The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (77 page)

 
The Elite bloodlines have no real idea what love is, none of them ever receive it and thus cannot express it.
 
Unfortunately, this is the sad reality for their children and certainly puts into perspective these people’s attitudes towards the rest of humanity.
 

During some of the interviews after the break-up of the marriage, Diana stated that on reflection, she could see that Charles had never been genuine in his affection towards her and even before the wedding she had realised she would also be having a relationship with his one true love Camilla Parker-Bowles the ‘third person in the marriage’, which of course became more apparent as time passed.
 
During the marriage, Charles and Camilla communicated with the codenames ‘Gladys and Fred’.
 
Camilla like the Windsors, is close to the Rothschilds and on the first anniversary of Diana’s death, she was on the Ionian island of Corfu enjoying the hospitality of Lord Jacob Rothschild, who just happened to have spent £16 million leasing and restoring the Spencer’s 18th century mansion overlooking Green Park in London close to Buckingham Palace.
 

A week after her engagement to Charles, Diana’s bulimia began in earnest.
 
This is an eating disorder which results in vomiting every time food is eaten and Diana was suffering this three or four times a day and eventually became desperately thin.
 
This condition could well be a direct result of the satanic upbringing experienced by Diana and in this case was triggered when Charles put his hand on her waist and said, “Oh, a bit chubby here, aren’t we?” she stated.
 
This may also be construed as yet another character assassination of Diana to ensure that by the time of her murder, she was seen as ‘the crazy woman’, to totally discredit her.
 
Bulimia is of course a disease of the emotions, as most diseases are and Diana had been an emotional wreck since the break-up of her father and mother’s marriage in-line with the standard upbringing of bloodline offspring.

She described the attitude of Charles thus:

 
“He found the virgin, the sacrificial lamb and in a way he was obsessed with me.
 
But it was hot and cold, hot and cold.
 
You never knew what mood it was going to be, up and down, up and down… He was in awe of his mama, intimidated by his father and I was always the third person in the room.”

 
Just before the marriage to Charles, she met her sisters and told them she could not go through with the wedding, especially with Camilla still on the scene, but they said she had no choice because “your face is on the tea towels and you’re too late to chicken out”.
 
Immediately before the wedding, Diana stayed at Clarence House, the London residence of the Queen Mother but when she arrived, no-one was there to welcome her.
 
It was, she said, like going to a hotel.
 
How typical.

 
And so, Diana and Charles were married in St Paul’s Cathedral on the 29th July 1981, the numbers here are very significant, but more importantly this just precedes the sacrificial ritual and feast of Lammas.
 
That morning at Clarence House she said she felt calm, deathly calm: “I felt I was a sacrificial lamb to the slaughter.
 
I knew it but I couldn’t do anything about it”.
 
How prophetic these words would turn out to be.

 
They spent their first night of their honeymoon at the Mountbatten (Battenberg) family estate at Broadlands in Hampshire, before sailing around the Greek Islands in the Royal Yacht Britannia.
 
The Bulimia got worse and she considered suicide, such was the scale of her unhappiness and this was just the start of the marriage.
 
She said at one point… “My husband made me feel to inadequate in every possible way.
 
Each time I came up for air he pushed me down again.
 
I hated myself so much”.
 

One of Diana’s royal duties in 1982 was to represent the Queen at the funeral of Princess Grace of Monaco, herself a victim of murder by the Elite when the brakes on her car ‘failed’.
 
Princess Grace, formerly the actress Grace Kelly, ran the Monaco branch of the secret society, the Order of the Solar Temple with Jean Louis Marsan, the close friend of her husband, Prince Rainier.

And so, the Windsors achieved their first objective upon the arrival of Prince William.
 
Diana was informed that the birth had to be induced to fit in with Charles’ polo playing programme and William was duly born on the 21st June 1982, which just ‘happens’ to be the summer solstice.
 
What kind of people, portrayed by the media as role models for us all, would induce a child’s birth to fit in with the father’s polo-playing programme?
 
I think we know the answer to that question, well enough.
 
Of course, in reality the inducement was to ensure the birth occurred on the solstice in accordance with occult ritual with which the Elite are so obsessed to the exclusion of all else, but the fact that they would regard birth inducement to fit-in with social activity as ‘normal’, speaks volumes about the mind-set of these people.
 
The summer solstice esoterically represents the height of the sun’s power in the northern hemisphere whilst it is at its highest point in the solar year and it is even possible to predict what colour outfits the Queen will wear each day such is their obsession with esoteric and occult principles.

So, the new-born was ‘christened’ William, for the bloodline of William the Conqueror, Arthur, for the sun god symbol, King Arthur, Philip, for the Duke of Edinburgh and Louis, for Lord Louis Mountbatten, Prince Charles’ mentor.
 
Two years later in 1984, Prince Harry was born and thus Diana’s royal role was concluded, as she related to Andrew Morton:
 

“Then suddenly as Harry was born it just went bang, our marriage, the whole thing went down the drain”.

Diana and Charles separated in 1992, divorced on the 28th August 1996 and then, just over one year later, she was dead.
 
The cycle was complete.

 
The media onslaught against Diana commenced in earnest in 1992, shortly after the official separation.
 
