Authors: James A. Connor
But none of her children had reckoned on Katharina's stubbornness. She wouldn't have it. She believed that she was in the right, and that was that. To move out of Leonberg would be to abandon the field to the Reinbolds, something she could not do, before God. Katharina refused to go to Linz for fear that they might think she had a guilty conscience.
Instead, she moved to Heumaden, which was close by, to the house of her daughter Margaretha and her son-in-law, Pastor Georg Binder.
But living in Heumaden meant to Katharina that she would no longer be living in her own house or managing her own properties, and this burned her like acid. After she left town, the Reinbolds claimed that she had given evidence against herself by running away, which was exactly what Katharina feared. What she couldn't see was that her life was in danger, whether she was a witch or not, and getting out of town was the only way to save it.
After a great struggle within the family, Katharina's children managed to convince her to lease her home to Christoph for three years by promising that they would support her during that time. Since Christoph, who had just become a citizen of Leonberg, was still living in Luther Einhorn's jurisdiction, the three children agreed that Margaretha and Johannes would take turns inviting Katharina into their homes. Christoph Kepler was adamant about his mother's move to Heumaden, if not Linz, because he had a feeling that things were going to get very bad indeed for Katharina. The lies had been repeated so many times by so many people that they had begun to be accepted as the truth. By this time, Katharina was nearly under house arrest. Einhorn had warned Christoph to keep his mother from visiting other people in their homes, because this would cast even more suspicion onto her.
On December 2, 1616, the duke's consistory in Stuttgart ordered Einhorn to inventory all of Katharina Kepler's assets. Einhorn did what he had been ordered to doâclosed up her house and counted all her assets, with the expectation that he would be able to make payments out of it to the Reinbolds and the Hallers for their pain and suffering. After doing that, he bragged about town that it was he who got the old woman arrested, he who got her estate closed up, and he who would be in charge of her fortune.
A few weeks later, in January 1617, Jakob Reinbold wrote to the duke himself and requested that the “fugitive” Kepler woman be arrested and brought back to Leonberg. He claimed that because his wife was still suffering and no one knew the kind of poison Katharina had put into her po
tion, the Kepler woman should be returned to Leonberg so that she could be forced to confess and to hand over the information they needed to help Ursula. Oh, and by the way, he asked the duke if Katharina's estate could be confiscated rather than just inventoried and if he and his family could have a share of that estate for their pain and suffering.
Meanwhile, the Kepler family found out about Jakob Reinbold's petition, and in January 1617 Christoph and Pastor Georg Binder petitioned the duke to dismiss Jörg Haller's request that Katharina's estate pay for the support of his children. For once, the Keplers were successful. The duke, perceiving the corruption behind the whole affair and yet not knowing what to do about it, was embarrassed and avoided taking sides. However, as more petitions fluttered his way, his embarrassment grew. He really wanted the whole thing to go away.
In February Emperor Ferdinand, who succeeded Matthias after his death, summoned Kepler to Prague, and so Kepler hurriedly left for the capital. He didn't stay long, however, because he wanted to return to Linz to take his mother to Leonberg. Meanwhile, in Leonberg, Einhorn had refused to show Katharina Kepler's advocate the duke's order and instead read them excerptsâ“a little of this and a little of that.” On March 9, Christoph Kepler and Pastor Binder wrote to the duke directly to complain about Einhorn's behavior, especially his refusal to show them the duke's order.
From February to August, the Keplers fought with Einhorn, trying to get him to allow the slander case to come to trial. The duke ordered Einhorn to do so, but on more than one occasion he ignored the order, and then bragged that if the duke forced him to obey his order, he would petition the Royal Chamber Court. The town bailiff of Leonberg, Jakob Kern, set the date for the slander trial on at least three occasions, but each time Einhorn managed to find a pretext to worm out of it.
