The Maid and the Queen (21 page)

This episode has naturally been attributed to divine revelation; however, there was perhaps another explanation for Joan’s perspicacity. She did not in fact discover Charles by wandering alone into the main hall and through a body of three hundred knights as is implied; rather, she was
escorted
into Charles’s presence by the count of Vendôme. The count of Vendôme was among those who had conspicuously accompanied Yolande of Aragon when she returned to the royal court the previous September, and was one of the lords who formed the nucleus of her political party. He understood precisely what was at stake and how important it was that this young woman see Charles and convince him to stay in France and fight the English. The count of Vendôme, not finding the king precisely where he had left him, would naturally have looked around for him, and the count of Vendôme knew what Charles looked like. Since her escort both wanted and needed Joan to detect the king, it is hardly surprising that she did so. It also helped that Charles was distinctive-looking. He had inherited his father’s and uncle’s extremely large nose, and this would have been known even in Domrémy.

However Joan managed to recognize him, from the moment she approached Charles, she demonstrated the same piety, passion, and strength of purpose that had so impressed all who had met her previously. With a deep reverence that must have put the timorous king immediately at his ease, she curtsied before him. “I was myself present at the castle and the city of Chinon when the Maid arrived, and I saw her when she presented herself to his royal majesty,” said Raoul de Gaucourt, a member of Charles’s entourage. “She showed great humility and simplicity of manner, this poor little shepherdess…. I heard her say the following words to the king: ‘Very noble lord dauphin, I have come and I have been sent from God to bring aid to you and to the kingdom.’” The duke of Alençon, who was out hunting quail, was called back to Chinon in a hurry “when a messenger came to tell me that a maiden had arrived at the king’s court who declared herself to have been sent by God to chase out the English and raise the siege the English had set around Orléans.” Joan later described her meeting with Charles to Friar Jean Pasquerel, her confessor, in greater detail: “When [the king] saw her, he asked Joan her name and she answered: ‘Gentle dauphin, I am Joan the
Maid, and the King of Heaven commands that through me you be anointed and crowned in the city of Reims as a lieutenant of the King of Heaven, who is king of France…. I say to you, on behalf of the Lord, that you are the true heir of France, and a king’s son, and He has sent me to you to lead you to Reims, so that you can receive your coronation and consecration if you wish it.’ This being understood, the king said to his courtiers that Joan had told him a certain secret that no one knew or could know except God; and that is why he had great confidence in her. All of that I learned from the mouth of Joan, because I was not present,” reported Friar Pasquerel.

The mystery of what secret Joan told Charles in order to win his confidence has remained a matter of speculation for six centuries. Some people believe she passed the king a ring verifying his royal birth; others aver that Joan revealed herself at this time to have been Charles’s half sister, the product of a liaison between Isabeau of Bavaria and the duke of Orléans, who had been spirited away from the Hôtel Saint-Pol at birth to be raised by peasants in Domrémy. Both of these hypotheses, and many others like them, were long ago refuted by the historical evidence and have been rejected as a matter of record; they persist only in fiction.

The truth was there was no “sign” as such. Joan herself expressed frustration when later questioned about this by Charles’s advisers. “In God’s name, I am not come to Poitiers to make signs; but take me to Orléans, I will show you the signs for which I have been sent!” What Joan did was speak in her convincingly passionate manner directly to Charles’s innermost fears and especially to his obsession with his possible illegitimacy. At the very end of his life, in confession—not a place where people ordinarily prevaricate—Charles confirmed that he had believed in Joan because she had known “the secret prayer” he had made to God. This prayer consisted of three “requests,” the principal entreaty being that Charles’s questions concerning his own parentage be answered by God, and he himself established, both within his own mind and that of the kingdom at large, as the legitimate son of Charles VI, king of France, and thus the true heir to the throne.
^*

