100 Perks of Having Cancer: Plus 100 Health Tips for Surviving It (55 page)

Read 100 Perks of Having Cancer: Plus 100 Health Tips for Surviving It Online

Authors: Florence Strang

Tags: #Health; Fitness & Dieting, #Diseases & Physical Ailments, #Internal Medicine, #Oncology, #Cancer, #Medicine & Health Sciences, #Clinical, #Medical Books, #Alternative Medicine, #Medicine

BOOK: 100 Perks of Having Cancer: Plus 100 Health Tips for Surviving It
12.38Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub

around us and even inside our own bodies. Our blood and bones contain

potassium 40, carbon 14, and radium 226. There is also radiation that

comes naturally from the soil and the air, which finds its way into our food.

Basically, there are two types of radiation out there: nonionizing radiation

and ionizing radiation.

Nonionizing radiation
refers to waves that travel through the air but do

not have enough energy to damage atoms and, ultimately, living cells. Some

types of nonionizing radiation include electromagnetic (that is, from power

lines), microwaves, radio waves, and infrared waves. This form of radiation

can do damage, but it is in the form of heat damage (heat burns), not cell

destruction and possible cancer.

Ionizing radiation
includes x-rays, gamma rays, and UV rays (solar), and

Perk #56: A Surprise Visitor

225

this is the type of radiation present when we think of nuclear radiation. Ion-

izing radiation causes damage to the body’s cells and can cause cancer. We

aren’t aware of exposure to these types of rays unless we agree to a CT scan

or nuclear medical test or we bake in our bikinis (and I don’t mean cook-

ies). This type of radiation is cumulative—that is, exposure adds up over

your lifetime. It is also all around us in the environment.

So how much is too much? When we talk about “damage” and “harmful

radiation,” we want to know
how much radiation can I get and still be sure I

won’t grow another pinky finger.

There are many ways of measuring radiation. For the purpose of conti-

nuity, I will use the unit “millisievert” or mSv. You may also hear of “rems”

or “rads” when reading or hearing about radiation. They are all different

ways to measure radiation, but it all means ionizing radiation.

We know from Japanese victims of Hiroshima, unfortunately, that sud-

den exposure (all at once, not over the course of a lifetime) to various levels

of radiation produces the following effects:


500 mSv—nausea


700 mSv—vomiting


750 mSv—hair loss in one to two weeks


900 mSv—diarrhea


1000 mSv—internal bleeding


4,000 mSv—death within two months


10,000 mSv—death in one to two weeks


20,000 mSv—death within hours

So we know what levels are harmful, but it’s a bit trickier to determine

what levels are “safe.”

The general population is exposed to about 3 mSv/year through building

materials, radon, soil, and foods grown in that soil. We know that these

constant low levels of exposure are not harmful or the world’s cancer rate

would be 100 percent.

226

100 Perks of Having Cancer

But what about diagnostic medical testing? I agree that safety must be a

priority, but the risk has to be weighed against the benefit. When considering

a medical diagnostic test, for example, is it really safer to forgo a mammogram

(0.7 mSv) once a year because you are worried about radiation exposure?

CT scans can expose your body to 20 to 40 mSv at a time. If you have

repeated CTs and have significant radiation exposure from other tests, this

could put you at risk of developing cancers later in life. There are situations

where repeated CTs are necessary, but unfortunately (in the United States)

doctors are so “lawsuit conscious” that they often go overboard with diag-

nostic testing, checking and rechecking to make sure they haven’t missed

something that could lead to a lawsuit down the road.

Researchers found a population of 25,000 Japanese post-atomic-bomb

survivors who were exposed to roughly the same amount of radiation as

two CT scans. Based in part on those studies, the Food and Drug Adminis-

tration estimates that an adult’s lifetime risk of developing radiation-

induced cancer from one CT scan is roughly 1 in 2,000. The risk for children

is higher because kids are more sensitive to the harmful effects of radiation

because they are still developing.

