Lies My Teacher Told Me (11 page)

Excluding the passage on the right, including the passage on the left, excluding the
probably true, including the improbable, amounts to colonialist history This is the
Columbus story that has dominated American history books. All around the globe, however,
the nations that were “discovered,” conquered, “civilized,” and colonized by European
powers are now independent, at least politically. Europeans and European Americans no
longer dictate to them as master to native and therefore need to stop thinking of
themselves as superior, morally and technologically. A new and more accurate history of
Columbus could assist this transformation.

Of course, this new history must not judge Columbus by standards from our own time. In
1493 the world had not decided, for instance, that slavery was wrong. Some Indian nations
enslaved other Indians. Africans enslaved other Africans. Europeans enslaved other
Europeans. To attack Columbus for doing what everyone else did would be unreasonable.

However, some Spaniards of the timeBartolome de las Casas, for exampleopposed the slavery,
land grabbing, and forced labor that Columbus introduced on Haiti. Las Casas began as an
adventurer and became a plantation owner. Then he switched sides, freed his Indians, and
became a priest who fought desperately for humane treatment of the Indians. When Columbus and other Europeans
argued that Indians were inferior, Las Casas pointed out that Indians were sentient human
beings, just like anyone else. When other historians tried to overlook or defend the
Indian slave trade, begun by Columbus, Las Casas denounced it as “among the most
unpardonable offenses ever committed against God and mankind.” He helped prompt Spain to
enact laws against Indian slavery.95 Although these laws came too late to help the Arawaks and were often disregarded, they did
help some Indians survive. Centuries after his death, Las Casas was still influencing
history; Simon Bolivar used Las Casas's writings to justify the revolutions between 1810
and 1830 that liberated Latin America from Spanish domination.

When history textbooks leave out the Arawaks, they offend Native Americans. When they
omit the possibility of African and Phoenician precursors to Columbus, they offend African
Americans. When they glamorize explorers such as De Soto just because they were white, out
histories offend all people of color. When they leave out Las Casas, they omit an
interesting idealist with whom we all might identify. When they glorify Columbus, our
textbooks prod us toward identifying with the oppressor. When textbook authors omit the
causes and process of European world domination, they offer us a history whose purpose
must be to keep us unaware of the important questions. Perhaps worst of all, when
textbooks paint simplistic portraits of a pious, heroic Columbus, they provide feel-good
history that bores everyone.

Considering that virtually none of the standard fare surrounding Thanksgiving contains
an ounce of authenticity, historical accuracy, or cross-cultural perception, why is it so
apparently ingrained? Is it necessary to the American psyche to perpetually exploit and
debase its victims in order to justify its history?

Michael Dorris European explorers and invaders discovered an inhabited land. Had it been pristine
wilderness then, it would possibly be so still, for neither the technology nor the social
organization of Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries had the capacity to maintain, of its
own resources, outpost colonies thousands of miles from home.

Francis Jennings The Europeans were able to conquer America not Because of their military genius, or their
religious motivation, or their ambition, or their greed. They conquered it by waging
unpremeditated biological warfare.

Howard Simpson It is painful to advert to these things. But our forefathers, though wise, pious, and
sincere, were nevertheless, in respect to Christian charity, under a cloud; and, in
history, truth should be held sacred, at whatever cost . . . especially against the narrow
and futile patriotism, which, instead of pressing forward in pursuit of truth, takes pride
in walking backwards to cover the slightest nakedness of our forefathers.

Col. Thomas Aspinwall

Over the last few years, I have asked hundreds of college students, “When was the country
we now know as the United States first settled?” This is a generous way of phrasing the
question; surely “we now know as” implies that the original settlement antedated the founding of the United States. I initially
believedcertainly I had hopedthat students would suggest 30,000 B.C., or some other
pre-Columbian date.

They did not. Their consensus answer was “ 1620.”

