Authors: Derek Chollet
  Â
in Libya,
113â114
  Â
obstacles to,
27
  Â
patience in,
222â224
  Â
precision in,
221â222
  Â
skepticism in,
225â226
  Â
success of,
230â231
  Â
sustainability in,
218â220
Lynch, Marc,
95
“Massive Ordnance Penetrator” (MOP),
189â190
maximalism,
215
McFaul, Michael,
171
McGovern, George,
30
Meacham, Jon,
209
Merkel, Angela
  Â
career of,
62
  Â
support of,
178
  Â
ties of,
211
Middle East
  Â
airstrikes in,
2
  Â
foreign policy for,
94â96
  Â
Marshall Plan of,
94
  Â
military power in,
69â70
military power
  Â
in Afghanistan,
71â72
,
79
,
144â145
  Â
Clinton, H., view of,
87â88
  Â
criminal's in,
81â82
  Â
deliberation of,
81â82
  Â
of Democrats,
38â39
  Â
in Iran,
187â189
,
200â201
  Â
in Iraq,
144â145
  Â
against ISIS,
157
  Â
in Israel,
194â195
  Â
in Libya,
99â100
,
105â106
,
110
,
113
  Â
limitations of,
85â86
  Â
in Middle East,
69â70
  Â
Obama's relationship with,
79â81
  Â
of Putin,
17â18
  Â
in Russia,
172â173
  Â
struggles with,
82â83
  Â
in Syria,
142â144
  Â
training for,
146â147
  Â
in Ukraine,
167â170
Milne, David,
59
MOP.
See
“Massive Ordnance Penetrator”
Morsi, Mohammed
  Â
economy under,
118
  Â
election of,
117â118
  Â
end of,
120
Moscow,
64â65
Mosul,
149
Mubarak, Hosni
  Â
departure of,
117â118
  Â
end to,
90
Muslims
  Â
anti-American,
133â134
  Â
fears of,
95
  Â
leadership of,
117â120
  Â
plan for,
67â68
  Â
view of,
117
NATO
  Â
after Cold War,
32
  Â
during Libyan crisis,
100â101
  Â
in Ukraine crisis,
167â170
Netanyahu, Benjamin
  Â
concerns of,
11â12
  Â
Obama relationship with,
190â191
“New American Moment,”
87â88
“New START,”
159
Niebuhr, Reinhold
  Â
influence of,
224
9/11 attack
  Â
foreign policy after,
32â33
  Â
Obama administration after,
ix
,
33
Nixon, Richard,
204
  Â
Obama compared to,
212â213
Nobel Peace Prize
  Â
award,
19
  Â
speech for,
79
no-fly zone
  Â
establishment of,
13
,
130â131
  Â
in Iraq,
130â131
  Â
support for,
97
  Â
symbolic,
98
  Â
in Syria,
154
North, Oliver,
82
North Korea,
53â54
Norway,
105
  Â
Oslo,
66
Nye, Joseph,
229
Obama, Barak
  Â
Adams compared to,
214
  Â
at American University,
29â30
,
201â202
  Â
antiwar statements of,
28â30
,
40â41
  Â
Arab Spring speech by,
95
  Â
balance of,
215â218
  Â
in Berlin,
62â63
  Â
Bush liked by,
206â212
  Â
characteristics of,
xviâxvii
  Â
choices of,
25
  Â
Clinton, H.,. chosen by,
65
  Â
coercive diplomacy of,
19â23
  Â
critics of,
67
,
72â73
,
82
,
123â124
,
155â156
,
177â178
  Â
Eisenhower compared to,
204â207
  Â
exceptionalism of,
226â231
  Â
fallibility of,
224â225
  Â
favorite philosopher of,
203
  Â
foreign policy checklist of,
xv
  Â
grand strategy of,
xi
  Â
leadership principles of,
43â44
  Â
liberation of,
23â24
  Â
Netanyahu relationship with,
190â191
  Â
Nixon compared to,
212â213
  Â
patience of,
222â224
  Â
precision of,
221â222
  Â
Qaddafi confronted by,
103â104
  Â
role models of,
204
  Â
skepticism of,
225â226
  Â
speeches of,
211
  Â
style of,
210â211
  Â
sustainability of,
218â220
Obama administration
  Â
Arab Spring approach of,
91â92
  Â
after Bush administration,
x
,
xii
  Â
confronting China,
58â59
  Â
Congress battles with,
94
  Â
domestic politics during,
60
  Â
foreign policy of,
58â59
,
212â213
  Â
Iran relationship with,
183â185
,
199â202
  Â
Israel relationship with,
190â191
  Â
during Libya crisis,
97
,
101â102
  Â
limitations of,
85â86
  Â
“off ramp” plan of,
165â166
  Â
against Putin,
162â163
  Â
security issues of,
xixâxx
  Â
supporting Ukraine,
168â170
,
174â175
  Â
Taliban dealing with,
71â72
  Â
troop strategies in,
78
  Â
Ukraine debate within,
174â176
OPCW.
See
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
“Operation Desert Fox,”
107
“Operation Inherent Resolve,”
151
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW),
19
Oslo,
66
Ottoman empire,
xix
Our Own Worst Enemy,
(Gelb, Lake, Destler),
47
,
230â231
Pakistan
  Â
America relationship with,
69â70
  Â
finances in,
70
  Â
terrorism in,
69
Panetta, Leon
  Â
in Iranian affairs,
194â195
  Â
in Israeli affairs,
193
  Â
in Libyan affairs,
110â111
Paris attacks,
150
patience,
222â224
Paul, Rand,
16
Pentagon
  Â
in Iranian affairs,
187
  Â
during Syrian crisis,
1â8
  Â
wanting troops,
81â82
Persian Gulf War,
207
Petraeus, David,
141
Pew Research Center,
13
Philippines,
55
Powell, Colin,
36
Prague,
66
precision,
221â222
Putin, Vladimir
  Â
aggression of,
160â161
  Â
benefits of,
172
  Â
control of,
65
  Â
military power of,
17â18
  Â
Obama administration against,
162â163
Qaddafi, Muammar
  Â
exit of,
106â109
  Â
forces of,
96â97
  Â
intentions of,
102â103
  Â
Obama confronting of,
103â104
  Â
overthrow of,
100
  Â
security forces of,
97
,
160
“qualitative military edge,”
192â193
Reagan administration
  Â
criminals in,
82
  Â
Iran after,
xiv
Remnick, David,
xvii
Republicans
  Â
on budget,
60
  Â
during Bush administration,
36â37
  Â
mystique of,
35
  Â
wanting force,
15
Rhodes, Ben
  Â
on Egypt,
123â124
  Â
on military support,
142
  Â
on strategy,
xviii
Rice, Susan,
1
Riedel, Bruce,
69
Roosevelt, Teddy,
44â45
Rose, Gideon,
100â101
Ross, Dennis,
191
Rumsfeld, Donald,
82
Russia,
xx
  Â
America relationship with,
53â64
,
159â164
  Â
Europe relationship with,
164â165
  Â
foreign policy with,
171
  Â
military power in,
172â173
  Â
missiles in,
17
  Â
penalty box for,
164â165
  Â
reset in,
64â65
  Â
in Syria,
17
,
172â173
,
179
  Â
Ukraine relationship with,
162
,
172
safe zone
  Â
critiques of,
131
  Â
establishment of,
130
Schell, Jonathan,
45
Schröder, Gerhard,
62
Scowcroft, Brent,
33â34
,
208â209
“Scowcroft Democrats,”
208
security forces
  Â
of Afghanistan,
144â145
  Â
in America,
118