Bunich, claims
that ‘‘from October 1940 to May 1941 Hitler sent Stalin six personal letters.
Only two have been found, one dated December 3, 1940, and the second
May 14, 1941.’’ None of Stalin’s replies have been found. In his December
1940 letter, Hitler advises Stalin that he intends ‘‘no later than the summer
188
SECRET LETTERS
of the coming year’’ to resolve the English question by ‘‘seizing and occupy-
ing the heart of the British Empire—the British Isles.’’ Referring to his
statements in an earlier letter that German troops were assembled in an
area of the Government General inaccessible to English aviation and intel-
ligence for reorganization and training, he acknowledges that this has
aroused in Stalin ‘‘understandable anxiety.’’ He goes on to say that ‘‘rumors
of a German invasion of the USSR are being deliberately circulated by the
appropriate German offices’’ as a way of ‘‘keeping Churchill and his circles
in ignorance of our precise plans.’’ Hitler closes by proposing a personal
meeting with Stalin ‘‘at the end of June–beginning of July 1941.’’5
Although the December letter contains references to the usual decep-
tion themes, nothing can match Hitler’s personal letter to Stalin of May 14,
1941. According to the author of a November 2003 article in
Krasnaia
Zvezda,
it was intended by the Nazis to ‘‘misinform the leadership of the
USSR concerning its true intentions. The German Führer himself was
involved in this action. It endeavored to exploit the Soviet leader’s long-
standing distrust of the ruling circles of Great Britain, his efforts to put off
the beginning of the war at any price, and his belief that the English leader-
ship planned to push Germany into attacking the USSR.’’6
In the excerpts in the article, Hitler again explained the presence of
German troops on the Soviet border as protection from British aircraft
even though they had given rise to rumors of a conflict ‘‘between us.’’ Hitler
assured Stalin ‘‘on my honor as a chief of state’’ that these rumors could be
completely ignored. They ‘‘are being spread by English sources,’’ he as-
serted, admitting, though, that with so many troops concentrated in the
area a conflict could break out ‘‘without our wishing it.’’ He feared, he said,
that ‘‘some of my generals might deliberately embark on such a conflict in
order to save England from its fate and spoil my plans.’’
Hitler then advised Stalin that ‘‘by approximately June 15–20 I plan to
begin a massive transfer of troops to the west from your borders.’’ He asked
Stalin ‘‘not to give in to any provocations that might emanate from those of
my generals who might have forgotten their duty. And, it goes without
saying, try not to give them any cause. If it becomes impossible to avoid
provocation by some of my generals, I ask you to show restraint, to not
respond but to advise me immediately of what has happened through the
channel known to you.’’
The phrase noted by Zhukov, ‘‘on my honor as a chief of state,’’ would
seem to authenticate the excerpts in the
Krasnaia Zvezda
article. The issue,
however, is more complicated. The excerpts also appear, word for word, in
SECRET LETTERS
189
Bunich’s novel, which purports to reproduce the entire text of the letter.
(English translations of both the December 1940 and the May 1941 letters
can be found in appendix 2.)7
Zhukov told Simonov that Hitler responded to a letter Stalin wrote at
the beginning of 1941 expressing concern over the presence of large num-
bers of German troops in Soviet border areas. Hitler’s December 31, 1940,
letter may have been that response. The phrase ‘‘on my honor as a chief of
state’’ appears not in that letter, however, but in the May 14, 1941, letter, the
last one from Hitler. This confusion is not surprising since Zhukov’s mem-
ory may have dimmed, but he may also have been repeating what Stalin
told him. Zhukov’s statements to Simonov do indeed reflect Hitler’s expla-
nations for the German troop presence in Soviet border areas, but no
mention is made of Hitler’s intentions toward Great Britain, which figure
prominently in both letters. Stalin may not have wished to reveal an aspect
of German military planning that Hitler expected him to keep confidential;
on the other hand, if Lev Bezymensky’s recollection of his 1966 meeting
with Zhukov is correct and Zhukov did read portions of the Hitler-Stalin
correspondence in June 1941, it is surprising that Zhukov said nothing to
either Simonov or Bezymensky of Hitler’s statements about attacking En-
gland. Zhukov would have immediately understood their significance.
The May 14 letter, then, might be seen as the final masterpiece in a
gallery of disinformation. By confiding in Stalin that some of his generals
might launch an unauthorized provocative attack and asking Stalin not to
respond in kind, Hitler virtually dictated the scenario Stalin followed in the
first hours after the invasion. By the same token, it was tragic for the
Soviets that Timoshenko, Zhukov, and those around them—knowing what
they knew of the extent of German preparations and aware, as military pro-
fessionals, that an offensive across thousands of kilometers could never
have been undertaken as a ‘‘provocation’’ by a few dissident German gen-
erals—could not change the views of their stubborn leader. At a minimum,
these Hitler letters, if genuine, demonstrate that Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
was right when he wrote that Stalin, who trusted no one, did in fact ‘‘trust
Adolf Hitler.’’8
There is another aspect of the May 14 letter that demands attention.
