Authors: John le Carré
Endara, recently widowed, married his mistress within months of his first wife's demise, Luis rattles on. The President is fifty-four, his bride, a student at Panama University, twenty-two. Panama's press are making sport of the event, dubbing Endara âEl Gordo Feliz', or âHappy Fatty'.
We cross the Palace forecourt, admire the counterfeit herons, ascend the superb Spanish colonial staircase. Early photographs depict Endara as the street brawler he once was, but the Endara who receives me looks so like my Count that if it weren't for the tail suit and red sash across the vast white waistcoat, I might in my dreams have asked him for five hundred pounds. A young woman is crouched on all fours at his feet, her shapely rump pressed into designer jeans as she wrestles with a Lego palace she is building with the President's children.
âDarling,' Endara cries down to her, in English for my benefit. âSee who is here! You have heard of . . .' et cetera.
Still kneeling, the First Lady looks me cursorily up and down and resumes her building.
âBut darling, of
course
you have heard of him!' the President implores her. âYou have read his wonderful books! We both have!'
Belatedly, the former diplomat in me stirs.
âMadame President. There is no reason on earth why you should have heard of me. But you have surely heard of Sean Connery, the actor, who was in my recent film?'
Long silence.
âYou are
friend
of Mr Connery?'
âIndeed I am,' I reply, though I scarcely know him.
âYou are very welcome in Panama,' she says.
In the Club Union, where Panama's rich and famous have their presence here on earth, I enquire yet again after the Count Mario da Bernaschina, Ambassador to France, putative husband to the Countess, purveyor of unbranded Scotch. Nobody remembers him, or if they do, they prefer not to. It takes an indefatigable Panamanian friend called Roberto to report, after prolonged enquiry, that the Count had not only existed, but played an insignificant role in the volatile history of his country.
The title of Count âcame from Spain via Switzerland', whatever that meant. He had been a friend of Arnulfo Arias, President of Panama. When Arias was toppled by Torrijos, Bernaschina had fled to the American Canal Zone, claiming to be Arias' ex-Foreign Minister. He was nothing of the kind. Nevertheless, he lived large for several years until an evening when, dining at an American club, I like to think lavishly, he was kidnapped by Torrijos' secret police. Incarcerated in the notorious La Modelo prison, he was charged with conspiracy against the state, treason and sedition. Three months later he was mysteriously released. Though in age he boasted of his twenty-five years as a Panamanian diplomat, he had never so much as belonged to the Panamanian foreign service. Least of all had he been Panama's Ambassador to France. Of the Countess, if such she was, mercifully nothing: my boyhood fantasies could remain intact.
As to that cask of unbranded whisky and the unsolved matter of who, if anyone, was owed five hundred pounds, of one thing only we may be certain: when conman meets conman, both sides will end up crying foul.
Countries are characters too. After a walk-on part in
The Night Manager
, Panama is insisting on star billing in a new novel I am planning, although it is five years later. My hero-to-be is that much neglected denizen of the spy world, the intelligence fabricator or, as the trade jargon has it, pedlar. True, Graham Greene celebrated the
fabricator's calling in
Our Man in Havana.
But no sudden war resulted from poor Wormold's fabrications. I wanted the farce to turn to tragedy. The United States had already achieved the remarkable feat of invading Panama while it still occupied the country. Then let it invade a second time, on the strength of my pedlar's cooked-up intelligence.
But who would play the part of my pedlar? He must be socially trivial, benign, innocent, lovable, a non-player in the world's game, but a striver for all that. He must be loyal to whatever he loves most: his wife, his children, his profession. He must be a fantasist. Intelligence services are famously susceptible to fantasists. Many of its most famous children â Allen Dulles for one â have been fantasists in their own right. He must be engaged in a service industry where he rubs shoulders with the great, the good, the influential and the credulous. A fashionable hairdresser then, a
Figaro?
An antique dealer? A gallery owner?
Or a tailor?
There are only two or three books of mine of which I can truthfully say, âThis is where it began.'
