individuality can be realized in any other society, with any other group of individuals, or in any other period than that in which he is actually living."
33
|
Stoicism is a one-way street. Self-sufficient individuals act in accordance with nature, but nature owes them nothing back. Certainly nature has not endowed them with "unalienable rights."
|
How, then, did Stoicism advance the climate of potentiality for an eventual emergence of the idea of individual rights? The answer is threefold.
|
First, it shifted the definer of persons from the city, as in the case of Plato and Aristotle, to the larger world, or cosmos. To the question: "To whom or what do you belong?" the good Stoic would probably answer, "Not to Sparta or Athens, but to my rationality, which is the part of me most akin to the Law of Nature." No longer was the idea of citizenship limited to local communities.
|
Second, new emphasis was attached to the individual as a moral agent. Stoics, to be sure, labor as hard as Heracles at being virtuous without thinking of themselves as autonomous or independent agents, but they are moral agents nevertheless.
|
Finally, the Stoics elaborated and extended the idea of natural law, providing a framework to which many subsequent doctrines could be attached. B. F. Wright locates the earliest sources of American theories of natural law in Plato and Aristotle but concludes that it was the Stoics who produced a theory of natural law adapted to legal and political implications from which human laws and institutions could be seen as at least approximating the laws of nature. These Stoic ideas, as appropriated by Cicero and the Roman jurists, were the sources from which modern ideas of natural law are derived. 34
|
Roman Law and Natural Law
|
If Rome's mission was war, her vocation was law. 35 Law has been called the most original product of the Roman mind. While in most other areas of intellectual activity the Romans were subject to the Greeks, here they were
|
|