At the end of August 1617, the weather was still hot, the air still humid. The farmers were preparing for the harvest, and the gossip of Leonberg was afire with the terror of witches. Katharina, certain of her innocence, insisted on her day in court and, in spite of all that had happened to her, returned to Leonberg and tried to move back into her house. She
still believed she would be vindicated in the end and that the court would restore her good name.
On September 1, Johannes Kepler wrote to the duke to inform him of all the events in Leonberg and to request a proper administrator for his mother's assets. Up until this time, the administrator would have been Einhorn, which would have been a serious conflict of interest. In his letter, Johannes explained to the duke: “I have doubts and I worry that before the examination of those witnesses, by whom she will prove her innocence, that because she is a careless old woman (who has already let go of the keeping of her own house and has rented her estate), it will lead presently to additional useless costs, and also subject her to the machinations of her adversaries.” He then asks the duke to authorize “that her property and estate be managed by someone who will administer, advice, and provide expert opinion to the war magistrates of Leonberg, and will save her estate from ruin and reduction, and will take from it only as much as is necessary for her legal personal use and also for the payment of her debt.”
In October, Katharina arrived in Heumaden. She had been gone over nine months in Linz and complained bitterly about being away from Leonberg. Johannes left Linz soon after, but on the way he suffered another tragedy. He stopped in the little town near Regensburg, on the Danube River, where he found out that his stepdaughter, Regina, by then a married woman with children, had recently died. Her husband, Philip Ehem, had no one to care for his children, so he asked Kepler to leave his fifteen-year-old daughter, Susanna, behind to watch the children while Kepler traveled on to Leonberg. Finally, on October 30, Kepler arrived. It should have been a time of celebration, for it was the Lutheran jubilee. All around him, however, there were tragedies. His stepdaughter had died. His mother was on trial for her life. And fire had destroyed Vaihingen, a nearby town.
Kepler had traveled all the way to Leonberg hoping that his presence would help his mother's case and that he could run political interference for Katharina in ways that Christoph could not. The chief counsel set a new date for the slander trial in November, but once again Einhorn man
aged to slip by the order. On November 20, without consulting with the bailiff, Einhorn summoned Katharina to his office once again to fish for some new “development” that might allow him to evade the new slander trial date, set for November 24, even though the date had been announced and all the parties informed. Frustrated and angry, Kepler finally asked the duke if his mother could return with him to Linz without loss of honor on her part, and the duke agreed. But Katharina would not go. She would have her day in court, even if it killed her. Even so, the high court in Stuttgart ordered the magistrate to allow Kepler to take his mother back to Linz with him. Also, they told Kepler that the duke would not allow the Reinbolds to postpone the slander trial any longer.
Throughout 1617â18, Einhorn managed to sidestep everybody. Jakob Kern, the bailiff, tried to schedule the slander trial in spite of Einhorn, but failed. Johannes Kepler, realizing that his mother's case against the Reinbolds was stalled, returned home in December 1617 only to find his daughter Katharina sick in bed.
Nothing much happened after that until May 1618, when the examination of witnesses on the slander trial began. No one knows what day that trial took place or what the result was. Somehow the documents disappeared. Kepler claimed that his mother had won the day, because four honest old town councilors, elder burghers with some standing in Leonberg, had come forward to set the record straight, saying that Katharina Kepler's reputation was impeccable and that the Reinbold woman's reputation was nowhere near as clean. The Kepler family waited for the judgment against the Reinbolds to be made public, but it never was. That judgment was quickly lost, because Einhorn and the Reinbolds, possibly with the help of the Prince Friedrich Achilles, worked furiously to bury it.
Suddenly there was a bill of indictment against Katharina consisting of forty-nine articles, finally putting on paper what up until that time had had merely been gossip. Johannes was furious. This started off as an evil fantasy, and now, because of Einhorn, his mother was fighting for her life.
Then on May 23, 1618, the Thirty Years' War started with a comic opera in Prague, and Germany paid for its years of sectarian hatred.
