Boomers: The Cold-War Generation Grows Up (16 page)

The centerpiece of a high school yearbook, whether in the 1960s or the twenty-first century, is the section displaying all the graduating seniors, more formally dressed than on most ordinary school days. A litany of activities—Chorus 1, 2, 3, Football 3, 4, or Class President 4—hints at continuing and changing interests and the most popular or least active graduates. Beyond the changing fashion statements and the notes on activities, a difference in yearbooks several decades apart may be seen in the “future plans” under
senior photos. A relatively typical twenty-first-century high school yearbook would list nearly three of four seniors intending to continue in school in a wide spectrum of institutions, from community colleges to world-class universities. But for about half the members of the first class of Boomer high school graduates, future plans would include specific jobs, marriage plans, military service, or vague assurances that a particular graduate “will be successful in anything he attempts” or have a “rewarding career in her chosen profession.” Many of these Boomers were in their last year of formal education, and more than a few would become parents in the very near future. Many of the cute couples in those yearbook photos were already pricing engagement rings.

The large number of Boomers for whom senior year in high school was probably their last school experience viewed twelfth grade from a different perspective. Many of these teens had found schoolwork a daunting combination of boring and difficult, and were tired of regimentation and bell schedules. They hoped their post-school careers would be more exciting and knew that work was more financially rewarding than school. Boys dreamed of buying their own car, girls thought about dramatically enhanced fashion choices, less encumbered by dress codes. For these students, the last game, the last dance, and the last prom carried greater nostalgia than the last class and the last exam.

The roughly equal number of Boomers who aspired to college viewed their senior year as a different transition. “College preparatory” courses in high school were already demanding, yet counselors, teachers, films, and books suggested that college would be even more daunting, with professors more stern and unyielding than high school teachers. College did offer the prospect of more choice of courses,
less adult supervision, and a social life where fraternities, sororities, and related social activities were still a major and well-publicized part of the collegiate lifestyle. But senior year produced a number of decisions and complications. In the early sixties a boy was nearly twice as likely to attend college as a girl, and many high school couples wondered what would happen to their relationship if one went away to college while the other remained at home. Was the school close enough that the person staying home could visit on weekends? Would the student come home relatively often? Should either person be free to explore other relationships? Would an extended engagement be viable?

Boys contemplating college also had to include the prospect of compulsory military service in their plans. Should they enlist and enter college at a more mature age, enter a college
ROTC
program, seek a major that might secure a draft deferment, or take their chances on being drafted after graduation? Some of these options would be affected by the fact that while draft boards granted draft deferments for full-time students, anyone slipping below a C average for even a semester would be thrown into the draft eligibility pool. As the Vietnam War expanded and casualties rose, these decisions took on still greater importance.

In early June 1964 the oldest Boomers encountered their last round of high school examinations and attended commencement services that offered a bittersweet theme: a nation with seemingly unlimited economic potential, and the traumatic experience of John Kennedy's death partway through the academic year. The New Frontier and Lyndon Johnson's now emerging Great Society had produced generous pay raises, low rates of unemployment, and excellent job prospects for both high school and college graduates. Unlike
their parents, this first cohort of Boomers boasted a near 90 percent graduation rate. During that summer at least some teens waiting to enter college must have experienced a twinge of envy for their peers who had already entered the workforce and were showing off their new cars, new clothes, and other short-term advantages over college.

The summer of 1964 emerged as a transitional period not only for the first Boomers but for American society as a whole. While many recent graduates inhabited that limbo between high school and college, the larger nation experienced urban riots, the murder of civil rights workers in the Deep South, a contentious Democratic National Convention in Atlantic City, and an escalation of the simmering Vietnam conflict after the Gulf of Tonkin resolution in Congress. At a few schools, such as the University of California at Berkeley, a confrontational mood spilled over into the first full-fledged campus protest of the sixties, the Free Speech Movement led by Mario Savio. Yet in September new students arrived on the campuses of a nation that was generally upbeat about its future.

A lead feature in an early-autumn edition of one national magazine marveled at the prospects for American society. “An astonishing, unprecedented prosperity pervades the country. The GNP has risen $112 billion in three years. There aren't enough pots to hold the chickens or enough garages to go around. Just as astonishing as the prospect is the way Americans take it for granted.”

As anxious and excited Boomers made tearful farewells to parents and siblings, an entire nation seemed vicariously to follow the exploits of the Spock babies who had now reached late adolescence. In some respects their college rituals would seem strikingly familiar to students inhabiting
twenty-first-century universities. The endless trek with boxes and parcels from the spacious family car to a less than spacious dorm room; the initial exchanges between roommates who would now become major figures in one another's lives; the alternately serious and silly rituals of freshman orientation; and the experience of sitting in a college lecture hall dominated by an erudite yet intimidating professor are hallmarks of both eras.

Beyond these commonalities, the collegiate world of 1964 would seem positively quaint nearly a half-century later. While the freshman world of 1964 would be seen as relatively casual compared to other generations of collegians, blazers and ties for men, skirts and dresses for women were still essential parts of a campus wardrobe. Students wearing flip-flops, shorts, and hooded sweatshirts would probably receive an invitation from the instructor to leave the classroom.

