The most romantic â and, I would like to think, most likely â hypothesis was whispered to me by my grandmother. Because she “had her own idea” about it, which she never completely acknowledged but readily alluded to; she evaded my insistent questions about the death of the prodigal son, but recalled the anxiety with which he had mentioned the atmosphere of rebellion then reigning in the plantations â and indeed, the first indigenous nationalistic ideologies must have been rousing those wretched men at that time, bent under the white yoke toward a soil whose fruits they did not taste. Childishly, no doubt, but not without reason, Elise secretly thought that Dufourneau had died at the hands of the black laborers, whom she imagined much like slaves from another century crossed with Jamaican pirates as they were depicted on bottles of rum, too dazzling to be peaceful, as bloody as their madras scarves, cruel as their jewels.
A credulous child, I shared my grandmother's views; I do not renounce them today. Elise, who had laid the groundwork for the drama by teaching Dufourneau spelling, by loving him as a mother when she knew herself to be a possible spouse, who had determined the destiny of the little commoner by leading him to believe that perhaps his origins were not what they seemed and appearances were thus reversible, Elise who had been the confidant recording the proud
defiance of the departure and the sibyl uttering it into the ear of future generations; it fell to Elise to write the drama's denouement as well, and she acquitted herself justly. The end that she had appointed him did not belie her hero's psychological coherence. As with all so-called upstarts who cannot make others forget their origins any more than they can themselves, who remain poor men exiled among the rich without hope of return, Dufourneau, she knew, had undoubtedly been all the more pitiless toward the lowly in his efforts to keep himself from recognizing in them the image of what he had never ceased to be. Slave labor dug under with the seed and struggling to rise with the sap toward the fruit, sheaves of mud that the ploughshare sprays at you, that nervous air as the man in the necktie or a storm approaches, all of this had once been his lot, and maybe he had loved it, as a man loves what he knows. The uncertainty of a mutilated tongue that serves only to deny accusations and ward off blows had been his; he had come so far to flee the labors he loved, the language that humiliated him; to deny having ever loved or feared what those black men loved and feared, he brought the whip down on their backs, shouted abuses into their ears. And the blacks, concerned with reestablishing the balance of destinies, wrested from him one final terror to equal their thousand terrors, wounded him one last time to equal all their wounds and, extinguishing forever that horrified stare in the instant when he finally admitted he was one of them, killed him.
This way of conceiving his death accords even more subtly with the little I know of his life; from Elise's version emerged a unity other than one of behavior, a darker coherence, quasi-metaphysical and almost ancient. It was the sarcastic, distorted echo of a speech, as life is of a
desire. “I will become rich, or die there.” In the book of the gods, this boastful alternative had been reduced to a single proposition: he died at the very hands of those whose labor had made his fortune; he was enriched by a sumptuous, bloody death like a king immolated by his subjects; in gold only had he become rich there, and he had died of it.
Maybe just yesterday, some old woman sitting on her doorstep in Grand-Bassam remembered a white's look of terror when the blades gleamed, the slight weight of his body out of which the stained blades were withdrawn; today she is dead; and Elise is dead, too, who remembered the first smile of a small boy when he was handed a bright red apple, polished in an apron. A life without consequence flowed between apple and machete, each day further dulling the taste of one and sharpening the edge of the other. Who, if I did not note it here, would remember André Dufourneau, false noble and thwarted peasant, who was a good child, perhaps a cruel man, had powerful desires and left no traces but in the fiction spun by an old peasant woman now dead?
for Jean-Benoît Puech
Sometimes as a child in Mourioux, when I was sick or simply anxious, my grandmother would get out the Treasures to divert me. That was what I called the two old dented, decorated tins that had once contained biscuits, and that then served as receptacles for a very different kind of nourishment. What my grandmother drew from them were objects she called precious, along with their histories, those memories that are the jewels inherited by common folk. Complicated genealogies hung suspended with the charms on small copper chains; watches were stopped on some ancestor's hour; among anecdotes strung along the beads of a rosary, coins bore, with the profile of a king, the account
of a gift and rustic name of the giver. The inexhaustible myth authenticated its small token; the token gleamed weakly in the hollow of Elise's palm, in her black apron, chipped amethyst or ring missing its stone. The myth that poured blandly from her mouth provided a stone for the ring and purified it, rich with all the verbal jewelry that glitters in the strange proper nouns of the forefathers, in the hundredth variant of a familiar story, in the obscure motifs of marriages and deaths.
