Beethoven: Anguish and Triumph (2 page)

By the postmodern end of the twentieth century, the word
genius
had evolved again, the concept becoming a sociopolitical outrage to be pulled from its pedestal and smashed. I am not a postmodernist any more than a modernist or a neoromantic; I am neither conservative nor liberal. I try to look at things with as few preconceptions as possible and see what is actually there (without holding any illusion that this is ultimately achievable). That truth and fact and objectivity are all unreachable is no reason not to struggle toward them—to the death, if necessary.

So when it comes to history and biography, I believe, submission to objective fact is, for all its limitations, what the discipline is about. “Interpretation” comes in second to that, and for me a distant second. A biography is mainly a narrative of a life, not an interpretation of it. Nor do I pick and choose from my subject's life to make a tidy literary form. Our lives are not like a book; real lives drift, and my books drift along with them. Anyway, I usually find facts more interesting than interpretations, also more dramatic and unexpected and funny. I believe that most of the time, interpretation in a biography is best left up to you, dear reader. I supply the material for you to work with.

All my biographies have been written on the basis of that philosophy. I look for fact, however impossible the quest. For me, the idea of spending one's life chasing something impossible is simply normal, necessary, even a touch heroic. It is what artists do all the time. In one of his rare poetic moments in words, Beethoven put it in a nutshell: “The true artist has no pride. He . . . has a vague awareness of how far he is from reaching his goal; and while others may perhaps admire him, he laments the fact that he has not yet reached the point whither his better genius only lights the way for him like a distant sun.” To me, art is when you make things up, so I call biography a craft rather than an art. But in both endeavors the impossibilities are alike.

 

The preceding thoughts are said in relation to my subject's life, not his music. I don't believe any person's life is lived to be “interpreted,” by strangers, for money. Every person's life is ultimately a mystery, even to him- or herself. That is the moral source of the humility with which I write biography. But art is created to be enjoyed, to move, to excite, to soothe and provoke, to teach, to be discussed, indeed to be interpreted. While I will submit judgments and interpretations of Beethoven's life only when they seem to me obvious, in the book there will be a good deal of interpretation of the music. Composers hear music one way, performers another way, listeners another, scholars another. I hear mainly as a composer. In the conservatory where I taught, the focus was not on our art as an abstract theoretical study but on
making
music. I have taught musical composition and theory and history in hopes of helping my students become better performers and composers. That is the angle of view in this book: Beethoven as a maker of music.

As a composer, I like to see how a thing was made, and I hope to convey that fascination to my readers. I ask for a bit of patience from nonmusicians for technical moments here and there. I have tried to keep these to a minimum, placing a lot of the technical matters in the endnotes (which are designed to be browsed and are largely directed to musicians and scholars). Beethoven's pieces will be treated as they come up in the course of his story. This is not so much a “life and works” as a “works as part of a life.” Still, I will by no means try to cover every piece he wrote but rather the important ones and minor ones of particular interest.

I will be steadily interested in what my subject seems to have intended in his music; at the same time, my analyses are ultimately my own. I know that most of the labor in creating a work of art is unconscious and instinctive. Art is too complex to be done any other way. All the same, though Beethoven's creative trances were deep, I have found him to be an unusually conscious craftsman. By the time sketches for a work were well under way, what we see in the sketchbooks is not as much the
creation
of a work as the
realization
of a fundamental conception that was already in place, with a firm sense of the leading ideas and of what the whole was “about.” Beethoven kept at a piece as long as it took, but until the late music he usually composed quite fast. Still, the details were mutable, and he considered everything provisional to the end. A fine conception for a work is not enough; one has to make it happen, note by note. That is an exacting and sometimes excruciating process, and it cannot be done without a steady supply of inspiration.

In Beethoven's day, most music was put together with reference to existing models. The period he grew up in, what we call the Classical era in music, established formal outlines for composition that he largely adhered to—freely and creatively. The book will therefore be much involved with traditional forms such as sonata and sonata-rondo and variations and how he interacted with them. Because this issue is important, the appendix explains those musical models. I suggest reading the appendix before the book proper. Those not interested are welcome to skip it—but the book will make more sense if you read it.

