Authors: J. M. Gregson
Lambert did not work like that. He let the Scene-of-Crime team and the house-to-house men get on with their necessary routine work, reporting in the main to DI Rushton, who enjoyed the painstaking documentation and checking for discrepancies much more than he did. He headed the CID investigation himself, spending most of his hours away from the Murder Room, interviewing important witnesses himself wherever possible, using a detective-sergeant, rather than the more normal inspector, to accompany him, to support him; even, when he thought it necessary, to conduct key interviews.
It was irregular, but it worked. The old Chief Constable, Douglas Gibson, had told his successor all about Lambert when he handed over. âHe has his own methods. You'll find yourself calling him old-fashioned, though I'm not sure that's the right phrase. Stubborn, certainly. But not threatening: I believe him when he says he wants to stay exactly where he is as far as rank goes. And he gets results.'
It was the last phrase which struck home with George Harding. In an era where crime statistics are public property and a senior policeman's job can depend on clear-up rates, Detective-Superintendent Lambert's record was second to none. That was bound to win him a little indulgence. And Harding found that he had assembled a team around him who seemed to accept his methods. Policemen generally did, if the villains were nailed. That was in everyone's interest, including those young thrusters for promotion who occasionally found Lambert treading on their toes.
For his part, Lambert found that the new CC had one great advantage: he had no exaggerated reverence for the media.
He did not dissolve into apology and explanations at the sight of a television crew; still less did he extract Lambert from the urgency of his investigations to confront the media representatives. When the official Press Officer could no longer hold them at bay with his routine announcements on police progress, George Harding saw them himself.
His Chief Constable's uniform and badges sat easily upon him, whereas Douglas Gibson had always looked and felt like a station sergeant in fancy dress. He took the questions of press men and television women calmly, refusing to answer if he thought them not in the public interest, dealing equably with those queries which were disguised insults to the force, giving precisely the information he had planned in advance and no more.
It was all a great relief to Lambert, who sat beside his Chief at the morning press conference on what the tabloids had already dubbed the Cotswold Strangler. He had needed to do little more than reinforce the Chief's highly articulate account of the investigation and explain a little of police procedure. Where Douglas Gibson, an honest cop of the old school, had usually looked shifty and defensive in front of the cameramen, Harding gave the impression of a Chief Constable and a force that were operating smoothly and were confident of success.
It was only when he sat down to compare notes with Lambert and his team leaders in the Murder Room afterwards that he allowed the strain to show. No one liked a serial killer. The police like everyone else were left wondering where the next strike would be, how many victims there would be before the murderer was identified. The mistakes made in the pursuit of the Yorkshire Ripper were never far from policemen's minds, and they knew that the press would be delighted to hark back to those confusions if the CID did not get a result quickly in this one.
âI've just told the organs of enlightenment how much we're on top of the case,' said the Chief Constable with a sardonic smile. âNow tell me how much we really know.'
Rushton, at a nod from Lambert, took this as his cue to report on the findings he had been gathering together at the centre of operations. He would normally have been in his element with the CC in his audience, taking the opportunity in his slightly officious way to demonstrate his grasp of detail, his efficiency in documenting and cross-referencing the bewildering collection of data the men on the ground were bringing in, his insight into what might be key areas for further investigation.
Instead, he was for once a little hesitant. He looked white and strained, almost as though he wished this task had fallen to someone else. He was having to work hard to summon the concentration necessary to summarize a mass of information. Lambert wondered if he was sickening for something, or whether the absence of any definite lead made him nervous of the new Chief Constable's wrath.
Rushton said, âWe have accumulated a lot of knowledge, but as yet nothing that would point to an arrest, sir.'
âYou mean you've produced bugger-all as yet. Don't try and fob me off as if I were Joe Public, lad. I was putting out statements like that when you were in nappies.' By police standards, it was a gentle rebuke, amiably delivered; a modern Chief Constable has no need of vehemence.
âYes, sir.' Rushton coloured and looked at his notes. âWe still haven't got a definite time for the death of Julie Salmon, the first girl. She wasn't found for a couple of days, as you know. She was last seen at seven o'clock on the evening of Wednesday, 25th May, and the autopsy confirms pretty certainly that she died that night. We don't know what time: it could be any time within about eight hours. We may never know more precisely than that.'
âNot until we arrest her killer,' said Harding drily. âWhat suspects do we have for Julie Salmon?'
âThere's an ex-boyfriend. A Darren Pickering. Neanderthal type, not averse to a bit of violence. We've had him in before. Once in connection with football hooliganism a punch-up between rival groups of so-called supporters once for a fight outside a pub. Neither came to court.'
âHow recently?'
Other officers would have gone to the computer, where Rushton had made sure the information was available to anyone who pressed the right button. Instead, he pulled out a card covered in his own neat handwriting. âThe football incident was during last season. The pub fight was almost two years ago. The officer who interrogated him is still here; as I say, neither incident came to court.'
âAny history of violence towards women?'
âNot as far as we've been able to ascertain, sir. But he did admit in interview that it was the girl that had ended the affair. And it was only ten days before she was killed.'
âAnd off the record, Inspector, would you put him in the frame for these killings?'
Rushton was thrown a little by the direct question. He never liked to commit himself: you could end up looking very silly if your opinions were thrown back at you later. And this might be the CC's only contact with him in months. He said, âI couldn't say, sir. I didn't conduct the interviews with Pickering myself.'
âI saw him, sir. I'd rate him a possible, along with several others with no alibi for either of the killings. Nothing stronger than that.' It was Bert Hook, the most junior officer in the room of high ranks, who had spoken up unexpectedly. âHe's rough, and I don't mean a rough diamond. You'd prefer him to be on your side in a fight: he's strong and hard. I don't know whether he's a man who'd go round killing girls: I've been trying to answer that ever since I saw him.'
