The Ignatius Catholic Study Bible New Testament (275 page)

Disputes about the authorship of 2 Peter erupted again with the advent of modern scholarship. Today a majority of exegetes maintain that 2 Peter is a pseudepigraphical work, a letter written by an unknown figure several decades after the apostle's death in the mid-60s. Perhaps the author was a onetime disciple of Peter, but this is uncertain. What is critically established, say advocates of this view, is that he borrowed Peter's name and reputation to add authority to his own pastoral instructions. Several facts have been put forward to support this position, such as the stylistic differences between 1 and 2 Peter, as well as the hesitation of the early Church to accept the letter as apostolic. Beyond this, literary analysis indicates that the author borrowed thoughts and expressions from two other New Testament letters: 1 Peter and Jude. Inasmuch as scholars often date those two epistles in the late first century, 2 Peter could not, then, have been written within the lifetime of the apostle. Not only that, but some scholars feel it is highly improbable that someone of Peter's stature and authority would ever have stooped to rely on the work of a lesser-known figure such as Jude. Finally, confirmation of the pseudepigraphical hypothesis is said to come from 3:16, where the author refers to a collection of Paul's letters. Again, the argument goes, it is unlikely that all of the Pauline epistles were gathered together and venerated as a collection of scriptural writings before the late first century, well after the time of Peter.

Despite the doubts that have historically surrounded the epistle, conservative scholarship continues to maintain the apostolic authorship of 2 Peter. It is not that the difficulties of holding this position are minimized or ignored; rather, the historical and literary evidence is evaluated differently.
(1)
The divergence in style between 1 and 2 Peter is real but does not amount to proof that the two letters come from different authors. There is reason to think that 1 Peter was penned by Peter's associate Silvanus (1 Pet 5:12); in which case, Peter may well have written the second letter himself, or perhaps he did so with the help of a different scribe. Either way, this would provide a reasonable explanation for the different writing styles evident in the two letters.
(2)
Acknowledgment of differences must be balanced by a consideration of the similarities between 1 and 2 Peter (compare 2 Pet 1:2 with 1 Pet 1:2; 2 Pet 1:20-21 with 1 Pet 1:10-12; and 2 Pet 2:5 with 1 Pet 3:20). Of course, one could explain these points of contact as the literary borrowing of a later writer, but it is more natural to suppose that a single author wrote both works in question.
(3)
The dependence of 2 Peter on the letters of 1 Peter and Jude is fairly well established. However, the dates of these letters are themselves disputed, so it is precarious to use them as fixed chronological points from which to make judgments about the authorship of 2 Peter. Moreover, the assertion that Peter would think it below his dignity to utilize the work of someone less prestigious than himself (Jude) lacks supporting evidence. Its working assumption—that Peter was more controlled by pride and a sense of superiority than by a desire to communicate Christian truth in ways that had already proven effective for other ministers of the gospel—is itself highly questionable.
(4)
The author assumes in 3:16 that his readers are familiar with Pauline letters that were circulating in the early Church. However, there is simply no historical evidence to substantiate the claim that such a collection could not have come together before the late first century. In point of fact, Paul encouraged communities to exchange his letters even in his own lifetime (Col 4:16).

On balance, Peter's authorship of 2 Peter has more in its favor than the modern theory of pseudepigraphical authorship. It is not strictly impossible that an unnamed and unknown author wrote the epistle posing as the Apostle Peter, but neither is it likely. The fact that 2 Peter was included in the canon of Scripture shows that the Church distinguished this letter from the corpus of pseudepigraphical writings that were falsely attributed to Peter in the second century. The sound use of literary and historical analysis can be used to confirm this distinction and to support the Petrine authorship of the letter even today.

Date
 Efforts to date 2 Peter hinge entirely on the question of authorship. If the letter is authentic and comes from Peter himself, then it must have been written before his martyrdom in Rome in the mid-60s. The statement in 2 Pet 1:14, in which the author anticipates that his death will come soon, implies that it was written shortly before this time. On the other hand, if the letter was written by someone impersonating Peter, then the question of dating is more open-ended. Proponents of pseudepigraphical authorship regularly claim that 2 Peter was the last book of the New Testament to have been written. Though some would date it around
A.D.
80, most scholars of this persuasion date the book in the second century, some as late as
A.D.
140.

Destination
 There are no explicit statements in 2 Peter that specify either its place of origin or its destination. Answers to these questions can only be inferred and for this reason remain tentative. The most likely location for its origin is Rome, the place from which Peter sent his first letter in the early 60s (1 Pet 5:13) and the place where tradition says he died in the mid-60s. Evidence is lacking that he left the imperial capital in Italy at any time between these two events. The most likely location of its recipients is northern Asia Minor (modern Turkey), assuming that 3:1 is referring to 1 Peter (1 Pet 1: 1) and not to a now-lost letter that had been sent to the same readership.

