Read Schrodinger's Cat Trilogy Online
Authors: Robert A. Wilson
But still nobody took Fuller’s money theories seriously, except Dr. Naismith, and Eve Hubbard, who had run for President in 1980 on the Libertarian Immortalist ticket (“An End to Death and Taxes!”).
There was another President of Unistat who resigned, actually, but he “only” (as they say) existed in a novel. This was a science-fiction thriller set in a parallel universe and was called
Wigner’s Friend.
It was about the worst possible President the author, a Harvard professor named Leary, could imagine.
The President in Leary’s book, called Noxin, was a monster. He got the country into totally unnecessary wars without the consent, and sometimes even without the knowledge, of Congress. He lied all the time, compulsively, even when it wasn’t necessary. He put wiretaps on everybody—
even on himself.
(Leary, a psychologist, claimed this bizarre fantasy, which smacked of satire, was possible, for a certain type of paranoid mind.) He used the FBI and the IRS to harass every citizen who resisted this tyranny. He not only took bribes, but even had a team of enforcers who extorted “campaign” money from corporations under threat of turning the IRS on them. His political enemies all died in a series of strange assassinations that couldn’t be explained. When Congress started investigating his crimes, he betrayed his own co-conspirators one by one.
Noxin even misappropriated government money to fix up his house, and cheated on his income tax.
The book was a runaway best-seller, because it had a taut, suspenseful plot and because Unistaters could congratulate themselves on not being dumb enough to ever elect such a President.
Naismith, despite his Texas accent, was no imbecile; he had his finger on
part
of what was really going on.
The Federal Reserve did create money out of nothing. So did all the other banks.
The laws of Unistat allowed this, by permitting banks to issue loans up to as much as eight times the amount they had in deposits. Every time a bank made a loan on money they didn’t actually have, they were
creating
money.
Most of the people who knew about this (aside from the bankers) went paranoid worrying about it. This was because they did not realize how much of their Reality was created in similarly occult ways.
The Federal Reserve made it possible for other banks to loan what they didn’t have. The Fed
“guaranteed”
the credit of the banks.
The Fed was able to make this guarantee because it had lots of credit itself, in the form of government bonds.
The government bonds were good because they were guaranteed by loans from the Fed.
The loans from the Fed were guaranteed because the government gave them bonds.
And this was safe, because the bonds (remember) were guaranteed by the Fed.
That’s why Clem Cotex laughed for half an hour when he finally figured out the Unistat economy.
The Communists had instituted this monetary policy because it made virtually all commerce dependent on money that didn’t exist.
The Communists had abandoned pure Marxism in 1904 and were now following a system based partly on Marx and partly on traditional shamanism.
The whole Communist movement had secretly been taken over, in 1904, by General E. A. Crowley, the famous explorer. Crowley had learned a lot from the tribal shamans in the “backward” parts of the world he frequented. Chiefly, he had learned that the universe is created by the participation of its participants.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was hand-picked by General Crowley to manage the Communist takeover of Unistat. Crowley picked Roosevelt chiefly because of his radio voice. The agreement was simple: Crowley would keep Roosevelt supplied with women—“That crip Casanova never gets enough,” he was soon complaining—and Roosevelt, in turn, introduced Nasrudin’s magic wand to political economy.
Even though many clear-sighted, patriotic citizens saw through Roosevelt and warned, repeatedly, that he was leading the country to communism, the majority paid no heed to these voices of reason. They were charmed by Roosevelt’s radio voice, as Crowley had predicted.
Actually, Roosevelt kept before him, every time he spoke on radio, a large sign with a wise saying attributed to the man who won the Bad Ass Hog Calling Contest in 1923. The sign said:
YOU’VE GOT TO HAVE APPEAL AS WELL AS POWER IN YOUR VOICE. YOU MUST CONVINCE THE SWINE THAT YOU HAVE SOMETHING FOR THEM.