The Spy Who Came in from the Cold
began in London airport, when a stocky man in his forties flopped on to a bar stool beside me, delved in his raincoat pocket and poured a handful of loose change in half-a-dozen currencies on to the bar. With a fighter's thick hands, he raked through the coins till he had enough of one currency.
âLarge Scotch,' he ordered. âNo bloody ice.'
It was all I ever heard him say, or so I now believe, but I fancied I caught a whiff of Irish in his voice. When his glass came, he ducked his lips to it in the practised movement of an habitual drinker and emptied it in two gulps. Then he shuffled off, looking at nobody. For all I'll ever know he was a commercial traveller down on his luck. Whoever he was, he became my spy, Alec Leamas, in
The Spy Who Came in from the Cold.
Then there was Doug.
An American friend visiting London suggests we drop in on his tailor, Doug Hayward, who has his premises in Mount Street in the West End. We are in the mid-nineties. My friend is from Hollywood. Doug Hayward dresses a lot of film stars and actors, he says. Somehow you don't expect tailors to be sitting down, but Doug when we find him is enthroned in a winged armchair, talking on the telephone. One reason he sat a lot, he later told me, was that he was tall and didn't want to tower over his customers.
He is talking to a woman, or I guess she's a woman because there are a lot of dears and darlings and references to her old man. His voice is theatrical and authoritative, with the Cockney traces ironed out of it, but the cadences still there. When Doug was young, he had spent a lot of time practising his elocution so that he could talk posh in front of shop. Then the sixties came along, posh was out, regional came back in, and thanks not least to the actor Michael Caine, a client of Doug's, Cockney was the flavour of the decade. But Doug wasn't about to have learned his posh for nothing. So he stuck to it, while the posh blokes went off round the corner and learned how to talk common.
âNow listen, darling,' Doug is saying into the telephone. âI'm sorry to hear your old man's playing around, because I like you both. But look at it this way. When you two got together, you were his bit on the side and he had a regular missus. Then he gets rid of his missus and he marries his bit on the side.' Pause for effect, because by now he knows we're listening. âSo there's a vacancy, isn't there, darling?'
âTailoring is theatre,' Doug tells us over lunch. âNobody comes to me because they
need
a suit. They come for the buzz. They come to get their youth back, or have a natter. Do they know what they want? Of course they don't. Anyone can dress a Michael Caine, but can you dress Charles Laughton? Somebody has to be in
charge
of a suit. I had a bloke the other day asking me why I don't make suits like Armani. “Listen,” I told him. “Armani makes better Armani suits
than I do. If you want an Armani, go down to Bond Street, save yourself six hundred quid and buy one.”'
I named my tailor Pendel, not Hayward, and called the book
The Tailor of Panama
, with tacit acknowledgement to Beatrix Potter's
The Tailor of Gloucester.
I gave him a half-Jewish background because, like the earliest American moviemakers, most of our tailoring families in those days were East End immigrants from middle Europe. And Pendel after the German word for pendulum, because I liked to think of him swinging back and forth between truth and fiction. All I needed now was a decadent, well-born British rascal who could recruit my Pendel and use him to line his own pocket. But for anyone who has taught at Eton, as I had, there were candidates galore.
26
Under deep cover
It's only a few years since we said our goodbyes to him, but I may not tell you when or where. I may not tell you whether we burned or buried him, whether we did it in the town or in the country, or whether his name was Tom, Dick or Harry, or the funeral was Christian or of another sort.
I will call him Harry.
Harry's wife was at the funeral, standing very straight, the same wife he had had for fifty years. She had been spat on in the fish queue for him, jeered at by neighbours for him and had her house burgled by the police who thought they were doing their duty by shaking out the local Communist Party firebrand. There was a child there too, now grown, who had suffered similar humiliations at school and later. But I may not tell you whether this was a boy or a girl child, or whether he or she has found a safe corner in the world Harry believed he was protecting. The wife, now widow, stood as steady as she had always done under pressure, but the grown-up child was crumpled with grief, to the mother's evident contempt. A life of hardship had taught her to value bearing, and she expected it of her offspring.
