Authors: William X. Kienzle
Tags: #Mystery & Detective, #General, #Suspense, #Fiction
They both laughed.
Quickly returning to seriousness, Tully said, “Let’s keep as tight a rein on Carson as possible. I don’t see Stapleton as a violent type. And I wish to God that we could keep that nun in a jar.”
“Sister Joan? You think somebody’s still after her?”
“It would tie things up neatly, wouldn’t it? She’s still the first base that nobody’s touched yet.”
“There’s no way we can keep her under surveillance. She’s determined to continue doing her job. And her job drags her over the Whole metropolitan area.”
“Uh-huh.”
Damn! It could almost drive a man prayer.
“Where’s father Benz?”
Cardinal Mark Boyle finished chewing the morsel of lamb before answering. “There is a gathering of his priest friends at the seminary this evening. I gave him the night off.”
“Good.” Archbishop Lawrence Foley was pleased to be able to spend the evening alone with his friend. Benz, secretary to the Cardinal, was a nice enough young man, but he was from a different era, two or more removed from these two old bishops. Without the young man, who, courtesy demanded, should be included in the conversation, the older men were free to retreat as far as they liked into history. And they would.
Foley lived in a condominium on Detroit’s far east side, He could have lived virtually anywhere he wished, but he wanted to reside in the city, though not in an area inhospitable to strolling the streets, and not in a rectory. He had reached an age where he would deal with people and the clergy in particular only when he wished. Not when they wanted him. Retirement, he thought, should have some privileges.
But this night—for he would stay over till morning—he would spend with his old friend Mark Boyle.
Boyle, at sixty-nine, was slightly more than five years Foley’s junior. They had met some forty years before in Rome when both were students. Both had been ordained—Foley for the diocese of Miami and Boyle for the diocese of Cleveland. As brilliant seminarians, both had been selected by their respective bishops to attend graduate studies in Rome. Foley majored in canon law, Boyle in theology.
Even as young men, they had enough in common to become friends. They were English-speaking United States citizens, at the peak of their youth; roommates, expected to achieve much by their appointment to graduate study—and they were strangers together in a foreign land.
Building on that, they formed an abiding friendship that had grown stronger and deepened over the years. Each was of Irish descent, as were so many American bishops. They both had become auxiliary bishops, Foley in his native Miami, Boyle in his native Cleveland. Foley had risen to the rank of archbishop when he was named ordinary of Cincinnati. Boyle was named archbishop of Pittsburgh, then archbishop of Detroit, then named a Cardinal by Pope Paul VI.
The two vacationed regularly together, usually in Florida, where Foley had so many friends and contacts. They golfed together, neither well, both mostly for exercise. They could spend evenings together chatting knowledgeably about many things or in companionable silence.
The pièce de résistance having been finished, Mrs. Provenzano, Boyle’s housekeeper, removed the dishes and served coffee and sherbet.
“Delicious lamb,” Foley said to Mrs. Provenzano, who smiled and, thank God, was still able to blush at a compliment.
“She was a genuine find,” Boyle said after the housekeeper had left them. “She has only two rules by which to live: no beef and no chicken.”
Foley chuckled. “The martyrdom of today’s bishop, stuffed to death with rubbery chicken and leathery beef cooked by the ladies of the Rosary Altar Society on the occasion of parish confirmations.”
Boyle smiled. “Of course they are well-meaning people, but they surely need an injection of imagination. The beef is usually sliced thin enough that one can get by without having to consume very much. But whichever doctor it was who pronounced chicken a healthy food never tried the parochial mass-produced variety.”
Foley began toying with a spoon.
“Still miss cigarettes?” Boyle asked.
Foley studied the Cardinal, “Now what would make you say a thing like that?”
“Something to do with your hands. Toying with a utensil instead of handling a cigarette.”
“Doesn’t happen much anymore. But after a good dinner and with coffee …” Foley shrugged.
“Still?”
“There was a time, Mark, me lad, that I could not envision being on the telephone, getting through the daily mail, a hundred other daily tasks such as getting up in the morning or going to bed at night, without a cigarette. It’s down to this, after a good dinner. That’s not so bad, is it now? Nice bit of deduction though.”
