Mary Tudor (70 page)
Authors: Linda Porter
Born in 1520, Homem had a colourful past. He had been imprisoned in a Moroccan fortress in 1544, on suspicion of implication in a murder in Lisbon. But he escaped and made his way to England, where he joined as many as 60 other cartographers working for Henry VIII. Their work was important but not always glamorous, since it frequently involved mapping harbours and fortifications as Henry prepared to fight the French and the Scots. Homem must have been unusually skilful. After only three years in England he was a chart-maker with a European reputation, supporting himself as a freelance working for an international clientele. Most of his commissions were for private libraries. The atlas ordered by the queen of England was, though, of a different order of magnificence.
The atlas is dated 1558, which is probably the year of its completion. Not all of it survives - nine maps out of a likely 14 or 15—but what remains is breathtaking.The maps are surprisingly accurate for Europe, Africa and Asia, and they also show the coast of north-eastern America as well as all of South America. Originally, there may have been a decorative circular diagram of the zodiac as well as the surviving calendar, tables of solar declination, a lunar chart and the zonal world map. Most striking of all is the ethnographical and wildlife decoration, which would have been undertaken in Venice. Here are camels and vivid tents in North Africa and great fishes swimming in the oceans. Diogo Homem’s world teems with life and colour and the spirit of discovery. The Queen Mary Atlas, overlooked for many years, as so much else to do with Mary, is no dry document from the past. It is a work of art.
30
30
While Mary encouraged the search for exotic new markets, she also knew that domestic commerce and industry must be supported. Guilds, towns and boroughs were seen as potential sources of wealth, and it was recognised that a more coherent structure for local government would be of benefit to the country as a whole. Guilds were strengthened, apprenticeship laws enforced and the mobility of workers restricted.This would appal 21st-century advocates of market forces, but free enterprise was not a concept appreciated by Mary and her government. They thought English domestic prosperity could best be achieved by protecting traditional institutions and industries, and Parliament agreed with them. A conservative approach was typified by the legislation passed by the parliament of 1555; it was cantankerous on matters of religion but its achievements in social and economic legislation were considerable. Local authorities were able to issue licences to beggars, in an attempt to handle vagrancy more successfully, and, for those who were in work, there was legislation to ensure that they stayed employed, where they were, so that they did not add to the problem. The right to weave was confined to those living in corporate towns, and the number of looms operated by any one individual was restricted. Two years later, the Woollen Cloth Act reinforced this determination to manage the manufacture of what was still the country’s main industrial staple, by placing heavy fines on manufacturers who tried to set up independently.
To make local government and industry more efficient, and civic dignitaries more amenable, the Crown encouraged incorporation of towns and boroughs.They were the front line in administering law and order in England and in dealing with burgeoning social problems. Mary granted more than twice the number of charters per year compared to her predecessors and was working towards a uniform standard for the structure and power of municipal governments. Towns could act as corporate entities before the law, enabling them to hold lands that might be sold or let as a source of income for education, poor relief and public works.They were also able to issue by-laws, providing them with a local framework for justice. Incorporation was a matter of local pride and many of these charters were still being used as instruments of government right up till 1835. The charter incorporating the borough of Wycombe in Buckinghamshire is typical of the privileges granted to many others. In this case, the loyalty of the town during the succession crisis of 1553 and Wyatt’s rebellion was noted.The mayor, two bailiffs and burgesses would be a ‘body corporate and politic … able to plead and be impleaded in all courts and places both spiritual and temporal’. They were empowered to hold a court at least once every three weeks, ‘with full power to hear and determine all pleas of debt, account, covenant, contract, force and arms’.
31
And to facilitate local trade and industry, a market was granted weekly, with major fairs twice a year.
31
And to facilitate local trade and industry, a market was granted weekly, with major fairs twice a year.
Mary could take comfort from the fact that the conduct of local government was mainly in the hands of people she trusted. Here the queen’s supporters played a large part. Her marriage to Philip of Spain was of international significance, but Mary ruled the shires of England through the relatives and friends of those with whom she had long-standing ties. Lords lieutenant in the counties and justices of the peace were frequently appointed as the result of their kinship to someone in this network. All were good Catholics in the queen’s eyes. Marriage to Philip may have reduced the influence of Mary’s wider affinity on matters of state, but in terms of English daily life, they remained an important force.