A three-part heartfelt supplication to God to give him some sign that he
was who he was supposed to be, to silence the doubts that had been raised by the opposition and that nagged at his soul and tormented his reason, to give him aid and succor in his struggle with the English, to protect him from harm by showing him which path was best to take—and then, suddenly, Joan, an obviously devout peasant girl reputed to be a holy woman, materializes out of the farthest reaches of the kingdom promising to lift the siege of Orléans and drive out the English in words that echo in the strongest possible tones the terms of that prayer: “I say to you, on behalf of the Lord, that you are the true heir of France, and a king’s son, and He has sent me to lead you to Reims.” In his darkest hour, Charles had cried out to God for a sign of divine favor, and God had answered his prayer and sent a messenger to reassure him of the truth. History and literature were full of accounts of similarly miraculous events; why should this not be one of them? What other explanation could there be for Joan’s presence at court? How else could she, a poor ignorant peasant girl from so far away, possibly have known what was in a king’s heart? What else but a divine command could have compelled her to attempt such a dangerous journey, one that had so little prospect of success? Charles had asked for a talisman, and God had sent one. Joan did not have to produce a sign,
she was herself the sign
.

After their conversation, “the king seemed radiant,” reported Simon Charles. No longer unsure, Charles began to act with energy, and to believe once more in himself and his cause. It was a turning point in his career and the war, and it all came from this meeting. “To introduce a prophetess to the impressionable Charles could have been a stroke of something approaching political genius,” admitted his biographer M. G. A. Vale.

C
HARLES ORDERED
that Joan be treated as a guest of the court for a week while he made up his mind exactly what to do with her. She was given rooms in the tower of one of his castles and assigned a page to accompany her during the day and a small household of women to stay with her at night. According to the duke of Alençon, the next day, “Joan came to the king’s mass, and when she saw the king, she bowed deeply; and he led Joan into a chamber,” recalled the duke. “The king kept the lord of La Trémoïlle and myself with him, saying to everyone else that they could retire. And then Joan made several requests of the king…. Many other things that I do not remember were said until it was time for dinner.” After the meal, they took Joan into a nearby field where she demonstrated her martial abilities. “Joan ran about charging with a lance, and I, seeing Joan behave like this, carrying and running with the lance, gave her the gift of a horse,” the duke of Alençon continued.

Joan addresses Charles at the royal court.

The presence of Georges de la Trémoïlle at these meetings ensured that Joan’s influence on Charles would not go uncontested. For all of her passion and piety, which had in the past won her so many followers, Joan never succeeded in convincing this particular councillor that she had come from God and not the opposition. La Trémoïlle, shrewd and practiced, knew better than to attack Joan openly while the king was so obviously taken with her. Instead, he merely planted doubts, and the upshot of these was that Charles decided that Joan should be examined by members of the Church to verify that she was genuinely an agent of God and not a trick played by the devil.

A small group of regional clerics, led by a couple of bishops in company with some lesser local Church officials, were accordingly rounded up and commanded to investigate Joan and render an opinion on her authenticity. The reluctance of this group to take responsibility for a definitive verdict is
not difficult to imagine. After questioning Joan and deliberating for a week, they prudently recommended that she be interrogated by more learned authorities, and Charles arranged for her go to Poitiers, where she could be scrutinized by established specialists in scripture and theology.

The subsequent investigation of Joan at Poitiers, by a tribunal that boasted a number of masters from the University of Paris who had been exiled from the school for maintaining their political allegiance to Charles, was an extremely odd affair. Hurriedly conducting the inquiry in three weeks, this group made no attempt to appeal to the pope for guidance, as similar panels had done in the past with other holy women such as Elizabeth of Hungary, Catherine of Siena, or Bridget of Sweden. Nor was any real effort made to challenge Joan’s view of herself or her mission. Her interrogators did not even mind when she answered rudely or evasively. For example, Friar Pierre Seguin reported, “I asked her what language her voice spoke. She answered, ‘Better than yours.’ Me, I spoke the dialect of Limoges; and then I asked her if she believed in God; she answered ‘Yes, better than you.’ And I then said to her that God wouldn’t want us to believe in her unless something made us think that we should do so. I could not advise the king simply on her assertion that he should entrust men-at-arms to her so that she might lead them into peril, unless she could at least tell him something further. And she answered, ‘In God’s name, I did not come to Poitiers to produce signs…. But lead me to Orléans, and I will show you the sign for which I was sent.’” Rarely in history have members of the Church shown such patience and forbearance in their investigation of a young woman purporting to know the will of God better than they did.