L
ETTER FROM
K
EPLER TO
H
ERZOG
J
OHANN
F
RIEDRICH VON
W
ÃRTTEMBERG
N
OVEMBER
1620
Highest Honorable, Merciful Duke and Sir,
Your Ducal Highness is aware of my modest obedient service.
Merciful Duke and Sir,
As much as I did not want to bother your Ducal Highness, the misfortune and the misery of my mother, under arrest at Güglingen, is becoming so great that all of us, including our relatives, fear what is becoming obviousâher utter ruin. Her suffering is accompanied by the suffering of the three of us, her children, but we do not in any way assume that your Ducal Highness has taken joy in this judgment, but rather, as the trusted father over his subjects, that you would like to help all of us escape from it.
For our mother, who in her seventy-fourth year and with present maladies of body and soul, was foremost never convicted before this arrest, now four months long, is heartbreaking. And if she, poor thing, considers that she has withstood four months of torment, with neither judgment nor legal proceeding, it is all the more painful for her when she remembers that those accusations she was charged with are as incredible as they have ever been. She has not knowingly committed even the least visible injustice, nowhere close to any of the charges brought so far. For this reason, they want to assume her to be culpable on the basis of the gathered suspicion. We would rather that these same legal proceedings should be
praised as Christian love in many parts, and that those who have suspected others unfairlyâonly and solely her adversary, those who slandered her among the people six years ago and was lawfully charged for itâis to carry blame.
But much harder for us, and much more dangerous for our mother, is that our mother is being guarded by two keepers, men who themselves are deeply in debt, whose common thinking and conscious efforts are solely intended to extend their duty as long as possible. To achieve this, they think that no act is too audacious or too low. They take the unfortunate utterances, despondency, fickleness, impatience, and whatever else this troublesome situation may exact from such an old woman and interpret it maliciously, comment and portray it in a manner that when, finally, were she to be released, she would be burdened with even more suspicions than were put upon her before her arrest. To this end, we can doubtlessly interpret the purpose of our adversary's journey to Güglingen.
Thirdly, these useless and wasteful guards have caused unmanageable expenses by unnecessarily burning wood so they did not have to sleep too close to the fire, to such an extent that within a few weeks, after keeping house in this manner, my mother would have nothing left of her income. Even her income is in danger, since the magistrate of Leonberg, in order to obtain alimony for her, sold all her fields and then raised an untimely dispute between us, the children, who have our own expenses. In addition, my brother fears that I will cause him to be thrown into poverty in the future, since my arrival in the country has led to such an extension of the court case and has incurred such great expenses. I have to lament to God in Heaven, since I have been forced to abandon my poor wife and children on the road in a foreign place near Regensburg, without food or money. And still I will soon have to leave, task unaccomplished, with shame, ridicule, and heartache, for I have no credit in the country.
O
N
M
AY
23, 1618, in Prague, spring was slowly edging into summer, the spring rains were giving way to summer's heat, and the capital was nearly at war with itself. The Protestant Bohemian Estates had come to the point of murder, because the Habsburgs, who had once made promises of religious concessions to them, had reneged.
1
After the Habsburg brothers' war, Matthias replaced Rudolf as emperor. He stayed on in Prague until after his brother's death and then transferred his capital to Vienna, where it remained. He passed the rule of Bohemia on to his nephew Archduke Ferdinand of Styria, who with the negotiated blessing of the Estates took the crown in 1617. Before leaving, Matthias confirmed all the promises he had originally made to the Protestants, promises that he had made under duress when he needed their help to fight Rudolf. Protestants could practice their religion as they saw fit; they could hold public office; they could
live without fear of losing their land, their titles, or their lives. But then the Catholic faction, like a boulder in the river, refused to move. This was the same group that Rudolf, by nature more open to new ideas than Matthias, had to deal with for years. Led by the Spanish but with cousin Ferdinand's not too secret support, they would not sign any document that promised equality to the Protestants, because for them there was only one Christian church, one heir to Peter, and one true doctrine. There could be no compromising with heretics.