At the bottom of one of these tins, for me, for Elise, for our secret palavers, lay the Peluchet Relic.
Of all the treasures, this was the most ordinary and the most precious one. Elise rarely failed to produce it, after all the others, as the best-loved of the Household Gods; and as such, it was â more than the others â archaic, primitive, its artwork rough and plain. Along with uneasy expectation, its appearance caused in me a kind of malaise and poignant pity. No matter how I looked at it, it was not equal to the profuse account that it elicited from Elise, but its insignificance made it heartbreaking, like that account; in both of them, the insufficiency of the world became crazy. Something endlessly concealed itself there, which I did not know how to read, and I bewailed my poor reading skills; some mystery lay obscured just inches away, pledged divine allegiance to what flees, wanes, and remains silent. I did not want that to be true; my hand released the relic fearfully and curled up in Elise's hands; beseeching, a lump in my throat, I searched her eyes. To no avail: she spoke, her eyes summoned in the distance by who knows what, which I was afraid of seeing; and she also spoke of the hidden, of bodies disappearing and our souls forever in flight, of visible absences for which we substitute the absenteeism of loved ones, their defection
in death, indifference, and departures. She inseminated the void they leave with hurried words, jubilant and tragic, which the void inhales just as the hole of a hive draws the swarm, and which, once inside the void, proliferate. For herself and her small witness, for a compensating god who may have been lending an ear, as well as all those who, up until that day, had held that object in tears, she created once again, she founded and consecrated forever, as her mothers had done before her and as I am going to do here one last time, the everlasting relic.
The Peluchet line died out with the last century; the last, to my knowledge, was Antoine Peluchet, perpetual son and perpetually unachieved, who carried off his name to distant parts and lost it there. It was this name, fallen into disuse, that the relic carried on to me. The object of women, relayed, handed down from one to another, it compensates for the inadequacies of the males and confers upon the most sterile among them a kind of immortality, which poor peasant issue, hurried off by death and oblivion, would certainly not have assured him.
Antoine vanished and became a dream, about which we will hear. He had an older sister who does not appear in this narrative because Elise did not speak of her; I do not know the first name of this sacrificed sister, just as I do not know the name of the rustic she married; but I know that the two of them had only one daughter, whom they named Marie and who married a Pallade. In turn, these Pallades engendered two daughters: one of them, Catherine, died without leaving descendants (I knew this ancestor); the other, Philomène, married Paul Mouricaud, of Les Cards, with whom she conceived a single child, Elise, my grandmother. The latter, from her bond with
Félix Gayaudon, brought into the world just my mother, who bore a daughter who died as an infant, and me. Here is what I find moving: in this long procession of female heirs, single, well-behaved daughters in their little bonnets and smocks, I am the first man to possess the relic since Antoine, who dispossessed himself of it, but whose name it retained. Among all that female flesh, I am the shade of that shade; after so long a time â a whole century has passed â I am the closest to being his son. Over the heads of so many buried grandmothers, wives in labor, perhaps we nod to one another; our destinies hardly differ, our desires leave no trace, our works amount to nothing.