The penultimate paragraph reads: ‘‘I thank you for having agreed with me
on the question known to you and I ask you to forgive me for the method I
have chosen for delivering this letter to you as quickly as possible.’’9 Very
likely the ‘‘method . . . for delivering’’ the letter refers to the unscheduled
flight on May 15, 1941, of a Junkers transport to Moscow. In the Bunich
190
SECRET LETTERS
novel, it is depicted as a courier plane carrying the letter to Stalin.10 In any
case, a German JU-52 aircraft made its way through Soviet airspace, un-
detected and apparently unauthorized, and, against all regulations, landed
at the central airfield. Here it was not only allowed to land but also refueled
for its return trip and permitted to leave Soviet airspace. These actions
were obviously at Stalin’s behest. Kept in the closest secrecy, the official
permission extended to the plane was unknown to all but a very few. This
intrusion of Soviet airspace immediately became a sensation within the
defense establishment.11
According to a statement by the Defense Commissariat, because of
poor organization the early-warning posts of the Fourth Separate PVO
(National Air Defense) Brigade of the Western Special Military District
detected the JU-52 only after it had penetrated twenty-nine kilometers into
Soviet airspace. Mistaking the JU-52 for a commercial aircraft, a DC-3, on
a routine flight, they failed to notify anyone of the intrusion. Although the
Belostok airport had been informed of the JU-52 flight (we do not know by
whom), it did not pass the information on to PVO or to the Ninth Mixed Air
Division (responsible for interception) because its communications were
down. Similarly, senior officers of PVO Moscow did not learn of the flight
until May 17 even though a PVO Moscow duty officer had been advised by
a Civil Air Fleet dispatcher that the aircraft had passed over Belostok. In
addition, the Defense Commissariat report went on, the Red Army air
forces took no measures to halt it. Moreover, the chief of staff of the air
forces, Major General Pavel S. Volodin, and the chief of the First Depart-
ment of the staff, Major General Vladimir D. Grendal, knew that the air-
craft had crossed the frontier without authorization. They not only failed
to take measures to detain it but assisted its flight to Moscow by giving
orders to PVO to ensure its safe arrival and by permitting it to land at a
Moscow airfield. How could this have happened? Whatever the truth of the
matter, the incident was treated as a major failure of the air defense system
and the Red Army’s air forces.12
On June 7 Colonel General Grigory M. Shtern, the air defense chief,
was arrested. (Chief since March 19, he had assumed his new position only
to discover that air defenses were in abysmal shape.) On June 10, the
Defense Commissariat, in NKO Order No. 0035, reprimanded Volodin and
Grendal for having given the ‘‘JU-52 unauthorized permission for the flight
and for landing in Moscow without having checked its right for such a
flight.’’13 On June 27 Volodin was arrested, and on October 28 he was shot
without trial along with Shtern and others.14
SECRET LETTERS
191
It seems evident that for a transport aircraft the size of the JU-52 (note
that it had been mistaken for a Douglas DC-3) to have flown through Soviet
airspace unchallenged from the western border to Moscow would have
been a near miracle. For it to have landed safely in Moscow, been refueled,
and been allowed to leave soon after its arrival without a major PVO inves-
tigation seems incredible. It can be postulated, therefore, that Stalin, who
was awaiting a response from Hitler to one of his letters, gave the order to
allow the JU-52 to proceed to Moscow, land, and be refueled for its return
flight. He would not, of course, have said a word about a communication
from Hitler. When the story of the ‘‘unauthorized’’ JU-52 flight began to
leak out, causing an outcry in PVO and the air forces, Stalin acted imme-
diately to take advantage of the situation, moving first against Shtern,
whom he had long disliked, and then against Volodin. As air forces chief of
staff, Volodin may have known that Stalin was behind the safe arrival and
departure of the flight. By the time of Volodin’s arrest on June 27, five days
after the invasion, Stalin would have realized he had been cruelly deceived
by Hitler. The flight was testimony to that fact. It was imperative he get rid
of Volodin, who knew too much and could not be allowed to survive. Far-
fetched? Not if one considers Stalin’s passion for conspiracy and his ability
to wait patiently for the right moment and then act quickly to achieve his
ends. He would never have allowed it to become known that he had been
naïve enough to have fallen for Hitler’s disinformation.15
∞Ω
C H A P T E R
The Purges Revived
When Proskurov was relieved of his position as
chief of military intelligence back in July 1940 and an order came down
placing him at the disposition of the Defense Commissariat, he became a
man without a job.1 An order of this type was issued when Stalin or the top
military brass had not yet decided on an officer’s next assignment. For a
man with the energy and determination of Proskurov, this distance from
the action was hard to take. The fact that the air forces were undergoing a
reorganization favored by many senior officers made it that much harder.
He wanted to be part of the planning. A decree of the Council of People’s
Commissars dated July 25, 1940, ordained that the air division would be
the basic organizational structure of the Red Army’s air forces.
This changeover was to be fully completed by January 1, 1941, and
would involve an increase of over 60,000 personnel in the Red Army air
forces. Proskurov would surely have learned of the reorganization from
his friends in the air forces, particularly those with whom he had served in
Spain. Although he could not participate in the implementation of the new
decree, he must surely have followed the action closely, even from afar.
Still, he very much wanted a new assignment and he must have pushed
hard to get one. Therefore, it was no surprise when word came of a Sep-
tember 9, 1940, order appointing him deputy chief of aviation for the Far
Eastern Front. Nothing happened, however; written on the original of the
document were these words: ‘‘Hold until further notice.’’2 Instead, on Octo-
THE PURGES REVIVED
193
ber 23 Proskurov was appointed deputy to the chief of the Main Directo-