A tape of an intimate telephone conversation between Diana and the car dealer, James Gilbey, was released through the media at this time and in the tape Diana said that Charles was a real torturer.
 
She told Gilbey:

“I’ll go out and conquer the world, do my bit in the way I know how and leave him behind”.
The irony of her character assassination by the Windsor’s via the compliant press was that it actually worked in her favour and her popularity grew.
 
Imagine the frustrations of the establishment as in their desperation they tried harder and harder to defame her and yet her star just seemed to continue rising.
  
Of course this is a pertinent demonstration of the fact that the Elite have no idea what love is, as Charles himself stated and the fact that they find it difficult to combat what they cannot understand.
 
The heady combination of Diana’s enormous heart, her global public profile, her down-to-earth woman-of-the-people charisma and her intense desire to prove the Windsors to be the cold, heartless brutes they most certainly are, threatened the very survival of royalty in all its forms.

 
It is now, this gang of criminals and multi-generational genocidal murderers and their ancient practices and rituals, upon which we will focus.
 
A necessary step, if we are to truly understand their motives and raisons d’etre.

Diana’s natural compassion and empathy with people thoroughly exposed the Windsors and their ilk as irrelevant in the eyes of the people.
 
The shy and gullible child, whom the Windsors calculatingly enticed into their ‘world of pain’ to act as a ‘brood-mare’, became a woman of great mental strength who realised her true power and was not afraid to use it.
 
This then was the beginning of her downfall.
 
She brought the issue of landmines from obscurity into the open and thus to the minds of the masses and thus became a serious danger to the forces of evil and their profits.
 
Diana also knew many intimate secrets within the establishment and was prepared to expose them to get what she wanted – her rights as a Princess and more importantly, a mother.
 
Was there an element of vindictiveness behind it all?
 
Probably, but who among us would blame her after the way she had been used and then discarded and had her life publicly devastated and torn apart?

 
In March 1997, a few months before she died, Diana made a phone call to someone who was amazed when she told him she was the Princess of Wales.
 
Totally astounded, he first of all professed disbelief, especially when she told him she was calling from a ‘supermarket phone’ in England.
 
Diana herself stated openly that she often made calls from public telephones, particularly from a certain department store in Kensington [Mohammed Fayed’s Harrods], when she wanted to be certain the conversation would not be taped.

 
Diana admired the man she had called, who shall remain nameless, for his wisdom and knowledge and she told him she had something to reveal that would shake the world and asked for his advice on how best to go about it.
 
He has never revealed exactly what she told him, yet one researcher called the man and asked him if it was her awareness of the Windsor’s widespread connection to drug trafficking that was the issue.
 
His reply was “Oh no, it was much worse than that”.
 
So to lower initiates or outer-circle operatives, the fact that she was about to reveal something thoroughly incriminating, would be their understanding of why she was killed, but there is a yet more compelling reason for her untimely death – one which would have been planned long, long before.

Diana because of the ‘quality of her soul’ and into which bloodline she specifically chose to be born, was the reason she was chosen as the incubator and breeding partner for the House of Windsor to create a more acceptable genetic ‘cloak’.
 
With these genes, this ancient, royal bloodline could continue to thrive, thus rejuvenating the tired, old genes which had been re-cycled for generations resulting in in-breeding on an industrial scale and the health problems inherent with that particular philosophy (see the section on ‘Jack the Ripper’ regarding Prince Eddy, for example).

To the higher initiates or fully illuminated operatives of the Elite, this ritual was the killing of the moon Goddess in the middle earth, Diana in her highest form.
 
As with John F. Kennedy, to the unaware masses, the deed appeared to be done because of the policies he was pursuing, but to the highest initiates it was an ancient Merovingian ritual known as the ‘Killing of the King’.

 
The final sequence of events which led to her ritual murder involves as I state earlier in the chapter, at almost every turn, the man called Mohamed Fayed, the Egyptian former owner of Harrods.
 
Many people in British high society see Fayed as an enemy of the establishment as proven by his long battle with the Lonrho tycoon and mass murderer in Africa, ‘Tiny’ Rowlands.
 
This is a subtle ploy to ‘control the opposition’, a tactic used successfully in many covert Elite operations.
 
The theory being that if you control both sides in a battle, you are bound to ‘win the war’.
 
And as time passed, sure enough, Fayed was ultimately ‘defeated’ in his so-called quest for justice which symbolically and psychologically implants itself in the minds of the masses who eventually will begin to believe that he was wrong after all.

 
Fayed has also lied extensively about his background, claiming to be from a wealthy family, when he patently was not.
 
He is also well-known to be a sexual ‘pervert’ and has escaped prosecution for a growing number of sexual assaults on female staff working at Harrods. One girl, Samantha-Jane Ramsey, said that when she complained to her supervisor that she had been groped by Fayed, the supervisor sighed, ‘not another one’.
 
She was dismissed from her job for making the complaint which is the fate of all those who speak out about his molestation and ‘style’ of management.
 
John Monks the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, stated that; “…there was a regime of fear and terror at Harrods”.

When Samantha-Jane took her complaint to the local Marylebone Police Station, she said that the officer told her; “You are not the first to come to us.
 
We have files inches high on Mr Fayed, but no proof.
  
It would be your word against his”.