The Signature of All Things (74 page)

“What a life you have lived!” Wallace said.

Alma had to look away when he said this. He was the first person who had ever said so. She felt overcome by shyness, and also by the urge, once more, to put her hands on his face and feel his features—just as she felt moss these days, memorizing with her fingers what she could no longer adore with her eyes.

S
he had not planned when to tell him, or what to tell him, exactly. She had not even planned that she
would
tell him. In the last few days of his visit, she came to think that she would probably not tell him at all. Honestly, she felt it was enough merely to have met this man, and to have closed the gap that had divided them all these years.

But then, on his final afternoon in Amsterdam, Wallace asked if Alma would personally show him the Cave of Mosses, and so she took him there. He was patient about walking across the gardens at her achingly slow pace.

“I apologize that I am so pokey,” Alma said. “My father used to call me a dromedary, but these days I grow weary after ten steps.”

“Then we shall rest every ten steps,” he said, and took her by the arm to help guide her along.

It was a Thursday afternoon, and drizzling, so the Hortus was mostly deserted. Alma and Wallace had the Cave of Mosses to themselves. She took him from boulder to boulder, showing him the mosses of all the continents and explaining how she had woven them all together in this one place. He marveled at it—as would anyone who loved the world.

“My father-in-law would be fascinated to see this,” he said.

“I know,” said Alma. “I’ve always wished to bring Mr. Mitten here. Perhaps someday he will visit.”

“As for me,” he said, sitting on the bench in the middle of the exhibit, “I think I would come here every day, if I could.”

“I do come every day,” said Alma, joining him on the bench. “Often on my knees, and with tweezers in hand.”

“What a legacy you have created,” he said.

“That is kind praise, Mr. Wallace, from one who has created quite a legacy himself.”

“Ah,” he said, and brushed away the compliment.

They sat in pleasant silence for a while. Alma thought of the first time
she was alone with Tomorrow Morning in Tahiti. She thought of how she had said to him, “You and I are—I believe—more closely affixed to each other’s destinies than one might think.” She longed to say the same thing now to Alfred Russel Wallace, but she was not certain if it would be correct to do so. She would not want him to think that she was boasting about her own theory of evolution. Or—worse—that she was lying. Or—worst of all—that she was laying challenge to his legacy, or to Darwin’s. It was probably best to say nothing.

But then he spoke. He said, “Miss Whittaker, I must tell you that I have thoroughly enjoyed these last few days with you.”

“Thank you,” she said. “And I have enjoyed you. More than you can know.”

“You are so generous, to have listened to my ideas about anything and everything,” he said. “Not many are like you. I have found in life that when I speak of biology, they compare me to Newton. But when I speak of the spirit world, they call me a weak-minded, babyish idiot.”

“Do not listen to them,” Alma said, and patted his hand protectively. “I have never liked it when they insult you.”

He was quiet for a while, and then: “May I ask you something, Miss Whittaker?”

She nodded.

“May I ask how it is that you know so much about me? I do not wish you to think I am offended—on the contrary, I am flattered—but I simply cannot make sense of it. Your field is bryology, you see, and mine is not. Nor are you a spiritualist or a mesmerist. Yet you have such familiarity with all my writing across every possible field, and you also know my critics. You even know who my wife’s father is. Why could that be? I cannot put it together . . .”

He trailed off, fearing, it appeared, that he had been impolite. She did not wish him to think that he’d been rude to an elderly woman. She did not wish him to think, either, that she was some unhinged old bat with an unseemly fixation. That being the case, what else could she do?

She told him everything.

W
hen she was finished speaking at last, he was silent for a long while, and then asked, “Do you still have the paper?”

“Certainly,” she said.

“May I read it?” he asked.

Slowly, without further conversation, they walked through the back gate of the Hortus, to Alma’s office. She unlocked the door, breathing heavily from the stairs, and invited Mr. Wallace to make himself comfortable at her desk. From under the divan in the corner, she retrieved a small, dusty, leather valise—as worn as though it had circled the world several times, which, indeed, it had—and opened it. Inside was but a single item: a forty-page document, handwritten, and gently swaddled in flannel, like an infant.

