The moderator looked horrified, and after she managed to wrest the floor back from the fat man, she explained that people don't get fat because they eat too much. She told us about a recent weight-gain study that proved that some people are genetically programmed to store more fat than others. They put a large group of people, fat and thin, on identical, high-calorie diets. While some people gained as little as ten pounds during the months-long study, others gained thirty or more pounds. This proved, she said, that some people were genetically predisposed to gain weight. Fat people, she corrected the red-faced man, don't get fat because they eat too much. They get fat because their bodies are programmed to be heavy.
The moderator didn't address what seemed like the obvious lesson of the study: People who gain more weight eating the same amounts of food as other people should probably bear that in mind when they belly up to the buffet and eat less. Of course, it's not fair that one person can eat a pint of ice cream every day and remain thin while another person will get hugely obese. But as my fellow conservatives like to point out, America is about equal access, not equal outcomes. Every American may have equal access to ice cream, but there's no guarantee that the outcome of eating ice cream will be equal. And, hey, if there's no shame in being fatâif fat is fit, fun, and sexyâwhy does it matter so much to NAAFA why someone gets fat? Overeating? Genetic predisposition? Who cares? If fat is good for you, if it's fun and sexy, should it matter how someone gets big? It seemed to me like a rather curious, blame-shifting argument for a fat activist to make. The skinny people blame the fat people for overeating; the fat people blame their genes for overstoring. But if you don't believe there's any shame in being fatâor if you don't believe there should beâwhy spend time assigning blame? Why not just have another pint of Chocolate Chip Cookie Dough ice cream?
The moderator passed the floor to a very tall woman who weighed at least five hundred pounds. The woman objected to the red-faced man calling fat people who could only get around in wheelchairs or motorized carts as “disabled.” They were, she sniffed, “differently mobile.” Instead of getting the surgery, fat people should demand bigger airline seats, better treatments for weight-related health conditions, and fat-tolerant workplaces. The next woman to speak, a woman with a huge belly that hung down to her knees, held up her canes and tersely explained to the red-faced man that she never really enjoyed walking all that much, so not being able to get around on her own was no great loss. She lived to read, she said, and she couldn't care less if she could walk. The red-faced man snorted; the moderator silenced him with a look. The nurse who had undergone WLS was in the clear, as the red-faced man was drawing all the fire.
The floor then passed to an apple-shaped woman sitting next to me. She paused and took a deep breath after the moderator called on her. She had just undergone WLS, she said, and pleaded with her fellow fat women to respect her decision. All her friends were eating friends, she said, and she wound up with diabetes and such bad back pain that she couldn't sleep at night. She made up her mind to have the surgery when she had to send away for a special implement to wipe herself after defecating.
“It was a stick,” she said. “A stick. I had to wipe myself with a
stick
.”
A young woman with a blond bob spoke next. She had also undergone WLS, and said it was something she had to do for herself and her kids.
Three women sitting together began to speak all at once. They challenged the idea that being fat meant they or anyone else in the room was unhealthy. One woman (apple-shaped) said that she rides her bike everywhere she goes, hikes, and swims three times a week. Another woman (pear-shaped) said that it was only a myth that being fat was bad for you; fat people needed to eat right and move, but they didn't need to lose weight to be healthy. The third (gourd-shaped?) insisted that her eating wasn't out of control and insisted she didn't have any “eating friends,” only friends she eats with. All three of the “fat and fit” women looked to be in their mid-twenties, and none appeared to weigh more than 250 pounds. They did look fitâespecially compared with the woman with the canes who didn't care if she lost her ability to walk.
All of this was too much for the red-faced fat man, who began speaking without waiting for the moderator to call on him. He wagged a finger at the three fat-and-fit women. While they may not be experiencing any weight-related health problems now, they would sooner or later. They were like smokers who insist that smoking can't be all bad for you because they haven't come down with lung cancer yet. The three fat-and-fit women began to argue with the fat man, which prompted the moderator to wrap up “Help! My Friend Is Getting WLS!” before a brawl broke out. This wasn't what I came to San Francisco for! I wanted to spend the weekend with happy, content gluttons, a hotel filled with happy, content, fat people enjoying guilt-free meals. Instead I found myself trapped in a hotel full of fat people tearing each other apart.