An account of the proceedings hints at the explanation for this uncharacteristic deference, which clearly had far more to do with politics than theology. “Finally, it was concluded by the clerks after their interrogations… that given the great need in which both the king and the kingdom found themselves—since the king and his subjects were at that moment in despair and had no other hope of aid if it came not from God—the king should make use of her assistance.” The wording of their final decision—“In her, Joan, we find no evil but only good, humility, virginity, devotion, honesty, and simplicity”—was a masterful display of the art of appearing to authenticate Joan and her mission without actually saying so, a necessary precaution in case she should turn out to be under the influence of an evil spirit or a heretic after all.

The tribunal’s reference to
Joan’s virginity provides the final clue to the motivating force behind this verdict. According to the prophecies, the woman destined to save France would be a virgin, and although Joan claimed to be such, it was necessary to offer more substantive proof. As this evidence obviously could not be obtained through scriptural questioning, a physical examination was required. It was not appropriate that she be inspected by men, so two noblewomen were instead enlisted in the effort. “I heard it said that Joan, when she came to the king’s court, was examined by women to know what was in her, if she was a man or a woman, and if she was a virgin or corrupted,” recalled Joan’s confessor, Jean Pasquerel. “Those who visited her for this purpose were, from what I heard, the lady of Gaucourt and the lady of Trèves.”

It should come as no surprise that the lady of Gaucourt and the lady of Trèves were both devoted and long-standing members of Yolande of Aragon’s household. The lady of Trèves was in fact the wife of Robert Le Maçon, who had been Charles’s counselor since he was fourteen, and who had helped him to escape Paris by giving up his own horse to the boy when the Burgundians overran the city in 1418. To add the authority and prestige of rank to these proceedings, Yolande herself oversaw the manner of Joan’s physical examination and presented the findings to Charles. “The Master’s report having been made to the King, this Maid was put into the hands of the Queen of Sicily, mother of the Queen our sovereign lady, and to certain ladies being with her, by whom this maid was seen, visited and secretly regarded and examined in the secret parts of her body,” reported Jean d’Aulon, Joan’s steward. “But after they had seen and looked at all there was to look at in this case, the lady [Yolande] said and related to the King that she and her ladies found with certainty that she [Joan] was a true and entire maid in whom appeared no corruption or violence. I was present when the lady made her report.

“After having heard these things, the King, considering the great goodness which was in this maid and what she had said to him, that by God was she sent to him, concluded in his Council that, henceforth, he would use her aid for the war,” Jean concluded.

Joan was going to Orléans.

B
UT FIRST
she had to be outfitted as befit her new position as a knight in the king’s army. She was sent to Tours for her equipment. Charles paid 100
livres tournois to have a suit of armor and a banner made especially for her; she chose her own standard, “on which was painted the image of Our Savior seated in judgment in the clouds of the sky, and there was an angel painted holding in his hand a
fleur-de-lys
which the image was blessing,” noted her confessor. To round out her military entourage she was given, in addition to her squire, two pages and two heralds. Two of her brothers, sent by the family to search for her, apparently also joined her at this time as part of her retinue. Although Robert de Baudricourt had already given her a sword, Joan wanted one with a religious provenance and wrote to the clerics of the church of Sainte-Catherine-de-Fierbois, a town she had stopped in on her way to Chinon, asking them to unearth a blade that had been brought back from a crusade and buried as a relic behind the altar. Word that a young woman purporting to be an emissary from God had promised to lift the siege of Orléans had already spread throughout the vicinity. The officials of Sainte-Catherine-de-Fierbois, sensible of the miraculous nature of the undertaking, hurriedly exhumed the sword and had it cleaned. “An arms merchant of Tours went to seek it, and the prelates of that place gave me a sheath, and those of Tours also, with them, had two sheaths made for me: one of red velvet and the other of cloth-of-gold, and I myself had another made of right strong leather,” Joan noted.