This was not that different from what the more radical Protestants believed in their secret hearts, though in the Habsburg lands, being the underdogs, what they settled for was freedom. They did not get that either. Under the new archbishop of Prague, Johannes Lobelius, the Catholics turned up the heat, and one by one the concessions to the Protestants evaporated. Anger swelled in the ranks, and the Bohemian Estates turned from petitions for imperial concessions to secret meetings and whispers about violence. Civil war was brewing all over the city. Protestants could no longer hold the offices that they once held, while the Prague towns had lost their right of self-rule. The cap was the day the Catholics tore down two new Protestant churches that were built on lands once belonging to a Benedictine monastery, claiming that the land was still Catholic land. The Protestants stamped about, their whispers becoming shouts. All church lands belonged to the king, they said.
The Protestant Estates held a meeting at the largely Hussite Carolinum University to discuss the situation. Their resolution was to send one more petition to Matthias requesting that he honor his promises. One evening, the radical faction, led by Václav Budova of the Bohemian Brethren and Count Matthias Thurn, known for his hot temper, met in the Minor Town in the home of one of their members, Jan SmiÅický, to plot murder. Their specific targets were the royal administrators who lived in the Prague Castle, whom they accused of subverting Matthias's honest promises to them.
But there were deeper reasons hidden behind these. Even in the age of absolute monarchy, kings had limited power. As rulers of national governments, they still had to deal with the local nobility, town councils, and estate representatives, since most of the actual work of government was
done by them. Kings rarely had standing armies, and what they did have was meager. They relied on taxing the local governments to maintain their armies and their way of life, and if a king did not have a healthy relationship with his local governments, then his support, military and financial, could dry up. This was especially true after the Reformation and the Peace of Augsburg. In spite of the old formula “whose the land, his the religion,” if a local ruler belonged to a religion different from that of his people, most especially from that of those who formed his local governments, then his position was precarious. Even in a world that operated on the divine right of kings, new radical theories were popping up around Europe, even in Prague, that held that the people could legitimately depose their own king, if that king practiced the wrong kind of religion.
2
But even the most radical would rarely shout that theory from the rooftops, for it was too new and frankly dangerous. They would rather make their revolt while gravely proclaiming they were saving the rightful king from bad advisers. That was the position that Ferdinand II found himself in, in both Austria and Bohemia.
Before they sent their petition to the emperor, radicals such as Thurn and Budova were in the minority. But that soon changed. Matthias responded to their request, but his response was not what the Estates had hoped it would be. His answer was haughty and condescending, the answer of a man who had achieved the power he had wanted and planned on using it. Matthias's refusal set fire to the city. The radicals had suddenly become the darlings, and the political faction of the Protestant Estates had become a movement.
On May 23, a hot crowd of angry Protestants, all members of the Estates, followed the radical faction up the hill to the Prague Castle, where the Catholic DiviÅ¡ ÄernÃn opened the gate for them. He would later die on Emperor Ferdinand's scaffold for that mistake. From there, they stormed the staircase leading to the offices of the royal administrators; they brawled their way in and confronted the bureaucrats along with their secretaries. There were only four of the administrators there that day, the other six having left town rather suddenly, for their health. The remaining four, Jaroslav of Martinic, Adam of Sternberg, Dìpold of Lobkovic, and Vilém
Slavata of Chum, either had important business to conduct, were very brave men, or were slow on the uptake.
The mob confronted them and accused them of intrigue and of being responsible for the king's bad faith. The tension in the room nearly exploded, teetering on the edge of riot. The four administrators pleaded with the Estates men, assuring them that they were not the ones responsible for the tone of Matthias's answer and that they were only servants of the emperor, like the Protestants themselves. This did not mollify the crowd, however, for they had come ready for blood. The radicals had been planning for this day for some months and would not back down. The fact that the four men had little to do with the king's answer to the Estates did not matter. The fact that the answer had actually been written by Melchior Cardinal Khlesl, the gray eminence of the imperial court, meant nothing. These men were Catholic, they were intransigent, and they were there.