Obviously, my students' heads have been filled with America's origin myth, the story of
the first Thanksgiving. Textbooks are among the retailers of this primal legend.

Part of the problem is the word settle. “Settlers” were white, a student once pointed out to me. “Indians” didn't settle. Students
are not the only people misled by settle. The film that introduces visitors to Plimoth Plantation tells how “they went about the
work of civilizing a hostile wilderness.” One recent Thanksgiving weekend I listened as a
guide at the Statue of Liberty talked about European immigrants “populating a wild East
Coast.” As we shall see, however, if Indians hadn't already settled New England, Europeans
would have had a much tougher job of it.

Starting the story of America's settlement with the Pilgrims leaves out not only the
Indians but also the Spanish. The very first non-Native settlers in “the country we now
know as the United States” were African slaves left in South Carolina in 1526 by
Spaniards who abandoned a settlement attempt. In 1565 the Spanish massacred the French
Protestants who had settled briefly at St. Augustine, Florida, and established their own
fort there. Some later Spanish settlers were our first pilgrims, seeking regions new to
them to secure religious liberty; these were Spanish Jews, who settled in New Mexico in
the late 1500s.5 Few Americans know that one-third of the United States, from San Francisco to Arkansas to
Natchez to Florida, has been Spanish longer than it has been “American,” and that Hispanic
Americans lived here before the first ancestor of the Daughters of the American Revolution ever left England. Moreover, Spanish culture left an indelible mark on
the American West. The Spanish introduced horses, cattle, sheep, pigs, and the basic
elements of cowboy culture, including its vocabulary: mustang, bronco, rodeo, lariai, and so on.6 Horses that escaped from the Spanish and propagated triggered the rapid flowering of a new culture among the Plains Indians. “How
refreshing it would be,” wrote James Axtell, “to find a textbook that began on the West
Coast before treating the traditional eastern colonies.”

Beginning the story in 1620 also omits the Dutch, who were living in what is now Albany by
1614. Indeed, 1620 is not even the date of the first permanent British settlement, for
in 1607, the London Company sent settlers to Jamestown, Virginia, No matter. The mythic origin of “the country we now know as the United States” is at Plymouth Rock, and the year is 1620. Here is a representative account from The American Tradition-.

After some exploring, the Pilgrims chose the land around Plymouth Harbor for their
settlement. Unfortunately, they had arrived in December and were not prepared for the New
England winter. However, they were aided by friendly Indians, who gave them food and showed them how to grow corn. When warm weather came, the colonists planted, fished,
hunted, and prepared themselves for the next winter. After harvesting their first crop,
they and their Indian friends celebrated the first Thanksgiving.

My students also remember that the Pilgrims had been persecuted in England for their
religious beliefs, so they had moved to Holland. They sailed on the Mayflower to America and wrote the Mayflower Compact, the forerunner to our Constitution, according
to my students. Times were rough, until they met Squanto, who taught them how to put a
small fish as fertilizer in each little cornhill, ensuring a bountiful harvest. But when I ask my students about the plague, they
just stare back at me. “What plague? The Black Plague?” No, I sigh,

that was three centuries earlier. The Black Plague does provide a useful introduction,
however. William Langer has written that the Black (or bubonic) Plague “was undoubtedly the worst disaster
that has ever befallen mankind.”9 In the years 1348 through 1350, it killed perhaps 30 percent of the population of Europe. Catastrophic as it was,
the disease itself comprised only part of the horror. According to Langer, “Almost
everyone, in that medieval time, interpreted the plague as a punishment by God for human sins,” Thinking the day ofjudgment was imminent,
farmers did not plant crops. Many people gave themselves over to alcohol. Civil and
economic disruption may have caused as much death as the disease itself. The entire
culture of Europe was affected: fear, death, and guilt became prime artistic motifs.
Milder plaguestyphus, syphilis, and influenza, as well as buboniccontinued to ravage
Eutope until the end of the seventeenth century.

