âYes. But it's like so much in life, isn't it â an opportunity shows, such as your glimpse of the pub car park dogs, and one either takes it or sees it disappear, perhaps for ever. Had you gone back a day or two later there might have been no trace of the dogs.'
âYes, the postman
doesn't
always ring twice.'
âJimmy Cain. A great film and book.'
âOr then again, as to literature,' Ian replied, âthere's “a tide in the affairs of men which taken at the flood leads on to fortune,” but, not taken, the result is shallows and misery.'
âGood old
Julius Caesar.
The theatre can often deliver a truth. Think of this new play by John Osborne,
Look Back in Anger
,
with its obvious flaming, bitter disgust at the Britain we live in now. The flagrant lack of good leadership, the absence of a philosophy to live by. The loss of an empire and nothing to take its place and conserve our collective pride. How many does he speak for, I wonder?'
âYes, do you find Britain disgusting, Mr Skeeth?'
âMilton. How I wish I'd been offered the privilege of producing that play.'
âIt chimes with your thinking, does it?'
âThere'll be other works along the same lines from different writers, I expect,' Skeeth said.
âYou believe this is a general view, do you, contempt for the way our country is governed at present?'
âA prevailing dissatisfaction.'
âWarranted?'
âIt's certainly there.'
âPerhaps we should meet?' Ian said.
âI wondered if you might call at my house for a drink.'
âWhere do you live?'
Again there was a pause as if he thought Ian knew the address but wouldn't admit it, because that would indicate research into Skeeth had already been done. And it had been. Did he suspect this? Did it scare him? âFeder Road, Chelsea, number twelve,' Skeeth said.
âFine.'
âWe'll be here all this evening.'
Which âwe' would that be? Was Jeff with him â Jeff who could be unhelpful and frightening? But Ian didn't ask. He'd prefer not to sound confrontational. Skeeth might be frightened off. Charteris recalled that sketch Driberg did of him as a great null, uncommitted nothingness which the customers were conned into thinking they should transform into a something by coughing all their intimacies to him. Yes, a smart old printman, Driberg, and political with it.
When the phone call had ended, Ian talked to Lucy about it. He would like another view. Correction: he wanted not just another view; he wanted
her
view, which was sure to be wise and sharp and to do with basics. âWhat exactly is it that Emily and Ray Bain suspect him of?' she said. âIt ties in with what you told me Driberg hinted at, does it? I mean Driberg's state-of-the-nation analysis, not his scabbily slanderous analysis of you.'
âThey believe that if the Suez situation keeps on going disastrously wrong for us, as seems likely,
the country will slip into chaos and become more or less ungovernable â bad for everyone, but especially bad for those with a lot to lose, such as Skeeth and his family and the family boodle, properties and business. There'd be a small but formidable part of the population like that. They favour strong governance â thrive under it, are cosseted and protected under it, hold peerages and knighthoods and courtierships under it â and if it's not available they'll try to supply it.
âTo get what they want they might form alliances with working-class folk like Dill and the folk Dill represents, who could erupt on to the streets and make trouble, but trouble that remains controlled, so no factories or plant belonging to the Skeeth family and similar are arsonized. Some of the Dill brigade have special talents â one called Malcolm dug out my name from a supposedly secure police source. This is infiltration on quite a scale. They can discover supposedly secure data, including the ownership of my car. Hence, the Skeeth phone call. I get an inkling of an organization already in place and functioning effectively, frighteningly.'
âThe Dills and Malcolms will be cut adrift, of course, once power is secured, will they?' Lucy said.
âNaturally. Emily, Ray Bain and Driberg think something like this Right-Left line-up of forces was rumoured in 1936, at abdication time. They believe there could be a repeat now, but with a much better chance, because they don't have to depend on the king, who bolted in 'thirty-six. Although Skeeth's tone was sort of jokey and flippant on the phone just now, he spoke seriously about chances that might be caught or missed. I said the postman doesn't always ring twice. Sometimes he might, though.'
