The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (51 page)

BOOK: The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality
4.9Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

 

Hitler responded… “But I must also draw Mr. Roosevelt's attention to one or two mistakes in history.
 
He mentions Ireland, for instance, and asks for a statement to the effect that we will not attack Ireland.
 
Now, I have just read a speech by Mr. de Valera, the Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister), in which he does not charge Germany with oppressing Ireland, but reproaches England with subjecting Ireland to continuous aggression.
 
With all due respect to Mr. Roosevelt's insight into the needs and cares of other countries, it may nevertheless be assumed that the Irish Taoiseach would be more familiar with the dangers which threaten his country than would the President of the United States.

 

Similarly the fact has obviously escaped Mr. Roosevelt's notice that Palestine is at present occupied not by German troops but by the English; and that the country is undergoing restriction of its liberty by the most brutal resort to force, is being robbed of its independence and is suffering the cruellest maltreatment for the benefit of Jewish interlopers.

 

The Arabs living in that country would therefore certainly not have complained to Mr. Roosevelt of German aggression, but they are voicing a constant appeal to the world, deploring the barbarous methods with which England is attempting to suppress a people which loves its freedom and is merely defending it.

 

This, too, is perhaps a problem which in the American President's view should be solved at the conference table, that is, before a just judge, and not by physical force or military methods, by mass executions, burning down villages, blowing up houses and so on.
 
For one fact is surely certain.
 
In this case England is not defending herself against a threatened Arab attack, but as an uninvited interloper is endeavouring to establish her power in a foreign territory which does not belong to her.”

Hitler then reminds America that it should not fear Germany as she did not have hidden intentions or motives.
 
Besides, she did not have the natural or military resources to wage a world war across the Atlantic.
 
Only the USA had the wherewithal to do that.

“And, I here solemnly declare all assertions which have in any way been circulated concerning an impending German attack or invasion on or in American territory are rank frauds and gross untruths, quite apart from the fact that such assertions, as far as military possibilities are concerned, could only be the product of the silliest imagination.
 
Friendship and respect for the British Empire must be mutual.

 

During the whole of my political activity I have always propounded the idea of a close friendship and collaboration between Germany and England.
 
In my movement I found others of like mind. Perhaps they joined me because of my attitude in this regard.
 
This desire for Anglo-German friendship and co-operations conforms not merely to sentiments based on the racial origins of our two peoples but also to my realisation of the importance of the existence of the British Empire for the whole of mankind.

 

I have never left room for any doubt of my belief that they existence of this empire is an inestimable factor of value for the whole of human culture and economic life.
 
By whatever means Great Britain has acquired her colonial territories and I know that they were those of force and often brutality, I know full well that no other empire has ever come into being in any other way, and that, in the final analysis, it is not so much the methods that are taken into account in history as success, and not the success of the methods as such, but rather the general good which those methods produce.

 

Now, there is no doubt that the Anglo-Saxon people have accomplished immense colonizing work in the world.
 
For this work, I have sincere admiration.

 

I regard it as impossible to achieve a lasting friendship between the German and the Anglo-Saxon peoples if the other side does not recognize that there are German as well as British interests, that just as the preservation of the British Empire is the object and life-purpose of Britons, so also the freedom and preservation of the German Reich is the life-purpose of Germans.

 

A genuine lasting friendship between these two nations is only conceivable on a basis of mutual regard.
 
The English people rule a great empire.
 
They built up this empire at a time when the German people were internally weak.

 

Germany once had been a great empire. At one time she ruled the Occident. In bloody struggles and religious dissensions, and as a result of internal political disintegration, this empire declined in power and greatness and finally fell into a great sleep.

 

But as this old empire appeared to have reached its end, the seeds of its rebirth were springing up. From Brandenburg and Prussia there arose a new Germany, the Second Reich, and out of it has finally grown the Reich of the German people.

 

And I hope that all the English people understand that we do not possess the slightest feeling of inferiority to Britons.  

 

The part we have played in history is far too important for that.”

 

Then, he insisted on naval parity, renegotiating the Anglo-German Naval Treaty, and the return of all German colonies.
 
It seems clear that Britain could have come to terms with the Reich, thus retaining her naval strength, her army and air power, and her colonies, therefore avoiding whatever hostilities there might have been on the continent.
 
But largely due to the provocations of Churchill and the war party, this option was never considered.
 
This is one of the great what-ifs of history.
 

Hitler continued; 

 

“If however, President Roosevelt considers that he is entitled to address the problems of Europe, in particular to Germany or Italy, because America is so far removed from Europe, we on our side might by the same right, address to the President of the American Republic the question as to what aim American foreign policy in turn has in view, and on what intentions this policy is based, in the case of Central and South American states, for instance. In this event Mr. Roosevelt would, I must admit, every right to refer to the Monroe Doctrine and to decline to reply to such a request to interfere in the internal affairs of the American continent.