“It just occurred to me. You used to say that you thought much of your reason for smoking was to have something to occupy restless hands.”
“True as far as it goes, but a bit of a simplification. There’s the nicotine, an addictive drug. But speaking of deduction, has anything new come up in the police investigation?”
“Into the death of Larry Hoffer? Not that I’m aware of.”
“What do you think? Isolated instances? Coincidence? Or is there a connection between the murders of that poor woman and Hoffer?”
Boyle finished the sherbet and carefully wiped his lips. “I feel very strongly that they are related. And that’s why I’m concerned about Sister Joan’s welfare. I believe that whoever killed Larry also killed Helen Donovan thinking she was her sister. And the guilty party is still at large, probably looking for an opportunity to attack Sister Joan.”
“It’s hard to hide, particularly in this day and age.”
“I’ve talked to her about going away. A vacation, study, virtually anything to get her away from here, somewhere where she could be safer.”
“She won’t go?”
Boyle shook his head. “She’s politely refused every offer. I get the impression she feels some sort of debt to her sister. She is certain the killer was looking for her and that her sister was in the wrong, place at the wrong time. With Sister it is the whole thing. That her sister was dressed in Joan’s habit. There’s a sense of desecration in a religious being attacked. In many ways, Joan feels that in death if not in life she is her sister’s keeper.”
Foley was tempted to fiddle with something, anything: spoon, knife, whatever. But having had his subconscious raised, he deliberately interlaced his fingers and rested his hands on the tabletop. “But, why?” he asked. “What possibly could be the connection between Larry Hoffer and Sister Joan—given the assumption that she was the real intended victim?”
“I’ve thought about that a great deal. Almost obsessively.” Boyle sipped his coffee. It was excellent; Mrs. Provenzano had experimented with the blend until she was satisfied. “I keep returning to the recent staff meeting—the last time they were together. Sister Joan as one who had escaped the grave, and Larry Hoffer at his final meeting—though none of us knew it at the time. I’ve even seen it in a dream. I can hear the angry voices, most of them directed at Larry. And I wonder: Could anyone at the meeting … a staff member … could any one of them …? But then I dismiss the questions as impossible speculation. Besides, such questions are better asked—and answered—by the police.”
“They need help!” Foley’s tone was forceful, urgent.
“Help? The police? From whom?”
“Us!”
Boyle looked startled. “You’re not serious.”
Foley was very serious. “These are officials of the archdiocese of Detroit. If there were only one victim—Larry Hoffer—we might suppose his enemy could have been … anyone. It’s not hard to suppose that he’s made enemies during his long career. He was, after all, a financier, and money is a common enough motivation for enmity, hatred, violence … murder.
“But that is true only if Hoffer were the only victim. It does not in any way address the selection of Sister Joan as a designated victim by the same killer. Whoever is doing this is doing it for some religious reason. Oh, I know to the police that might sound like a contradiction in terms. But we could list hundreds of examples through history when people were murdered for reasons connected to religion.”
“Well, I can assure you, Lawrence, that I am not going to volunteer my services, such as they are, to the Detroit Police Department.” A smile threatened to break through, but Boyle held it well in check. “Of course, if you …”
“Come, come, Mark,” Foley interrupted, “you know I wasn’t referring to a couple of old fogies like us! I meant one of your priests. You must have someone who could guide the police through the morass of Church bureaucracy.”
Boyle’s smile did break through. “There is someone. I don’t think you’ve met him yet. Father Robert Koesler.”
“He has some special training?” Foley was surprised that any priest would spring immediately to mind as a liaison with a homicide department of a major city such as Detroit. If anyone had challenged him to come up with such a priest in Cincinnati, he would have been hard-pressed to do so.
“Not training, Larry; experience.”
“This … this Koesler: He’s done this sort of thing before?”
Boyle nodded. “It’s uncanny, but it certainly has happened before. I’ve had occasion to speak with him about it, of course. I’m convinced a good deal of his involvement is not by design. He certainly is not in any way trained in criminology. But he has been called upon by the police to do just what you suggested: help them find their way through Church avenues and paths that seem to be an added mystery to the police.”