âBut any putsch would need the military wouldn't it? Or at least the threat of the military.'
âOf course. Many of the people on the Right would have experience of command. Perhaps the plot already
has
some of the military. Maybe there are generals, and admirals, and air marshals who feel disgust at the prospect of an illegal invasion and Suez war â Operation Musketeer it's called, I hear from a
Times
Whitehall correspondent. Eden and the government know how unpopular the idea of conflict is. How could they not know? There are continuous battles inside the government about the legality or not of the war. As Mr
Times
describes it, the attorney general, Manningham-Buller, has decided an invasion is unlawful. But Eden ignores his views, and the Solicitor General's, Harry Hylton-Foster. Kilmuir, Lord Chancellor, will try to cook up some sort of justification instead. Confidential, so far.'
âIs that a job for a Lord Chancellor?'
âDoubtful. Manningham-Buller, Hylton-Foster and some of their staff are livid. There are resignation threats.'
âProvable?'
âPossibly not. In any case, it's the way Prime Ministers have always behaved, I suppose, leaning on subordinates for an OK, and probably the way a Prime Minister will behave in the future if we land in another illegal war. Mr
Times
says there are officers in a basement office at the Air Ministry planning an Allied Air Force Task Force. The room is so hidden away they're known as “the troglodytes”. They are very unhappy, he tells me,
about the confusion of political and military objectives. This uneasiness might be widespread in the armed forces, and exploitable.'
âBut the 1936 element?' Lucy said. âWhat's a supposed plan â very supposed â what's a supposed plan for an uprising then got to do with now? Have Emily and the others galloped to see resemblances? It's as if they've concocted a new shadow situation from a past state of things that nobody's altogether sure about, anyway. To me it sounds like figments on figments, guesses on guesses, fantasy on fantasy.'
âIt's possible, though.'
âLikely?' she said. âCould Emily, Bain and Driberg all have been listening to the same source â the same faulty source? They seem to confirm one another, but actually they're all starting from the same wrong spot.'
âI've thought of that.'
âAnd?'
âThere's a new, 1956 factor. Skeeth mentioned the Osborne play
Look Back in Anger
and its raging suggestion that there's something rotten in the state of present-day Britain. OK, it's probably bullshit: most likely Britain is more or less the same as it always was. But the accusation gives a writer something to hang a nicely worded tirade on. I asked Skeeth if
he
agreed about the rottenness. I don't think he answered. Do they want to clean up â in all senses, get once glorious GB back on track, ruling the waves etcetera? Do we detect a kind of perverted patriotism?
âThe conversation wasn't total playfulness and banter. And where it seemed to be playfulness and banter I got the idea occasionally that he was terrified. He couldn't understand how I'd located Dill and the others, nor what the result might be. He kept on with what sounded like farcical questions about the country pub and my noticing the dogs, and being a terriers fan, but which really weren't so farcical. He thinks my knowledge of their scheme is better than a journalist's.'
âAnd he's right, isn't he?'
âOf course.'
âThe file shows plainly enough how you got on to Dill and the others. It's simple.'
âYes, Skeeth's under watch and Dill is noted calling at the Chelsea house. But, of course, Skeeth doesn't know this. And neither does Dill,' Ian said. âDill still thinks Jimmy Cagney was a film star, and that's all.'
âYou hope. Ah, and you think Skeeth is afraid Dill will suspect he â Skeeth â mentioned them to you, pointed you towards the dogs and Dill?' Lucy asked.
âHe's scared of Dill. The upper-crust are always scared of the lower crust, and the lower crust never fully trusts the upper crust. There are fine historical precedents.'
âBut why would Skeeth betray them?' Lucy said. âThat's what it would be, isn't it, betrayal?' She was lying on a settee, wearing an old sweater and elastic waisted trousers. She spoke to him over the good mound of her pregnancy. Her brain was, as ever, fully directed at his problems, ordered, alert to all the possibilities, entirely clear. She frowned a little through concentration, grinned occasionally when she got a kick from the kid, but generally looked as serene, confident and lovely as ever. âIn the chat after the pub, Dill turned suddenly very reticent, virtually hostile,' Ian said. âNext step, Malcolm does a check on me. They become vigilant, disbelieving, they examine all the likelihoods, none comfortable â for them.'