Residence life, that part of the “college experience” that now seems so important that counselors and parents encourage dormitory life for students who have a family home five miles from campus, was both less pervasive and yet far more regulated when the Boomers entered college. On the one hand, many urban institutions of the early sixties saw their mission as augmenting classroom space rather than dormitory space to meet the Boomer surge; in turn, many parents of college students who themselves had not attended college saw residence life as slightly absurd if their sons or daughters could easily take a subway, bus, or car to class and live free at home. Major urban universities, such as City College of New York,
UCLA
, the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, Villanova, and Loyola of Chicago, were typical city schools that concentrated on the instruction of
large numbers of commuters, with dormitory space limited to students attending from long distances.

One of the realities of college life in 1964 that made commuters less inclined to envy their dormitory counterparts was that in many cases residence life was both more spartan and stricter than accommodations at home. American colleges had never been known for providing sumptuous housing, and since most sixties institutions were overcrowded, comfortable residence halls were often at a premium. Dormitories might include old structures beyond their prime, semi-permanent buildings slapped together to handle the G.I. Bill surge of veterans, and new facilities designed to hold maximum numbers of students. The combination of outdated or subpar electrical outlets and a general desire to discourage students from wasting time encouraged many colleges to forbid private television sets or telephones in rooms. Television viewing often became a communal experience as students sprawled around dormitory lounges where either the majority or the most vocal students determined choice of programs. Telephone use was often another form of communal enterprise as students queued to make calls as other residents hovered impatiently for their turn. Incoming calls largely depended on someone in the hall bothering to answer the phone or convey the message to the intended party.

If dormitories provided few choices for entertainment, dining halls offered equally few selections. A society in which few children were asked their preference for dinner at home was consistent in its attitude toward students “away at college.” Most meals offered one main course, though substitutions might be permitted. College dining services were also split between schools that allowed students to take
multiple helpings and those that limited diners to one serving, forcing many students to rely on dorm snack machines for extra calories.

Communal phones and limited meal selections tended to be secondary concerns in the greater conflict between the individual and the university over the right of decisionmaking and autonomy. The first Boomers entered college at a time when the recent domination of university life by the “Silent Generation” of the 1950s had lulled administrators into a belief that the major crisis of the new decade would be swelling numbers, not serious student rebellion.
In loco parentis
was still taken quite seriously in the colleges of 1964 as student curfews and gender separation in residence facilities sometimes offered a student less freedom than he or she experienced at home. The relatively arbitrary rules and sanctions that permeated the college experience for the arriving postwar generation were particularly frustrating when they were linked to the daunting academic grind of the mid-sixties.

The demographic backdrop to the arrival of the Boomers was the stark reality that the 2.7 million college students of 1950 were now the 4.8 million of 1964, and that number was soaring with a baby boom that had not yet ended. A Yale freshman complained to an interviewer, “I feel like a mail-order bride as the work is poured on much faster than I expected and my teachers calmly refer to ‘those who stay in this course'; many of us are putting in 18-hour days to compete for a ‘C' average.” Many very good high school students experienced their first taste of failure as reality came crashing down on them. More than a few teachers were encouraged by their superiors to grade on a strict curve, which guaranteed a substantial number of Ds and Fs. Some
instructors graded more harshly, which could produce a class in which more than half of the enrolled students failed. This process produced a steady, barely subdued feeling of panic as students put in all the hours they could and still received grades that placed them on the brink of dismissal. Students agonized over the embarrassment of devolving from the high school “brain” to a dismissed college freshman returning home in disgrace. Even students with passable grades complained that on good nights they were able to sleep fewer than six hours while on some nights there was no sleep at all.

While Boomer college students of the mid-sixties began to challenge some traditions and rules, many aspects of the college experience were relatively slow to change. (Getty Images)

A Yale dean admitted that the high school class of 1964 faced “shattering pressure as their academic world tumbles down on them. They only accept it because they know everybody else is in the same boat.” Students frequently admitted
to guilt feelings when they took even one night off from studying, and by the end of the fall term more than 20 percent required psychological counseling, even if they had escaped the dreaded letter of dismissal. Boomer students were thrust into a far more demanding environment than earlier collegians as colleges reluctantly accepted more students than they could possibly house or instruct and then employed a draconian grading policy to shrink the class to more manageable levels.

One of the results of this intellectual component to cold-war competition was a sense of uncertainty, anxiety, and fear of failure, from freshman student to college president. Media narratives and photographs of the period are filled with poignant images of dismissed students packing their books and saying goodbye to roommates while hurrying out of the dorm before the tears came. In other images, shocked and disbelieving parents usher their child toward the family station wagon, no doubt wondering how to tell friends and neighbors that their high school star has become a collegiate academic failure.

On a higher level, many of the Boomers' professors found themselves caught between a rapidly escalating emphasis on publishing and a rapidly expanding pool of students who wanted instruction and advice. Even in an environment where colleges were hiring five new instructors for every faculty member who retired, professors still greatly feared a downward career spiral, in which failure to publish sufficiently might result in a move to a lesser school in “academic Siberia,” and poor student feedback might bring the same fate.