Read Erased: Missing Women, Murdered Wives Online
Authors: Marilee Strong
Tags: #Violence in Society, #General, #Murderers, #Case studies, #United States, #Psychology, #Women's Studies, #Murder, #Uxoricide, #Pregnancy & Childbirth, #True Crime, #Social Science, #Crimes against, #Pregnant Women, #Health & Fitness
E R A S E D
local hotel’s car rental desk. Like Scott Peterson and Amber Frey,
Barber and Kennedy had been seeing each other for only a few weeks
at the time Barber’s wife was murdered. He initially hid from her the
fact that he was married. When she did find out and wanted to stop
seeing him, he told her he loved her and couldn’t live without her.
In testimony to a grand jury convened to investigate his wife’s
killing, Barber admitted to four other affairs, two with coworkers and
two with women he met in bars. For the last year of his marriage, he
and his wife weren’t even living together, as he had taken a job out of
state and only saw April on weekends.
As Chris Francis, the assistant state’s prosecutor, put it at Barber’s
2006 trial, ‘‘He was living the life of a single man.’’
He had also run up more than $50,000 in debt through day
trading, recklessly buying and selling stocks. He financed his trading
by getting cash advances on his credit cards.
According to her best friend, April had confronted her husband
with suspicions that he and Kennedy were having an affair. Although
he denied it, the friend said April told him on the actual date of
their anniversary—two weeks before the murder—that she wanted
a divorce. Barber later admitted that his wife asked him if he was
having an affair, but denied that she said she would end the marriage.
He claimed that their relationship was still loving and amicable the
night of their belated anniversary dinner and shoreline stroll.
However, Barber’s plan to kill his wife seems to have been in the
works long before April found out about his cheating and threatened
to leave him. A little less than a year before his wife died, Barber took
out a $2 million life insurance policy on himself and April. It was an
extraordinarily high amount of insurance to carry on a spouse who
earned a relatively modest income as a radiation therapist.
Then, six months before she died, Barber did something that
appeared even more suspicious, in light of what happened that day
on the beach. Forensic analysis of his computer unearthed the fact
that on Valentine’s Day, no less, Barber did a Google search on
his computer using the search terms ‘‘trauma cases gunshot right
chest’’—the exact part of the body where, six months later, he
received his most potentially dangerous wound. Six days after that
search, he searched again, Googling ‘‘medical trauma gunshot chest.’’
Police also discovered that he had purchased a bulletproof vest on
eBay a few months before the killing, which he claimed he had done
simply out of curiosity.
Hiding in Plain Sight
1 1 9
‘‘What are the odds of somebody researching gunshot wounds to
the right chest and getting a gunshot wound to the right chest six
months later?’’ fellow prosecutor Matthew Fox said in his closing
argument. ‘‘Those odds don’t exist.’’
Police interpreted other activity found on his computer as indi-cating he was considering faking his own death. But it could just
as easily be research he conducted to plan an eraser killing. He
researched no-body murders and cases of missing persons being
declared dead. He looked into how to get a death certificate in
Mexico and the ability to collect on life insurance in the event of a
homicide. He entered such specific queries as ‘‘How much blood is
in the human body?’’ and ‘‘How much blood loss is required to be
declared dead?’’
He also researched bail bonds and moving to Brazil, apparently
intent on doing whatever it took to get away with his crime. He never
got the chance to flee, however. His mother and grandparents had
put all their resources together, including title to the family farm, in
hopes of securing his release, but bail was denied. He admitted in
grand jury testimony that he knew Brazil did not have an extradition
treaty with the United States.
Justin Barber was such a cool customer, so detached from normal
human emotions, that on the day he carried out his grand plan, he
took time out to play around on the Internet. In the hours before the
murder, Barber downloaded sixteen songs to his computer, including
a 1988 Guns N’ Roses tune with the lyric ‘‘I used to love her but I had
to kill her. . . . And now I’m happier this way.’’