Certainly a level of centralisation was required to tackle the severe problems of famine and disease that beset Mary’s reign. Measures of social welfare were needed on a nationwide scale, and the Marian regime did not throw up its hands and leave the outcome to God. In London, five charities were brought together to provide a city-wide system of poor relief. Failed harvests meant that proclamations had to be used to provide for the distribution of grain where the situation was most desperate. Laws against grain-hoarders were vigorously enforced and systematic surveys of stocks undertaken. In Yorkshire in 1557, justices of the peace were appointed with specific responsibility for overseeing this process.
Throughout Mary’s reign there was another trend that had considerable impact on English prosperity. This was a sustained effort to overhaul financial management and provide a better underpinning for the economy as a whole. Financing the cost of government itself was a constant difficulty, as Mary’s predecessors well knew. The crux of the problem was that the financial structure was medieval and had not remotely kept pace with the requirements of an early-modern monarchy. Ireland alone cost Mary nearly
£
40,000 a year and household charges had spiralled, with no overhaul since 1519, when Mary was only three years old. But worse still were areas that should have brought in revenue, such as the exchequer and various of the other ancient departments originally set up to provide income, but now little more than the preserve of placemen. And an absolute priority was to restore the currency, the foundation on which everything else depended. Henry VIII and Edward VI had both debased the coinage. Minting continued through most of Mary’s reign and plans were put in place between 1556 and 1558 for a major recoinage, but these had to be shelved in the face of the mounting pressures of war, dearth and disease. The plans formed the basis for the great Elizabethan recoinage carried out in 1560—61, however.
£
40,000 a year and household charges had spiralled, with no overhaul since 1519, when Mary was only three years old. But worse still were areas that should have brought in revenue, such as the exchequer and various of the other ancient departments originally set up to provide income, but now little more than the preserve of placemen. And an absolute priority was to restore the currency, the foundation on which everything else depended. Henry VIII and Edward VI had both debased the coinage. Minting continued through most of Mary’s reign and plans were put in place between 1556 and 1558 for a major recoinage, but these had to be shelved in the face of the mounting pressures of war, dearth and disease. The plans formed the basis for the great Elizabethan recoinage carried out in 1560—61, however.
Reform of the exchequer had long been anticipated, but Mary was able to put it into practice.The project was handed to the aged marquess of Winchester, a long-time servant of the Crown but, as someone who had carried out her father’s orders for the treatment of Mary and her mother in the 1530s, scarcely a confidant.Winchester duly amalgamated the courts of Augmentation and First Fruits and Tenths into the exchequer, but his attempts to stamp out corruption, rife as it probably was, involved reverting to accountancy methods so ancient that Mary would have none of them. She wanted the more advanced methods of accounting and auditing developed in the King’s Chamber, which demonstrates that she had a far better financial grasp than her critics have claimed. Mary was not fascinated by figures, but as someone who had signed off her accounts since she was in her early twenties and a woman of property on a large scale, she appreciated the importance of a well-run fiscal organisation. But she may have suspected that Winchester was as interested in his own aggrandisement as he was in good practice at the exchequer, and in 1557 she moved him across to a different but nonetheless important area of responsibility, the financial administration of the navy.
The main achievement of these years in bringing revenues to the Crown was the extensive overhaul of customs and excise. This was a corollary of the drive to increase trade, but it also tapped unused sources of income. Hundreds of commodities remained untaxed, and those that were were taxed on the basis of valuations going back as far as 1507. Rampant inflation of 350 per cent made them completely useless. A new Book of Rates was introduced, surviving almost unchanged until 1604. Most of the revisions and additions were on non-essential imported goods, a move intended to help English industry. Customs collection was centralised, thus ensuring that money came directly to the Crown instead of being creamed off by the multitude of professional collectors who were awarded receivership rights for political support. Sir Francis Englefield, a Mary loyalist, was awarded the post of Surveyor General of the Customs for the Port of London.This role was extended nationwide under Elizabeth, until she reverted to the old system of individual collectors in the 1570s. As a means of rewarding service it was too tempting, but decentralisation was a retrograde step.
