Read The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown Online
Authors: Andreas J. Köstenberger,Charles L Quarles
In terms of external evidence, there are strong doubts regarding the originality of the passage in John's Gospel. (1) The pericope is absent from all pre-fifth-century manuscripts (though there is a certain amount of debate regarding this). (2) It appears in no fewer than six different places in the manuscript tradition: after John 7:36; after 7:44; after 7:52; at the end of John's Gospel; after Luke 21:38; and at the end of Luke's Gospel. (3) There is a lack of citation of this pericope in early patristic writings up to the fourth century (though this is debated).
The obvious conclusion, therefore, from studying both the internal and the external evidence regarding this pericope is that the account was almost certainly not a part of the original Gospel and should therefore not be regarded as divinely inspired, authoritative, or canonical. This does not mean the account is necessarily unhistorical. It is certainly possible (though impossible to verify) that the encounter between Jesus and this woman took place in the way recounted in this story. Nevertheless, like the longer ending of Mark, the story should be treated with caution.
__________________________
1
For a more thorough treatment of these and other textual issues in John's Gospel, see Köstenberger, John, 50, 88, 245–49 (with further bibliographic references).
2
For these and other references, see ibid., 50.
3
See the discussion and further bibliographic references in Köstenberger, John, 195.
In addition to the temple's destruction, the early Christian Gentile mission (Acts 9:16; Rom 1:13) and the emergence of early gnostic thought likely served as part of the matrix that occasioned the writing of John's Gospel. Since John wrote in the Diaspora for both Jews and Gentiles attracted to Judaism and since he wrote 50 years after the formation of the church when the Gentile mission was well underway, it stands to reason that this mission directly affected John's writing. Gnosticism, which began to emerge in the latter half of the first century but did not come to full fruition until the second century, provided part of the backdrop as well. Though John did not embrace or promote gnostic teachings, like many evangelistic writings ever since he used the conceptual categories of his audience to contextualize his message (see John 1:1, 14). These three important factors—the temple's destruction, the Gentile mission, and gnostic thought—combined as possible occasions for John's Gospel.
45
Purpose
Toward the end of his Gospel, John stated his purpose as follows: “But these [signs] are written so that you may believe Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and by believing
you may have life in his name” (20:31).
46
On a surface reading, “so that you may believe” suggests an evangelistic purpose, that is, leading John's readers to first-time faith in Jesus as Messiah.
47
At the same time, John's Gospel seems to presuppose an audience that is already familiar with Scripture since it contains detailed instructions for believers, especially in the second half of the Gospel. What is more, there are few examples of directly evangelistic first-century documents. For reasons such as these, it seems that John's purpose encompassed both aspects, evangelism of unbelievers and edification of believers, and that John pursued an indirect evangelistic purpose, aiming to reach an unbelieving audience through the Christian readers of his Gospel.
48
Thus according to 20:31, John's purpose was to set forth the evidence that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, so that people might believe in him and as a result have life in his name.
49
The purpose statement corresponds to the opening chapter of the Gospel where John set forth Jesus' messianic identity (see 1:1–3,14,29,34,41). The body of John's Gospel presents a series of Jesus' messianic “signs” and narrates his death, resurrection, and appearances in order to elicit faith in Jesus as the Messiah from those who read it. “Believing” in John's Gospel goes beyond mere intellectual assent; it involves putting one's trust in Jesus.
50
“Life” refers to eternal communion with Jesus entered into already in the here and now (see 5:24; 8:12; 10:10; 17:3).
Finally, it is important not to confuse John's likely
purpose
with possible
effects
of his Gospel. Carson and Moo aptly noted, “Just because John's gospel can be used to offer comfort to the bereaved in the twenty-first century does not mean that is why the evangelist wrote it.”
51
John explicitly stated his purpose (20:30–31), which, against the backdrop of his provenance and occasion, is best understood as indirect evangelism. All other purposes must be seen as subordinated to this larger purpose or as effects that result from it.
LITERATURE
Literary Plan
There is wide agreement in the literature that John's Gospel breaks down into an introduction (1:1–18), a first major unit frequently called “The Book of Signs” (1:19–12:50; focusing on Jesus' messianic “signs” for the Jews), a second major unit best termed “The Book of Exaltation” (13:1–20:31; anticipating Jesus' exaltation with the Father subsequent to his crucifixion, burial, and resurrection), and an epilogue (chap. 21).
52
There is also considerable support for the notion that chapters 11–12 represent a transition from “The Book of Signs” to “The Book of Exaltation,” featuring Jesus' climactic “sign,” the raising of Lazarus, which, in turn, foreshadows Jesus' own resurrection.
53
With regard to the structure of “The Book of Signs,” many believe, on the basis of literary
inclusios
, that this unit is made up of two major cycles narrating Jesus' ministry, a “Cana cycle” (2:1–4:54; see 2:11; 4:54) and a “festival cycle” (5:1–10:42; see 1:19–34; 10:40–41).