It is clear that Beethoven considered music a language conveying emotion and character, and he expected sensitive listeners to understand it in those terms. His favorite critics of his work were notably flowery and imaginative to our ears. In fact, I find the feelings and “narratives” in his instrumental music more transparent than in, say, Mozart or Brahms.

After the emotional part of music comes the formal, the abstract, the structural scaffolding. In my discussions of Beethoven's music I don't play the influences game as much as many writers do. Saying that this tune echoes Mozart, that keyboard figure Clementi, and so on, may often be true, but that does not tell us much about the work at hand. Each work is conceived as an individual by a composer who was, in his more serious efforts, trying to do something new. For me every one of Beethoven's major works is a boldly painted individual with an unforgettable profile. I'll note influences here and there, but on the whole with each piece I'll mainly be interested in what is special, not what is typical.

Likewise, in much commentary there is a tendency to look at every work in a given form, such as sonata form, as just one more example of that form, perhaps with a few quirks. From a composer's perspective, that is a backward view of the matter. For a composer of Beethoven's era, the
idea
of a work comes first, and then it is mapped into a familiar form that has to be cut and measured to fit the idea. The “quirks” in a given piece are clues to the distinctive nature of that piece. Sometimes for the composer the fundamental idea is such that a new, ad hoc form has to be invented.

Like many musicians I consider our art ultimately an emotional language beyond words—which is to say, a mystery. I hope I have conveyed that too. The success of a given work is ultimately unanalyzable. A clever scaffolding can hold up a dull building just as well as a beautiful one. I'll also admit that the kind of analysis I indulge in, Beethoven himself didn't care for. He considered his workshop a private matter, and I have some appropriate regret at having snooped into it. But I've spent the writing part of my career trying to explain music and musicians to nonmusicians, and that effort continues in this book, whose research and writing consumed some dozen years of my life.

I add that I don't expect anyone to take my interpretations and analyses of the music as any sort of final word. No reader will have precisely the same responses I do. Music is not mathematics. The individuality of responses to music is one of its greatest virtues. While I talk sometimes about Beethoven's creative process—indeed, a central chapter is devoted to the
Eroica
—when I envision him creating, I am not saying
it happened like this
but rather
it happens like this
and
something in this direction seems to have given rise to this idea, this piece
.

I offer my interpretations and analyses of the music as a point of view, and as a gesture in the direction of what I believe Beethoven expected his listeners to do: be sensitive and knowledgeable enough to sense the spirit in which his music was offered, then respond to it creatively, as an individual. I consider it my job here to get as far as I can in understanding what Beethoven had in mind before his work reached the public, to report the response of his audience mainly via contemporary critics, then to add my own responses. What an artist thinks he or she is doing, what the general public thinks they are doing, and what I surmise they are doing are three different things. Biography, I believe, is properly concerned with all three.

 

My own encounters with Beethoven were early and deep, as with most musicians. He is so ingrained that most of us don't entirely remember how his work and his story reached us. In classical music I was first involved with Brahms and Copland and Handel and Bach, because they are what I first happened to encounter. But I knew Beethoven was supposed to be great, so when one day in my teens I ran across a record of the
Eroica
sitting inexplicably in a rack at Pruitt's Supermarket in Chattanooga, Tennessee, I bought it, took it home, and eagerly listened. It went in one ear and out the other. I kept listening, a couple of dozen times as I remember, until it started to make sense.