Sound financial management meant leading by example. The royal household itself was subject to scrutiny. A report of 1555 looked in detail at possible reductions in costs and wages. It made uncomfortable reading. Wages were far too high and the requirement to feed, clothe, house and educate members of the household and their families was proving an unacceptable burden. The report suggested strongly that liberties were being taken with royal generosity and that this must stop, no matter how much offence was caused: ‘
£
396 [per annum] is paid for clothing 21 ladies and gentlemen under warrant dormant. There is no precedent for such largesse.’ But even more tricky was the amount that the monarch spent on herself:‘I place in this category’, wrote the unsparing auditor, ‘clothing for adorning the royal person, bed coverlets, material for horsecloths and litters, with other equipment for horses and mules. In his tenth year, HenryVIII spent
£
1631 and in his eleventh only
£
911, on the wardrobe of the robes, the wardrobe of the beds, on the stable and on saddles and harnesses.’ And what had his daughter done? ‘In her first year, the queen spent
£
5100 on the same … Henry VIII, who had two minstrels, gave
£
29 annually to both. Since she has 38 minstrels [a comment revealing just how much Mary loved music], the queen gives
£
572 annually for clothing.’ Then came the crunch. ‘In summary: the largesse of Henry VIII amounted to
£
4300 in 1518/19. The largesse of the queen [in 1553/4] amounted to
£
9600. If warrants dormant, or grants of the same certain kind, were reduced to an annual
£
1000 and those uncertain could be contained to
£
3000, the expense of the wardrobe would diminish to
£
4300, and so a great decrease from the present charge would ensue.’
32
Although this summation was written 450 years ago, it would surely meet the approval of a modern financial adviser. Basically, Madam was too kind-hearted to those around her and utterly self-indulgent when it came to clothes and entertainment. Mary Tudor was human, after all. In the queen’s defence, it should be pointed out that the very high expenses of the first two years of her reign were caused by her coronation and marriage. But, so far as we can tell, she never did cut back her spending on her wardrobe.
£
396 [per annum] is paid for clothing 21 ladies and gentlemen under warrant dormant. There is no precedent for such largesse.’ But even more tricky was the amount that the monarch spent on herself:‘I place in this category’, wrote the unsparing auditor, ‘clothing for adorning the royal person, bed coverlets, material for horsecloths and litters, with other equipment for horses and mules. In his tenth year, HenryVIII spent
£
1631 and in his eleventh only
£
911, on the wardrobe of the robes, the wardrobe of the beds, on the stable and on saddles and harnesses.’ And what had his daughter done? ‘In her first year, the queen spent
£
5100 on the same … Henry VIII, who had two minstrels, gave
£
29 annually to both. Since she has 38 minstrels [a comment revealing just how much Mary loved music], the queen gives
£
572 annually for clothing.’ Then came the crunch. ‘In summary: the largesse of Henry VIII amounted to
£
4300 in 1518/19. The largesse of the queen [in 1553/4] amounted to
£
9600. If warrants dormant, or grants of the same certain kind, were reduced to an annual
£
1000 and those uncertain could be contained to
£
3000, the expense of the wardrobe would diminish to
£
4300, and so a great decrease from the present charge would ensue.’
32
Although this summation was written 450 years ago, it would surely meet the approval of a modern financial adviser. Basically, Madam was too kind-hearted to those around her and utterly self-indulgent when it came to clothes and entertainment. Mary Tudor was human, after all. In the queen’s defence, it should be pointed out that the very high expenses of the first two years of her reign were caused by her coronation and marriage. But, so far as we can tell, she never did cut back her spending on her wardrobe.
Nevertheless, as the reign progressed, Mary was presiding over a series of laudable initiatives that were beginning to improve life in England. Stability and tranquillity, however, remained elusive goals. The threat of intrigue and the prospect of war were ever present. For wherever Elizabeth was, there also lurked deceit. And wherever Philip, Mary’s husband, might be, in England or in Brussels, there was another inescapable reality: sooner or later, his troubles would be England’s, too.
Other books
Keeping Secrets by Linda Byler
Sophie's Run by Wells, Nicky
The Werewolf Bodyguard (Moonbound Book 2) by Camryn Rhys, Krystal Shannan
Bloodstain by John C. Dalglish
Lock and Load (SEAL EXtreme Team) by Kimberley Troutte
This Birding Life by Stephen Moss
Face Value by Cheryl Douglas
Mouth of the Rat (A Samantha Jamison Mystery) by Edelheit, Peggy A.
The Intercept by Dick Wolf
