doorway, staring at the pole and threatening it. In the afternoon he let the group back outside, but he and the beta male continued to watch the pole and threaten it from time to time. 1
|
The scientists at Yerkes were studying animal social activity, which turns out to be complex. Beyond caring about food, sex, and danger, monkeys have a primitive society and a capacity for altruism. Like people, they pass experience down from generation to generation. They learn from each other. They have friends and enemies, and they keep track of many relationships at once. A young female is likely to grow up dominant if her mother is dominant. A strong monkey will respect a weak monkey if the weak one has strong allies.
|
Although social activity was the focus of their studies, the scientists also paid attention to biological factors, including testosterone. In the world of monkeys, it was easy to see nature and nurture working together. Testosterone led to fighting, and to sex, too, which was often the point of the fight. Winning fights and having sex led to more testosterone. When a male monkey won a fight, his testosterone increased; when he lost a fight, it dropped. Defeated monkeys withdrew and looked depressed. Sex therapy helped them. Their testosterone levels returned to normal when they were moved away from other males and placed among friendly females. With less testosterone, the alpha male might not have been aggressive enough to fight and intimidate his way to the top of the hierarchy, or bold enough to protect his troop from the totem pole threat. Testosterone helps a monkey gain power, and the support of influential friends or a socially prominent family helps him stay in power.
|
The emphasis on biology made research at Yerkes different from most research on human behavior. Scientists studying people have tended to keep biology and behavior separate, perhaps because scientists, like most people, like to think their minds operate a rung or two above their glands and the rest of their bodies. After my trip to Yerkes, I thought about how the differences between animal and human research were consistent with the attitudes I grew up with on the farm. Maybe trying to rise above nature meant pretending nature was not important. I began to wonder more about physiological factors among people, particularly testosterone. Testosterone influenced the way farm animals and monkeys behaved. Could it play a role in human barroom fights, marital conflict, war, or national leadership? Did it change with
|
|