Q
As soon as he was released from the hospital, Barber seemed
ready to move on with his relationship with Shannon Kennedy, not
returning to his home, but instead going to stay at the hotel where
Kennedy worked and continuing to pursue her even though she
refused to see him. At the same time, he denied having a relationship
with Kennedy to police until detectives informed him that she was
there at the station giving her own statement. One particularly
disturbing thing Kennedy had told authorities was that right around
the time of the murder, Barber started putting up pictures of his wife
in his Jacksonville condo. He told her that relatives would be coming
to town, and he needed to keep up appearances.
1 2 0
E R A S E D
He filed to collect on the $2 million insurance policy within weeks
of April’s death, yet asked April’s aunt to pay for his wife’s burial,
claiming he was broke. At her funeral, he avoided making eye contact
with April’s family and friends.
A few months after the murder, he transferred to a job all the
way across the country, in Oregon, and quickly took up with a new
woman. Two years passed before he was charged with killing April, as
it took prosecutors a long time to feel that they had amassed a strong
enough case. The fact that Justin was shot four times was one of the
things that worried prosecutors. It seemed hard to believe someone
would actually do that to himself.
The defense initially planned to point the finger at a convicted
rapist who was arrested a year after the murder for assaulting women
near the beach where April died. Barber’s attorney filed court papers
saying that his client saw a newspaper picture of the rapist and
identified him as looking similar to the man he claimed attacked him
and his wife. But cell phone and credit card records proved that this
man was in Connecticut, a thousand miles away from Florida, on the
night of the murder.
The jury was initially split, but after four days of deliberations
found Barber guilty of first-degree murder. Barber declined to testify
on his own behalf in both the guilt and penalty phases of his trial.
After their guilty verdict, Barber’s attorney announced to the stunned
jurors that ‘‘on principle’’ Barber had refused to let any other relatives
plead for his life.
‘‘He will not . . . seek mercy for a crime that he did not commit,’’
defense counsel Robert Willis explained. Willis simply entered into
the record that his client had no criminal record and spoke for three
minutes expressing incredulity at their verdict.
By a vote of eight to four, the jurors recommended a sentence of
death over life in prison. Unlike most states, Florida only requires
that a simple majority of jurors agree on the ultimate penalty.
Three aggravating factors made Barber eligible for execution: ‘‘cold,
calculated premeditation,’’ financial motive, and that the murder was
committed in an especially ‘‘heinous, atrocious and cruel fashion.’’
Although judges usually follow a jury’s recommendation, the trial
judge opted instead for life in prison, saying that the murder ‘‘was
not the most aggravated and unmitigated of crimes.’’
In an interview with the CBS news magazine
48 Hours
after his
trial, Barber defended the verdict even while planning to appeal it.
Hiding in Plain Sight
1 2 1
‘‘I would have never asked for mercy for the person who killed
her,’’ he said, still proclaiming his innocence. ‘‘If the jury believes
that I’m that person, then they should send me to Death Row.’’ Like
L. Ewing Scott and so many other eraser killers, he was not about to
admit his crime and ask for mercy, even if his silence meant receiving
greater punishment.
Q
Of all the methods used to conceal a murder and erase any
connection to that death, poisoning is certainly the most time
honored. Poisons and their detection have presented problems for
the legal system for centuries. Today there are thousands of easily
obtainable substances that in theory can be used to kill someone,
ranging from prescription medicines, such as the benzodiazepine
family of tranquilizers, to household chemicals like antifreeze, to
toxic elements like mercury.
Most poisons can be detected in the body—that is, if someone
takes the initiative to look for them. A killer with a working knowl-edge of human biology, chemistry, and the medical aspects of death,
and, ideally, familiarity with how death is usually investigated, may
be able to poison someone and get away with murder without raising
any suspicions.
Robert Girts happened to have all those skills. The thirty-nine-year-old resident of Parma, Ohio, a suburb of Cleveland, was a licensed
funeral director and embalmer. His job was to disguise the ugly
aspects of death, to make the dead appear lifelike, serene, accept-ing of their fate. He had also worked earlier in his career for the
county coroner’s office, where he was able to learn quite a bit about
‘‘real-world’’ death investigation.
In September 1992, Girts’s third wife, Diane, forty-two, was
looking forward to moving into the home she and her husband had
just purchased in a nearby town. Since shortly after their marriage
two years before, the couple had been living in a rental unit on the
grounds of one of the funeral homes where her husband worked.