The relic is a small ceramic Virgin with child, supremely inexpressive in a glass and silk case that contains, in a sealed double bottom, the miniscule remains of a saint. This object followed the path that I have traced right up to me, and took up all those names; and all the names I have given are attested here and there by the stone slabs in the cemeteries of Chatelus, Saint-Goussaud, Mourioux, constant under the daytime sun and the night frost; and all the inconstant flesh inhabiting those names appealed to the relic when doing battle with the essential, when, in its living nest, essence clashed with itself and, from this struggle, appeared or disappeared, when flesh had to be born or die. Because the relic is a gris-gris. It was brought to the deathbed (in the bustling heat of the harvest outside, the men in sweaty shirts returning to weep for a moment beside the dying one, then going back out to strain under the sky, the straw and its dust, the excess of wine that multiplies tenfold the tears; or in sad winter, when death is banal, naked, tasteless). It was brought in before death prevailed; they looked at it before going under; some wild-eyed, some eyes quiet, they kissed it or
cursed it: Marie, who rendered her soul without a word, and Elise, who procrastinated under my vigil for three nights, and all their trembling, cocky husbands, who, even breathless, chattered on to keep denying that their moment had come. Hands that could no longer grasp anything but spasm and pallor grasped it nevertheless; and wicked claws grasped it, vicious and inert as the embedded nail, already from beyond the grave and yet still on this side, like dying words and inexorable hope. And the same impassive object had welcomed them, no less terrified and refusing with all their strength, when they had exited their mothers' wombs (when the harvest blazed in August, or in sad winter); because the relic aided the women in their labor, when with great cries the name is carried on. There was not a single squall from a creature newly arrived in stupor and trembling, in the secrecy of small rooms and soaked sheets where, once more, a young girl ceased to be one, over which the relic did not preside, kneaded by the mother and soiled by the child, little ever-virgin doll, enigmatic and comforting, bathed in sweat. Marie clutched it and cried out (and her mother Juliette before her) until the little expelled Philomène cried in turn, still without name or face; and twenty years later, Philomène clutched it and uttered a cry hardly different, and what would become Elise cried; and Elise, twenty years later, and the little Andrée, and the latter, a quarter century later, and finally me, who will not start the cycle again.
No more than Antoine was able to restart it, the son of Toussaint Peluchet and Juliette who delivered him in tears in about 1850.
He was born in Le Châtain. It is a place with thick vegetation but stony, with vipers, foxglove, and buckwheat, and the ferns grow high
there under arches of blue shade. From the village windows, from the time he could see, the child saw the low steeple of Saint-Goussaud, eaten away and enlivened by moss, and under the porch of which a painted wooden saint keeps watch, his simple, old-style deacon's robe sweeping the black flank of a reclining bull that the people here call
Le Petit Boeuf
, and revere. The deacon is the good Goussaud, hermit, exalted shepherd or rigid scholiast, founder from the year 1000; the bull's coat is studded with a thousand pins planted there by awkward, laughing, tearful girls making love vows, or women, with hands more sure and already weary, wishing for children. Like me, the young Antoine was led before these Household Gods; in his father's enormous fist, his small hand, daring and tender, was lost. His father lowered his voice, explained in a whisper the inexplicable world, how warm breathing herds depended on cold wooden idols, how impassive, painted things reigned secretly in the dark over the great fields of summer, in the flash of a wing more imperious than the eye of a kite, more decisive than the ascent of a lark. In the church blinded by its moss-covered windows, the dark reigned; finally the father struck a light. The thousand pins sparkled all at once in the candle's flame; the chasuble trembled, the ochre hands high above opened; and revealed, interminable, the gaze of the saint, ironic and naïve, hung over the child.
(Perhaps later, when he was sixteen or eighteen years old, he came to say goodbye to the worm-eaten group bristling with the pointed little desires of women, to find confirmation there of what, as a child, he had grasped without knowing it; to verify just this: what mattered to him â a rage to leave, and it hardly matters if you call that flight
saintliness or highway robbery, refusal and inertia in any case â was not the fact of the age-old pinpricks where each had left its tiny mark and its shard of desire, but the single massive desire of the sterile, solipsistic founder, the saint with the wooden gaze. Like the monk Goussaud of the past, undoubtedly violent and immoderately vain, who cloistered himself in the nearby forest, raging with hope that those jeering crowds, having driven him from the cities, would come imploring him, whose effigy now ruled over the harvest in five parishes, enflamed the girls, impregnated the women, and finally offered the violence of the roads to prodigal sons, like that monk and all those who revive their embers from the ashes with which they cover them, he had to see himself refused everything in order for the chance to possess it all. I imagine him, his face unforgettable in that moment and entirely forgotten, rediscovering this formidable commonplace; I imagine him, Antoine, still smooth-cheeked, leaving forever that always-nocturnal church, rage and laughter contorting his mouth, but emerging into the daylight as into his glorious future.)