Â
I
kept my word and escorted Teresa and Shawn to the formal dance on Saturday night. The walls had been opened up to create the largest version of the Westin's collapsible ballroom, and soon after we arrived the ballroom was full of fat women wearing the kinds of outfits fat women are rarely seen inâflashy sequined numbers, sleeveless gowns, and little black dresses held up by little black straps. There was a lot of exposed flesh and a lot of time and trouble had been taken with hair and makeup. Most fat women try to get through the day without being noticed; most don't want to attract any more attention to their already hyper-scrutinized bodies. But the Westin's ballroom was filled to bursting with big women in outfits that screamed
“Look at me!”
There were very few men in the room when we arrivedâthere were actually fewer men in the ballroom at dinner than there had been at breakfast. But we passed a dozen or more men lurking in the hallways outside the ballroom on our way in.
“The FAs are out in force,” Teresa said as we made our way to the ballroom. While a lot of FAs enjoy watching women eat, Teresa explained, most of the FAs who attend NAAFA dinner dances typically skip the dinner and buy a dance-only ticket.
Teresa and Shawn ate very little, just like they had at breakfast. Their small stomachs require them to eat five or six little meals over the course of the day, instead of three large meals. If they eat too much at once, they'll throw the food up. When dinner was over, the doors to the ballroom were flung open and FAs seeped in like a gas, spreading across the ballroom while me and the BBWs were finishing our desserts. Most of the FAs were older, some were dressed rather fussily, and every last one was at least as skinny as I was.
“The National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance believes that a preference for a fat partner is as valid as any other preference based on physical characteristics, such as a particular height, eye color, or hair color,” reads NAAFA's official position paper on fat admirers. “Individuals who are attracted to a fat partner should be able to pursue, date, and make a commitment to a person of their size preference without fear of societal ridicule. Further, NAAFA believes that in a society where at least 55 percent of the population is considered fat, a preference for a fat partner is normal and should be encouraged rather than discouraged.”
NAAFA's position paper on FAs urges these men to come out of the closet and organize their own movement. The FAs at the dance, lurking in the corners, didn't seem like “movement” types. When I approached an FA near the bar in the ballroom and asked him what he found attractive about fat women, he wasn't able to look me in the eye. Maybe he could tell I wasn't an FA, and he wasn't comfortable discussing his preference with me. After an awkward hesitation, he said, “Not until you run your hands over someone supersized can you appreciate how wonderful all that flesh feels.” Then he slunk off.
The general consensus at our table was that most FAs are a little creepy; a lot of them are ashamed of their attraction to fat women, and they're not very good at concealing their feelings of shame. They come to NAAFA events (indeed, NAAFA encourages them to come), seduce fat women in hotel rooms, and then run home to skinny wives and girlfriends. When one particularly notorious FA was spotted in the room, a brassy blonde in metallic silver hot pants and a matching bra ran from table to table, warning her fat sisters about this particular FA's MO.
“He'll say, âOh, I love you, I want to marry you, I want you to meet my mother,' ” she warns the women at my table, “and the moment you sleep with him, he's gone.”
As we dished the FAs, I remembered something I read on NAAFA's Web site before I came to San Francisco. “At different times throughout history, the fat figure was looked upon as the ideal, desirable figure,” according to NAAFA. “Today, the American cultural aesthetic of beauty ranges from the thin supermodel whose proportions are unrepresentative of the naturally occurring shape of the human female, to an emaciated, sunken-eyed look termed âheroin chic.' ”
Beauty ideals are not and have never been democratic; if majority rule applied to beauty ideals, then fat would definitely be in. The reason certain traits become beauty ideals is precisely because of their rarity or the difficulty the average person has in achieving them. When food was scarce, heavy people were beautiful; when most people worked in the sun all day, white skin was sexy. Now that food is plentifulâeven the poor are obeseâthin is beautiful; now that most people have to work inside all day, tan skin is sexy. The thin that's sexy isn't just your run-of-the-mill thin, but a thin that says, “I can look on all the food spread before me every day and ignore it, not indulge. I can control myself. I can starve myself.” America's current beauty ideal isn't so much anti-fat as pro-youth and pro-self-denial, both increasingly rare traits in the United States as boomers age and their asses spread like Krispy Kreme franchises. Fat will be back in style when famines are.