 

We Germans support a similar doctrine for Europe and above all, for the territory and interests of the Greater German Reich.

 

Moreover, I would obviously never presume to address such a request to the President of the United States of America, because I assume he would probably rightly consider such a presumption tactless.”

 

A little later in the speech, more history lessons are offered by Hitler, especially with regard to the violent history of the USA, which remains pertinent to this day considering the actions of their current government.

 

“For not statesmen, including those of the United States, especially her greatest, made the outstanding part of their countries' history at the conference table.
 
The freedom of the United States was not achieved at the conference table any more than the conflict between the North and the South was decided there.
 
I will not mention the innumerable struggles which finally led to the subjugation of the North American continent as a whole.
 
I recite all this only in order to show that your view, Mr. Roosevelt, undoubtedly deserving of all respect, is not confirmed by the history either of your own country or of the rest of the world.”

 

Hitler then openly declared his purposes and deeper allegiances…

 

“I took the leadership of a state which was faced by complete ruin thanks to the promises of the outside world and the evil of its democratic regime.
 
Billions of German savings accumulated in gold or foreign exchange during many years of peace were extorted from us. We lost our colonies.
 
In 1933 I had in my country 7 million unemployed, a few million part-time workers, millions of impoverished peasants, trade destroyed, commerce ruined; in short, general chaos.

 

Since then, Mr. Roosevelt, I have only been able to fulfil one single task.
 
I cannot feel myself responsible for a world, for this world took no interest in the pitiful fate of my people.
 
I have regarded myself as called upon by Providence to serve my own people alone and to deliver them from their frightful misery.
 
Thus, for the past six and one half years, I have lived day and night for the single task of awakening the powers of my people in face of our desertion by the rest of the world, and of developing these powers to the utmost and for utilising them for the salvation of our community.

 

I have conquered chaos in Germany, re-established order, immediately increased production of all branches of our national economy, by strenuous efforts produced substitutes for numerous materials which we lack, prepared the way for new inventions, developed transportation, caused magnificent roads to be built and canals to be dug, created gigantic new factories.
 
I have striven no less to translate into practice the ideal behind the thought 'community', and to promote the education and culture of my people.
 
To protect them against the threats of the outside world, I have not only united the German people politically, but also rearmed them, I have likewise endeavoured to rid them of that [Versailles] treaty page by page, which in its 448 articles contains the vilest oppression which has ever been inflicted on men and nations.

 

I have brought back to the Reich its provinces stolen from us in 1919; I have led back to their country millions of Germans who were torn away from us and were in abject misery; I have reunited the territories that have been German throughout a thousand years of history and, Mr. Roosevelt, I have endeavoured to accomplish this without bloodshed and without bringing to my people and so to others, the misery of war

 

For my world, Mr. President, is the one which Providence has assigned me and for which it is my duty to work. Its area is much smaller.
 
It comprises my people alone.
 
But I believe I can thus best serve that which is in the hearts of all of us, justice, well-being, progress and peace for the whole community of mankind.”

This speech was not deemed worthy of a reply by the Allies, who of course predictably, totally ignored and buried it in the graveyard of unwanted history and thus the escalation of the war continued.

Pearl Harbour
 

It had already been planned that America would take part in World War II, the vast profits available for the military-industrial Elite corporations in an operation of this scale, being too good an opportunity to pass-up.
 
However, the huge stumbling block to the US entering the conflict was Roosevelt’s reticence to commit American forces as he had been re-elected on a ‘no European war’ ticket and at that time over 80% of the American population were not in favour of partaking in yet another European war which they felt (quite correctly) was ‘none of their business’.

It is now also known that Roosevelt, under pressure from Elite industrial and financial interests and Churchill, desperate for the US to enter the war to aid a floundering British war effort, conspired together and with others to set in motion events to create a situation which would turn public opinion and generate the outcry that would make war inevitable.
 

Despite the fact that FDR had won a second term as President largely due to his oft-repeated promise that American soldiers would not become embroiled in the ‘European war’, he knew only too well that that is exactly what had been planned.
 

BOOK: The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality
4.9Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

Other books

Until I Saw Your Smile by J.J. Murray
Rich Girl Problems by Tu-Shonda L. Whitaker
Traitor's Chase by Stuart Gibbs
A Mile in My Flip-Flops by Melody Carlson
Winter Queen by Amber Argyle
Footsteps on the Shore by Pauline Rowson