When considering a CT scan or any diagnostic test that uses radiation,

you need to ask yourself (and ask your healthcare provider) “is this really nec-

essary,” and “is there another test such as an MRI or ultrasound tests that

would give the same information as a CT scan without the radiation.” MRIs

and ultrasounds do not use any ionizing radiation, and when looking at soft

tissue in the body, they can give the same information (most times) as CT

scans. MRIs are a bit pricey, while ultrasounds are a bargain in comparison.

You can use a handy Radiation Risk Calculator at www.xrayrisk.com to

check the levels of radiation of different diagnostic tests and to calculate

your risk of cancer from the tests that you have had so far. Have fun!

Please note that any radiation treatment for a specific cancer tumor

(excluding Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, or other cancers

in which large areas are treated with radiation at once) may not be included

in your lifetime overall cancer risk but may put you at risk for other condi-

tions such as heart disease (if the left breast was radiated) or soft tissue can-

cers like sarcomas. You should check with your radiation oncologist for the

specific risks that pertain to your cancer and area of treatment.

Perk #56: A Surprise Visitor

227

Cell phone radiation is composed of nonionizing radio frequency radi-

ation. This is the type that can produce heat, like from a microwave. How-

ever a team of thirty-one scientists from fourteen countries, including the

United States and Canada, after reviewing up-to-date studies on cell phones

and cancer risk, found an increase in certain types of brain tumors in those

with long-term cell phone use. You may see articles giving you the “SAR”

or specific absorption rate for certain cell phone models. SAR is the unit of

measure that was given to cell phone radiation. But it doesn’t matter if you

are using the lowest level phone because it all depends on the amount of

time you spend with it pressed against your ear. Using the speaker option

on your phone is always a healthier solution. (But using the speaker func-

tion around
me
would be very bad for
your
health.) Using a Bluetooth device

is another good option as the radiation levels are up to one hundred times

less than from a cell phone.

Since knowledge is power, you would be very powerful if you were aware

of your levels of radiation so that you could make an informed choice before

exposure.

The federal limits of radiation (above the natural 3 mSv/year) are as fol-

lows. These are just limit guidelines. It does not mean that you will get can-

cer if you exceed these limits. Exposure also is affected by a person’s weight.

A larger person would be less affected by 1 mSv than a smaller person (but

that’s
not
a reason to avoid losing weight if you need to).


astronauts—250 mSv/year


adults—50 mSv/year


children under 18—5 mSv/year


fetus—0.5 mSv/month (ultrasounds do not emit radiation)

Here is a list of common sources of ionizing radiation and the amounts

of exposure:


air travel—0.003 to 0.009 mSv/hour


dental bitewing x-rays—0.01 mSv


chest x-ray—0.1 mSv

228

100 Perks of Having Cancer


cardiac nuclear scan—40 mSv


smoking—3 mSv/year (For one pack/day. Tobacco contains radioactive

polonium 201 and lead 210. How d’ya like those cigarettes now?)


airport backscatter (full body scan)—0.1 mSv (intentionally
not
getting

into
this
controversy)


airport scanner—0.005 mSv


normal exposure from environment—3 mSv/year


mammogram—0.4–0.7 mSv


watching TV four hours/day for a year—0.02 mSv

Radiation could be the source of obsession if you consider all the radia-

tion we come in contact with every day. Don’t obsess or worry if you’ve

already had three CT scans this year, but if there is an option for CT #4 that

does not involve radiation, it might be something worth discussing with your

healthcare provider. Obviously, if the benefits of having the CT scan outweigh

the risk of having one, then you need to take that into account as well.

Please note:
If you plan to do further research (and I hope you do),

remember that 1 mSv is equal to 100 mrem. Some information sites have

incorrect exposure reports because of the different units of measure.

Be aware of your radiation exposure and make

good choices when it comes to your health.

Other books

Twosomes by Marilyn Singer
The Beast of the Camargue by Xavier-Marie Bonnot
Binding Ties by Max Allan Collins
East of Innocence by David Thorne
Beware, the Snowman by R. L. Stine
Cyrosphere: Hidden Lives by Deandre Dean, Calvin King Rivers
The Fire Wish by Amber Lough