The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality (141 page)

That any so-called 'doctors' would persuade a civilized nation to add voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable.
 
It is the height of criminal insanity!
 
No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin's 'Last Will' and Hitler's Mein Kampf: ‘America we shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within.’

Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of water poisoning by fluoridation?
 
Its use has been recorded in other countries. Sodium Fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most effective rat killers known to chemists: colourless, odourless, tasteless; no antidote, no remedy, no hope: instant and complete extermination of rats.
 
Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide, or quick national liquidation. It is criminal insanity - treason!!"
  
Dr. E.H. Bronner (nephew of Albert Einstein), Research Chemist, Los Angeles, January 1952

The public outcry at the time (now sadly forgotten) was such that the addition of fluoride into public water supplies was abandoned for a year.
 
However, the populace have a very short memory and the topic was resurrected again shortly thereafter, this time with little to no resistance whatsoever.
 

Fluoride, sad to say, has exactly the opposite effect on teeth to that which is promoted to us; strong healthy teeth.
 
There is now, especially in America, an absolute epidemic of dental fluorosis with up to 80% of children in some cities being affected.
 
The first visible sign of excessive fluoride exposure according to the US National Research Council are brownish flecks or spots, particularly on the front teeth, or dark spots or stripes in more severe cases.

What is much less known to the public is that fluoride also accumulates in bones.

"The teeth are windows to what's happening in the bones." Paul Connett, Professor of Chemistry at St. Lawrence University, New York.
 

In recent years, paediatric bone specialists have expressed alarm about an increase in stress fractures among young people in the US.
 
Connett and other scientists are concerned that fluoride-linked to bone damage in studies since the 1930s, may be a contributing factor.

In 1944 a severe pollution incident occurred downwind of the E.I. DuPont de Nemours Company chemical factory in Deepwater, New Jersey.
 
The factory was then producing millions of pounds of fluoride for the Manhattan Project whose scientists were racing to produce the world's first atomic bomb.

The farms downwind in Gloucester and Salem counties were famous for their high-quality produce.
 
Their peaches went directly to the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York City; their tomatoes were mainly bought by Campbell's for soup.
 
But in the summer of 1944 the farmers began reporting that their crops were blighted.
 
They said that poultry died after an all-night thunderstorm and that farm workers who ate produce they had picked would sometimes vomit all night and into the next day.
 
The horses looked sick and were too stiff to work, and some cows were so crippled that they could not stand up; they could only graze by crawling on their bellies.

The account was confirmed in taped interviews with Philip Sadtler (shortly before he died), of Sadtler Laboratories of Philadelphia, one of the USA's oldest chemical consulting firms. Sadtler had personally conducted the initial investigation of the damage.

Kidney disease is another hallmark of fluoride poisoning.
 
Multiple animal studies have found that fluoride levels as low as 1 part per million (ppm) which is the amount added to most fluoridated water systems, cause
kidney damage
.
 
And a Chinese study found that children exposed to slightly higher fluoride levels had biological markers in their
blood
indicative of kidney damage.

It has also been found that fluoride impairs proper
thyroid
function and debilitates the endocrine system.
 
Up until the 1970s, fluoride was used in Europe as a thyroid-suppressing medication because it lowers thyroid function.
 
Many experts believe that widespread hypothyroidism today is a result of overexposure to fluoride.

Since fluoride is present in most municipal water supplies in North
America
and in much of Western Europe, it is absurd to even suggest that parents avoid giving it to their young children.
 
How are parents supposed to avoid it unless they install a whole house reverse-osmosis water filtration system?
 
And even if families install such a system, fluoride is found in all sorts of food and
beverages
, not to mention that it is absorbed through the skin every time people wash their hands with or take a shower in fluoridated water.

There simply is no legitimate reason to fluoridate water.
 
Doing so forcibly medicates an entire population with a carcinogenic, chemical drug.
 
There really is no effective way to avoid it entirely and nobody really knows how much is ingested or absorbed on a daily basis because exposure is too widespread to calculate.
 
But political pressure and bad science have continued to justify
water fluoridation
in most major cities, despite growing mountains of evidence showing its dangers.

Is it any wonder that people now after years of ingesting this toxin, have no interest in the world around them and the fate awaiting them and their children and grandchildren?
  
After all, what’s more important than who wins the game this weekend or the latest adventures of our favourite soap characters?
 
All as planned of course.