Around that time I read Romain Rolland's legendary study,
Beethoven the Creator
. In it, every sketch of the
Eroica
becomes a heroic act. Undoubtedly, that book and its high-Romantic image of Beethoven helped nurture in me a desire to compose. Otherwise it was, in fact, not a useful model. It inflicted on me ambitions beyond my age and skill, a conviction that every idea must be born in suffering and voluminous sketches, and so on. When later I read Stravinsky saying something to the effect that “Every great genius does great harm,” I knew what he was talking about. Schubert had been one of the first composers to groan, “Who can do anything after Beethoven?” Thousands have echoed him since. In order to write my own music less encumbered, I had to divest myself of the Romantic myth of Beethoven. Only later did I come to a more thoughtful critique of that myth.

I'll add one more personal detail. The mother of my grandfather Lawrence Swafford came from a western Tennessee family of dirt farmers named Edgemon. Their ancestry is Dutch, and their name is a southernized version of “Egmont.” From that, I've long noted with due irony, I possess a family relationship to a play by Goethe and an overture by Beethoven. Given that I set out to be a composer and teacher and nothing else, who knew that someday I would write about both of them in a book.

 

For my thanks, I'll begin with writers who have inspired me, above all Thayer as amended and expanded by Elliot Forbes (under whose baton I sometimes played trombone at Harvard). I have made ample use of classic studies including the irreplaceable but long out of print
Der Junge Beethoven
by Ludwig Schiedermair, and H. C. Robbins Landon's collection of original sources in
Beethoven
. Recent biographies and studies by William Kinderman, Lewis Lockwood, Barry Cooper, Leon Plantinga, and Maynard Solomon have been valuable as sources of information, correction, and thought. Thanks to Beata Kraus of the Beethovenhaus in Bonn, who directed me to the sixty-volume collection of regional historical studies never mined in English biographies, the
Bonner Geschichtsblätter
. In those studies I found answers to a good many questions about Beethoven's youth and
Bildung
. Belated thanks to the late Dorothy DeLay, celebrated Juilliard violin teacher, who in a long interview gave me her thoughts about and experiences with musical prodigies. That interview has informed all my biographies. The operative line of hers: “They know how to play the piano or the fiddle, but they never learn how to live.”

Thanks to my musicologist readers Teresa Neff and Elizabeth Seitz, who vetted the book and saved me from any number of blunders. The remaining ones are entirely my responsibility. Thanks to Ben Hyman for consistently astute editing. Writer friend Zane Kotker contributed many suggestions, Boston Conservatory colleague Jim Dalton gave me advice on matters of tuning, and my German Ivesian friend Dorothea Gail found me items from the Bonn newspaper of the day. My brother Charles Johnson contributed his verbal expertise. Conductor and Ives editor James Sinclair looked over chapters and cheered me on. Marc Mandel, my editor for Boston Symphony program notes, was encouraging and understanding when he knew that my Beethoven notes were really aimed at this book. Thanks to the people at
Slate
for permission to use bits and pieces of articles I wrote for them. Michael and Patricia Frederick of the Frederick Historic Piano Collection provided invaluable information on and recordings of Michael's exquisitely restored period instruments. My pianist friend Andrew Rangell is an endless source of fascinating and provoking late-night conversations about Beethoven and music in general. My students in Beethoven classes over the years have provided a steady flow of ideas in every direction. I have fine memories of an afternoon with Beethoven editor Jonathan Del Mar, talking shop and looking over his materials.

Finally, I thank and apologize to the authors and friends whose ideas I have made use of without realizing it. What I know about Beethoven goes back some fifty years, research for the book goes back a dozen years, and in some cases I no longer know where an idea came from, whether it is my own or something I encountered a long time ago.

 

This book is dedicated to the late painter Frances Cohen Gillespie, who inspired me, as she did all her friends, with the passion, commitment, and beauty of her work. Of all the artists I've known personally, Fran most reminds me of Beethoven. During the long labor of this book, I lost more friends and inspirations whom I'd like to remember here: writer Norman Kotker; composer and hiking partner Dana Brayton; teaching colleague and hiking partner Ginny Brereton; physicist and oldest friend Mike Dzvonik; singer, violist, and cousin Cathy Bowers. They are all remembered and mourned by their family and friends, and all of them have echoes in this book.