Truth vs Falsehood (33 page)

   “He betrayed his country—and he did so at a time when we were locked in a bitter and dangerous cold war with the Soviet Union. Hanssen’s brazen and reckless misconduct, its surpassing evil, is almost beyond comprehension. Using the very tools he acquired as an FBI counterintelligence expert, he covertly and clandestinely provided the Soviet Union and then the Russians information of incalculable significance, extraordinary breadth, and exceptionally grave sensitivity. He did so knowing that his disclosures could—and ultimately did—get people killed and imprisoned, and he did so knowing that they placed in jeopardy the safety and security of our entire nation.
¹
That we did not lose the Cold War ought blind no one to the fact that Robert Philip Hanssen, for his own selfish and corrupt reasons, placed every American citizen in harm’s way.”

____________________

“
¹
All one has to do is look at the descriptions of some of the documents he compromised to the Soviets.
See, e.g
., Count 8 (“A TOP SECRET United States intelligence analysis of the effectiveness of Soviet intelligence collection efforts against certain United States nuclear weapons capabilities…”) and Count 12 (‘A highly restricted TOP SECRET/SCI Analysis, dated May 1987, of the Soviet intelligence threat to a specific and named highly compartmented United States Government program to ensure the continuity of government in the event of a Soviet nuclear attack….’)” (Court’s Notes)

(From
FindLaw.com
)

So much for the posture of ‘moral superiority’ favored by the Far Left as a smoke screen.

The puzzlement about Alger Hiss is clarified by the discovery that he had double compartmentalized personalities. One calibrates at 205 (public image) and the other at 160 (the conspirator). This condition is more common than suspected in espionage agents and in other cases of duplicity.

Because such individuals are of extreme danger in today’s nuclear world, which is also beset by terrorist bombers, their early detection by routine consciousness calibration screening of high security risks is critical to security. High-profile defectors, as well as others, were already detected in the early 1970s by consciousness research and demonstrated on videotape (Hawkins, 1995, Video #1). At that time, moles in both the CIA and the FBI were identified by calibration as to their level of consciousness. At the time, there was no point in pursuing their exact identities, which could have been easily revealed upon investigation in a matter of minutes. They were later exposed and made the headlines (Robert Hannsen and Aldrich Ames).

While dual compartmentalized personalities are recognized in psychiatry, this relative rarity (dissociative states, multiple personality disorder) obscures their detection in the public arena. Each of the double agents (Manhattan Project, FBI, and CIA) was responsible for the deaths of very many people, despite their claims to superiority as a rationalization for their duplicitous treachery. (The whole Cold War, as well as the current nuclear arms race, arose from the loss of atomic secrets to the former U.S.S.R.)

Detection of this disorder is difficult because the covering normal personality is what is presented to the public. Typically, the deception is expertly and successfully carried off for years without eliciting suspicion. The disorder is seen in the normal family man who has a secret sex life, in pedophiliacs and serial murderers, and in fire fighters who are secretly pyromaniacs. These are real-life Jekyll-and-Hyde personalities.

Compartmentalized dual personalities often arise in the media as high-profile cases that puzzle the public, the Court, and the jury. The crime is “out of character,” as they are described as “normal,” if not “just wonderful people.” (Character witnesses confirm that they are “wonderful.”) The position of the defense is, how could such a person possibly have committed such a crime? During the trial, the respectable, seemingly normal suspect characteristically has mask-like facial control, primarily emotionless and carefully guarded. Normal people with nothing to hide would automatically show a whole panoply of emotions, facial expressions, body language, etc. The reason the denial of guilt seems real is because the presenting personality, in fact, did not commit the crime; it is the second personality that is the savage criminal. Less severe examples are seen in cases of embezzlement, kleptomania, sexual compulsion, deviant behavior, and where men live dual lives, with separate wives and identities.

Of importance is that in dissociated dual personalities, the two personalities are actually not aware of each other. Although such disorders are statistically rare in the overall population, they are relatively common in criminal cases, as the second personality is often very active and surfaces via the action of the repressed criminality.