The radicals would have done away with all four of them, but the rest of the Estates men were more level-headed. They separated out the moderate CatholicsâDìpold of Lobkovic and Adam of Sternbergâfrom the ones who were more intransigent and pushed the moderates into an adjoining room, where they let them go. Then Count Thurn incited his fellow rebels, shouting encouragement. The time for talk was over, and the time for action was beginning. They should act now, decisively and quickly.
The remaining administratorsâJaroslav of Martinic and Vilém Slavataâhad been two of the most anti-Protestant members of the king's court in Prague and had been deeply involved in the Catholic faction for twenty years. They had consistently dragged their feet when ordered to approve Protestant rights, had argued against religious tolerance, and had worked tirelessly against the Protestant cause. Count Thurn, in good Bohemian fashion, hearkened back to the first defenestration of Prague performed by the followers of Jan Hus in the fourteenth century and ordered the two men thrown out the high window of the Bohemian chancellery, a fall that was a good fifty feet. Out went Jaroslav of Martinic without much ceremony. Then they picked up Vilém Slavata, but he grabbed on to the window sill and called out for his father confessor. Ap
parently, his conscience was not as clear as his compatriot's. This stalemate went on for a few long painful seconds until one of the rebels took the hilt of his dagger and pounded at Slavata's hands until he let go. But that was not enough, not quite. One of the secretaries, Johannes Fabricius, was edging along the wall toward the door when one of the Protestant men saw him; the crowd took him and threw him out the window too. Well, why not?
Oddly enough, all three men survived the fall and managed to crawl off in spite of the pistol shots that fell all around them. Later the Protestants claimed that the men fell on a pile of horse manure that had been left at the bottom of the wall under the window. Catholics, on the other hand, claimed that the men lived because the Blessed Virgin had spread her mantle under them so that they fell as lightly and as gently as rose petals. They were saved by a miracle, said the Catholics. They were saved by shit, said the Protestants.
The three men escaped, but not without harm. Slavata had a nasty head wound and could not leave the city, so he staggered to the imperial chancellor's house, where the chancellor's wife, Polyxena of Lobkovic, hid him from the mob and tended his wounds. Eventually, a body of men came to her house looking for the administrators, but she stood up to them, berated them, and sent them on their way. The secretary Fabricius had hurt his leg in the fall, but he managed to escape altogether. When he arrived at the emperor's court, he was greeted warmly and was later raised to the nobility. His title included the term “von Hohenfall,” making him the lord of “High Fall.”
Meanwhile, back in Prague, after news of the Second Defenestration of Prague hit the streets, the city erupted. Protestant burghers roamed the city murdering Franciscan monks and, predictably, invading and pillaging the Jewish quarter. The world that was Prague was changing; fire was on the wind, the Thirty Years' War had begun, and somehow once again the Jews were caught in the middle.
3
Â
K
ATHARINA
K
EPLER
was a stubborn woman. She had been accused falsely of witchcraft, and although she knew that she was not a witch, she believed that anyone who truly understood her would know that as well. So why should she be hiding out in Heumaden and Linz? Why should she not be back in Leonberg, proving to them all that they were wrong about her and that the Reinbolds were malicious slanderers? On June 16, 1618, Katharina returned to Leonberg for the first time since October 1616. The Reinbold faction raged. They thought that they had gotten rid of the troublesome old women once and for all. Einhorn was nervous, however. What was she doing back in Leonberg? What could she want among clean Christian people? Would she try to resurrect her lawsuit against them? He thought that he had safely doused the slander case against Ursula Reinbold, but now that Katharina Kepler had returned to Leonberg, she and her family could blow on the embers once again and have the whole thing brought to life. The old woman was altogether troublesome and had to be stopped.
Katharina's house was near the market square, so just standing at her doorstep upon her return, she let loose the hornets' nest of gossip. Still under great suspicion of witchcraft, Katharina sparked fear in many simple people and in some not so simple. While she was away, the fear of her had grown. Instead of dying out, what had been mere suspicion had blossomed into a prejudice, and from a prejudice into a court case. The Reinbold camp, which had been shepherding that prejudice, gathered its forces at once and petitioned to have Katharina arrested.