The warmer parts of Europe, Asia, and Africa have historically been the breeding ground
for most of mankind's illnesses. Humans evolved in tropical regions; tropical diseases
evolved alongside them. People moved to cooler climates only with the aid of cultural
inventionsclothing, shelter, and firethat helped maintain warm temperatures around their
bodies. Microbes that live outside their human hosts during part of theit life cycle had
trouble coping with northern Europe and Asia.11 When humans migrated to the Americas across the newly drained Bering Strait, if the
archaeological consensus is correct, the changes in climate and physical circumstance
threatened even those hardy parasites that had survived the earlier slow migration
northward from Africa. These first immigrants entered the Americas through a frigid
decontamination chamber. The first settlers in the Western Hemisphere thus probably
arrived in a healthier condition than most people on earth have enjoyed before or since.
Many of the diseases that had long shadowed them simply could not survive the journey.

Neither did some animals. People in the Western Hemisphere had no cows, pigs, horses,
sheep, goats, or chickens before the arrival of Europeans and Africans after 1492. Many
diseasesfrom anthrax to tuberculosis, cholera to streptococcosis, ringworm to various
poxesare passed back and forth between humans and livestock. Since early inhabitants of
the Western Hemisphere had no livestock, they caught no diseases ftom them.

Europe and Asia were also made unhealthy by a subtler factor: social density. Organisms
that cause disease need a constant supply of new hosts for their own survival. This
requirement is nowhere clearer than in the case of smallpox, which cannot survive outside
a living human body. But in its enthusiasm, the organism often kills its host. Thus the
pestilence creates its own predicament: it requires new victims at regular intervals. The
various influenza viruses must likewise move on, for if their victims survive, they
enjoy a period of immunity lasting at least a few weeks, and sometimes a lifetime.14 Small-scale societies like the Paiute Indians of Nevada, living in isolated nuclear and
extended families, could and did suffer post-Columbian smallpox epidemics, transmitted to
them by more urban neighbors, but they could not sustain such an organism over time.15 Even Indians living in villages did not experience sufficient social density. Villagers
might encounter three hundred people each day, but these would usually be the same three
hundred people. Coming into repeated contact with the same few others does not have the
same consequences as meeting new people, either for human culture or for culturing
microbes.

Some areas in the Americas did have high social density. Incan roads connected towns from northern Ecuador to Chile. Fifteen hundred to two thousand years ago the population of Cahokia, Illinois, numbered
about 40,000. Trade linked the Great Lakes to Florida, the Rockies to what is now New Eng
land.1 We are therefore not dealing with isolated bands of “primitive” peoples. Nonetheless,
most of the Western Hemisphere lacked the social density found in much of Europe, Africa,
and Asia. And nowhere in the Western Hemisphere were there sinkholes of sickness like
London or Cairo, with raw sewage running in the streets.

The scarcity of disease in the Americas was also partly attributable to the basic hygiene
practiced by the region's inhabitants. Residents of northern Europe and England rarely
bathed, believing it unhealthy, and rarely removed all of their clothing at one time,
believing it immodest. The Pilgrims smelled bad to the Indians. Squanto “tried, without
success, to teach them to bathe,” according to Feenie Ziner, his biographer.'

For all these reasons, the inhabitants of North and South America (like Australian
aborigines and the peoples of the far-flung Pacific islands) were “a remarkably healthy
race”20 before Columbus. Ironically, their very health proved their undoing, for they had built up
no resistance, genetically or through childhood diseases, ro the microbes that Europeans
and Africans would bring to them.

In 1617, just before the Pilgrims landed, the process started in southern New England. For
decades, British and French fishermen had fished off the Massachusetts coast. After
filling their hulls with cod, they would go ashore to lay in firewood and fresh water and
perhaps capture a few Indians to sell into slavery in Europe. It is likely that these
fishermen transmitted some illness to the people they met,21 The plague that ensued made the Black Death pale by comparison. Some historians think
the disease was the bubonic plague; others suggest that it was viral hepatitis,
smallpox, chicken pox, or influenza.

