Read The Screwtape Letters Online
Authors: C. S. Lewis
My dear Wormwood,
I sometimes wonder whether you think you have been sent into the world for your own amusement. I gather, not from your miserably inadequate report but from that of the Infernal Police, that the patient's behaviour during the first raid has been the worst possible. He has been very frightened and thinks himself a great coward and therefore feels no pride; but he has done everything his duty demanded and perhaps a bit more. Against this disaster all you can produce on the credit side is a burst of ill temper with a dog that tripped him up, some excessive cigarette smoking, and the forgetting of a prayer. What is the use of whining to me about your difficulties? If you are proceeding on the Enemy's idea of âjustice' and suggesting that your opportunities and intentions should be taken into account, then I am not sure that a charge of heresy does not lie against you. At any rate, you will soon find that the justice of Hell is purely realistic, and concerned only with results. Bring us back food, or be food yourself.
The only constructive passage in your letter is where you say that you still expect good results from the patient's fatigue. That is well enough. But it won't fall into your hands. Fatigue
can
produce extreme gentleness, and quiet of mind, and even something like vision. If you have often seen men led by it into anger, malice and impatience, that is because those men have had efficient tempters. The paradoxical thing is that moderate fatigue is a better soil for peevishness than absolute exhaustion. This depends partly on physical causes, but partly on something else. It is not fatigue simply as such that produces the anger, but unexpected demands on a man already tired. Whatever men expect they soon come to think they have a right to: the sense of disappointment can, with very little skill on our part, be turned into a sense of injury. It is after men have given in to the irremediable, after they have despaired of relief and ceased to think even a half-hour ahead, that the dangers of humbled and gentle weariness begin. To produce the best results from the patient's fatigue, therefore, you must feed him with false hopes. Put into his mind plausible reasons for believing that the air raid will not be repeated. Keep him comforting himself with the thought of how much he will enjoy his bed next night. Exaggerate the weariness by making him think it will soon
be over; for men usually feel that a strain could have been endured no longer at the very moment when it is ending, or when they think it is ending. In this, as in the problem of cowardice, the thing to avoid is the total commitment. Whatever he
says
, let his inner resolution be not to bear whatever comes to him, but to bear it âfor a reasonable period'âand let the reasonable period be shorter than the trial is likely to last. It need not be
much
shorter; in attacks on patience, chastity, and fortitude, the fun is to make the man yield just when (had he but known it) relief was almost in sight.
I do not know whether he is likely to meet the girl under conditions of strain or not. If he does, make full use of the fact that up to a certain point, fatigue makes women talk more and men talk less. Much secret resentment, even between lovers, can be raised from this.
Probably the scenes he is now witnessing will not provide material for an
intellectual
attack on his faithâyour previous failures have put that out of your power. But there is a sort of attack on the emotions which can still be tried. It turns on making him
feel
, when first he sees human remains plastered on a wall, that this is âwhat the world is
really
like' and that all his religion has been a fantasy. You will notice that we have got them completely
fogged about the meaning of the word âreal'. They tell each other, of some great spiritual experience, âAll that
really
happened was that you heard some music in a lighted building'; here âreal' means the bare physical facts, separated from the other elements in the experience they actually had. On the other hand, they will also say âIt's all very well discussing that high dive as you sit here in an armchair, but wait till you get up there and see what it's
really
like': here âreal' is being used in the opposite sense to mean, not the physical facts (which they know already while discussing the matter in armchairs) but the emotional effect those facts will have on a human consciousness. Either application of the word could be defended; but our business is to keep the two going at once so that the emotional value of the word âreal' can be placed now on one side of the account, now on the other, as it happens to suit us. The general rule which we have now pretty well established among them is that in all experiences which can make them happier or better only the physical facts are âreal' while the spiritual elements are âsubjective'; in all experiences which can discourage or corrupt them the spiritual elements are the main reality and to ignore them is to be an escapist. Thus in birth the blood and pain are âreal', the rejoicing a mere subjective point of view; in death, the ter
ror and ugliness reveal what death âreally means'. The hatefulness of a hated person is âreal'âin hatred you see men as they are, you are disillusioned; but the loveliness of a loved person is merely a subjective haze concealing a âreal' core of sexual appetite or economic association. Wars and poverty are âreally' horrible; peace and plenty are mere physical facts about which men happen to have certain sentiments. The creatures are always accusing one another of wanting âto eat the cake and have it'; but thanks to our labours they are more often in the predicament of paying for the cake and not eating it. Your patient, properly handled, will have no difficulty in regarding his emotion at the sight of human entrails as a revelation of Reality and his emotion at the sight of happy children or fair weather as mere sentiment,
Your affectionate uncle
SCREWTAPE
My dear, my very dear, Wormwood, my poppet, my pigsnie,
How mistakenly now that all is lost you come whimpering to ask me whether the terms of affection in which I address you meant nothing from the beginning. Far from it! Rest assured, my love for you and your love for me are as like as two peas. I have always desired you, as you (pitiful fool) desired me. The difference is that I am the stronger. I think they will give you to me now; or a bit of you. Love you? Why, yes. As dainty a morsel as ever I grew fat on.
