Howard Marks' Book of Dope Stories (69 page)

Eighteenth-century medics formed the first factories for manufacturing madmen and developed the earliest advertising campaigns for selling ‘insanity’ by renaming badness as madness, and then offered to dispose of it. They progressively metaphorised disagreeable conduct and forbidden desire as disease – thus creating more and more mental diseases; second, they literalised this medical metaphor, insisting that disapproved behaviour was not merely
like
a disease, but that it
was
a disease. By the twentieth century, madness was bursting through the walls of the insane asylums and was being discovered in clinics and doctors’ offices, in literature and art, and in the psychopathology of everyday life. Religion and common sense lost their nerve, no longer able even to try to resist the opportunistic theories and oppressive technologies of modern behavioural science. Those who use drugs are now viewed as unable to help themselves, victims of their irresistible impulses from which they need the protection of others. This made it logical and reasonable for politicians and psychiatrists to advocate drug controls.

Presumably some persons have always ‘abused’ certain drugs – alcohol for millennia, opiates for centuries. However, only in the twentieth century have certain patterns of drug use been labelled as ‘addictions’. Traditionally, the term ‘addiction’ has meant simply a strong inclination towards certain kinds of conduct, with little or no pejorative meaning attached to it. Thus, the
Oxford English Dictionary
offers such pre-twentieth-century examples of the use of this term as being addicted to ‘civil affairs’, to ‘useful reading’ – and also ‘to bad habits’. Being addicted to drugs is not among the definitions listed. The term ‘addiction’ was understood to refer to a habit, good or bad as the case might be, actually more often the former. Although the term ‘addiction’ is still often used to describe habits, usually of an undesirable sort, its meaning has become so expanded and transformed that it is now used to refer to almost any kind of illegal, immoral or undesirable association with certain kinds of drugs. For example, a person who has smoked but a single marijuana cigarette, or even one who has not used any habit-forming or illegal drug at all, may be considered to be a drug addict. The noun ‘addict’ has lost its denotative meaning and reference to persons engaged in certain
habits
, and has become transformed into a stigmatising label, possessing only pejorative meaning referring to certain
persons
. The term ‘addict’ has thus been added to our lexicon of stigmatising labels – such as ‘Jew’, which could mean either a person professing a certain religion or a ‘Christ killer’ who himself should be killed; or ‘Negro’, which could mean either a black-skinned person or a savage who ought to be kept in actual or social slavery. More specifically still, the word ‘addict’ has been added to our psychiatric vocabulary of stigmatising diagnoses, taking its place alongside such terms as ‘insane’, ‘psychotic’ and ‘schizophrenic’.

Ceremonial Chemistry
, 1974

This extract has been paraphrased by Howard Marks.

King Lamus descended on me one morning, just after I had taken a dose, and was raking my brain for a reason for my action. I was alternately chewing the end of my pencil and making meaningless marks on the paper. I told him my difficulty. ‘Always glad to help,’ he said airily; went to a filing cabinet and produced a docket of typed manuscripts. He put it in my hand. It was headed: ‘Reasons for taking it’.

‘Help you at all?’ asked Lamus.

Well, honestly, it did not. I had thought out most of those things for myself at one time or another; and I seemed to have got past them. It’s a curious thing that once you’ve written down a reason you diminish its value. You can’t go on using the same reason indefinitely. That fact tends to prove that the alleged reason is artificial and false, that it has simply been invented on the spur of the movement by oneself to excuse one’s indulgences.

Diary of a Drug Fiend
, 1970

William James

I
N AN ORDINARY
person the consumption of alcohol will lead to an enkindling of the Jathara Agni. Ayurveda recognises this and prescribes medicinal wines when there is a need to increase the appetite and promote digestion.

An Aghori, though, is not an ordinary person. Aghoris do not live to eat. An Aghori who drinks must drink not to lose his consciousness and become more enmeshed in the world’s Maya, but rather to dilate certain brain cells to increase, not decrease, the awareness. Alcohol should sharpen your mind so much that a problem which might take hours to think out in the normal state can be done instantaneously. It’s the same with every other type of intoxication also: if you can’t control it, don’t do it; you’re sure to scuttle yourself.

When an Aghori takes a lot of intoxicants he feels like going to the smashan and being alone with his thoughts. He becomes more introverted; he feels like telling everyone he meets ‘Leave me alone!’ And if he covers himself with ashes and remains naked and shouts obscenities, no one is likely to come near, and he can be in his mood all day long. This is one of the reasons why Aghoris act the way they do. I used to do it myself.