But now it's time to dance.
Â
I
'm all for sin, and I'm pro-gluttony, but I'm not deluded. A sober celibate who eats very little and drinks next to nothing will probably outlive meâhe'll outlive everybody who indulges in drugs, sex, food, and booze. (Unless he gets run over by a beer truck driven by an oversexed pothead, which would serve him right.) The value of a single life, however, isn't only measured in time; quantity of life is important, of course (who wants to die young?), but quality of life also matters. The sober celibate may live to be a hundred, but what good is a hundred years of life if you're miserable the entire time? Sober celibates aren't necessarily miserable, of course, but personally, I would be a miserable sober celibate. I thank God and Thomas Jefferson and the rest of the founding fathers that I'm free to enjoy my life and indulge myself and sin and pursue happiness in ways that carry some risks, even if the way I choose to live shaves a decade or two off my life.
All I ask of the world and my fellow citizens is to leave me alone; I don't ask, Ã la NAAFA, that everyone pretend my sins are risk-free. I went to the NAAFA's weekend celebration to spend time with big, fat, gluttonous,
content
Americans. What I found was an organization that couldn't admit that the pleasures of gluttony were worth the health risks of obesityâand I found very little public gluttony. The women who were having the surgery and becoming “too thin” for the size-acceptance movement, couldn't eat much at any one time; women who were content being fat didn't eat much in public either, as that might contradict NAAFA's fat-people-aren't-fat-from-eating-too-much dogma. No one at any of the buffets I attended cut loose.
But it was time that I did.
Like the nurse and the other woman at the WLS seminar, I have a special eating friend. Tim is a straight guy and in good shape, but he has fat-hoarding genes and he has to watch what he eats. He rides his bike everywhere, eats salads for lunch, and tries to have plain grilled chicken breasts for dinner a couple of times a week. I follow pretty much the same routine. But our resolve goes to hell when we eat together. We're like a man and woman who are desperately attracted to each other but, alas, married to other people. It's not a good idea for Tim and me to spend much time together.
The two of us have gone to restaurants and ordered three appetizers and three entrées. If we're out together and Tim doesn't order an appetizer, I'll order one for him. We can never pass up dessert when we eat together, something we're capable of doing when we're with other people. Once in a very expensive restaurant, we were having a hard time deciding which one of the five items on the dessert menu we would split. Tim got up to go to the bathroom, leaving me to choose. All five desserts were sitting on the table when Tim returned. Nothing remained of our desserts when we staggered out of the restaurant an hour later.
Our dining relationship is sick and self-destructive. We both refer to eating together as MAD, for “mutually assured destruction,” a reference to the Cold War stalemate that kept the peace for half a century. Basically, if I'm going to get fat, so is Tim, and vice versa. I suspect there's some repressed erotic component to all this oral gratification. Tim's girlfriend, a doctor, weighs about ninety pounds and would forget to eat if Tim didn't remind her. Abbey takes no great pleasure in food and, unlike Tim and me, Abbey doesn't see the thrill in eating her way through the dessert menu in an expensive restaurant. Abbey eats, but without passion. My boyfriend, on the other hand, loves food, and eats constantly. But Terry is a six-foot-tall, 150-pound swimmerâhe's basically 139 pounds of bone and muscle, 10 pounds of skin, and 1 pound of hair. Terry will never be fat, no matter how much he eats, so food has no dire consequences for him, no danger. For Terry, crème brûlée is not an act of glamorous, self-destructive transgression. It's just dessert.