Alma carried it over to Wallace, then settled herself comfortably on the divan while he read it. It took him a while. She must have dozed—as she did so often these days, and at the strangest moments—for she was startled awake by his voice sometime later.

“When did you say that you wrote this, Miss Whittaker?” he asked.

She rubbed her eyes. “The date is on the back,” she said. “I added things to it later, ideas and such, and those addenda are filed away in this office somewhere. But that which you hold in your hands is the original, which I wrote in 1854.”

He considered this.

“So Darwin was still the first,” he said at last.

“Oh yes, absolutely,” said Alma. “Mr. Darwin was the first by far, and the most thorough. There has never been any question about that. Please understand, Mr. Wallace, I do not pretend to have a claim . . .”

“But you arrived at this idea before me,” Wallace said. “Darwin beat us both, to be certain, but you arrived at the idea four years before me.”

“Well . . .” Alma hesitated. “That is certainly not what I wish to say.”

“But Miss Whittaker,” he said, and his voice grew bright with excitement and comprehension. “This means there were three of us!”

For a moment, Alma could not breathe.

In an instant, she was transported back to White Acre, to a fine autumn day in 1819—the day she and Prudence first met Retta Snow. They were all so young, and the sky was blue, and love had not yet grievously injured any of them. Retta had said, looking up at Alma with her shiny, living eyes, “So now there are three of us! What luck!”

What was the song that Retta had invented for them?

We are fiddle, fork, and spoon,

We are dancing with the moon,

If you’d like to steal a kiss from us,

You’d better steal one soon!

When Alma did not respond right away, Wallace came over and sat beside her.

“Miss Whittaker,” he said, in a quieter voice. “Do you understand? There were three of us.”

“Yes, Mr. Wallace. It appears that there were.”

“This is a most extraordinary simultaneity.”

“I’ve always thought so,” she said.

He stared at the wall for a while, silent for another long spell.

At last he asked, “Who else knows about this? Who can vouch for you?”

“Only my uncle Dees.”

“And where is your uncle Dees?”

“Dead, you know,” said Alma, and she could not help but laugh. This was how Dees would have wanted her to say it. Oh, how she missed that stout old Dutchman. Oh, how he would have loved this moment.

“But why did you never publish?” Wallace asked.

“Because it was not good enough.”

“Nonsense! It’s all here. The entire theory is all here. It’s certainly more developed than the absurd, feverish letter I wrote to Darwin in ’fifty-eight. We should publish it now.”

“No,” Alma said. “There is no need to publish it. Truly, I do not have a need of that. It is enough, what you just have said—that there were three of us. That is enough for me. You have made an old woman happy.”

“But we
could
publish,” he pushed on. “I could present it for you . . .”

She put her hand on his. “No,” she said, firmly. “I ask you to trust me. It is not necessary.”

They sat in stillness for a while.

“May I at minimum ask why you felt it was not worth publishing in 1854?” Wallace said, breaking the silence.

“I did not publish because I believed there was something missing from the theory. And I will tell you, Mr. Wallace—I
still
believe there is something missing from the theory.”

“Which is what, exactly?”

“A convincing evolutionary explanation for human altruism and self-sacrifice,” she said.

She wondered if she would have to elaborate. She did not know if she had the energy to dive fully into the giant question again—to tell him all about Prudence and the orphans, and the women who pulled babies from canals, and the men who rushed into fires to rescue strangers, and the starving prisoners who shared their last bites of food with other starving prisoners, and the missionaries who forgave the fornicators, and the nurses who cared for the insane, and the people who loved dogs that no one else could love, and all the rest of it beyond.

But there was no need to get into particulars. He understood immediately.

“I’ve had the same questions, myself, you know,” he said.

“I know that you have,” she said. “I’ve always wondered—did Darwin have such questions?”

“Yes,” Wallace said. Then he paused, reconsidering. “Though I never knew exactly what Darwin concluded on the matter, to be honest. He was so careful, you know, never to make proclamations about anything until he was absolutely certain. Unlike me.”