I went to the funeral because long ago I had had the management of Harry, which was a sacred trust as well as a delicate one since all his energies from late childhood onward had been directed at
frustrating his country's perceived enemies by becoming one of them. Harry had absorbed the Party's dogma until it was second nature to him. He had bent his mind until he scarcely knew its old shape any more. With our help he had schooled himself to think and react from the hip as one of its faithful. Yet he always managed to come up smiling for his weekly debriefings with his case officer:
All right then, Harry? I would ask.
âHunky-dory, thanks. How's your good self and the missus?'
Harry had taken on all the Party's dirty jobs, in the evenings and on weekends, that other comrades were only too glad to be relieved of. He had sold or failed to sell the
Daily Worker
at street corners, ditched his unsold copies and turned in the cash we gave him to cover them. He had acted as runner and talent-spotter for visiting Soviet cultural attachés and third secretaries of the
KGB
, and accepted their dreary assignments to collect tittle-tattle about technical industries in the area where he lived. And if no tittle-tattle came his way, we provided him with that too, having first made sure it was harmless.
Gradually, through diligence and devotion to the cause, Harry rose to become a valued comrade, entrusted with semi-conspiratorial errands that, though he played them for all they were worth, and so did we, seldom amounted to anything of substance in the intelligence market place. But this lack of success didn't matter, we assured Harry, because he was the right man in the right place, the essential listening post. If you didn't hear anything, Harry, we told him, that's fine too because it means we can sleep a little easier at night. And Harry would remark cheerfully that, well, John â or whatever I called myself â somebody has to clean out the drains, don't they? And we'd say, somebody has to, Harry, and thank you for being the one.
From time to time, perhaps to bolster his morale, we'd enter the virtual world of staybehind: if those Reds ever do come, Harry, and you happen to wake up to find yourself the Party's grand poobah for your district â that's when you'll become the link man for the resistance movement that's going to have to drive those bastards back into
the sea. In earnest of which fantasy, we would dig his radio transmitter out of its hiding place in his attic, blow the dust off it and watch him send dummy messages to an imaginary underground headquarters, and receive dummy orders in return, all by way of practice for the imminent Soviet occupation of Britain. We felt a little awkward doing this, and so did Harry, but it was part of the job, so we got on with it.
Ever since I left the secret world, I pondered the motives of Harry and his wife, and of other Harrys and their wives. Shrinks would have had a field day with Harry, but Harry would have had one with the shrinks, too. âSo what am I supposed to do, then?' he'd have asked them. âLet the Party steal the bloody country from underneath my nose?'
Harry took no delight in his duplicity. He bore it as a necessary burden of his calling. We paid him a pittance, and if we'd paid him more, he'd have been embarrassed. Besides, he could never have enjoyed his money. So we gave him a tiny private income and a tiny pension and called it his alimony, and we threw in all the respect and friendship that security allowed. With time, furtively, Harry and his wife, who posed as the good comrade's wife, became mildly religious. The minister of the religion they espoused seems never to have asked why two such avid communists came to him to pray.
When the funeral was over, and the friends and family and Party comrades had dispersed, a pleasant-faced man in a raincoat and black tie walked over to my car and shook my hand. âI'm from the Office,' he murmured shyly. âHarry's my third this month. They all seem to be dying off at the same time.'
Harry was one of the poor bloody infantry of honourable men and women who believed that the communists were set on destroying the country they loved, and felt they'd better do something about it. He thought the Reds were a nice enough bunch in their way, idealistic but a bit warped. So he put his life where his convictions were and died an unknown soldier of the Cold War. The practice of infiltrating spies into supposedly subversive organizations is as ancient as
the hills. As J. Edgar Hoover reportedly said with unusual wit when told the news that Kim Philby was a Soviet double agent:
âTell 'em, Jesus Christ only had twelve, and one of them was a double.'
Today, when we read of undercover policemen worming their way into peace and animal-rights organizations, taking lovers and fathering children under false identities, we are repelled because we know at once that the targets never justified the deception or the human cost. Harry, thank God, did not operate that way, and he believed absolutely that his work was morally justified. He saw international communism as his country's enemy, and its British manifestation as the enemy inside the home camp. No British communist I ever met would have subscribed to that view. The British establishment emphatically did, and that was good enough for Harry.