âHow did he react to being questioned about the girls?'
âHe was shaken. He pretended not to be, that it was police victimization and no more than he expected. And he had the duty solicitor summoned pretty promptly, so that he said no more than he had to. But he was shaken when we questioned him about Julie Salmon. Less so about Hetty Brown. That's what you might expect, of course. He knew Julie Salmon well, and Hetty Brown hardly at all, according to his statement. And we haven't found anything to connect him with her. He doesn't seem to have been among her clients.'
âIs there anything to connect the two girls?' Harding knew the CID men would have asked themselves this, investigated exhaustively all the things he was asking about. But he was briefing himself on the investigation: these were the most serious crimes so far on his new patch, and he would have to account for the police reaction to them in various contexts. He had better be fully informed, even if his days of direct contact with detection were far behind him now.
Lambert said, âBeyond the fact that they were killed in the same area and in the same way, not very much. Julie Salmon was an attractive girl, living at home with her parents. They reported her missing that first night, though she wasn't found for another forty-eight hours. She worked in an estate agent's office. Her parents didn't approve of her relationship with Darren Pickering, as you might expect, and were quite relieved when it broke up.'
âNo suggestion that Julie Salmon was on the game? Or dabbling with it?'
âNone at all. She was on the surface rather a shy girl, without many boyfriends before Pickering. She kept a diary, but there's nothing in it that seems significant. She appears to have had a brief relationship with an older man before Pickering â there's a reference to this man calling Pickering âa lout' after she took up with him. Sounds like a professional man; we went through all her associates at work, but came up with nothing.'
âA married man?'
âQuite possibly, though there's nothing to indicate that definitely. The meetings seem to have been only sporadic from the diary. But it's very vague anyway, like most of the other entries. She never refers to the man by name. Her mother produced the diary for us immediately, and I wonder if Julie was a bit guarded in writing because she suspected her mother might get hold of the diary when she was out. Of course, they may be nothing more than a young girl's fantasies about an older man: she was only nineteen when she died, and these entries are a few months before her death.'
âWhat about Hetty Brown?'
âNo diary to help us there, I'm afraid. Be useful if there was, even if it was no more than a list of her meetings with men.'
âNo mysterious professional man there?'
âNone apparent, no, sir. Our source of information is mainly her flatmate, Debbie Cook. They worked together at ICI in Gloucester for a while, then were laid off. Took to the game to pay the rent, according to her. It certainly looks like that: they've neither of them been at it long.'
There was a little silence in that room of hard professionals. It was a familiar enough story, more frequent in these days of the slump which the government still called a recession. A prospect of easy money in hard times. And now a girl of twenty-one was dead.
The Chief Constable voiced the question which had nagged at them all as they gathered information. âSimilar killings. Same murderer?'
Lambert smiled wryly; in this situation, any kind of certainty was a comfort, but they were difficult to come by. âThe method of dispatch is identical. Dr Burgess is away, but our police surgeon, Dr Haworth, has been good enough to come in this morning.'
He nodded to the only man in the room who had not so far spoken. Don Haworth took it as his cue to summarize his findings. He had been sitting on the edge of his chair, apparently fascinated by his first view of routine police procedures. âI was the first medical man at the scene of both killings, in my capacity as police surgeon. Both girls were killed by vagal inhibition; gloved hands were expertly applied to both throats. Probably plastic gloves of some kind, since I understand forensic have found no traces of material on the skin.' He looked interrogatively at DI Rushton, who nodded confirmation.
âMy opinion would be that it would be the same pair of hands in each case, but I could not swear to that in court; you would need other evidence, which it seems at the moment you do not have.'
It came out like a suggestion of police negligence, so that Lambert, who was the man who had sanctioned Haworth's rather irregular presence in this group, was moved to say, âIt was Dr Haworth who helped to pinpoint the time of death in the case of the second murder.'
Haworth smiled that boyish, self-deprecating smile that made him seem younger than his thirty years. âI thought between twelve and one on the morning of the eleventh of June. Again, I couldn't make that more than an opinion in court. I'd have to go with the four-hour period the pathologist came up with after the PM.'
Harding looked for a moment at the eager young man with his slightly untidy mop of fair hair. It was useful to have a medic in on this session; typical of Lambert, that, he thought. âAny other thoughts, Doctor? Now is the time to speculate: we won't throw your thoughts back in your face later, even if they prove to be wildly mistaken.' The words were intended as much for the policemen in the room as for Haworth. There was nothing like the fear of being wrong in front of top brass to keep ideas bottled up.
The police surgeon shrugged. âNothing to add to forensic findings, I'm afraid.'
Lambert said, âIt's useful to know that Don thinks it probable the same man killed both girls. There are some differences as well as the obvious similarities. The first girl was violently raped. The second had had intercourse, but there were no signs of violence.'
Rushton, anxious now to get back into the discussion, said, âThe first girl obviously resisted fiercely. The second one was a prostitute. Maybe she had the sense to take the line of least resistance with a sexual assault. Perhaps if she'd resisted, there would have been the same marks on Hetty Brown as there were on Julie Salmon.'
Rushton, terse and strained, sounded almost as though he was delivering a moral judgement. Perhaps the Puritan in him thought that Hetty Brown should not have allowed intercourse without a fight.
Lambert said, âDespite her struggle, there were very few signs of the killer left on Julie Salmon that have so far proved useful to us. No skin under her fingernails. A few clothing fibres, but even those not necessarily from her killer. She was murdered in a derelict house, which was why she wasn't found for a couple of days.'
âBut you have semen samples?'