“Do you … assign him to this duty?” Foley found this difficult to comprehend.
“He seems to gravitate to this role quite independently of anyone’s commissioning him.”
“Well,” Foley said, “he certainly seems made to order for what I had in mind.”
“Shall we repair to the study?” With the meal ended Boyle thought Foley would be more comfortable in the well-upholstered study
Boyle rose from his straight-backed chair fairly spryly. Foley had a considerably more challenging time of it. But he managed. Boyle did not offer assistance. He knew Foley would prefer to be independent.
The study was exactly that. Just about every inch of wall space was lined with books that were read, consulted, treasured. Cardinal Boyle spent many a contented evening alone with his books, studying.
The two settled into comfortable chairs. Boyle offered a selection of liqueurs. Foley, claiming an advanced stage of fatigue, declined. They sat in silence for several minutes.
Foley was first to speak. “Have you given much thought to the future … to the future of our Church?”
“Certainly. It won’t be long.”
“No, it won’t. Pretty soon all the priests—even the Pope,
in nomine Domini—
will be too young to remember what the Church was before Vatican II.” Foley shook his head. “That is if there are still any more priests.”
“I’m not inclined to be that pessimistic, Larry.”
“God will provide?” Mockingly.
“Yes …” Boyle drew out the word, “but not magically.”
“A married clergy?”
“I think it inevitable. We already have the beginnings of it with the sizable number of married Protestant clergy that have converted and are now functioning.”
“The transition is going to be difficult.”
“No doubt. But it has to happen.”
“There are going to be some angry Catholics. Some very angry Catholics.
“There are already some very angry Catholics.” Cardinal Boyle had had firsthand experience.
“But it works.” Foley resettled himself in the chair as if fighting off tiredness. “We’ve known it all along. Martin Luther, among others, was right. It is not only possible but beneficial to have a married clergy. The Protestant clergy—just about every sort of clergy but Latin Rite Catholics—have proven the naturalness of a married clergy. And now the converts among ministers and Protestant priests, they’re doing all right. And I almost forgot that other phenomenon, our brother priests who marry and then become Protestant—even Orthodox—priests. Quite a display of proof there. It is as you yourself just said: inevitable. Yes, yes, yes: We are going to have optional celibacy—the day after I die.”
Boyle chuckled. “Thus saving some poor woman from becoming Mrs. Lawrence Foley.”
“‘Mrs. Foley ” Even the name sounds peculiar. In that context,” he clarified. “The first and almost the only Mrs. Foley that comes to mind is my mother.”
“Besides, Larry, it is not as smooth a picture as you paint.”
“Oh, I don’t know”
“There’s the problem of divorce among the clergy:”
“I suppose,” Foley admitted, “You don’t have divorce when you have an unmarried clergy. But then, divorce seems to be part of life—a tragic part of life. Something we would better understand if some of us had to go through it.”
“You’re mellowing, Larry.”
“I’ve mellowed, Mark.”
“Another problem you’ve skipped over: the convert clergy with their wives and families, many of them, are not being accepted by all parishioners, even though the parishes they are assigned to are carefully selected.”
“Transitional, Mark, transitional. Our people are so used to the unencumbered priest that it’s going to take a while for them to adjust.” Foley cocked his head toward the Cardinal. “What is it with you, Mark? Are you merely playing
advocatus diaboli
or do you have serious reservations about a married clergy? You did say it was inevitable.”
“Inevitable, true. But … somehow … I regret the loss of what we had. It was, I think, nobly unique.”
They sat in silence for several minutes.
“Admirably unique,” Foley agreed at length.
“The seminary training,” he continued, “so strict and unyielding, yet the system formed men—good men, responsible, leaders. But,” he sighed, “that’s pretty much gone already.”
Boyle nodded agreement. But then he amended Foley’s statement. “The mere change to optional celibacy may or may not have its effect on the training for priesthood. But, in any case, it will no longer be necessary to produce that challenge to human nature, the asexual macho man.”
“Yes, yes, yes. No more
Going My Way
, or
Bells of St Mary’s
, or
Keys of the Kingdom
, or Father Flanagan of
Boys’ Town.
It’s probably just as well that Bing didn’t live to see this.”