You have let a soul slip through your fingers. The howl of sharpened famine for that loss re-echoes at this moment through all the levels of the Kingdom of Noise down to the very Throne itself. It makes me mad to think of it. How well I know what happened at the instant when they snatched him from you! There was a sudden clearing of his eyes (was there not?) as he saw you for the first time, and recognised the part you had had in him and knew that you had it no longer. Just
think (and let it be the beginning of your agony) what he felt at that moment; as if a scab had fallen from an old sore, as if he were emerging from a hideous, shell-like tetter, as if he shuffled off for good and all a defiled, wet, clinging garment. By Hell, it is misery enough to see them in their mortal days taking off dirtied and uncomfortable clothes and splashing in hot water and giving little grunts of pleasureâstretching their eased limbs. What, then, of this final stripping, this complete cleansing?
The more one thinks about it, the worse it becomes. He got through so easily! No gradual misgivings, no doctor's sentence, no nursing home, no operating theatre, no false hopes of life; sheer, instantaneous liberation. One moment it seemed to be all our world; the scream of bombs, the fall of houses, the stink and taste of high explosive on the lips and in the lungs, the feet burning with weariness, the heart cold with horrors, the brain reeling, the legs aching; next moment all this was gone, gone like a bad dream, never again to be of any account. Defeated, out-manoeuvred fool! Did you mark how naturallyâas if he'd been born for itâthe earth-born vermin entered the new life? How all his doubts became, in the twinkling of an eye, ridiculous? I
know what the creature was saying to itself! âYes. Of course. It always was like this. All horrors have followed the same course, getting worse and worse and forcing you into a kind of bottle-neck till, at the very moment when you thought you must be crushed, behold! you were out of the narrows and all was suddenly well. The extraction hurt more and more and then the tooth was out. The dream became a nightmare and then you woke. You die and die and then you are beyond death. How could I ever have doubted it?'
As he saw you, he also saw Them. I know how it was. You reeled back dizzy and blinded, more hurt by them than he had ever been by bombs. The degradation of it!âthat this thing of earth and slime could stand upright and converse with spirits before whom you, a spirit, could only cower. Perhaps you had hoped that the awe and strangeness of it would dash his joy. But that is the cursed thing; the gods are strange to mortal eyes, and yet they are not strange. He had no faintest conception till that very hour of how they would look, and even doubted their existence. But when he saw them he knew that he had always known them and realised what part each one of them had played at many an hour in his life when he had supposed himself alone, so that now he
could say to them, one by one, not âWho
are
you?' but âSo it was
you
all the time.' All that they were and said at this meeting woke memories. The dim consciousness of friends about him which had haunted his solitudes from infancy was now at last explained; that central music in every pure experience which had always just evaded memory was now at last recovered. Recognition made him free of their company almost before the limbs of his corpse became quiet. Only you were left outside.