‘‘All Diane wanted to do since she was five years old was to get
married and have the little white house with the picket fence,’’ said
her best friend since childhood, Barbara Madden, who was planning
to fly in from her home in California in mid-September so that Diane
could show her the new home.
1 2 2
E R A S E D
Two days before Madden was to depart for her visit, when she
called to confirm her plans, Diane’s husband told her matter-of-factly
that his wife had died two weeks earlier.
‘‘Do you have any questions?’’ he asked abruptly, after providing
just the most cursory of facts.
On the afternoon of September 2, Diane’s boss called to see why
she hadn’t shown up that day; an employee from the funeral home
went to look for her and found Diane’s body floating in her bathtub.
Mrs. Girts, a bookkeeper and office manager, appeared to have been
getting ready for work when she died. Her dress was laid out on the
bed, her curling iron turned on and ready for use.
Police who responded to the scene found no signs of foul play and
no obvious cause for the woman’s death.
Robert Girts had gone to Chicago the day before to help his brother
move. When he heard the news, he rushed back, arriving before his
wife’s body was taken away. Robert tried to talk the paramedics into
taking his wife to a local hospital instead of the coroner’s office. They
found the request odd, as Mrs. Girts was clearly dead and beyond
hope of resuscitation.
Perhaps Girts was banking on his knowledge that in the case
of an apparently natural death the decedent’s spouse could request
an in-hospital autopsy, and that those autopsies were typically not
conducted by people specially trained to look for death by homicide.
However, hospital autopsies are for those who die in the hospital.
People who die mysteriously elsewhere go to the coroner. Girts had
actually asked the ambulance crew to take her to a specific hospital,
a small community facility that does not perform autopsies. Maybe
he thought he could finagle things so that no autopsy would be
conducted at all. He had done that once before, it would later be
discovered.
The autopsy revealed no explanation for Diane’s death. The
coroner did note reddening of the skin that might indicate car-bon monoxide poisoning, but tests revealed no significant levels
of the gas in her bloodstream. Knowing that the police had found
nothing indicative of a crime, accident, or suicide at the home, the
coroner listed the cause of death as undetermined. Although key
fluids from the body were retained for possible future examination,
Hiding in Plain Sight
1 2 3
Diane’s grieving family and friends were forced to bury her without
having any idea why she died.
Q
For the next few weeks very little happened in the case, and it might
easily have slipped into the netherworld of successful eraser killings
without resolution. Unfortunately for Robert Girts, the woman with
whom he had been secretly having an on-again, off-again affair for
more than a decade began talking to the police.
Elizabeth Bethea said she was stunned when she heard about the
sudden death of Girts’s wife because just a couple of weeks prior, he
had promised her that he was finally going to be getting a divorce. In
fact, he told Bethea he would be free when he returned from his brief
trip to Chicago.
Girts told Bethea that Diane died of an aneurysm, but by
mid-September he began telling the authorities that he believed
she had committed suicide. On September 20, he gave police a
handwritten note he claimed to have found tucked in his briefcase.
The undated note in his wife’s handwriting read, ‘‘I hate Cleveland.
I hate my job. I hate myself.’’ He said his wife had suffered three
miscarriages and was despondent over the thought that she might
not be able to have children. He said she was also depressed over
her weight and her inability to find a satisfying job. No one else who
knew her had seen any signs that Diane was depressed or suicidal,
including a friend who spoke with her on the phone for forty minutes
on the morning that she died.
Around this time, the coroner’s office decided to run a screening
for the most widely used poisons, including cyanide. Unlike in the
flawless world of
CSI
, the test for cyanide came back negative. But it
was discovered that the reagents used for testing had been somehow
compromised. Another test was run, and as a backup, a sample of fluid
was sent to another laboratory, which ran an independent screening
using a different methodology. Both tests came back positive. Diane
Girts was found to have twice the minimum lethal threshold of
cyanide in her system.
At last the cause of death was determined to be acute cyanide
poisoning, a particularly hellish way to die. The chemical prevents
1 2 4