This split of personality occurs before age three, as the infant responds to parental correction not by modifying the personality but by dissociating the personality into the ‘good me’ and the ‘bad me’. The ‘bad me’ then becomes repressed, disowned and unameliorated, and begins to lead a secret life, free of restraint. The ‘bad me’ is sometimes given a different name and only emerges periodically to commit acts of cruelty or bizarre behaviors and serial murders. These people often become famous criminals, e.g., “Jack the Ripper,” and the elusive serial killers that make the headlines as serial rapists, pedophiliac child killers, cannibalistic murderers, and talisman criminals who taunt the police and public with signatures to their crimes.

The discovery that two completely different personalities can exist in the same individual came about accidentally. Some years ago, a prospective visitor was screened by consciousness calibration prior to the visit. Upon rescreening as the date for the visit approached, a widely different calibration was obtained (originally 350; the second time, 135). This was the first encounter with the phenomenon. Further questioning revealed that there was a wide disparity between the intentions of the two different persons in one body. One was benign and the other malicious, and therefore, the visit was cancelled. Several years later, an employee who had been acting somewhat strangely was also found to have a second, untrustworthy personality and had to be terminated, despite an excellent curriculum vitae.

Consciousness calibration is the only decisive method for the detection of dangerous individuals. The process, as was demonstrated on the videotape, is quite simple. One merely states, “This person is integrous.” (Yes/No) “The second in command is integrous.” (Yes/No) “The third level down is integrous. (Yes/No) When the level is determined, the roster, especially by identification photos, reveals in a few seconds those individuals who make the arm go weak to an investigative team that has no idea who these persons might really be. A well-trained and integrous team is only interested in the truth. They do not need or even want to know the names of the individuals. The test subject can even be a child, as was demonstrated in the video, who knows nothing of the matter.

The same procedure reveals terrorist suspects, e.g., “Heathrow Airport contains a dangerous terrorist.” (Yes/No) Then determining the location is easy. Using a map, one states “In Section A.” (Yes/No) “In Section B. In Section C,” and so on. Then the flight number is identified. “A terrorist is trying to board Flight 222, which is scheduled to leave at 4:15 PM.” (Yes/No).

This procedure can be done with the video surveillance of a crowd, such as at a football stadium or a parade. The only requirements are that the intention and purpose are integrous, the persons doing the questioning have the authority, and they have received permission to ask about a given matter prior to using the arm-response technique.

Although individuals with severe character disorders are adept at dissimilation, they can only control their personality performance and cannot disguise their low calibratable level of consciousness, which is in the ‘public domain’ of the universal, impersonal field of consciousness that has no opinions or intellectual limitations. Like an impersonal electrostatic field that merely crackles and gives an electrostatic response to the presence or absence of electrons, it is beyond deception and has no motivation. The muscle test is not truth versus falsehood but merely indicates truth or its absence. An electrostatic field simply fails to respond if it is not presented with a stimulus, but it visibly “lights up” commensurate with the strength of the stimulus and thereby serves as a diagnostic function of impressive elegance.

Truth and Survival

By analysis, it is revealed that the highest fruits of our society are the automatic consequence of truth, and society’s problems are the fallout from falsehood. Freedom, peace, and, as we have seen, even survival itself, are supported by the social fabric field in which truth prevails. How, then, is such truth to be identified inasmuch as man’s mental apparatus precludes it by design, and 78 percent of the world’s population (49 percent in America) lives by principles that are not integrous? In a free society, the nonintegrous are vociferous and convincing, and the media magnify their influence.

CHAPTER 12

Problematic Issues

As is apparent from an analysis of the functioning of consciousness and its various levels in the human domain, the different levels of consciousness can be identified not only by calibration but also by the characteristics of that particular field itself. In society, claims to truth are bandied about by vested interests whose subterfuge can only be detected by those who themselves are integrous, seasoned, and balanced by wisdom and experience.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse in court nor does ignorance of the truth prevent one’s death by violence. This underlying reality is intuited by modern society in which the quest for truth is almost the essence of every public discussion and news report. Survival is not secured by means of political persuasion, sociological theories, highly emotional demagoguery, political elitism, or religious dogma. The capacity to recognize the truth is a potential within human consciousness, and the combined intention of the consciousness of all people in that direction intensifies the overall field. At some intuitive level, everyone knows that truth supports life and falsity brings death. In a world with nuclear capacity, the differentiation is now a literal, concrete, pragmatic necessity. The price of denial or unawareness of truth is to be blindsided by death and destruction (i.e., Pearl Harbor and 9/11).

Problematic Positionalities and Issues