“Unlike you,” Alma agreed. “But not unlike me.”

“No, not unlike you.”

“Were you fond of Mr. Darwin?” Alma asked. “I’ve always wondered that.”

“Oh, yes,” said Wallace easily. “Quite. He was the best of men. I think he was the greatest man of our time, or, indeed, of most times. To whom can we compare him? There was Aristotle. There was Copernicus. There was Galileo. There was Newton. And there was Darwin.”

“So you never resented him?” Alma asked.

“Heavens no, Miss Whittaker. In science, all merit should be imputed to the first discoverer, and thus the theory of natural selection was always meant to be his. What’s more, he alone had the grandeur for it. I believe he was our generation’s Virgil, taking us on a tour through heaven, hell, and purgatory. He was our divine guide.”

“I’ve always thought so, too.”

“I tell you, Miss Whittaker, I am not at all distressed to learn that you beat me to the theory of natural selection, but I would have been terribly
cast down to have learned that you had beat Darwin. I so admire him, you know. I would like to see him keep his throne.”

“His throne is in no danger from me, young man,” said Alma mildly. “No need for alarm.”

Wallace laughed. “I quite enjoy it, Miss Whittaker, that you call me a young man. For a fellow in his seventh decade, that is quite a compliment.”

“From a lady in her ninth decade, sir, it is simply the truth.”

He did indeed seem young to her. It was interesting—the best parts of her life, she felt, had always been spent in the company of old men. There were all those stimulating meals of her childhood, sitting at the table with the endless parade of brilliant aged minds. There were the years at White Acre with her father, discussing botany and trade late into the night. There was her time in Tahiti with the good and decent Reverend Francis Welles. There were the four happy years here in Amsterdam with Uncle Dees before his death. But now she herself was old, and there were no more old men! Now, here she sat with a stooped graybeard—a mere child of sixty—and she was the ancient tortoise in the room.

“Do you know what I believe, Miss Whittaker? Regarding your question on the origins of human compassion and self-sacrifice? I believe that evolution explains
nearly
everything about us, and I certainly believe that it explains absolutely everything about the rest of the natural world. But I do not believe that evolution alone can account for our unique human consciousness. There is no evolutionary need, you see, for us to have such acute sensitivities of intellect and emotion. There is no practical need for the minds that we have. We don’t need a mind that can play chess, Miss Whittaker. We don’t need a mind that can invent religions or argue over our origins. We don’t need a mind that causes us to weep at the opera. We don’t need opera, for that matter—nor science, nor art. We don’t need ethics, morality, dignity, or sacrifice. We don’t need affection or love—certainly not to the degree that we feel it. If anything, our sensibilities can be a liability, for they can cause us to suffer distress. So I do not believe that the process of natural selection gave us these minds—even though I do believe that it did give us these bodies, and most of our abilities. Do you know why I think we have these extraordinary minds?”

“I do know, Mr. Wallace,” Alma said quietly. “I’ve read a good deal of your work, recall.”

“I will tell you why we have these extraordinary minds and souls, Miss Whittaker,” he continued, as though he had not heard her. “We have them because there is a supreme intelligence in the universe, which wishes for communion with us. This supreme intelligence longs to be known. It calls out to us. It draws us close to its mystery, and it grants us these remarkable minds, in order that we try to reach for it. It wants us to find it. It wants union with us, more than anything.”

“I know that is what you think,” said Alma, patting his hand again, “and I believe it is quite an inventive notion, Mr. Wallace.”

“Do you think I’m correct?”

“I couldn’t say,” said Alma, “but it is a beautiful theory. It comes as close to answering my question as anything ever has. Yet still you are answering a mystery with another mystery, and I cannot say if I would call that science—though I might call it poetry. Unfortunately, like your friend Mr. Darwin, I still seek the firmer answers of empirical science. It is my nature, I’m afraid. But Mr. Lyell would have agreed with you. He argued that nothing short of a divine being could have created a human mind. My husband would have loved your idea. Ambrose believed in such things. He longed for that union you mention, with the supreme intelligence. He died searching for that union.”