Unfortunately, Roosevelt was assassinated by a disgruntled office seeker in 1937.
The Communists found an equally loyal servant in 1948, however, in the famous General Douglas MacArthur, who was a military genius with one fatal flaw: he had an ego so large that only by contemplating the mathematical definition of infinity could anything so limitless be imagined.
MacArthur completed the Communization of Unistat in return for having his picture put on pennies, nickels, dimes, dollars, postage stamps, paintings in every public place, G.I.-issue condoms, the ceilings of barber shops, Mount Rushmore, the Sistine Chapel frescoes (advising
God during the Creation), all government documents, the chief balloon in all Macy’s parades, in place of the test pattern on TV screens, marriage licenses, dog licenses, and in various other places that he thought of from time to time.
A brave and patriotic senator, Joseph R. McCarthy, attempted to expose MacArthur’s government, which was staffed entirely by card-carrying Communists. (The Communists carried cards because, with so many conspiracies going on at the time, it was the only way they could identify themselves to one another.) The senator was smeared by the press, censured by his colleagues, and hounded to an early grave.
“Ike” Eisenhower, a popular Western film star of the period, contributed to McCarthy’s demise by making a national tour supporting the President.
“I don’t know anything about politics or military strategy,” old “Ike” would tell audiences, his face full of stupid sincerity. “But I know General MacArthur is a smart man and a tough man and can outfox the Commies every time.”
Like almost everybody else, “Ike” thought the Communists had taken over Russia, not Unistat.
One of the most insidious things the CIA Communists did when they took over Unistat was to change the Constitution.
The original Constitution, having been written by a group of intellectual libertines and Freemasons in the eighteenth century, included an amendment which declared:
A self-regulated sex life being necessary to the happiness of a citizen, the right of the people to keep and enjoy pornography shall not be abridged.
This amendment had been suggested by Thomas Jefferson, who had over nine hundred Black concubines, and
Benjamin Franklin, a member of the Hell Fire Club, which had the largest collection of erotic books and art in the Western world at that time.
The Communists changed the amendment to read:
A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the citizens to keep and bear arms shall not be abridged.
All documents and textbooks were changed, so that nobody would be able to find out what the amendment had originally said. Then the Communists set up a front organization, the National Rifle Association, to encourage the wide usage of guns of all sorts, and to battle any attempt to control guns as “unconstitutional.”
Thus, they guaranteed that the murder rate in Unistat would always be the highest in the world. This kept the citizens in perpetual anxiety about their safety both on the streets and in their homes. The citizens then tolerated the rapid growth of the Police State, which controlled almost everything, except the sale of guns, the chief cause of crime.
The Wilhelm Friedemann Bach Society was in the same downtown Washington building as the Warren Belch Society and the Invisible Hand Society, but Clem Cotex never thought much about them. He assumed, as did
everybody else who noticed the name on the building directory, that the W. F. Bach Society was just a group of musicologists.
Nothing could have been further from the truth.
They were also trying to find out “what the hell is really going on.”
This odd fraternity had named themselves after W. F. Bach not just for his music, which was superb, but for his effrontery, which was even more superb. Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, one of the twenty children of Johann Sebastian Bach, did not have the easy and immediate success of his brothers, Johann Christian Bach and Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach. In fact, because he was original and because he had to compete with the other three Bachs (already well established in the esteem of music lovers), Wilhelm Friedemann was neglected for a long time and might have ended his days in poverty and obscurity. But W. F. Bach was not the sort of man to take defeat easily. He hit on a plan which caused his music to be played everywhere, and made him quite a bundle of Deutschmarks, even though people were still saying he was the least important of the Bachs.
Wilhelm Friedemann had simply sold his compositions, one by one, as newly discovered work by his father, J. S. Bach.
Of course there had been art forgers and music forgers and even novel forgers both before and after W. F. Bach, but he had raised the philosophical ante on the bothersome question “If a work of art cannot be distinguished from a masterpiece, is it not a masterpiece?” or, in the vernacular, “How important is a Potter Stewarting
signature
, anyway?”