Up until that point, Einhorn had managed to push through most of what the Reinbolds wanted, but now that Katharina had returned, they didn't have everything their own way and had to split the differenceâon June 23, the high court in Stuttgart denied their petition for Katharina's arrest, but at the same time they advised that the witchcraft trial against Katharina Kepler should go forward. So Katharina was allowed her freedom, but the charges stood.
On October 8, the court publicized the witness examinations that they had made on May 7. During this time, Johannes Kepler sought the advice of the well-known jurist Christian Besold, and in April 1619 he received a
letter from Besold that frightened him. Besold said that he had studied the forty-nine accusations that the Reinbolds had skillfully gathered for their court action and in his opinion they had the ring of truth. He was not hopeful about Katharina's case and advised Johannes to contact Dr. Bidenbach, one of the duke's legal advisers and a man who was personally close to the Kepler family.
A few months later, on June 10, 1619, Besold met with the Kepler family and their advocates and laid out for them all the behind-the-scenes manipulations that Einhorn had engaged in. Finally, the Keplers began to understand the power of the forces arrayed against them, but it was too late. If they had truly understood what was happening a year before, then they might have taken steps to neutralize Einhorn, but by the time they had figured it all out, Einhorn and the Reinbolds had already curried too much favor in high places, and their whispering campaigns had effectively turned the populace against Katharina. People were already beginning to remember old illnesses, twinges of sciatica and bouts of intestinal parasites, and were assuring each other that Katharina had had a hand in it all. Two months later, on August 16, Dr. Phillip Jacob Weyhenmayer, Jakob Reinbold's advocate, walked into the courtroom and read into the record all forty-nine of the “most terrible and shameful articles”:
Accuser Jacob Reinbolden, in marriage and in the name of his dear housewife Ursula, versus Katharinam Kepplerin:
1. States in this behalf
(salva priori protestatione)
that it is true, first, that no person shall harm another in body or health in any way, and is forbidden under pain of punishment.
2. That it is also true that a person who inflicts pain upon another person is responsible and liable for all loss.
3. And then, thirdly, it is true that the Kepler woman, against the above laws not only took hold of Reinbold's wife but also caused harm.
4. Fourth, it is true that the Kepler woman in 1613 invited Reinbold's wife into her home and gave her a potion.
5. That a few footsteps later, Ursula fell ill.
6. And as a result, to this date, she endures unspeakable pain.
7. True that the same Ursula Reinbold has tried numerous proper remedies, at substantial cost to her, but nothing would help.
8. True that the Kepler woman confessed to the magistrate that she gave such a potion to the accuser.
9. True that the Kepler woman tried to hit another person when that person caught her in the unjust act of giving a drink to the glazier's wife.
10. True that Ursula could swear a corporeal oath in good conscience to God that such a potion caused her present unspeakable illness.
11. Then the following is also true and strongly apparent in keeping with the Kepler woman's fiendish misdeeds: The Kepler woman was raised by her aunt in Weil der Stadt, and that same woman was a witch and later burned for it.
12. True that the Kepler woman's own mother (after above fiend was burned and the girl returned to her parents in Ãlttingen) was willing to overlook her daughter's upbringing as long as she hadn't learned the fiend's trade at Weil.
13. Further, it is true that the Kepler woman's own son Heinrich states that his mother is out of her mind, since she once rode a calf to its death and then wanted to prepare a roast for him from it.
14. And that this Heinrich declined and wanted to report his own mother and accuse her of witchcraft to the authorities.
15. True that she also wanted to seduce Schützenbastian's daughter to follow the trade of witchcraft, as well asâ¦
16. â¦having told the same young woman that there is neither hellnor heaven, but that if one dies, everything would be over, just as it is with the senseless beasts.