He saw not only Them; he saw Him. This animal, this thing begotten in a bed, could look on Him. What is blinding, suffocating fire to you, is now cool light to him, is clarity itself, and wears the form of a Man. You would like, if you could, to interpret the patient's prostration in the Presence, his self-abhorrence and utter knowledge of his sins (yes, Wormwood, a clearer knowledge even than yours) on the analogy of your own choking and paralysing sensations when you encounter the deadly air that breathes from the heart of Heaven. But it's all nonsense. Pains he may still have to encounter, but they
embrace
those pains. They would not barter them for any earthly pleasure. All the delights of sense, or heart, or intellect, with which you could once have tempted him, even the delights of
virtue itself, now seem to him in comparison but as the half nauseous attractions of a raddled harlot would seem to a man who hears that his true beloved whom he has loved all his life and whom he had believed to be dead is alive and even now at his door. He is caught up into that world where pain and pleasure take on transfinite values and all our arithmetic is dismayed. Once more, the inexplicable meets us. Next to the curse of useless tempters like yourself the greatest curse upon us is the failure of our Intelligence Department. If only we could find out what He is really up to! Alas, alas, that knowledge, in itself so hateful and mawkish a thing, should yet be necessary for Power! Sometimes I am almost in despair. All that sustains me is the conviction that our Realism, our rejection (in the face of all temptations) of all silly nonsense and claptrap,
must
win in the end. Meanwhile, I have you to settle with. Most truly do I sign myself
Your increasingly and ravenously affectionate uncle
SCREWTAPE
From the collection of essays
Screwtape Proposes a Toast
C. S. Lewis had finished putting this book together shortly before his death on 22 November 1963. It is devoted almost entirely to religion and the pieces are derived from various sources. Some of them have appeared in
They Asked for a Paper
(Geoffrey Bles, London 1962), a collection whose subjects included literature, ethics and theology. âScrewtape Proposes a Toast' was initially published in Great Britain as part of a hard-covered book called
The Screwtape Letters and Screwtape Proposes a Toast
(Geoffrey Bles, London 1961). This consisted of the original âThe Screwtape Letters', together with the âToast', and also a new preface by Lewis. Meantime, âScrewtape Proposes a Toast' had already appeared in the United States, first as an article in
The Saturday Evening Post
and then during
1960 in a hard-covered collection,
The World's Last Night
(Harcourt Brace and World, New York).
In the new preface for
The Screwtape Letters and Screwtape Proposes a Toast,
which we have reprinted in this book, Lewis explains the conception and birth of the âToast'. It would be quite wrong to call the address âanother Screwtape letter'. What he described as the technique of âdiabolical ventriloquism' is indeed still there: Screwtape's whites are our blacks and whatever he welcomes we should dread. But, whilst the form still broadly persists, there its affinity to the original
Letters
ends. They were mainly concerned with the moral life of an individual; in the âToast' the substance of the quest is now rather the need to respect and foster the mind of the young boy and girl.
âA Slip of the Tongue' (a sermon preached in Magdalene College Chapel) appears in a book for the first time. âThe Inner Ring' was a Memorial Oration delivered at King's College, University of London in 1944; âIs Theology Poetry?' and âOn Obstinacy in Belief' were both papers read to the Socratic Club, subsequently first appearing in the âSocratic Digest' in 1944 and 1955 respectively. âTransposition' is a slightly fuller version of a sermon preached in Mansfield College,
Oxford; whilst âThe Weight of Glory' was a sermon given in the Church of St Mary the Virgin, Oxford, and first published by SPCK. All these five papers were published by kind permission in
They Asked for a Paper.
âGood Work and Good Works' first appeared in
The Catholic Art Quarterly
and then in
The World's Last Night.
At the end of his preface to
They Asked for a Paper,
Lewis wrote: âSince these papers were composed at various times during the last twenty years, passages in them which some readers may find reminiscent of my later work are in fact anticipatory and embryonic. I have allowed myself to be persuaded that such overlaps were not a fatal objection to their republication.' We are delighted that he allowed himself to be persuaded in the same way over this paperback collection of pieces on religious themes.
J.E.G.