âWell, of course they'd be vigilant â some obvious, officer-qualities city lad descends on them and wants lessons in the art of badger hunting. Credible? Likely? It's more or less preposterous, isn't it? As you say, they probably think you're one of Emily's lot, doing some would-be subtle penetration.'
âYes, they might. And they'll ask how this one of Emily's lot found them in their country pub. They'll wonder, won't they?'
âBy a tip-off from Milton Skeeth? You think that's what they decide? But I come back to the same question, why would he betray them?'
âIn fact, he wouldn't and hasn't. Of course he hasn't. He told me nothing except he knew Dill, and, of course, he's coughed nothing to Emily or Bain or their people.'
âYou're one of their people, aren't you?'
âFor the moment. But he's done no coughing to me, either, just a sort of PG Wodehouse chit-chat, though with undertones.'
âIt's not negligible that he's told you he knows Dill,' Lucy replied.
He delighted in that precision from her, the ânot negligible'. It was like a seminar. âBut he thinks I know already that he's matey with Dill. He deduces that's why I'm out badgering.'
âYes.' She wagged a finger at him. âYou
have
come to sound like an undercover agent.'
âI am. Skeeth will also believe that Dill and co. won't be able to see any other path to them but dear Milt. They probably sensed from the beginning that the toffs and tycoons might ditch them when they felt like it. They're not stupid. Most likely they'd know some of that relevant history â wars bringing death and suffering to ordinary folk, and riches and lands to the high-born and the arms dealers. The Workers' Education Association probably points out that kind of dire process, and so it should. Perhaps Dill and the rest imagine the conspiracy has been rumbled by Emily's squad, and Skeeth under questioning sang and sang, involving everyone. The conspiracy, if it exists,
has
been rumbled by Emily's squad, but Skeeth hasn't done any singing, as far as I know. He's done some waggish conversation with me.'
âYes, as far as you know. But wouldn't Skeeth explain to Dill you were a journalist, not a spy?'
âHe might. He's not convinced of that himself, though. In any case, a journalist is just as bad from their angle, isn't he? What do journalists do? Expose people. They want to get front-page headlines that start with very upper case, REVEALED: and then the dirt in detail on whatever it is â secrets laid out for their readers' enjoyment. I think it's all partly a class thing. Dill and friends are working class. Journalists, Skeeth and those with Skeeth, are at least middle class and perhaps higher. The working class is used to being screwed and let down by their supposed superiors.'
âI don't think you should go round to his house,' Lucy replied.
âIt'll be all right. You don't get violent skulduggery in Chelsea. This is the home of a famous theatre man, and member of an eminent family. Anyway, Emily's people are in the street, watching.'
She grimaced, didn't even get near to swallowing this. âHow would they know if things had gone wrong inside the house, gone wrong for
you?
The outside of the house would look as it ever did. And it might be too late if they did eventually suspect something was amiss inside.'
âI think I ought to see him. I feel a sort of duty.'
âWho to?'
âNot sure.'
âAlways, darling, you're imagining yourself in moral debt to someone.'
âIt's my nicer side,' Ian said. âEmily obviously feels a debt to me because of my dad. So, I get the Sword of Honour and now the file. I have to do a bit of reciprocity. That Driberg sketch of my personality â the perfect reporter because a total blank, a great fillable emptiness, inconstant with no positive drive orâ'
âDon't. I'd rather not hear anything else from the rude swine,' Lucy said.
âI'd like to show I'm not like that,' Charteris said.
âShow whom? You don't have to show
me.
I know it's bloody rubbish.'
âShow myself. I'd like to be rated good at coping with a big newspaper story, but something beyond that, too.'
She shook her head. âEgomania. But, OK. You can't go alone, though. I'll come with you.'