17. Turned out to be true then, that the Kepler woman said, if anyone practices the fiend's trade, then that person would have a good life and possess many wonderful things.
18. When the witches gather, they would have the best time, eat the best food and drink the best drink, and enjoy so much voluptuous pleasure that no one could praise it enough.
19. True, that the accused asked the grave digger for the skull of her deceased father, informing him that she wanted to make a drinking cup out of it, and then have the cup bound in silver; when, however, the grave digger let her know that he was not allowed to do this, that he would have to get permission from his superiors, the Kepler woman told him to let it be.
20. True that the Kepler woman injured the brick maker's wife to such an extent that the woman is unable to work even now.
21. True that she gave the schoolmaster [Beutelsbacher], and also another person [the wife of Bastian Meyer], a potion in a pewter cup, so that he became lame and is even now unable to work, and that the other person fell ill and passed away from it.
4
22. And it is just as true that the infamous Kepler woman gave a similar potion to the barber's apprentice (who had cut her hair), so that he fell seriously ill at once.
23. True that she touched the two-year-old calf of Haussbeckhen, so that it died.
24. No less true that she rode the cow of Michael Stahl, the local saddler, at midnight, so that the cow kicked and raged as if mad and if he hadn't helped the animal right then and infused her, she would have died the same night.
25. True that the butcher Stoffel was injured by the Kepler woman on his foot at the market square, where he sold his meat, and that he has endured great pain for some time.
26. And in turn she remedied his pain.
5
27. True that she gave the wife of Guldinmann a basket of herbs which, when given to the livestock, made them act as if they wanted to climb the walls.
28. Further true that the above mentioned livestock started to kick and their throats swelled.
29. True that she touched the old brick maker Görge Bretzern's two pigs, so that the same also started kicking and climbing the walls until they finally died.
30. True that during the time the Kepler woman was preparing her slander case, she injured Jörg Haller's girl on her arm so that the girl endured much pain.
31. True that Haller reported her accordingly to the magistrate.
32. True that the magistrate, after listening to the Kepler woman enough said she could not produce a reason for doing so [hitting the Haller girl], which had the ring of truth.
33. That the magistrate hereby advised the Kepler woman that he could not keep quiet about the criminal process and was obliged under oath and office to report the same.
34. True, that the accused ardently implored the magistrate to spare her and not forward a report to the chancellery.
35. As was no less true that the Kepler woman promised to give the magistrate a cup if he would refrain from reporting her.
36. As was further true that the Kepler woman's children tried to corrupt him and keep him away from the truth, butâ¦
37. â¦the magistrate accepted neither gift nor offering, but includedthese things in his report to the chancellery.
38. True that afterward the Kepler woman did not leave to walk home, but walked directly from the court house out of the upper town gate.
39. True that due to the humble reports of the local magistrate, and no less the magistrate of Stuttgart, the court ordered her arrest.
40. As the accused was advised accordingly by her children, it is true that she moved out of the duchy to Austria.
41. And although it is true that the accused party requested judicialiter (by law) to state that she is innocent of any actions causing the unspeakable suffering of Ursula Reinbold, she should still appear before the court in person and defend her misdeeds.
42. True that she never came forward, but ran away and let her kin handle her affairs even to this day.
43. And that by her running away the Kepler woman gave strong evidence that she caused bodily harm to the accuser Ursula.
44. True that the accused after her escape from Leonberg also came to Stuttgart, attacked a young girl, born in Gebersheim, on the open road, so that same was injured to such a degree that she endured much pain for a long time.
45. True, that even some of the Kepler woman's friends consider her a witch and have knowledge of several wicked acts.
46. That she chased her husband out of the house (undoubtedly with her witchly deeds), and thereafter he perished miserably in the war.
47. True that she touched two local children, who also died.
48. True that the general consensus in Leonberg is that the Kepler woman injured the accuser Ursula and caused her the reported bodily injury.
49. True that the accuser Ursula would much rather pay a thousand florins than be subjected to the unspeakable agony she endures daily, and at every moment.