FOLLOW-UP
DISPOSITION
Admission Criteria
- Observation and intervention for traumatic injury
- Concerns about disposition or lack of availability of child welfare receiving site, if required
- Goal must always be to ensure safety of child and siblings.
Discharge Criteria
- Adequate ED evaluation and medical follow-up
- Safe setting for child must determine disposition
- An abused child has a significant chance of further abuse so disposition must be determined in collaboration with social services and family evaluation
- Child (and siblings) may require placement in foster care.
Issues for Referral
- All patients require referral to the appropriate child welfare agency.
- Other family members may require evaluation before disposition is determined.
PEARLS AND PITFALLS
- A history inconsistent with the physical findings should lead to a suspicion of NAT.
- When child abuse is suspected, it must be reported.
ADDITIONAL READING
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Evaluation of suspected child physical abuse.
Pediatrics
. 2007;119:1232.
- Guenther E, Knight S, Olson LM, et al. Prediction of child abuse risk from emergency department use.
J Pediatr
. 2009;154:272–277.
- Hudson M, Kaplan R. Clinical response to child abuse.
Pediatr Clin North Am
. 2006;53:27–39.
- Kleinman PK, ed.
Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse
. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1998.
- Lane WG, Dubowitz H, Langenberg P. Screening for occult abdominal pain in children with suspected physical abuse.
Pediatrics.
2009;129:1595.
- Lindberg DM, Shapiro RA, Laskey AL, et al: Prevalence of abusive injuries in siblings and household contacts of physically abused children.
Pediatrics.
2012;130:193.
- Togioka BM, Arnold MA, Bathurst MA, et al. Retinal hemorrhages and shaken baby syndrome: An evidence-based review.
J Emerg Med
. 2009;37:98–106.
- Vandeven AM, Newton AW. Update on child physical abuse, sexual abuse and prevention.
Curr Open Pediatr.
2006;18:201
See Also (Topic, Algorithm, Electronic Media Element)
Trauma, Multiple
CODES
ICD9
- 995.50 Child abuse, unspecified
- 995.53 Child sexual abuse
- 995.54 Child physical abuse
ICD10
- T74.12XA Child physical abuse, confirmed, initial encounter
- T74.22XA Child sexual abuse, confirmed, initial encounter
- T74.92XA Unspecified child maltreatment, confirmed, initial encounter
ACETAMINOPHEN POISONING
Mark B. Mycyk
BASICS
DESCRIPTION
- Acetaminophen (APAP) is available alone, in combination with oral opiate, and in >200 OTC cold remedies:
- One of the most common drugs implicated in intentional and unintentional poisonings
- The number 1 reason for hepatic transplantation in the US
- N
-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine (NAPQI) produced when APAP metabolized by cytochrome P-450:
- NAPQI normally detoxified by glutathione
- In overdose, glutathione is quickly depleted and NAPQI causes hepatic damage.
- N
-acetylcysteine (NAC) replenishes the liver’s glutathione stores.
- Increased risk of toxicity:
- Patients with poor nutrition have decreased glutathione stores.
- Pharmacokinetics:
- APAP half-life:
- 2.5–4 hr in a nonoverdose setting
- >4 hr in overdose
- Toxic dose >150 mg/kg acutely
- Probable toxic level is 140
μ
g/mL at 4 hr postingestion (see Fig. 1 nomogram for acute intoxication).
- Therapeutic plasma concentration is 5–20 μg/mL.
Rumack–Matthew nomogram. (Adapted from Rumack BH, Matthew H. Acetaminophen poisoning and toxicity.
Pediatrics
. 1975;55:871–876.)
DIAGNOSIS
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS
Acute overdose:
- Phase 1: 0.5–24 hr postingestion:
- Nausea, vomiting, malaise
- Occurs with large overdoses
- May not be present with smaller toxic doses
- Phase 2: 24–72 hr postingestion:
- Decreased GI symptoms
- Hepatic damage is occurring.
- Right upper quadrant pain and tenderness
- Elevation of liver enzymes, PT/INR, bilirubin
- Oliguria
- Prolonged (>4 hr) APAP half-life implies hepatic toxicity.
- Phase 3: 72–96 hr postingestion:
- Critical time period in the prognosis
- Peak liver function abnormalities
- Hepatic encephalopathy develops.
- If the PT/INR continues to rise and/or renal insufficiency develops beyond the 3rd day postingestion, there is high likelihood that the patient will require hepatic transplantation.
- Phase 4: 96 hr to 10 days postingestion:
- Resolution of hepatic injury or progression to complete hepatic failure
ESSENTIAL WORKUP
- Ingestion history of all APAP-containing products
- Time of ingestion
- APAP level:
- Obtain 4 hr postingestion level or immediately on presentation if >4 hr postingestion.
- Use Rumack–Matthew nomogram as therapeutic guide for single acute overdose (see Fig. 1).
- In chronic or very late ingestions (>24 hr), obtain level, but do not use nomogram for therapeutic guidance.
- Call poison center ([800] 222-1222) or toxicologist.
DIAGNOSIS TESTS & NTERPRETATION
Lab
- APAP level
- Electrolytes, BUN, creatinine, and glucose
- Liver enzymes:
- Elevated AST is the first abnormality detected.
- AST/ALT levels may rise >10,000 in stage III of toxicity.
- Bilirubin
- PT/INR
- Pregnancy test
- Toxicology screen
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
- Suspect APAP as coingestant with other drugs in overdose.
- Causes of acute onset hepatotoxicity:
- Infectious hepatitis
- Reye syndrome
- Amanita
sp. mushrooms toxicity
- Herbal and dietary supplements
- Other drug ingestions
TREATMENT