Aghoris are thrill seekers; that’s it in a nutshell. When I went to the USA in 1981, what was the thing I most enjoyed? The roller coasters! Especially ‘Space Mountain’ at Disney World and the old wooden roller coaster at Circusworld. I could stay on a roller coaster all day! That rush of speed, that excitement! Most people just scream and forget it, just as most people who drink get drunk and pass out, and most people who indulge in sex have an orgasm and go to sleep. But what is the use in that? That is mere bodily indulgence. To be an Aghori you must go beyond all limitations, and the biggest limitation is the limitation of the body. When we Aghoris use thrills, intoxicants and sex we use them to go beyond the body. It is the same way with music. Maybe if I use music as an example you’ll understand what I mean about intoxicants and sex. Music is vibration, just like mantra. You can use it to benefit your
sadhana
. Any music will work, if it has a nice melody and a good rhythm. I love Jim Reeves because he has both melody and a good rhythm, and also pathos. I enjoy Spanish and Caribbean tunes, and I will even listen to some rock music, though much of it is too violent for my purposes. Some of our bigoted Indians say, ‘Only Indian music can make your mind more meditative,’ but that is all bull. It is true that our Indian rhythms are far more advanced in complexity than are the Western ones, and our tunes are much more intricate, but there is something about Western music which makes it particularly useful for getting into certain frames of mind.

Meat is also an intoxicant, by the way. It is just as intoxicating as music, alcohol, marijuana or sex. But it involves killing a sentient being, which I don’t like; I am fond of animals. Besides, when you eat meat you must be in a position to ensure that the animal gets a higher rebirth, if you don’t want to be stained by karma. So it is better to avoid it.

There are three important reasons why Aghoris love to take intoxicants. First, it is a question of challenge and response. It is a contest between the Aghori and the drug: Who is stronger? Will the drug be able to overcome the Aghori’s will and drown his consciousness or will the Aghori be able to control the drug’s effect and bend it to his will. The exhilaration of such a duel is a sublime intoxication in itself.

Second, if the Aghori is able to master the intoxication, the force of the intoxicant magnifies the force of his concentration, since the mind is a chemical phenomenon. As the concentration is strengthened, the image of the deity which is being continually formed in the subtle body is made firmer and clearer, and this brings success at worship all the closer.

Third, Aghoris always worship Shiva, who loves intoxicants. This has a dual-purpose effect. Not only does the Aghori please Shiva by offering Him the intoxicant, but the very act of taking the intoxicant helps the Aghori self-identify with Shiva, since permanent intoxication is one facet of Shiva’s personality. Shiva is intoxicated with
samadhi
consciousness: We have to work up to His level gradually.

Most people never realise that the purpose of intoxication is to sharpen the mind. They take marijuana, then eat heavily, then enjoy sex. They will enjoy penetration for one minute and think that they are copulating for years because of the drug’s distortion of the sense of time. It’s all such a waste.

Aghoris take all sorts of intoxicants, some much worse than these. It is a part of the
sadhana
. I used to keep a cobra and let him bite me on the tongue every hour, just for that peculiar thrill. To feed him I had to put a small hole in an egg and then forcibly pour the contents down his throat. The idea that cobras drink milk is ridiculous. I had several cobras, including one albino who had three lines on his hood: the symbol of Shiva. I kept a king cobra also. Its poison is much deadlier than that of other cobras because its diet is nothing but other cobras. I used to keep white arsenic also, and lick one of the crystals every hour or two. For my marijuana and hashish I had a special pipe made from a particular type of clay into which I had mixed arsenic, aconite, datura seeds, opium, and whatnot. It was a chillum, about a foot long. Beautiful! I used to drink twenty-four hours a day sometimes, and go through cases and cases of Scotch. I drank it neat, straight from the bottle. But after a while I began to think ‘What is the use!’ I have stopped most of my intoxicants, though I sometimes still drink alcohol or use bhang.

One of the big disadvantages of intoxicants is their side effects. Smoke chillum after chillum of marijuana or hashish and you are bound to develop a terrible cough, and probably chronic bronchitis. Drink bottle after bottle of whisky and your liver must suffer. Drink bhang and become chronically constipated. And long-term use of arsenic or mercury? Don’t even
ask
about it. But all these substances have their own special advantages, which is why Aghoris put up with all the disadvantages.