A new study pre-published in December 2010 in the journal ‘Environmental Health Perspectives’ confirms that fluoridated water definitely causes brain damage in children. The most recent among 23 others pertaining to fluoride and lowered IQ levels, the new study so strongly proves that fluoride is a dangerous, brain-destroying toxin that experts say it could be the one that finally ends water fluoridation.
 
I have severe doubts about that.

I would strongly urge any dentist or doctor reading this to undertake their own research into the efficacy and effects of fluoride and not just parrot the propaganda relayed to them by their own Elite-controlled professional organisations.

However, it is also up to us all to stand up and say ‘no’ to mass water fluoridation.
 
If someone wishes to voluntarily imbibe fluoride, then let him/her do so.
 
I have no problem with that, but to forcibly administer this poison to an unsuspecting and unwilling populace without prior knowledge or consent is a criminal activity.
 
We are not prisoners….not just yet anyway.

What is actually in our water other than fluoride?
 
Is it pure or does it contain impurities and toxins?
 
If we take heed of the water companies, they will tell us that water is absolutely pure due to being filtered at source.
 
Wrong!
 
This is absolutely untrue.

Have you ever come across a bottle of prescription tablets or a medicine bottle that you no longer needed or perhaps had passed its expiration date?
 
You probably disposed of the substance by flushing it down the toilet, down the sink waste-disposal unit or throwing it in the waste bin?

It is extremely concerning that environmental contaminants originating from industrial, agricultural, medical and common household substances, ie., pharmaceutical waste, cosmetics, detergents and toiletries are being disposed of into the water systems of the world.
 
A variety of pharmaceuticals including painkillers, tranquilisers, anti-depressants, antibiotics, birth control pills, oestrogen replacement therapies, chemotherapy agents, anti-seizure medications etc., are finding their way into the water supplies via human and animal excreta from disposal into the sewage system.

Flushing unused medications down the toilet and pharmaceutical residue from landfills has a tremendously detrimental impact on groundwater supplies and thus drinking water.
 
Agricultural practices are a major source of this contamination and 40% of antibiotics manufactured are fed to livestock as growth enhancers.
 
Manure, containing traces of pharmaceuticals is often spread on land as fertiliser from which it can leach into local streams and rivers and thence into the water table.
 
Conventional wastewater treatments, filtration and recycling as commonly used by our water companies is not even close to being effective in eliminating the majority of pharmaceutical residues.

The prevalence of pharmaceuticals in water is nothing new.
 
In fact, it is reasonable to assume that as long as pharmaceuticals have been in use, they and their metabolites have contributed to overall environmental contamination.
 
What is new is our ability to detect trace amounts of these contaminants in water; hence, we are finding pharmaceuticals in water because we are finally able to detect them.
 

According to an article published in the December 2002 issue of Environmental Health Perspectives, the amount of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PCPs) released into the environment each year is roughly equivalent to the amount of pesticides used each year.
 

During 1999-2000, the US Geological Survey conducted the first nationwide investigation of the occurrence of pharmaceuticals, hormones and other organic contaminants in 139 streams from 30 states.
 
A total of 95 contaminants were targeted including antibiotics, prescription and non-prescription drugs, steroids and hormones, 82 of which were found in at least one sample.
 
In addition 80% of streams sampled were positive for one or more contaminant.
 
Furthermore, 75% of the streams contained two or more contaminants, 54% had greater than five, while 34% had more than ten and 13% tested positive for more than twenty targeted contaminants.
 
There is no valid reason to believe that this is not the case elsewhere in the world.

Pharmaceuticals have since been found in treated sewage effluents, surface waters, soil and tap water.
 
Antibiotics and oestrogens are only two of many pharmaceuticals suspected of persisting in the environment either due to their inability to naturally biodegrade or continued prevalence as a result of continuous release.

Recent monitoring studies fail to address one question: Are the levels of pharmaceuticals in the environment significant?
 
At first glance, one would say ‘no’ since levels found in the environment are six to seven orders of magnitude lower than therapeutic doses in spite of the fact up to 90 percent of an oral drug can be excreted in human waste.
 
However, low and consistent exposures would not likely produce immediate acute effects but rather subtle impacts such as behavioural or reproductive effects that could very well go unnoticed.

In addition, concern remains over the increasing practice of artificial recharge of groundwater with sewage effluent where pharmaceuticals have been found to percolate into the groundwater.
 
Some common pharmaceutical contaminants are known to persist for more than six years in the sub-surface or groundwater.