Within three years the plague wiped out between 90 percent and 96 percent of the
inhabitants of coastal New England. The Indian societies lay devastated. Only “the
twentieth person is scarce left alive,” wrote Robert Cushman, a Absent any illustrations of the epidemics in New England, these Aztec drawings depicting
smallpox, coupled with the words of William Bradford, convey something of the horror. “A
sorer disease cannot befall [the Indians], they fear it more than the plague. For usually
they that have this disease have them in abundance, and for want of bedding and linen and
other helps they fall into a lamentable condition as they lie on their hard mats, the pox breaking and mattering and
running one into another, their skin cleaving by reason thereof to the mats they lie on.
When they turn them, a whole side will flay off at once as it were, and they will be all
of a gore blood, most fearful to behold. Ana then being very sore, what with cold and
other distempers, they die like rotten sheep.” (Quoted in Simpson, Invisible Armies, 8.) Textbooks never display such sympathy for the Indians; at best they give only the
Tonto characters (here Squanto, later Sacagawea] individuality and agency.

British eyewitness, recording a death rate unknown in all previous human experience.22 Unable to cope with so many corpses, the survivors abandoned their villages and fled,
often to a neighboring tribe. Because they carried the infestation with them, Indians died
who had never encountered a white person. Howard Simpson describes what the Pilgrims saw:
“Villages lay in ruins because there was no one to tend them. The ground was strewn with
the skulls and the bones of thousands of Indians who had died and none was left to bury
them.”

During the next fifteen years, additional epidemics, most of which we know to have been
smallpox, struck repeatedly. European Americans also contracted smallpox and the other
maladies, to be sure, but they usually recovered, including, in a later century, the
“heavily pockmarked George Washington.” Native Americans usually died. The impact of the
epidemics on the two cultures was profound. The English Separatists, already seeing their
lives as part of a divinely inspired morality play, found it easy to infer that God was on
their side. John Winthrop, governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, called the plague
“miraculous.” In 1634 he wrote to a friend in England: “But for the natives in these
parts, God hath so pursued them, as for 300 miles space the greatest part of them are
swept away by the smallpox which still continues among them. So as God hath thereby
cleared our title to this place, those who remain in these parts, being in all not 50,
have put themselves under our protection . . ,”24 God the Original Real Estate Agent!

Many Indians likewise inferred that their god had abandoned them. Robert Cushman reported
that “those that are left, have their courage much abated, and their countenance is
dejected, and they seem as a people affrighted,” After a smallpox epidemic the Cherokee
“despaired so much that they lost confidence in their gods and the priests destroyed the
sacred objects of the tribe.”21 After all, neither Indians nor Pilgrims had access to the germ theory of disease. Indian
healers could supply no cure; their medicines and herbs offered no relief Their religion
provided no explanation. That of the whites did. Like the Europeans three centuries
before them, many Indians surrendered to alcohol, converted to Christianity, or simply
killed themselves.

These epidemics probably constituted the most important geopolitical event of the early
seventeenth century. Their net result was that the British, for their first fifty years in
New England, would face no real Indian challenge. Indeed, the plague helped prompt the
legendarily warm reception Plymouth enjoyed from the Wampanoags. Massasoit, the Wampanoag
leader, was eager to ally with the Pilgrims because the plague had so weakened his
villages that he feared the Narragansetts to the west.“ When a land conflict did develop between new
settlers and old at Saugus in 1631, ''God ended the controversy by sending the small pox
amongst the Indians,” in the words of the Puritan minister Increase Mather. “Whole towns
of them were swept away, in some of them not so much as one Soul escaping the Destruction,”28 By the time the Indian populations of New England had replenished themselves to some
degree, it was too late to expel the intruders.