Themes and Characteristics
 Second Peter was written to Christians dangerously exposed to an outbreak of false teaching. News had reached Peter that deceivers and scoffers were starting to infiltrate missionary Churches with their errors and were openly challenging the orthodox faith taught by the apostles. Peter's letter, which he describes as his parting words (1:14-15), responds to this situation both offensively and defensively.
(1)
Offensively:
Peter vigorously attacks both the claims and the conduct of these false prophets. Their most conspicuous error was the denial that Jesus would come again in glory as the Judge of the world. The apparent delay of the Christ's return was ridiculed (3:3-7). Other "destructive heresies" were propagated as well (2:1) and were used to justify and promote degenerate behavior. Far from being respectable teachers, these troublemakers, as depicted by Peter, led lives dominated by licentiousness (2:2), greed (2:3, 14), lust (2:10, 14, 18), insubordination (2:10), and irreverence toward angels (2:10-11). So heinous were their sins that Peter groups them together with the fallen angels, the wicked generation of Noah's day, and the depraved inhabitants of ancient Sodom (2:4-6). Readers are assured throughout the letter that certain destruction is in store for such troublemakers (2:1, 4-9, 20; 3:7).
(2)
Defensively:
Peter attempts to immunize his readers against deceptive ideas that could lead them astray. The best protection against error, he insists, is a firm understanding and commitment to apostolic doctrine. He thus reminds them of truths they already know (1:12-15; 3:1) and challenges them to grow still more in their knowledge of God and his ways (1:3; 3:18). And to faith they must add virtue, so that the truth of the gospel will shine forth through their lives as godliness (1:5-11). All of this has been made possible by Jesus Christ, who has provided every grace we need to escape the corruption of the world before the coming Judgment (1:3-4; 3:11). The greatest of these is a participation in "the divine nature" of God himself (1:4). «

OUTLINE OF THE SECOND LETTER OF SAINT PETER

1. Opening Address (
1:1-2
)

2. God's Precious Promises (
1:3-21
)

   A. The Vocation to Virtue (
1:3-11
)

   B. The Sure Prophetic Word (
1:12-21
)

3. Denunciation of False Teachers (
2:1-22
)

   A. The Presence of Deceivers (
2:1-3
)

   B. The Punishment of Deceivers (
2:4-10
)

   C. The Poison of Deceivers (
2:11-22
)

4. The Promised Return of Christ (
3:1-17
)

   A. The Skepticism of Scoffers (
3:1-7
)

   B. The Day of the Lord (
3:8-13
)

   C. Final Exhortation (
3:14-17
)

5. Closing Doxology (
3:18
)

THE SECOND LETTER OF

Chapters

1
2
3

Salutation

1
 
Simon
Peter, a servant and apostle of Jesus Christ,

To those who have obtained a faith of equal standing with ours in the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ:
^a

2
 
May grace and peace
be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord.

The Christian's Call and Election

3
 His divine power has
granted to us all things
that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to
^b
his own glory and excellence,
⁴
by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, that through these you may
escape
from the corruption that is in the world because of passion, and become partakers of the divine nature.
 
*
⁵
For this very reason make every effort to supplement your faith with
virtue
, and virtue with knowledge,
⁶
and knowledge with self-control, and self-control with steadfastness, and steadfastness with godliness,
⁷
and godliness with brotherly affection, and brotherly affection with love.
⁸
For if these things are yours and abound, they keep you from being ineffective or unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.
⁹
For whoever lacks these things is blind and shortsighted and has forgotten that he was
cleansed from his old sins
.
¹⁰
Therefore, brethren, be the more zealous to confirm
your call and election
, for if you do this you will never fall;
¹¹
so there will be richly provided for you an entrance into
the eternal kingdom
of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

12
 
Therefore I intend always to remind you
of these things, though you know them and are established in the truth that you have.
¹³
I think it right, as long as I am in
this body
,
^c
to arouse you by way of reminder,
¹⁴
since I know that the putting off of my body
^c
will be soon, as our Lord Jesus
Christ showed me
.
¹⁵
And I will see to it that after
my departure
you may be able at any time to recall these things.

Eyewitnesses of Christ's Glory

16
 
*
 For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were
eyewitnesses
of his majesty.
¹⁷
For when he received honor and glory from God the Father and the voice was borne to him by the Majestic Glory, "This is my beloved Son,
^d
with whom I am well pleased,"
¹⁸
we heard this voice borne from heaven, for we were with him on
the holy mountain
.
¹⁹
And we have the prophetic word made more sure. You will do well to pay attention to this as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until
the day dawns
and the morning star rises in your hearts.
²⁰
First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of
one's own interpretation
,
²¹
because no prophecy ever came by the impulse of man, but men
moved
by the Holy Spirit
spoke from God.
^e

False Prophets and Their Punishment

2
  
But false prophets
also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive
heresies
, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction.
²
And many will follow their licentiousness, and because of them the way of
truth will be reviled
.
³
And in their greed they will exploit you with false words; from of old their condemnation has not been idle, and their destruction has not been asleep.
 
*

4
 
For if God
did not spare
the angels
when they sinned, but cast them into hell
^f
and committed them to pits of deepest darkness to be kept until the judgment;
⁵
if he did not spare the ancient world, but preserved
Noah, a herald
of righteousness, with seven other persons, when he brought a flood upon the world of the ungodly;
⁶
if by turning the cities of Sodom and Gomor'rah to ashes he condemned them to extinction and made them an example to those who were to be ungodly;
⁷
and if he rescued righteous
Lot, greatly distressed
by the licentiousness of the wicked
⁸
(for by what that righteous man saw and heard as he lived among them, he was vexed in his righteous soul day after day with their lawless deeds),
⁹
then the Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trial, and to keep the unrighteous under punishment until the day of judgment,
¹⁰
and especially those who
indulge in the lust
of defiling passion and despise authority.