The original members of the W. F. Bach Society were people who had owned some magnificent Van Goghs back in the 1960s. Then one traumatic day, they did not own any Van Goghs at all. They owned El Mirs.
El Mir was the most talented painting forger of that time. His Van Goghs, Cézannes, and Modiglianis were totally indistinguishable from “the real thing,” whatever that is. It was widely believed, after El Mir was exposed by another forger named Irving, that many masterpieces
still
hanging in museums were El Mir’s work. Indeed, El Mir insisted on that, regarding it as the cream of the jest.
Some said that these El Mirs still hung in museums because the experts had not yet found any way to distinguish them from “real” art. Others said that the experts, once aware of El Mir’s work,
could
distinguish it from Van Gogh’s or Cezanne’s or Modigliani’s, but
would
not do so, because they had authenticated the fakes originally and did not want anybody to know that they had been fooled.
Blake Williams, Ph.D., had purchased a very fine El Mir, under the impression it was a Van Gogh, after the great success of his popularized book on primate psychology,
How to Tell Your Friends from the Apes
. Williams was then in the midst of his first phase synthesizing General Semantics and Zen Buddhism, and he immediately recognized what was
really
going on when identifiable El Mirs were everywhere falling in value after the great Expose.
It was a glitch, he decided.
He called together a small group of people who also owned identified El Mirs and begged them not to believe that they had been deceived.
“A signature,” he told them earnestly, “is not an
economic Good
in itself, like gold or land or factories. It is only a
squiggle
given contextual meaning by social convention.”
He went on like that for nearly an hour. He spoke of the differences between the map and the territory; between the spoken word (“a sonic wave in the atmosphere”) and the
nonverbal thing
or
event
which the word merely
designates; between the menu and the meal. He quoted Hume, Einstein, Korzybski, and Pope Stephen. He dragged in the latest theories in perception psychology, Ethnomethodology, and McLuhan’s version of media-message analysis.
He reminded them that Carlos Castaneda had studied Ethnomethodology with Garfinkle before studying shamanism with Don Juan Matus, and he assured them, as a professional anthropologist, that anyone who has the power to define reality for you has become a sorcerer, if you don’t catch the bastard real quick.
By this time a lot of his audience was irritated and a little frightened—mutters of “He’s just a damned crank” were heard from some corners of the room—but others were listening, enthralled.
Williams resorted to psycho-drama and Role Playing to get his point across. He said that he would pretend to be an extraterrestrial—“I wonder if it’s
just
pretending,” said an awed voice from the group who had followed this lecture with a sense of Illumination. Play-acting the extraterrestrial, Williams defied them to explain several things to him, rationally and logically, without assuming he had “intuitive” or
a priori
knowledge about what they took for granted.
He wanted to know, first, the difference between a dollar bill printed by the Unistat Treasury and a dollar bill printed by a gang of counterfeiters.
Everybody got excited, and most of them got angry, in the course of trying to make this distinction clear to the extraterrestrial, who was very literal and logical, and did not understand anything they took for granted until it was explained literally and logically.
By the time the extraterrestrial was willing to grant that there was an
agreed-upon
difference between the two
bills
created by
social consensus, a few people had left, saying, “It’s just an elaborate put-on.”
But the others, who stuck it out, were next confronted with a dollar bill hung in a museum as “found” art. Williams, the extraterrestrial, wanted to know whether its value was the same as, greater than, or less than it had been before being hung in the museum.
More people lost their tempers in the course of his discussion.
But Williams persisted. Still playing extraterrestrial, he wanted to know if it made any difference if the dollar hung in the museum as “found” art had been printed by the Treasury or by the criminal gang.
After a few minutes of this topic most of the people in the room were jumping up and down like the Ambassador who found the Rehnquist on the stairs.