54
In addition, some see a division between chapters 5–6 and chapters 7–10 in light of the watershed defection of many of Jesus' followers at the end of chapter 6.
55
“The Book of Exaltation” breaks down into the Farewell Discourse (13–17), which can be subdivided into a preamble (13:1–30), the Farewell Discourse proper (13:31–16:33), and Jesus' final prayer (17), and the Passion Narrative (18–20), culminating in a declaration of John's purpose (20:30–31). Thus John's Gospel reveals a deliberate literary plan that reflects the evangelist's theological message.
By way of brief summary, John achieved his purpose of demonstrating that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God (20:30–31; see “Purpose” above) by weaving together several narrative sections that function within an overall structure. The introduction to John's Gospel places the entire narrative in the framework of the eternal, preexistent Word made flesh in Jesus (1:1–18).
The first major section, “The Book of Signs,” sets forth evidence for Jesus' messiahship in the form of seven selected signs, whose narration serves as the framework for the first half of John's Gospel (1:19–12:50; see esp. 12:37–40; cf. 20:30–31).
56
John also includes Jesus' seven “I am” sayings (see chart below) and calls numerous (seven?) witnesses in support of Jesus' claims, including Moses and the Scriptures, John the Baptist, the Father, Jesus and his works, the Spirit, the disciples, and the evangelist himself. Representative questions concerning Jesus' messiahship serve to lead the Gospel's
readers to the author's intended conclusion, namely that Jesus is the Messiah (e.g., 1:41; 4:25; 7:27, 31, 52; 10:24; 11:27; 12:34).
Table 7.1: The “I Am” Sayings of Jesus in John's Gospel
Statement | Reference in John's Gospel | Significance |
“I am the bread of life.” | 6:35,48,51 | Spoken after feeding of multitude; in analogy with God's provision of manna for wilderness Israel, Jesus is the true bread of heaven able to satisfy people's spiritual hunger. |
“I am the light of the world.” | 8:12; 9:5 | Jesus as fulfillment of Feast of Tabernacles; Jesus is the salvation foreshadowed by the lamps of the Feast; “light” and “life” are related in John's Gospel, so Jesus is the “light of life” (8:12). |
“I am the door.” | 10:7,9 | Jesus is the exclusive way to salvation—all must be saved through him; spoken in context of Good Shepherd Discourse. |
“I am the good shepherd.” | 10:11, 14 | In contrast to the Pharisees as worthless shepherds (see Zech 11:17), Jesus is the shepherd-king in the tradition of David; the good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep (substitutionary atonement). |
“I am the resurrection and the life.” | 11:25 | Jesus is the resurrection that Mary and Martha (and most of Israel) are waiting for in the last day; spoken prior to the raising of Lazarus. |
“I am the way, the truth, and the life.” | 14:6 | Jesus asserts that he himself is the exclusive way to the Father; Jesus' use of articles ( the way, the truth, the life) further reiterates Jesus' status as the exclusive way to salvation. |
“I am the true vine.” | 15:1 | The OT used vine imagery to describe Israel (Isa 5:1–7; 27:2–6; Jer 2:21; Ezek 15; 19:10–14; Hos 10:1; Ps 80:9–16); Jesus is therefore the new Israel (as well as the replacement of the temple and Jewish festivals). |
The second major section of John's narrative, “The Book of Exaltation,” shows how Jesus ensured the continuation of his mission by preparing his new messianic community for its mission. This portion opens with Jesus' Farewell Discourse (chaps. 13–17), in which the new messianic community is cleansed, prepared, and prayed for. The cleansing is affected by the footwashing and Judas' departure (chap. 13); the disciples' preparation involves instructions regarding the coming of the Holy Spirit (chaps. 14–16); and Jesus' followers are prayed for in his final prayer (chap. 17).
John's Passion Narrative (chaps. 18–19) presents Jesus' death both as an atonement for sin (see 1:29, 36; 6:48–58; 10:15, 17–18), though largely without the Synoptic emphasis on shame and humiliation, and as a preface to Jesus' return to the Father (see 13:1; 16:28). The resurrection appearances and the disciples' commissioning constitute the focal point of John's penultimate chapter (chap. 20), where Jesus is cast as the paradigmatic “Sent One” (see 9:7), who now sends the representatives of his new messianic community (20:21–23).
The purpose statement of 20:30–31 reiterates the major motifs of the Gospel: signs, believing, (eternal) life, and the identity of Jesus as Messiah and Son of God. The Epilogue portrays the relationship between Peter and “the disciple whom Jesus loved” in terms of differing yet equally legitimate roles of service within the believing community.
The Epilogue (chap. 21), John's final major section, brings closure to the joint characterization of Peter and the “disciple Jesus loved” especially in the second half of John's Gospel, compares and contrasts their respective callings in ministry, and offers a further glimpse into the identity of the Gospel's author.
OUTLINE